Changes in attitudes of undergraduate students learning interprofessional education in the absence of patient safety modules: evaluation with a modified T-TAQ instrument

Assessment of the modified attitudes toward health care teams scale using item response theory analysis

The modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale (mATHCTS) is a self-administered questionnaire with 14 items to assess participants' perceptions of the impact of interprofessional collaboration. Its validity and reliability have been widely evaluated. The effect of interprofessional education (IPE) has been evaluated using changes in mATHCTS factor scores. However, several aspects of the scale require clarification: the difficulty of correctly answering each item; how well each item discriminates between respondents' abilities; and whether the mATHCTS is better at identifying those with higher/lower abilities. We investigated the mATHCTS's item characteristics such as difficulty, discrimination, and measurement accuracy using item-response theory (IRT) analysis. Health and welfare university students were administered a questionnaire prior to starting IPE in 2021. The results for 180 participants were analyzed based on IRT. The test-response (TRF) and test-information (TIF) functions, discrimination, and difficulty were estimated. All items' discrimination and difficulty were adequate. The TRF, which shows the relationship between scores and ability, increased monotonically. The TIF, which shows the relationship between ability and measurement accuracy, decreased as the total score increased. The mATHCTS effectively assessed participants' attitudes toward health care teams as a one-dimensional ability. The mATHCTS performed well in identifying participants with relatively low scores.

The 'STRICT' framework for promoting effective malaria control in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Malaria remains a significant public health burden, necessitating evidence-based strategies to reduce prevalence and associated morbidity. This study explores the potential of integrated healthcare, encompassing both modern and traditional herbal medicine (THM), for malaria control in Ghana.

METHODS

Employing a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical doctors, pharmacists, and THM providers. Thematic analysis approach was utilized to inductively analyse interview data and integrate participants' lived experiences and suggestions.

RESULTS

Six themes emerged: Standardization of THM practice; Training on THM broadened; Research on THM expanded; Increasing awareness of THM integration hospitals and inclusion of THM in national health insurance scheme; Constant supply of certified herbal medications; and Tax relief provision. These recommendations form the 'STRICT' framework for developing functional health system for promoting an effective malaria control through integrated healthcare in Ghana.

CONCLUSION

It was evident that the 'STRICT' framework can potentially transform healthcare delivery and improve service quality for malaria patients. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and managers can utilize these insights to advocate for and implement integrated healthcare strategies, ultimately enhancing service delivery for all Ghanaians, particularly those suffering from malaria.

Attitudinal changes of undergraduate students learning online interprofessional education for patient safety: Comparative evaluation of an online program using the DID method

Objective

Interprofessional education (IPE) can cultivate competencies in multidisciplinary collaboration for patient safety, and both face-to-face and online IPE programs have recently been introduced. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of the online IPE program on undergraduate students after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Methods

The difference-in-differences method was used to assess undergraduate students in the Schools of Medicine and Health Sciences and in the Faculty of Pharmacy at Takasaki University of Health and Welfare who participated in IPE programs at Gunma University (face-to-face IPE was implemented in 2019 and online IPE in 2020). We distributed a questionnaire that included modified versions of the Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale (ATHCTS) and the Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ) to evaluate attitudes toward health-care teams and collaboration for patient safety, respectively, and then compared the differences.

Results

The mean score on the "team efficiency" subscale of the ATHCTS in the online IPE program was significantly lower than that in the face-to-face IPE program. Scores on the T-TAQ in two categories, "mutual support" and "communication", were significantly higher in the online IPE program, which suggests that it may have a similar effect on students learning collaborative practice for patient safety. However, due to technological difficulties, the online IPE program reduced the educational effects for "team efficiency". The improvements in "mutual support" and "communication" seen in the online IPE program, suggest its necessity for collaborative practice for patient safety.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that an online IPE program for patient safety may provide better education effects as a whole, but efforts are needed to minimize the associated technological difficulties.

A realist synthesis of interprofessional patient safety activities and healthcare student attitudes towards patient safety

Interprofessional education (IPE) has been used for instilling a positive safety culture within healthcare, yet what interventions work to change healthcare student attitudes and how improved patient safety outcomes are best achieved with this intervention, is unclear and challenging to evaluate. A realist synthesis was undertaken to ascertain how, why, and in what circumstances IPE activities result in a positive change to student attitudes to patient safety. Database searches of CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Eric were undertaken in April 2022 to identify relevant studies. Synthesis with a realist framework of analysis, coupled with the development of a program theory was conducted to identify interactions among contexts, intervention, mechanisms, and outcomes (CIMO). Twenty-three articles eligible for inclusion articulated environments in which varied contexts, interventions, and mechanisms were activated to influence student attitudes to patient safety. Findings from this realist synthesis informs awareness into the methods of delivering and evaluating IPE activities and offers new perspectives for educators in planning and evaluating future IPE from a collaborative and positive safety culture perspective.

Effectiveness of a case-based digital learning interprofessional workshop involving undergraduates in medical technology, radiological science, and physical therapy: A pre–post intervention study

All healthcare professionals must understand information on a patient’s biophysical functions, and it is important to educate professionals on how to use this information in an interprofessional team for diagnosis. However, there is little interprofessional education for students of medical technology and radiological science involved in biophysical function diagnosis. In the present study, we developed a case-based interprofessional learning tool for using biophysical information for diagnosis. The study examined the effects of a collaborative exercise workshop for healthcare professional students using the tool. Participants were 234 students from three healthcare professions (medical technology, radiological science, and physical therapy). They completed the Japanese version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale before and after the workshops. The workshops incorporated digital materials that allowed students to examine the test results of a virtual patient, answer questions, and discuss their diagnoses and prognoses. For analysis, a two-way analysis of variance was performed on the total score on the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale of the three departments, and the effectiveness of the workshop for the three departments was compared. Statistical analyses showed no interaction between time and department (p = 0.283). After the workshop, students from all three departments showed significant improvements in total scores on the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (p < 0.01) with medium to large effect sizes (r = 0.33–0.52). In the comparison between departments, there was a significant difference in the awareness levels of only medical technology and radiological science students before the workshop (p = 0.015). This study conducted case-based learning workshops with students from three departments, in which a patient’s biophysical information was conveyed between occupational practices. The workshops improved the awareness of interprofessional education in students from all departments and revealed that interprofessional education is important for healthcare professions involved in biophysical function diagnosis.

The 'PRICE' of Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS): Stakeholders' Recommendations for Delivering Quality Care to Patients

Evidence-based strategies are needed to curb the growing cases of physical inactivity related morbidities. Delivering holistic care through collaborative shared decision making could boost the effectiveness of physical activity referral schemes (PARS) and foster the quality of care for patients with multimorbidity. A qualitative study involving semi-structured telephone interviews was utilised to gain insights from Australian PARS stakeholders (general practitioners, exercise physiologists, and patients). A pluralistic evaluation approach was employed to explore and integrate participants' opinions and experiences of PARS and their recommendations were used to develop a model for quality care delivery in PARS initiatives. Five overarching themes: promote, relate, incentivise, communicate, and educate were identified as the 'PRICE' for developing effective and functional PARS programmes that foster quality patient care. It was evident that PARS programmes or policies aimed at optimising publicity, encouraging incentives, improving interdisciplinary information sharing and professional relationships between patients and healthcare professionals can transform healthcare delivery and provide top quality PARS care services to patients. Therefore, governments, healthcare systems, and PARS administrators can translate and leverage the insights from this study to optimise the delivery of high quality care to PARS patients.