12-month trajectory and predictors of affect balance in nursing home residents living with dementia

A participatory approach to understand what might be most meaningful to people living with dementia in a positive psychology intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to understand which character strengths are most important for people living with dementia and therefore which strengths-based psychological interventions could be most meaningful and acceptable.

METHODS

A participatory design, utilising Delphi methodology, was incorporated into an iterative three stage framework: (1) literature reviewed for Positive Psychology (PP) interventions and patient public involvement to define the character strengths; (2) modified Delphi (N = 10) identified which character strengths are most important for living with dementia; (3) focus groups (N = 14) explored which PP interventions are most acceptable and meaningful. Qualitative data from the focus groups was analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Love, kindness and humour were deemed the most important character strengths for living with dementia. Qualitative data from the focus groups was captured in three superordinate themes: (1) lack of opportunity not capacity; (2) key considerations of PP interventions for people living with dementia; and (3) potential benefits of PP interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Love, kindness and humour come naturally to people with dementia, but people may lack social opportunities to use these strengths. Therefore, a PP intervention promoting positive emotion, social relationships and connection to one's values appears most meaningful and acceptable as this may provide a social context to use and maintain these strengths.

The Greenhouse Model of Nursing Home Care: A Scoping Review

The study aimed to comprehensively review and assess evidence-based outcomes of the Greenhouse model. We systematically reviewed, assessed, and reported on relevant literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the scoping review. We identified qualitative or quantitative studies that met our inclusion criteria from PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost. The review yielded 41,515 articles published between January 2015 and December 2022; eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The emerging themes were organizational culture, clinical outcomes, and business effects. The Greenhouse model offers a favorable organizational culture with opportunities to enhance clinical and business outcomes. The scoping review was registered in Prospero: CRD42023389048.

A Fresh Look at the Nursing Home Workforce Crisis: Transforming Nursing Care Delivery Models

The current State of the Science Commentary focuses on workforce challenges in the nursing home (NH) setting that lie within the purview of professional nursing-what professional nurses can do to promote high-quality person-centered care within a context of existing resources-individually and broadly across the collective profession. Historically, three models of care delivery have characterized the way in which nursing care is organized and delivered in different settings: primary nursing, functional nursing, and team nursing. Based on the existing evidence, we call for scientific leadership in the redesign, testing, and implementation of a nursing care delivery model that operationalizes relationship-centered team nursing. This integrative model incorporates successful evidence-based approaches that have the potential to improve quality of care, resident quality of life, and staff quality of work life: clear communication, staff empowerment, coaching styles of supervision, and family/care partner involvement in care processes. In addition to the needed evidence base for NH care delivery models, it is imperative that educational programs incorporate content and clinical experiences that will enable the future nursing workforce to fill the leadership gap in NH care delivery. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 16(1), 5-13.].