Long-term assessment of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) behavior after gastric application

Surgical Management of Non-ulcer, Nonneoplastic Gastric Perforations

Gastric perforation is a core emergency disease treated by the general surgeon. The majority are caused by peptic ulcer disease and neoplasms; however, other etiologies, such as iatrogenic injury and gastric ischemia, are prevalent enough to merit separate attention. While the authors can extrapolate from our knowledge of the treatment of ulcer and neoplastic perforations when treating the lesser known causes, there are nuanced differences in how they approach it. The recognition and treatment of non-ulcer, nonneoplasm gastric perforation will be the focus of this article.

Adverse Events of Endoscopic Clip Placement: A MAUDE Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clips are endoscopic mechanical devices with tensile and closure strength that can approximate tissue and provide hemostasis through a tamponade effect. Clips are ubiquitously used in endoscopic practice, and numerous studies have validated the clinical efficacy of clips, with recent guidelines recommending them as a first-line intervention for recurrent and persistent nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the safety profile for these devices has yet to be delineated, thus, we aim to investigate this feature by examining the adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

METHODS

Postmarketing surveillance data from the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database were analyzed from January 2012 to January 2021. The Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database is a reporting software and does not independently verify the details of complications.

RESULTS

Two thousand five hundred forty reports were issued, of which 287 were patient adverse events and 2766 were device problems. Activation, separation, and positioning issues were most common. No consequences or clinically significant impact on patients were seen in 1968 reports. Foreign bodies were seen in 97 cases, hemorrhage in 57 cases, tissue damage in 42 cases, embedded clips in tissues/plaques in 16 cases, perforation in 15 cases, lacerations in 6 cases, and infection in 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

While the most commonly reported device problems involved activation, separation, and positioning, most patients were clinically unaffected. Moreover, perforation and infection were exceedingly rare, further highlighting the safety profile of endoscopic clips.

Over-the-Scope Clip Applications as First-Line Therapy in the Treatment of Upper Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Perforations, and Fistulas

BACKGROUND

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) is an innovative device and has been successfully used in endoscopic treatment, however, there is a lack of clinical data from China. The aim of this study is to investigate the OTSC applications in the treatment of upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (UNVGIB), perforations, and fistulas in China.

METHODS

In total, 80 patients were treated with one OTSC respectively as first-line therapy in our endoscopy center between January 2016 and November 2020. Among them, 41 patients had UNVGIB, 34 patients had perforations, and five patients had fistulas. The technical and clinical success rates were used to assess the efficacy of OTSC on the above diseases. In addition, we compared the hemostatic efficacy of OTSC with the standard endoscopic therapy in ulcer bleeding and Dieulafoy's lesion by propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

In general, the OTSCs were applied successfully in all patients and achieved 100% (80/80) technical success. The clinical success of all patients was 91.3% (73/80). Among 41 patients with UNVGIB, the clinical success was 85.4% (35/41); 6 patients presented with recurrence. For patients of Dieulafoy's lesion and under antithrombotic therapy, we found that OTSC treatment had both efficient and reliable hemostasis effects. In addition, according to the characteristics of ulcers, site of bleeding lesion, and Blatchford score, all patients received similar and reliable clinical success rates. After propensity score matching, we found that OTSC treatment had low rebleeding rates when compared with standard endoscopic therapy in both Dieulafoy's lesion (15.0 vs 30.0%) and ulcer bleeding (17.6 vs 29.4%). Among 34 patients with perforations, the clinical success was 100% (34/34). Among five patients with fistulas, only one patient failed in maintaining the OTSC before esophageal fistula healing, and the clip achieved an overall clinical success of 80% (4/5).

CONCLUSION

The OTSC represents a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for UNVGIB, perforations, and fistulas as first-line treatment, especially for Dieulafoy's lesion or patients under antithrombotic therapy for UNVGIB, etc. However, OTSC application in these specific lesions or patients lacks adequate evidence as first-line treatment. Therefore, further larger sample and multi-center clinical trials are required to improve its indications in clinical treatment.

Over-the-Scope Clip in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Leaks and Perforations

While perforations, postoperative fistulas, and leaks have traditionally led to surgical or interventional radiology consultation for management, the introduction of the over-the-scope clip has allowed increased therapeutic possibilities for endoscopists. While primarily limited to case reports and series, the over-the-scope clip successfully manages gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, as well as postoperative leaks and fistulas. Retrospective studies have demonstrated a relatively high success rate and a low complication rate. Given the similarity to variceal banding equipment, the learning curve with the over-the-scope clip is rapid. However, given the higher risk of procedures involving the use of the over-the-scope clip, it is essential to obtain the scope in a stable position and grasp sufficient tissue with the cap using a grasping tool and/or suction. From our experience, while closure may be successful in lesions sized up to 3 cm, successful outcomes are obtained for lesions sized <1 cm. Ultimately, given the limited available data, prospective randomized trials are needed to better evaluate the utility of the over-the-scope clip in various clinical scenarios, including fistula and perforation management.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat mucosal and submucosal lesions sometimes results in low rates of microscopically margin-negative (R0) resection. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has a high R0 resection rate and allows for the definitive diagnosis and treatment of selected mucosal and submucosal lesions that are not suitable for conventional resection techniques.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EFTR using an over-the-scope clip (OTSC).

METHODS

This prospective, single-center, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at the endoscopy center of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. The study included patients aged 18-70 years who had gastric or colorectal submucosal tumors (SMTs) (≤ 20 mm in diameter) originating from the muscularis propria based on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and patients who had early-stage gastric or colorectal cancer (≤ 20 mm in diameter) based on EUS and computed tomography. All lesions were treated by EFTR combined with an OTSC for wound closure between November 2014 and October 2016. We analyzed patient demographics, lesion features, histopathological diagnoses, R0 resection (negative margins) status, adverse events, and follow-up results.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients (17 men and 51 women) with an average age of 52.0 ± 10.5 years (32-71 years) were enrolled in this study, which included 66 gastric or colorectal SMTs and 2 early-stage colorectal cancers. The mean tumor diameter was 12.6 ± 4.3 mm. The EFTR procedure was successful in all cases. The mean EFTR procedure time was 39.6 ± 38.0 min. The mean OTSC defect closure time was 5.0 ± 3.8 min, and the success rate of closure for defects was 100%. Histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 67 (98.5%) patients. Procedure-related adverse events were observed in 11 (16.2%) patients. The average post-procedure length of follow-up was 48.2 ± 15.7 mo. There was no recurrence during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

EFTR combined with an OTSC is an effective and safe technique for the removal of select subepithelial and epithelial lesions that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques.

Long-term outcomes of over-the-scope clip for refractory gastrointestinal diseases

BACKGROUND

The Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) can effectively treat refractory gastrointestinal diseases. However, most reports have focused on short-term effectiveness. We examined clinical outcomes of the deployed clips and long-term characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 47 patients with OTSC treatment, 35 with follow-up periods of ≥3 months were retrospectively examined. The indications were 11 bleedings, 17 perforations, and seven fistulas. The observation period was defined as medium-term (3 to <12 months) or long-term (≥12 months). The primary outcome was the clinical success rate without disease recurrence. The secondary outcomes were the complication rate, survival duration, and clip retention rate.

RESULTS

The medium- and long-term clinical success rates were 100% during the observation period (median, 44 months; range, 3-78 months). The complication rate was 2.9% (n = 1). The median survival time was 1,634 days for bleeding, 1,757 days for perforation, and 444 days for fistulas. The overall clip retention rates were 56.4%, 38.1%, 30.9%, and 25.9% after one, six, and 12 months and at the final follow-up, respectively. The average clip retention duration was 244 days in bleeding, 656 days in perforations, and 188 days in fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of clip detachment, the OTSC can be effective in long-term.

Methods for Endoscopic Removal of Over-the-Scope Clip: A Systematic Review

AIMS

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) has recently emerged as a new endoscopic device for treating gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, fistulas, and leaks. A modified OTSC device (full-thickness resection device, FTRD) has been widely used for endoscopic full-thickness resection. However, there is less experience regarding the indications and methods for OTSC removal. We aimed to summarize the existing methods and indications for OTSC removal.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant publications on OTSC removal. The details of OTSC removal, including the methods, indications, success rates, adverse events, and failure causes, were extracted and summarized. A meta-analysis of pooled success rates was conducted using STATA 15.0.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included. The reported methods for OTSC removal included (1) grasping forceps, (2) the Nd : YAG laser, (3) argon plasma coagulation, (4) the remOVE system, (5) endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection, and (6) ice-cold saline solution. Indications for OTSC removal were (1) poor healing, (2) OTSC misplacement, (3) repeat biopsy/therapy or further treatment, (4) adverse events after OTSC implantation, (5) removal after recovery, and (6) patient wishes. The pooled success rate of OTSC removal was 89% in patients treated with the remOVE system. Minor bleeding, superficial thermal damage, and superficial mucosal tears were common adverse events. Mucosal overgrowth was the main cause of OTSC removal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The remOVE system is the best investigated method, with sufficient efficacy and safety for OTSC removal. This is the first systematic review of OTSC removal and provides significant guidance for clinical practice.

Bariatric reduction system - BARS: device, technique and first clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric by-pass (RYGB) is one of the most effective bariatric procedures, but the rate of weight regain (WR) can reach 63% after the second year. Enlargement of the gastrojejunal anastomosis is one of the reported causes. A newly CE-marked flexible endoscopic system, Bariatric Anastomotic Reduction System (BARS) (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tuebingen, Germany), derivative of the well-established endoscopic over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) clipping system, has been recently developed. It was tested in pre-clinical and preliminary clinical use for feasibility and effectiveness in bariatric anastomotic reduction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using a single-channel endoscope with external supplemental working channel, the BARS device captures the two limbs of the anastomosis, reducing its size, thus slowing food passage. After preclinical assessment, six patients with at least a 15% WR and the presence of an enlarged gastrojejunostomy > 20 mm were enrolled. The mean patient age was 49 years (range 24-67). Average interval between gastric bypass and BARS procedure: 8 years (4-13).

RESULTS

All procedures were safely performed without complications. Mean procedure time: 52 min (37 - 75). Preliminary results: mean weight loss 6 kg (4-9) at a 3-month FU.

CONCLUSIONS

BARS could be a promising endoscopic system in case of WR after gastric bypass due to enlargement of the anastomosis.