The role of preoperative biopsy in pancreatic cancer

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is limited literature on sample adequacy for molecular testing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma obtained via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus EUS fine-needle biopsy (FNB). We aimed to compare these two modalities regarding sample adequacy for molecular and genomic sequencing.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent EUS at Saint Luke's Hospital from 2018 to 2021. The patients were categorized based on the method of EUS tissue acquisition, specifically FNA or FNB. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted for all cases by cytotechnologists.

RESULTS

Out of 132 patients who underwent EUS-guided biopsies, 76 opted for FNA, 48 opted for FNB, and 8 opted for a combination of both. The average number of passes required for FNB and FNA was 2.58 ± 1.06 and 2.49 ± 1.07, respectively (p = 0.704), indicating no significant difference. Interestingly, 71.4% (35) of FNB-obtained samples were deemed adequate for molecular testing, surpassing the 32.1% (26) adequacy observed with FNA (p < 0.001). Additionally, 46.4% (26) of FNB-obtained samples were considered adequate for genomic testing, a notable improvement over the 23.8% (20) adequacy observed with FNA (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Although the number of passes required for cytologic diagnosis did not differ significantly between EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA, the former demonstrated superiority in obtaining samples adequate for molecular testing. Tumor surface area and cellularity were crucial parameters in determining sample adequacy for molecular testing, irrespective of the chosen tissue acquisition modality.

Pancreatic Cancer Biopsy Modalities: Comparing Insurance Status, Length of Stay, and Hospital Complications Based on Percutaneous, Endoscopic, and Surgical Biopsy Methods

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is diagnosed histologically through percutaneous biopsy (PB), endoscopic biopsy (EB), or surgical biopsy (SB). Factors and outcomes associated with method type are not clearly understood. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between insurance status, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and different pancreatic biopsy modalities.

STUDY

The 2001-2013 database from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for those with pancreatic cancer who underwent biopsies using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Data regarding insurance status, hospital stay, demographics, and complications were analyzed using chi-square and multivariate analysis with α < 0.001.

RESULTS

A total of 824,162 patients with pancreatic cancer were identified. Uninsured and Medicaid patients were more likely to get PB compared to SB. Patients were more likely to have acute renal failure (ARF) with an EB compared to SB. Patients were more likely to have a urinary tract infection (UTI) with EB or PB compared to SB. All biopsy types were less likely to have pneumonia; pancreatitis was more prevalent in EB compared to PB and SB.

CONCLUSIONS

Uninsured and Medicaid patients were most likely to have a PB compared to EB despite unclear indications which may represent an underlying discrepancy in healthcare utilization. EB patients had the shortest LOS while SB patients stayed three more days; those who underwent a combination of biopsies had the greatest LOS. Patients with EB were more likely to develop ARF, UTI, and pancreatitis than SB, possibly attributed to the advanced nature of endoscopic ultrasound. It is important to establish appropriate algorithm contributors to guide decision-making.

The Rate of Avoidable Pancreatic Resections at a High-Volume Center: An Internal Quality Control and Critical Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of benign diseases among pancreatic resections for suspected malignancy still represents a relevant issue in the surgical practice. This study aims to identify the preoperative pitfalls that led to unnecessary surgeries at a single Austrian center over a twenty-year period.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for suspected pancreatic/periampullary malignancy between 2000 and 2019 at the Linz Elisabethinen Hospital were included. The rate of "mismatches" between clinical suspicion and histology was considered as primary outcome. All cases that, despite that, fulfilled the indication criteria for surgery were defined as minor mismatches (MIN-M). Conversely, the true avoidable surgeries were identified as major mismatches (MAJ-M).

RESULTS

Among the 320 included patients, 13 (4%) presented with benign lesions at definitive pathology. The rate of MAJ-M was 2.8% (n = 9), and the most frequent causes of misdiagnoses were autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 4) and intrapancreatic accessory spleen (n = 2). In all MAJ-M cases, various mistakes within the preoperative workup were detected: lack of multidisciplinary discussion (n = 7, 77.8%); inappropriate imaging (n = 4, 44.4%); lack of specific blood markers (n = 7, 77.8%). The morbidity and mortality rates for mismatches were 46.7% and 0.

CONCLUSION

All avoidable surgeries were the result of an incomplete pre-operative workup. The adequate identification of the underlying pitfalls could lead to minimize and, potentially, overcome this phenomenon with a concrete optimization of the surgical-care process.

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration with Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Randomized Crossover Single-Center study

Background/Aims The purpose of this study was to compare the results of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) performed at the same site in a single session in the same patient.

Methods Consecutive patients with solid gastrointestinal lesions referred for EUS evaluation underwent EUS-FNA and FNB using 22G needles with three and two passes, respectively, in the same session. Patients were randomized to one group having EUS-FNA first followed by EUS-FNB, while other group had EUS-FNB first followed by EUS-FNA.

Results Total 50 patients (31 male) of mean age 56.58 ± 14.2 years and mean lesion size of 2.6 (±2) cm were included. The Kappa agreement for final diagnosis for FNA and FNB was 0.841 and 0.61, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of FNA versus FNB were 85.19 versus 62.96% and 100 versus 100%, respectively, in comparison with final diagnosis.

Conclusion Both EUS-FNA and FNB are equally safe when compared between the two techniques simultaneously in same lesion. EUS-FNA is better than FNB in terms of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and tissue yield for solid GI lesion. However, the specificity and positive predictive value were equally good for both the modalities.

Correlation of transcriptional subtypes with a validated CT radiomics score in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Transcriptional classifiers (Bailey, Moffitt and Collison) are key prognostic factors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Among these classifiers, the squamous, basal-like, and quasimesenchymal subtypes overlap and have inferior survival. Currently, only an invasive biopsy can determine these subtypes, possibly resulting in treatment delay. This study aimed to investigate the association between transcriptional subtypes and an externally validated preoperative CT-based radiomic prognostic score (Rad-score).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 122 patients who underwent resection for PDAC. All treatment decisions were determined at multidisciplinary tumor boards. Tumor Rad-score values from preoperative CT were dichotomized into high or llow categories. The primary endpoint was the correlation between the transcriptional subtypes and the Rad-score using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for clinical and histopathological variables (i.e., tumor size). Prediction of overall survival (OS) was secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

The Bailey transcriptional classifier significantly associated with the Rad-score (coefficient = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.44, p = 0.001). Squamous subtype was associated with high Rad-scores while non-squamous subtype was associated with low Rad-scores (adjusted p = 0.03). Squamous subtype and high Rad-score were both prognostic for OS at multivariable analysis with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.79 (95% CI: 1.12-6.92, p = 0.03) and 4.03 (95% CI: 1.42-11.39, p = 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable PDAC, an externally validated prognostic radiomic model derived from preoperative CT is associated with the Bailey transcriptional classifier. Higher Rad-scores were correlated with the squamous subtype, while lower Rad-scores were associated with the less lethal subtypes (immunogenic, ADEX, pancreatic progenitor).

KEY POINTS

• The transcriptional subtypes of PDAC have been shown to have prognostic importance but they require invasive biopsy to be assessed. • The Rad-score radiomic biomarker, which is obtained non-invasively from preoperative CT, correlates with the Bailey squamous transcriptional subtype and both are negative prognostic biomarkers. • The Rad-score is a promising non-invasive imaging biomarker for personalizing neoadjuvant approaches in patients undergoing resection for PDAC, although additional validation studies are required.

Pancreatic cancer in 2021: What you need to know to win

Pancreatic cancer is one of the solid tumors with the worst prognosis. Five-year survival rate is less than 10%. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment, but the tumor is often diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease and surgery could be performed in a very limited number of patients. Moreover, surgery is still associated with high post-operative morbidity, while other therapies still offer very disappointing results. This article reviews every aspect of pancreatic cancer, focusing on the elements that can improve prognosis. It was written with the aim of describing everything you need to know in 2021 in order to face this difficult challenge.

The level of agreement between rapid-on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate and surgical histological diagnosis in gastrointestinal lesions

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the main tool for biopsy via fine needle aspiration (FNA) from gastrointestinal (GI) lesions including pancreatic, upper gastrointestinal, and adjacent lesions. The variable diagnostic yield and delay until the final pathological results can affect treatment planning and cause patient anxiety. We aimed to assess the agreement of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of EUS-FNA with the surgical histological diagnosis of patients who underwent resection.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed including all patients 18 years or older who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE for GI lesions. For patients who underwent surgical resection, the correlation between ROSE and the surgical histological diagnosis was evaluated with the kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Overall, 73 patients who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE were included, of whom 22 (30.1%) had curative resection. The final pathological diagnosis from surgery showed 17 malignant and 5 benign lesions. Among the benign lesions, ROSE correctly identified 2 (diagnostic accuracy of 40%), while among the malignant lesions, ROSE correctly identified 14 (diagnostic accuracy of 82.4%), yielding a fair kappa coefficient of 0.366 (95% CI 0.035-0.697). When classifying the lesions as either malignant vs benign or suspicious of malignancy, the kappa coefficient increased to 0.58 (95% CI 0.180-0.975) for the subgroup of pancreatic lesions, with diagnostic accuracy of 81.2% for the malignant category.

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of agreement for malignancy was found between FNA-EUS with ROSE and the final surgical histological diagnosis. ROSE can be used as an adjuvant diagnostic tool to optimise patient management and decrease delay-related anxiety.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided core needle biopsies (CNB) are increasingly being performed to diagnose solid pancreatic lesions. However, studies have been conflicting in terms of CNB improving diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency vs fine-needle aspiration (FNA), which this study aims to elucidate.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected on consecutive patients with solid pancreatic or peripancreatic lesions at a single tertiary care center from November 2015 to November 2016 that underwent either FNA or CNB. Patient demographics, characteristics of lesions, diagnostic accuracy, final and follow-up pathology, use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), complications, and procedure variables were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 75 FNA and 48 CNB were performed; of these, 13 patients had both. Mean passes were lower with CNB compared to FNA (2.4 vs 2.9, P = .02). Use of ROSE was higher for FNA (97.3% vs 68.1%, P = .001). Mean procedure time was shorter with CNB (34.1 minutes vs 51.2 minutes, P = .02) and diagnostic accuracy was similar (89.2% vs 89.4%, P = .98). There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy when ROSE was performed for CNB vs not performed (93.5% vs 85.7%, P = .58). Additionally, diagnostic accuracy of combined FNA and CNB procedures was 92.3%, which was comparable to FNA (P = .73) or CNB (P = .52) alone.

CONCLUSION

FNA and CNB had comparable safety and diagnostic accuracy. Use of CNB resulted in less number of passes and shorter procedure time as compared to FNA. Moreover, diagnostic accuracy for CNB with or without ROSE was similar.

A Blood-Based Multi Marker Assay Supports the Differential Diagnosis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer

The most frequent malignancy of the pancreas is the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite many efforts PDAC has still a dismal prognosis. Biomarkers for early disease stage diagnosis as a prerequisite for a potentially curative treatment are still missing. Novel blood-based markers may help to overcome this limitation.

Methods: Prior to surgery plasma levels of thrombospondin-2 (THBS2), which was recently published as a novel biomarker, and CA19-9 from 52 patients with histologically proven PDAC were determined, circulating cell-free (cfDNA) was quantified. 15 patients with side-branch IPMNs without worrisome features and 32 patients with chronic pancreatitis served for comparison. Logit (logistic regression) models were used to test the performance of single biomarkers and biomarker combinations.

Results: CA19-9 and THBS2 alone showed comparable c-statistics of 0.80 and 0.73, respectively, improving to 0.87 when combining these two markers. The c-statistic was further increased to 0.94 when combining CA19-9 and THBS2 with cfDNA quantification. This marker combination performed best for all PDAC stages but also for PDACs grouped by stage. The greatest improvement over CA19-9 was seen in the group of stage I PDAC, from 0.69 to 0.90 for the three marker combination.

Conclusion:These data establish the combination of CA19-9, THBS2 and cfDNA as a composite liquid biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage PDAC.

Percutaneous CT fluoroscopy-guided core biopsy of pancreatic lesions: technical and clinical outcome of 104 procedures during a 10-year period

Background In unclear pancreatic lesions, a tissue sample can confirm or exclude the suspected diagnosis and help to provide an optimal treatment strategy to each patient. To date only one small study reported on the outcome of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the pancreas. Purpose To evaluate technical success and diagnostic rate of all CT fluoroscopy-guided core biopsies of the pancreas performed in a single university center during a 10-year period. Material and Methods In this retrospective study we included all patients who underwent a CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of a pancreatic mass at our comprehensive cancer center between 2005 and 2014. All interventions were performed under local anesthesia on a 16-row or 128-row CT scanner. Technical success and diagnostic rates as well as complications and effective patient radiation dose were analyzed. Results One hundred and one patients (54 women; mean age, 63.9 ± 12.6 years) underwent a total of 104 CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the pancreas. Ninety-eight of 104 interventions (94.2%) could be performed with technical success and at least one tissue sample could be obtained. In 88 of these 98 samples, a definitive pathological diagnosis, consistent with clinical success could be achieved (89.8%). Overall 19 minor and three major complications occurred during the intra- or 30-day post-interventional period and all other interventions could be performed without complications; there was no death attributable to the intervention. Conclusion CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of pancreatic lesions is an effective procedure characterized by a low major complication and a high diagnostic rate.

Utilization of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging and obtaining a tissue diagnosis. The objective was to determine patterns of preoperative EUS and the impact on downstream treatment.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare-linked database was used to identify patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The staging period was the first staging procedure within 6 months of surgery until surgery. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with preoperative EUS. The main outcome was EUS in the staging period, with secondary outcomes including number of staging tests and time to surgery.

RESULTS

2782 patients were included, 56% were treated at an academic hospital (n = 1563). 1204 patients underwent EUS (43.3%). The factors most associated with receipt of EUS were: earlier year of diagnosis, SEER area, and a NCI or academic hospital (all p < 0.0001). EUS was associated with a longer time to surgery (17.8 days; p < 0.0001), and a higher number of staging tests (40 tests/100 patients; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors most associated with receipt of EUS are geographic, temporal, and institutional, rather than clinical/disease factors. EUS is associated with a longer time to surgery and more preoperative testing, and additional study is needed to determine if EUS is overused.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: Results in 250 patients

BACKGROUND

To determine the diagnostic accuracy and complications of percutaneous sonographic (US)-guided core needle-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

METHODS

Cases of US-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses performed in our department between July 2009 and June 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic data, lesions' size and location, pathology results, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and complications of the biopsies were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients (150 males, 100 females; age range, 16-88 years; mean age, 64.3 ± 12.1 years) were included in the study. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of all 250 biopsies were 94.8%, 94.3%, 97.2%, 99.5%, and 75%, respectively, and changed to 98.4%, 99%, 94.7%, 99%, and 94.7%, respectively, after the biopsy was repeated in 12 patients. Four (1.6%) major complications, including a pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery, and three cases of acute pancreatitis, and one (0.4%) minor complication (a vaso-vagal syncope), were observed. There was no biopsy-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy is a safe and highly effective method with acceptable complication rates in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:470-473, 2016.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in pancreatic tumor diagnosis

AIM: To evaluate the techniques, results, and complications related to computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS: CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions performed at a cancer reference center between January 2012 and September 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsy material was collected with a 16-20 G Tru-Core needle (10-15 cm; Angiotech, Vancouver, CA) using a coaxial system and automatic biopsy gun. When direct access to the lesion was not possible, indirect (transgastric or transhepatic) access or hydrodissection and/or pneumodissection maneuvers were used. Characteristics of the patients, lesions, procedures, and histologic results were recorded using a standardized form.

RESULTS: A total of 103 procedures included in the study were performed on patients with a mean age of 64.8 year (range: 39-94 year). The mean size of the pancreatic lesions was 45.5 mm (range: 15-195 mm). Most (75/103, 72.8%) procedures were performed via direct access, though hydrodissection and/or pneumodissection were used in 22.2% (23/103) of cases and indirect transhepatic or transgastric access was used in 4.8% (5/103) of cases. Histologic analysis was performed on all biopsies, and diagnoses were conclusive in 98.1% (101/103) of cases, confirming 3.9% (4/103) of tumors were benign and 94.2% (97/103) were malignant; results were atypical in 1.9% (2/103) of cases, requiring a repeat biopsy to diagnose a neuroendocrine tumor, and surgical resection to confirm a primary adenocarcinoma. Only mild/moderate complications were observed in 9/103 patients (8.7%), and they were more commonly associated with biopsies of lesions located in the head/uncinate process (n = 8), than of those located in the body/tail (n = 1) of the pancreas, but this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION: CT-guided biopsy of a pancreatic lesion is a safe procedure with a high success rate, and is an excellent option for minimally invasive diagnosis.

Pancreatic pseudopapillary tumour: A rare misdiagnosed entity

INTRODUCTION

Solid pseudo papillary pancreatic tumour is a rare entity. The atypical presentation causes a delayed or misdiagnosis of these pathology. It commonly affects the female population in the 2nd and 3rd decade of life. The presentation varies from non-specific abdominal pain to incidental findings in asymptomatic patients. It is a low-grade premalignant condition that is curable by excision of the tumour.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This paper presents a 17-year-old girl with intra-abdominal mass diagnosed with solid pseudo papillary tumour that underwent Whipple's procedure.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the presentations, diagnosis and pathology findings of this rare pathology.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis remains an enigma in view of the nature and location of the tumour. Resection is still the best choice remains for this condition.

The role of Movat pentachrome stain and immunoglobulin G4 immunostaining in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is highly responsive to steroid therapy, but because it mimics pancreatic cancer, it often precipitates unnecessary surgery. Adequate diagnostic tests are needed to permit appropriate medical therapy. Lymphocytic and obliterative phlebitis are reported in the majority of cases, as are elevated IgG4-positive plasma cells, indicating their high sensitivity. Their specificities, especially when used in conjunction, however, remain largely unknown. Movat pentachrome vascular and IgG4 immunohistochemical stains were performed on a total of 15 autoimmune pancreatitis cases (11 pancreatic resections and 4 biopsies), 39 usual-type alcoholic or idiopathic chronic pancreatitis cases, 35 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-associated chronic pancreatitis cases, and 29 normal pancreata. Marked and diffuse lymphocytic and obliterative venulitis were detected in all 15 cases of autoimmune pancreatitis on Movat staining (100% sensitivity). Only a single carcinoma-associated chronic pancreatitis case among all of the controls showed diffuse benign venulitis that was nonobliterative (99% specificity). Nine of 13, 9 autoimmune pancreatitis cases showed marked IgG4 immunopositivity at >or=10 positive plasma cells per x 400 field (69% sensitivity). No increased IgG4 plasma cells were found in any of 103 controls (100% specificity). In combination, all of the autoimmune pancreatitis cases had at least one (13/13) and most had both markers (9/13), whereas none of the controls had both markers. Overall, these combined stains show very promising diagnostic utility and should be considered in combination with clinical and serologic analyses in the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis suspicious for malignancy. Future validating studies on preoperative biopsies with outcome data following steroid therapy will be essential.