Procedural volume, cost, and reimbursement of outpatient incisional hernia repair: implications for payers and providers

Unplanned readmissions after hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Several quality indices have been set up for evaluating the impact of the reduction of the length of stay (LOS), such as the 30-day unplanned readmission (UR30) rate. The main goal of our study was to analyze the UR30 following groin hernia repair (GHR), primary- (PVHR), and incisional ventral hernia repairs (IVHR).

METHODS

A French registry-based multicenter study was conducted using prospective data from all consecutive patients registered from 2015 to 2021.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of UR30 was 1.32%. This included 160/18,042 (0.87%) for GHR, 41/4012 (1.02%) for PVHR, and 145/3754 (3.86%) for IVHR. The leading cause of UR30 was postoperative complications (POC). The nature of the predominant complications varied among the three categories. The correlation between UR30 and POC (and risk factors for POC) was strong in GHR but was not in IVHR due to a 'protective' longer LOS in this subgroup. As the LOS has decreased over the last years, this has 'mechanically' resulted in an increase in the occurrence of UR30, but not in a rise of POC, neither in volume nor in severity. The reduction of LOS just shifted the problem from inpatient to outpatient settings.

CONCLUSION

Since the steady development of day-care surgery, the prevention of the UR not only hinges on the prevention of the POC but newly on a better organization of outpatient care which is currently a huge challenge due to a GPs' and nurses' shortage in France.

Trends in performance of hospital outpatient procedures and associated 30-day costs among Medicare beneficiaries from 2011 to 2018

BACKGROUND

United States healthcare has increasingly transitioned to outpatient care delivery. The degree to which Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) have been able to shift surgical procedures from inpatient to outpatient settings despite higher patient complexity is unknown.

METHODS

This observational study used a 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older undergoing eight elective procedures from 2011 to 2018 to model trends in procedure site (hospital outpatient vs. inpatient) and 30-day standardized Medicare costs, overall and by hospital teaching status.

RESULTS

Of the 1,222,845 procedures, 15.9% occurred at AMCs. There was a 2.42% per-year adjusted increase (95% CI 2.39%-2.45%; p < .001) in proportion of outpatient hospital procedures, from 68.9% in 2011 to 85.4% in 2018. Adjusted 30-day standardized costs declined from $18,122 to $14,353, (-$560/year, 95% CI -$573 to -$547; p < .001). Patients at AMCs had more chronic conditions and higher predicted annual mortality. AMCs had a lower proportion of outpatient procedures in all years compared to non-AMCs, a difference that was statistically significant but small in magnitude. AMCs had higher costs compared to non-AMCs and a lesser decline over time (p < .001 for the interaction). AMCs and non-AMCs saw a similar decline in 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a substantial shift toward outpatient procedures among Medicare beneficiaries with a decrease in total 30-day Medicare spending as well as 30-day mortality. Despite a higher complexity population, AMCs shifted procedures to the outpatient hospital setting at a similar rate as non-AMCs.

IMPLICATIONS

The trend toward outpatient procedural care and lower spending has been observed broadly across AMCs and non-AMCs, suggesting that Medicare beneficiaries have benefited from more efficient delivery of procedural care across academic and community hospitals.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of resorbable biosynthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare, in terms of cost and serious complications, the use of biosynthetic resorbable parietal mesh with biologic mesh in patients undergoing contaminated ventral hernia repair (modified Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 3). Poly-4-hydroxy-butyrate (P4HB) biosynthetic mesh has rarely been the subject of comparative studies in the context of contamination. Data are required to confirm the effects of a transition from biological mesh to biosynthetic resorbable mesh.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. It was based on a decision analysis model built with clinical and economic data issued from a before-after study that included 94 patients hospitalized for ventral hernia repair at the University Hospital of Strasbourg (France) from June 2011 to February 2018. The effectiveness endpoint was the number of patients presenting with a serious specific complication or a general complication at 6 months. Data for surgical hospitalization stays, home hospitalizations and ambulatory care costs were included.

RESULTS

We found fewer serious complications with biosynthetic mesh: 21% versus 33% with biologic mesh. A cost savings of US $5146 was determined. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic analysis confirmed our findings and the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSION

P4HB biosynthetic resorbable mesh appeared to be the most effective and the least costly option. Additional data will be needed to confirm the superiority of biosynthetic mesh in terms of the recurrence risk reduction over a longer period.

It's not just an ileus: disparities associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair

PURPOSE

We sought to identify risk factors associated with postoperative ileus following ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2012, we identified adult patients that underwent either open or laparoscopic hernia repair for umbilical and ventral hernias with a diagnosis of umbilical/ventral hernia. We excluded cases with diagnosis of obstruction and bowel gangrene that underwent bowel resection, or with missing data. Risk variables of interest were age, sex, race, income status, insurance status, elective admission, comorbidity status (using the validated van Walraven Score), complications (mechanical, respiratory, postoperative infection, cardiovascular, intraoperative), morbid obesity, procedure type, conversion to open, mesh use, hospital type (rural, urban non-teaching, urban teaching), bed size, and region (northeast, midwest, south, west). Univariate analysis comparing patients with ileus vs control was performed. We then performed multivariable analysis using logistic regression, adjusting for all the risk variables, with ileus as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

30,912 patients were identified that met criteria. Of these, 2660 (8.61%) had postoperative ileus during their stay at the hospital. Univariate analysis showed all risk variables were associated with development of ileus with the exception of income status (p = 0.2903), elective admission (p = 0.7989), mesh use (p = 0.3620), and hospital bed size (p = 0.08351). Median length of stay was 7 days in the ileus cohort vs 3 days in control (p < 0.0001). Median total charges (adjusted to 2012 dollars) was $54,819 vs $35,058 (p < 0.0001). We then performed logistic regression adjusting for all risk variables and found that age (OR 1.66, p < 0.0001), male sex (OR 1.51, p < 0.0001), Black race (OR 1.49, p < 0.0001), comorbidity status (OR 1.12, p < 0.0001), laparoscopic cases converted to open (OR 1.55, p < 0.0001), postoperative complications (mechanical: OR 2.32, p < 0.0001, respiratory: OR 1.54, p < 0.0001, postoperative infection: OR 2.12, p < 0.0001, cardiovascular: OR 1.57, p = 0.0006, intraoperative: OR 1.29, p = 0.0200) were independently associated with increased risk of ileus. However, laparoscopic vs open (OR 0.76, p < 0.0001), elective admission (OR 0.91, p = 0.0378), and northeast vs south hospital region (OR 0.74, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with decreased risk of ileus.

CONCLUSION

We performed a large observational study looking for risk factors associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair. Race and region of treatment are independent risk factors associated with ileus following ventral hernia repair, and a potential source of disparities in care and increased admission length and higher cost of care. Further prospective studies are warranted.