1
|
Lipton JH. Maximizing the Value of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Management Using Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the USA: Potential Determinants and Consequences of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs, with Proposed Optimization Approaches. Clin Drug Investig 2024; 44:91-108. [PMID: 38182963 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-023-01329-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The introduction and widespread use of effective and well-tolerated tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia have been associated with marked increments in life expectancy and disease prevalence. These changes have been accompanied by elevations in costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which typically must be taken ad vitam after diagnosis and tend to be more expensive than medical therapies for many other hematologic malignancies. The aims of this review included evaluating the potential associations and consequences of healthcare resource utilization and costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and possible clinical management approaches to mitigate them. METHODS A PubMed search of English-language US study reports was conducted that covered the interval of 2001 (US approval of imatinib) through 17 April, 2023 augmented by manual reviews of published bibliographies from the referenced articles and searches of other databases: Google Scholar and Scopus. RESULTS On the basis of this analysis of chiefly real-world evidence (administrative claims database studies), healthcare resource utilization and costs can be considered indicators of ineffective chronic myeloid leukemia management, including potentially mutation-driven treatment resistance and costly tyrosine kinase inhibitor switches, non-adherence, and suboptimal tolerability, which may culminate in the progression of disease from the chronic to an accelerated or blast phase, with additional excess costs. Costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also associated with reduced treatment adherence. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000-$200,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, tyrosine kinase inhibitors can be considered cost effective from a US payer perspective. Potential clinical approaches to mitigate costs include regular molecular monitoring with proactive assessments of BCR::ABL1 gene mutations to avoid costly treatment switches, as well as interventions to enhance treatment adherence and tyrosine kinase inhibitor tolerability. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare resource utilization and costs of chronic myeloid leukemia care may be considered barometers of ineffective management, including mutation-driven tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and switching as well as non-adherence and intolerance. Future prospective research is warranted to help determine whether costs can be reduced and other treatment outcomes optimized via more proactive and effective diagnostic interventions (i.e., regular molecular monitoring and proactive mutational testing) and treatment approaches. The strengths and limitations of this review include its emphasis on observational research, which, on one hand, offers a naturalistic "real-world" perspective on current chronic myeloid leukemia management, but, on the other hand, is associational in nature and cannot be used to determine causality and/or its direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey H Lipton
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vu M, Degeling K, Thompson ER, Blombery P, Westerman D, IJzerman MJ. Health economic evidence for the use of molecular biomarker tests in hematological malignancies: A systematic review. Eur J Haematol Suppl 2022; 108:469-485. [PMID: 35158410 PMCID: PMC9310724 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Molecular biomarker tests can inform the clinical management of genomic heterogeneous hematological malignancies, yet their availability in routine care largely depends on the supporting health economic evidence. This study aims to systematically review the economic evidence for recent molecular biomarker tests in hematological malignancies. Methods We conducted a systematic search in five electronic databases for studies published between January 2010 and October 2020. Publications were independently screened by two reviewers. Clinical study characteristics, economic methodology, and results were extracted, and reporting quality was assessed. Results Fourteen studies were identified, of which half (n = 7; 50%) were full economic evaluations examining both health and economic outcomes. Studies were predominantly conducted in a first‐line treatment setting (n = 7; 50%) and adopted a non‐lifetime time horizon to measure health outcomes and costs (n = 7; 50%). Five studies reported that companion diagnostics for associated therapies were likely cost‐effective for acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Four studies suggested molecular biomarker tests for treatment monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia were likely cost‐saving. Conclusions Although there is initial confirmation of the promising health economic results, the present research for molecular biomarker tests in hematological malignancies is sparse with many applications of technological advances yet to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vu
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ella R Thompson
- Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Piers Blombery
- Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Westerman
- Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breccia M, Abruzzese E, Annunziata M, Luciano L, Sica S. Clinical and Psychological Factors to Consider in Achieving Treatment-Free Remission in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Front Oncol 2021; 11:631570. [PMID: 33777785 PMCID: PMC7987948 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.631570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has evolved dramatically in recent years. In this regard, the introduction of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has revolutionized therapeutic goals, and it is now desirable to obtain treatment-free remission (TFR), i.e. when a patient who has stopped TKI therapy maintains a major molecular response and does not need to restart treatment. This report summarizes the main findings from a group of expert hematologists in Italy who met to discuss treatment and management of patients with CML with focus on broad-ranging aspects of TFR. A survey was used to obtain information about the clinicians' experience with TFR and to better understand the clinical and psychological issues that patients and physicians face when considering TFR. The overall goal was to explore the possibility of discontinuing treatment from multiple points of view, considering both clinical aspects of TFR as well as psychological management of patients. Practical information is provided on aspects associated with initiating TFR, clinical data supporting it, the role of monitoring, and management of discontinuation-related adverse events. This publication outlines many of the shortcomings and highlights proposed solutions for routine clinical practice, and provides an overview of the literature relative to TFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Breccia
- Hematology, Department of Precision and Translational Medicine, Policlinico Umberto 1, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Abruzzese
- Division of Hematology, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Tor Vergata University, Roma, Italy
| | - Mario Annunziata
- Hematology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigia Luciano
- Hematology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Simona Sica
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dragani M, Rege Cambrin G, Berchialla P, Dogliotti I, Rosti G, Castagnetti F, Capodanno I, Martino B, Cerrano M, Ferrero D, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Crugnola M, Elena C, Breccia M, Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Galimberti S, Gozzini A, Bocchia M, Lunghi F, Cedrone M, Sgherza N, Luciano L, Russo S, Santoro M, Giai V, Caocci G, Levato L, Abruzzese E, Sora F, Saglio G, Fava C. A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:3692. [PMID: 33213044 PMCID: PMC7698481 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been achieved in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation warrants safe and prompt resumption of therapy. We retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy in a cohort of patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment per clinical practice. The outcome of these patients has recently been reported-281 chronic-phase CML patients were included in this subanalysis. Median follow-up since discontinuation was 2 years. Overall, 2203 analyses were performed, 17.9% in the first three months and 38.4% in the first six months. Eighty-six patients lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.7 months-65 pts (75.6%) during the first six months. We evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-month monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 19 pts (29.2%) would have a one-month delay, 26 (40%) a 2-month delay. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months. A less intense frequency of monitoring, particularly after the first 6 months off treatment, would not have affected the success of treatment-free remission (TFR) nor put patients at risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Dragani
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (G.R.C.); (P.B.); (G.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Giovanna Rege Cambrin
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (G.R.C.); (P.B.); (G.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Paola Berchialla
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (G.R.C.); (P.B.); (G.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Irene Dogliotti
- Hematology Unit, Department of Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (I.D.); (M.C.); (D.F.)
| | - Gianantonio Rosti
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli”, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.)
| | - Fausto Castagnetti
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli”, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.R.); (F.C.)
| | - Isabella Capodanno
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Bruno Martino
- Hematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy;
| | - Marco Cerrano
- Hematology Unit, Department of Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (I.D.); (M.C.); (D.F.)
| | - Dario Ferrero
- Hematology Unit, Department of Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (I.D.); (M.C.); (D.F.)
| | | | - Monica Crugnola
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy;
| | - Chiara Elena
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Massimo Breccia
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Iurlo
- Hematology Division, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.I.); (D.C.)
| | - Daniele Cattaneo
- Hematology Division, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.I.); (D.C.)
| | - Sara Galimberti
- Hematology Department, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Antonella Gozzini
- Hematology Division, Policlinico Careggi di Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Monica Bocchia
- Hematology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy;
| | - Francesca Lunghi
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Michele Cedrone
- Hematology Division, Az. Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy;
| | - Nicola Sgherza
- Division of Hematology, IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo Sofferenza, 71043 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy;
| | - Luigia Luciano
- Hematology Unit, “Federico II” Hospital, University of Naples, 80131 Napoli, Italy;
| | - Sabina Russo
- Department of Internal Medicine, AOU Policlinico di Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Marco Santoro
- Hematology Unit, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Valentina Giai
- Hematology Unit, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, 15121 Alessandria, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Caocci
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09121 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Luciano Levato
- Department Hematology-Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Elisabetta Abruzzese
- Hematology Unit, S. Eugenio Hospital, Tor Vergata University, 00144 Rome, Italy;
| | - Federica Sora
- Hematology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Saglio
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (G.R.C.); (P.B.); (G.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Carmen Fava
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (G.R.C.); (P.B.); (G.S.); (C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jabbour EJ, Mendiola MF, Lingohr-Smith M, Lin J, Makenbaeva D. Economic modeling to evaluate the impact of chronic myeloid leukemia therapy management on the oncology care model in the US. J Med Econ 2019; 22:1113-1118. [PMID: 31074658 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1618316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To develop an economic model to evaluate changes in healthcare costs driven by restricting usage of branded tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) through substitution with generic imatinib among chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in a typical Oncology Care Model (OCM) practice, and examine the impact on Performance-Based Payment (PBP) eligibility. Methods: An Excel-based economic model of an OCM practice with 1,000 cancer patients during a 6-month episode of care was developed. Cancer types and proportions of patients treated in the practice were estimated from an OCM report. All-cause healthcare costs were obtained from published literature. It was assumed that if a practice restricts usage of branded TKIs for newly-diagnosed CML patients, 80% of the market share of branded imatinib and 50% of the market shares of 2nd-gen TKIs would shift to generic imatinib. Among established TKI-treated patients, it was assumed that 80% of the market share of branded imatinib and no patients treated with 2nd-gen TKIs would shift to the generic. Results: Four CML patients were estimated for a 1,000-cancer patient OCM practice with a total baseline healthcare cost of $51,345,812 during a 6-month episode. If the practice restricts usage of branded TKIs, the shift from 2nd-gen TKIs to generic imatinib would reduce costs by $12,970, while shifting from branded to generic imatinib lowers costs by $25,250 during a 6-month episode. Minimum reductions of $3,013,832 in a one-sided risk model and $2,372,010 in a two-sided risk model are required for PBP eligibility; the shift from 2nd-gen TKIs to generic imatinib would account for 0.4% and 0.5% of the savings required for a PBP, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis indicates that the potential cost reduction associated with restricting branded TKI usage among CML patients in an OCM setting will represent only a small proportion of the cost reduction needed for PBP eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias J Jabbour
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | | | | | - Jay Lin
- Novosys Health , Green Brook , NJ , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kenzik KM, Bhatia R, Williams GR, Bhatia S. Medicare and patient spending among beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer 2019; 125:2570-2578. [PMID: 30973642 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors examined Medicare spending and patient spending in older patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) over the first 5 years from the time of CML diagnosis in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. METHODS Medicare beneficiaries with CML who were diagnosed between 2007 and 2012 at age >65 years were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (805 beneficiaries). A noncancer Medicare beneficiary sample was frequency-matched based on age, sex, and race/ethnicity (805 individuals). Patients were followed until 5 years from diagnosis, disenrollment, death, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first. Total Medicare spending, service-specific spending, and amount owed by patients was estimated monthly and then summed over 60 months and averaged to generate annual spending. RESULTS The median age at the time of diagnosis of CML was 76 years (range, 66-102 years). Overall, 51.4% of patients received TKIs (27.8% received imatinib alone), 28% received non-TKI therapy, and 21% received no treatment. The 5-year survival rate for patients with ≥85% time receiving TKIs was 79% compared with 76% for noncancer controls versus 62% for those with <85% time receiving TKIs. Annual Medicare spending was found to be significantly higher for patients treated with TKIs ($143,053) compared with those treated without TKIs ($41,268 vs $10,498 for noncancer controls). Annual patient cost responsibility was $11,712 per patient receiving any TKIs versus $7330 for those receiving non-TKI outpatient chemotherapy versus $3561 for noncancer controls. CONCLUSIONS Older patients with CML with adequate time receiving TKI therapy have 5-year survival rates that are comparable to those of their counterparts without cancer. However, TKI use is accompanied with significant Medicare and patient spending; patients receiving multiple TKIs (ie, dasatinib or nilotinib along with imatinib) constitute the group with the highest spending.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Kenzik
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ravi Bhatia
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Division of Pediatric Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|