Changes of menopausal hormone therapy use pattern since 2000: results of the Berlin Spandau Longitudinal Health Study

Different menopausal hormone regimens and risk of breast cancer

Background

There are considerable knowledge gaps concerning different estrogen and progestin formulations, regimens, and modes of administration of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of breast cancer. Our objective was to assess the different treatment options for menopausal HT and the risk of breast cancer.

Patients and methods

This Swedish prospective nationwide cohort study included all women who received ≥1 HT prescription during the study period 2005-2012 (290 186 ever-users), group-level matched (1 : 3) to 870 165 never-users; respectively, 6376 (2.2%) and 18 754 (2.2%) developed breast cancer. HT, ascertained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, was subdivided by estrogen and progestogen formulation types, regimens (continuous versus sequential) and modes of administration (oral versus transdermal). The risk of invasive breast cancer was presented as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Current use of estrogen-only therapy was associated with a slight excess breast cancer risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.08 (1.02-1.14)]. The risk for current estrogen plus progestogen therapy was higher [OR = 1.77 (1.69-1.85)] and increased with higher age at initiation [OR = 3.59 (3.30-3.91) in women 70+ years]. In contrast, past use was associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Current continuous estrogen/progestin use was associated with higher risk [OR = 2.18 (1.99-2.40) for progesterone-derived; OR = 2.66 (2.49-2.84) for testosterone-derived] than sequential use [OR = 1.37 (0.97-1.92) for progesterone-derived; OR = 1.12 (0.96-1.30) for testosterone-derived]. The OR for current use was 1.12 (1.04-1.20) for estradiol, 0.76 (0.69-0.84) for estriol, 4.47 (2.67-7.48) for conjugated estrogens, and 1.68 (1.51-1.87) for tibolone. Oral and cutaneous HT showed similar associations.

Conclusion

Different HT regimens have profoundly different effects on breast cancer risk. Because of registry limitations some confounders could not be assessed. This knowledge may guide clinical decision-making when HT is considered.

Attitude of German women towards hormone therapy: results of a lay survey

OBJECTIVE

Hormone therapy (HT) use has experienced a substantial change since publication of Women's Health Initiative (WHI) controlled trial. We aimed to investigate the attitude towards HT in German women aged 45-60 years.

STUDY DESIGN

A questionnaire was sent to 9785 randomly selected women in Germany aged between 45 and 60 years.

RESULTS

Response rate was 19.3% (n = 1,893). Of those, 81% experienced climacteric symptoms. Vasomotor symptoms were most frequently reported (71.2%; n = 1332). Of the respondents, 19.7% (n = 369) used HT. The most frequently mentioned benefits of HT were the improvement of climacteric complaints (71.2%; n = 1346), followed by the relief of osteoporosis (37.2%; n = 697) and the "anti-aging" effect (16.3%; n = 305). Breast cancer was stated as the main risk (64.9%; n = 1215), closely followed by weight gain (53.4%; n = 1000) and thromboembolism (48%; n = 898). About 44% of the women who has been advised by gynaecologists choose a HT, whereas this rate dropped down to 14.3% and 11.3% for women who have been advised by friends or media.

CONCLUSION

German women were generally aware of the main risks and benefits of HT. "More informed" women appear to be more likely to use HT compared to "less informed" women. The media produces negative impression of HT.

Midlife predictors of Alzheimer's disease

Factors contributing to increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) include age, sex, genes, and family history of AD. Several risk factors for AD are endogenous; however, accumulating evidence implicates modifiable risk factors in the pathogenesis of AD. Although the continued task of identifying new genes will be critical to learning more about the disease, several research findings suggest that potentially alterable environmental factors influence genetic contributions, providing targets for disease prevention and treatment. Here, we review midlife risk factors for AD, and address the potential for therapeutic intervention in midlife.