Endometriosis: seeking optimal management in women approaching menopause

Menopause and endometriosis

The shift in paradigm from the belief that endometriosis exclusively affects women of reproductive age has brought attention to its manifestation in postmenopausal patients. Despite this emerging awareness, there remains a dearth of information in the literature regarding postmenopausal endometriosis, with uncertainties surrounding its prevalence, clinical significance, optimal management strategies, and prognosis. Clinical manifestations of endometriosis in menopausal patients lack specificity, with pain onset possible at any stage of life. The primary approach for symptomatic postmenopausal endometriosis continues to be surgical excision, serving both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes while mitigating the risk of coexisting malignancies. Managing the disease in postmenopausal women presents challenges due to possible contraindications for menopausal hormone therapy and the elevated risk of recurrence and malignant transformation. However, conclusive data regarding the appropriateness of menopausal hormone therapy in women with endometriosis or a history of the disease are lacking. Current recommendations lean towards prioritizing combined menopausal hormone therapy formulations or tibolone over estrogen-only therapies due to their potentially higher malignancy risk. The possible increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women with endometriosis is likely linked to a history of surgical menopause at an earlier age, but more research is warranted. This narrative review summarizes the available literature and provides insights into the intricate connection between endometriosis and menopause, shedding light on pathogenesis, symptoms, oncologic risk, diagnosis, and treatment.

Guideline No. 449: Diagnosis and Impact of Endometriosis - A Canadian Guideline

OBJECTIVE

To provide a contemporary approach to the understanding of the impact and methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis in Canada.

TARGET POPULATION

Individuals, families, communities, health care providers, and health care administrators who are affected by, care for patients with, or manage delivery of services for endometriosis.

OPTIONS

The diagnosis of endometriosis is facilitated by a detailed history, examination, and imaging tests with providers who are experienced in endometriosis care. Surgical evaluation with pathology confirms a diagnosis of endometriosis; however, it is not required for those whose diagnosis was confirmed with imaging.

OUTCOMES

There is a need to address earlier recognition of endometriosis to facilitate timely access to care and support. Education directed at the public, affected individuals and families, health care providers, and health care administrators are essential to reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Increased awareness and education about the impact and approach to diagnosis may support timely access to care for patients and families affected by endometriosis. Earlier and appropriate care may support a reduced health care system burden; however, improved clinical evaluation may require initial investments.

EVIDENCE

Each section was reviewed with a unique search strategy representative of the evidence available in the literature related to the area of focus. The literature searches for each section of this guideline are listed in Appendix A and include information from published systematic reviews described in the text.

VALIDATION METHODS

The recommendations were developed following two rounds of review by a national expert panel through an iterative 2-year consensus process. Further details on the process are shared in Appendix B. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix C (Table C1 for definitions and Table C2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

This guideline is intended to support health care providers and policymakers involved in the care of those impacted by endometriosis and the systems required to support them.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Endometriosis impact and diagnosis updated guidelines for Canadian health care providers and policymakers.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Polygenic risk score phenome-wide association study reveals an association between endometriosis and testosterone

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis affects 1 in 9 women, yet it is poorly understood with long diagnostic delays, invasive diagnoses, and poor treatment outcomes. Characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside of the uterus, its main symptoms are pain and infertility. Endometriosis often co-occurs with other conditions, which may provide insights into the origins of endometriosis.

METHODS

Here a polygenic risk score phenome-wide association study of endometriosis was conducted in the UK Biobank to investigate the pleiotropic effects of a genetic liability to endometriosis. The relationship between the polygenic risk score for endometriosis and health conditions, blood and urine biomarkers and reproductive factors were investigated separately in females, males and females without an endometriosis diagnosis. The relationship between endometriosis and the blood and urine biomarkers was further investigated using genetic correlation and Mendelian randomisation approaches to identify causal relationships.

RESULTS

Multiple health conditions, blood and urine biomarkers and reproductive factors were associated with genetic liability to endometriosis in each group, indicating many endometriosis comorbidities are not dependent on the physical manifestation of endometriosis. Differences in the associated traits between males and females highlighted the importance of sex-specific pathways in the overlap of endometriosis with many other traits. Notably, an association of genetic liability to endometriosis with lower testosterone levels was identified. Follow-up analysis utilising Mendelian randomisation approaches suggested lower testosterone may be causal for both endometriosis and clear cell ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the diversity of the pleiotropic effects of genetic risk to endometriosis irrespective of a diagnosis of endometriosis. A key finding was the identification of a causal effect of the genetic liability to lower testosterone on endometriosis using Mendelian randomisation.

Topical estrogens for the treatment of superficial dyspareunia related to genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis: A clinical dilemma

Estrogen withdrawal, which occurs with the cessation of ovulation, causes genitourinary syndrome of menopause in up to 50-85% of women. Symptoms may profoundly impact quality of life and sexual function, interfering with enjoyment of sex in up to three out of four individuals. Topical estrogens have been found to provide symptom relief with minimal systemic absorption and appear to be superior to systemic therapy as what regards genitourinary symptoms. However, conclusive data on their appropriateness in postmenopausal women with a history of endometriosis is not available and the hypothesis that exogenous estrogen stimulation may reactivate endometriotic foci or even promote their malignant transformation is still open. On the other hand, endometriosis affects around 10% of premenopausal women, many of which may be exposed to an acute hypoestrogenic depletion even before spontaneous menopause occurs. This considered, excluding on principle patients with a history of endometriosis from first-line treatment for vulvovaginal atrophy would mean excluding a considerable percentage of the population from adequate care. More robust evidence is urgently needed in these regards. Meanwhile, it would appear reasonable to tailor the prescription of topical hormones in these patients, taking into account the entity of symptoms and the impact such symptoms have on patients' quality of life, as well as the form of endometriosis and the possible risks hormonal may entail. Moreover, the application of estrogens on the vulva instead of the vagina could be efficacious, while outweighing the possible biological cost of hormonal treatment in women with a history of endometriosis.

Evaluation and management of endometriosis

The initial diagnostic investigations for endometriosis are physical examination and pelvic ultrasound. The pelvic examination should include a speculum examination and vaginal palpation. Mobility, fixation and/or tenderness of the uterus and site-specific tenderness in the pelvis should be evaluated. Transvaginal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging are recommended to evaluate the extent of the endometriosis and to determine whether any urinary tract or bowel procedures might also be required during surgical resection. Quality of life should be assessed by using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30, its short version EHP-5 or the generic quality of life questionnaire SF-36. Management of endometriosis is recommended when it has a functional impact (pain, infertility) or causes organ dysfunction. Many gynecological societies have published different guidelines for the evaluation and management of endometriosis. However, the complexity of this disease together with the different available treatments lead to significant discrepancies between the recommendations. Postmenopausal endometriosis should be considered when a patient has a history of symptoms before menopause including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Malignant transformation of endometriosis is estimated to occur in about 0.7-1.6% of women affected by endometriosis. Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, specifically clear cell, endometrioid and low-grade serous types.

Deep Endometriosis and Infertility: What Is the Impact of Surgery?

In women with deep endometriosis, the spontaneous fertility rate might range from 2 to 10%. The optimal management of these women is still an area of debate. Therefore, this review aims to explore the literature on the impact of deep endometriosis surgery on reproductive outcomes and pregnancy rates in women with and without prior infertility. A total of 392 articles were identified through database searching. Twenty-three studies were eligible to be included in the review. A total of 1548 women were identified, 814 of whom became pregnant, with a mean pregnancy rate of 52.6% (95% CI 49.7-63%). Our review suggests that surgery may improve fertility outcomes. Due to the variability in the studies, it is impossible to stratify fertility outcomes of surgery by the localization of deep endometriosis. More investigations are needed to determine whether surgical management should be first-intention or limited to the failure of medically assisted reproduction treatment.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis

Endometriosis affects approximately 190 million women and people assigned female at birth worldwide. It is a chronic, inflammatory, gynecologic disease marked by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, which in many patients is associated with debilitating painful symptoms. Patients with endometriosis are also at greater risk of infertility, emergence of fatigue, multisite pain, and other comorbidities. Thus, endometriosis is best understood as a condition with variable presentation and effects at multiple life stages. A long diagnostic delay after symptom onset is common, and persistence and recurrence of symptoms despite treatment is common. This review discusses the potential genetic, hormonal, and immunologic factors that lead to endometriosis, with a focus on current diagnostic and management strategies for gynecologists, general practitioners, and clinicians specializing in conditions for which patients with endometriosis are at higher risk. It examines evidence supporting the different surgical, pharmacologic, and non-pharmacologic approaches to treating patients with endometriosis and presents an easy to adopt step-by-step management strategy. As endometriosis is a multisystem disease, patients with the condition should ideally be offered a personalized, multimodal, interdisciplinary treatment approach. A priority for future discovery is determining clinically informative sub-classifications of endometriosis that predict prognosis and enhance treatment prioritization.

State of the art, new treatment strategies, and emerging drugs for non-hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized control trials

Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to recap the data obtained from randomized controlled trials looking at new pharmacologic treatments for endometriosis published over the last decade with a focus on non-hormonal therapeutic options alleviating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.Methods: We identified relevant original studies in the English language through a search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE (2012 to present) databases using the appropriate MeSH terms and applying the article type filter 'randomized controlled trials'. A total of 179 records were found during the electronic search. After a detailed evaluation and review of the manuscripts, seven primary articles met the inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the data was conducted.Results: This review included several, non-hormonal emerging drug therapies for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Based on our results, we divided well-founded studies into three subgroups: antiangiogenic agents, immunomodulators, and natural components. Randomized control trials showed promising results with dopamine agonists (cabergoline, quinagolide, and bromocriptine), and the immunomodulatory JNK inhibitor bentamapimod. Agents that have not been represented in randomized control trials or have failed to demonstrate efficacy include statins and TNF-α inhibitors.Conclusion: Although there are substantial improvements in non-hormonal therapy options, majority of the currently available treatment options are supressive rather than curative and do not present a final solution for patients. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evalute the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration.

Salpingo-oophorectomy or surveillance for ovarian endometrioma in asymptomatic premenopausal women: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is 1.9% among women with endometriosis compared with 1.3% among the general population. When an asymptomatic endometrioma is incidentally discovered on imaging, gynecologists must weigh the procedural complications and the potential for subsequent surgical menopause against future ovarian pathology or cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine if performing unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a more cost-effective strategy for the prevention of death than surveillance for asymptomatic endometriomas.

STUDY DESIGN

We created a cost-effectiveness model using TreeAge Pro (TreeAge Software Inc; Williamstown, MA) with a lifetime horizon. Our hypothetical cohort included premenopausal patients with 2 ovaries who did not desire fertility. Those diagnosed with asymptomatic endometrioma underwent either unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or surveillance (ultrasound 6-12 weeks after diagnosis, then annually). Our primary effectiveness outcome was mortality, including death from ovarian cancer or surgery and all-cause mortality related to surgical menopause (± hormone replacement therapy) if the contralateral ovary is removed. We modeled the probabilities of surgical complications, occult malignancy, development of contralateral adnexal pathology, surgical menopause, use of hormone replacement therapy, and development of ovarian cancer. The costs included surgical procedures, complications, ultrasound surveillance, hormone therapy, and treatment of ovarian cancer, with information gathered from Medicare reimbursement data and published literature. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Δ costs / Δ deaths with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $11.6 million as the value of a statistical life. Multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness.

RESULTS

Our model demonstrated that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is associated with improved outcomes compared with surveillance, with fewer deaths (0.28% vs 1.50%) and fewer cases of ovarian cancer (0.42% vs 2.96%). However, it costs more than sonographic surveillance at $6403.43 vs $5381.39 per case of incidental endometrioma. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy costs $83,773.77 per death prevented and $40,237.80 per case of ovarian cancer prevented. As both values were well below the willingness-to-pay threshold, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy. If unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were chosen over surveillance for premenopausal patients with incidental endometriomas, 1 diagnosis of ovarian cancer would be prevented in every 40 patients and 1 death averted in every 82 patients. We performed 1-way sensitivity analyses for all input variables and determined that there were no reasonable inputs that would alter our conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy compared with surveillance for the management of incidental endometrioma in a premenopausal patient not desiring fertility. It incurs fewer deaths and fewer cases of ovarian cancer with costs below the national willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcome

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disease affecting approximately 10% of reproductive age women, around 21-47% of women presenting subfertility and 71-87% of women with chronic pelvic pain. Main symptoms are chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and infertility that seem to be well controlled by oral contraceptive pill, progestogens, GnRh antagonists. The aim of this review was to illustrate the modern diagnosis of endometriosis during pregnancy, to evaluate the evolution of endometriotic lesions during pregnancy and the incidence of adverse outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Published literature was retrieved through searches of the database PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA). We searched for all original articles published in English through April 2020 and decided to extract every notable information for potential inclusion in this review. The search included the following MeSH search terms, alone or in combination: "endometriosis" combined with "endometrioma," "biomarkers," "complications," "bowel," "urinary tract," "uterine rupture," "spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy" and more "adverse pregnancy outcome," "preterm birth," "miscarriage," "abruption placentae," "placenta previa," "hypertensive disorder," "preeclampsia," "fetal grow restriction," "small for gestation age," "cesarean delivery."

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Pregnancy in women with endometriosis does not always lead to disappearance of symptoms and decrease in the size of endometriotic lesions, but it may be possible to observe a malignant transformation of ovarian endometriotic lesions. Onset of complications may be caused by many factors: chronic inflammation, adhesions, progesterone resistance and a dysregulation of genes involved in the embryo implantation. As results, the pregnancy can be more difficult because of endometriosis related complications (spontaneous hemoperitoneum [SH], bowel complications, etc.) or adverse outcomes like preterm birth, FGR, hypertensive disorders, obstetrics hemorrhages (placenta previa, abruptio placenta), miscarriage or cesarean section. Due to insufficient knowledge about its pathogenesis, currently literature data are contradictory and do not show a strong correlation between endometriosis and these complications except for miscarriage and cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should focus on the potential biological pathways underlying these relationships in order to inform patients planning a birth about possible complications during pregnancy.

Role of surgical treatment in endometriosis

Endometriosis can take one of three forms depending on its clinical presentation and management: endometriotic ovarian cyst (ovarian endometrioma), superficial or peritoneal endometriosis and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).¹Among them, DIE is considered the most aggressive, and the patient is often affected by more than one type together. The therapeutic methodology should not be influenced by a combination of different types of endometriotic lesion. According to the clinical context and the patient's needs, the treatment of this pathology can be medical or surgical. Although medical therapy could improve endometriosis-associated symptoms, it never offers a definite treatment for symptomatic patients, who often require surgical treatment. The rationale behind endometriosis surgical treatment is to achieve the complete removal of all lesions through a one-step surgical procedure; to obtain promising long-term results for pelvic pain, recurrence rate, and fertility; and to protect the functionality of the involved organs. Achieving these results depends on the total removal of the pathology from the pelvis, in an attempt to preserve, as much as possible, the healthy tissues surrounding the site of the disease. The choice of a surgical approach rather than medical therapy is subject to the patient's expectations, such as pregnancy desire, the effectiveness of treatment compared to possible complications, the type of pain and its intensity, and the location and severity of the disease. In this context, surgical management using a multidisciplinary endometriosis team is an important factor for achieving good outcomes.

Possible role of microbiome in the pathogenesis of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

There is an urgent necessity to explore the complex pathophysiological nature of endometriosis, which may enable the rationale for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to be discovered. This systematic review aimed to clarify the bidirectional relationship between endometriosis and the microbiome and evaluate if the microbiome may be involved in endometriosis's pathogenesis, establishing a potential connection between the different studies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Studies were identified through a systematic literature search of papers that evaluated the microbiomes of human or other animal species with endometriosis and of those without in the electronic database PubMed/Medline, and Embase without a date restriction. We included all cohort studies focusing on the interaction between endometriosis and the microbiomes of humans or other mammals, evaluating if the microbiome may be involved in endometriosis's pathogenesis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Endometriosis appears to be associated with elevated levels of different microorganisms across various microbiome sites. An ineffective immune response seems to play a key role in endometriosis pathogenesis, and there is some scientific proof to state that the immune response may be modulated by the microbiome. Interestingly, nine studies of our review detected species belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Negativicutes characterized by Gram-negative staining, that were significantly increased in endometriosis cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory and clinical investigations indicate that hosts' microbiome profiles with and without endometriosis can be significantly different. To further our understanding of the relationships between endometriosis and the host microbiome, more studies are necessary.

Management Challenges of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most aggressive of the three phenotypes that constitute endometriosis. It can affect the whole pelvis, subverting the anatomy and functionality of vital organs, with an important negative impact on the patient's quality of life. The diagnosis of DIE is based on clinical and physical examination, instrumental examination, and, if surgery is needed, the identification and biopsy of lesions. The choice of the best therapeutic approach for women with DIE is often challenging. Therapeutic options include medical and surgical treatment, and the decision should be dictated by the patient's medical history, disease stage, symptom severity, and personal choice. Medical therapy can control the symptoms and stop the development of pathology, keeping in mind the side effects derived from a long-term treatment and the risk of recurrence once suspended. Surgical treatment should be proposed only when it is strictly necessary (failed hormone therapy, contraindications to hormone treatment, severity of symptoms, infertility), preferring, whenever possible, a conservative approach performed by a multidisciplinary team. All therapeutic possibilities have to be explained by the physicians in order to help the patients to make the right choice and minimize the impact of the disease on their lives.

How is small bowel permeability in endometriosis patients? a case control pilot study

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of women of reproductive age. Small bowel (SB) permeability and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) could play a role in the perduration of low grade inflammation status and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. To clarify this hypothesis, we measured SB permeability through plasma values of LPS and urinary secretion of lactulose (La), mannitol (Ma) and their ratio (L/M) in patients with endometriosis compared with healthy controls (HC). Eight patients and 14 HC entered the study. SB permeability was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography of urine concentrations of La and Ma. Plasma levels of LPS were measured in the blood. Moreover, a nutritional, gastroenterological, quality of life evaluation was performed through validates questionnaires and complete gynaecological evaluations. The statistical analysis of the obtained data did not show differences in anthropometric and nutritional characteristics and gastrointestinal functional disease in the two groups. Patients reported higher levels of pelvic chronic pain (3.87 ± 2.99 vs 0.15 ± 0.55; pe = 0.001) and significantly higher LPS plasma levels (0.529 ± 0.11 vs 0.427 ± 0.08; p value = .027) than HC. Our results indicate that intestinal permeability is abnormal in endometriosis patients, and it might play a role in the pathogenesis of this chronic disease.

Clinical characteristics difference between early and late recurrence of ovarian endometriosis after laparoscopic cystectomy

BACKGROUND

Ovarian endometriosis is the most frequent type of endometriosis. Despite the use of surgery and medication, many patients suffer from recurrence within near future. Currently, there are no effective clinical characteristics available to predict the time to recurrence in ovarian endometriosis patients.

PURPOSE

To identify the effective clinical indicators for early and late endometrioma recurrence, we compared the clinical characteristics of early and late recurrence after treatment.

METHODS

We collected 358 patients with ovarian endometriosis who had a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up after undergoing a laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma performed at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to April 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients were recruited in the validation set, with a median follow-up time of 83 months (60-120 months). Till the last follow-up, 68 patients exhibited recurrence. Three-year and 5-year recurrence rates were 9.2% and 15.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis in our study showed that patient with endometrioma surgery history had higher incidence of recurrence in 3 years after re-surgery (OR: 5.594, P = 0.029). Univariate and multivariate analyses using the logistic regression showed that the presence of tenesmus before surgery affected the incidence of early recurrence with a ratio of 57.9% (11/19) and 89.5% (17/19) in 3 years and 5 years after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of tenesmus before surgery may be linked to the early recurrence of endometrioma.

Genetic Characterization of Endometriosis Patients: Review of the Literature and a Prospective Cohort Study on a Mediterranean Population

The pathogenesis of endometriosis is unknown, but some evidence supports a genetic predisposition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the recent literature on the genetic characterization of women affected by endometriosis and to evaluate the influence of polymorphisms of the wingless-type mammalian mouse tumour virus integration site family member 4 (WNT4), vezatin (VEZT), and follicle stimulating hormone beta polypeptide (FSHB) genes, already known to be involved in molecular mechanisms associated with the proliferation and development of endometriotic lesions in the Sardinian population. Materials and Methods: In order to provide a comprehensive and systematic tool for those approaching the genetics of endometriosis, the most cited review, observational, cohort and case-control studies that have evaluated the genetics of endometriosis in the last 20 years were collected. Moreover, 72 women were recruited for a molecular biology analysis of whole-blood samples—41 patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis and 31 controls. The molecular typing of three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was evaluated in patients and controls: rs7521902, rs10859871 and rs11031006, mapped respectively in the WNT4, VEZT and FSHB genes. In this work, the frequency of alleles, genotypes and haplotypes of these SNPs in Sardinian women is described. Results: From the initial search, a total of 73 articles were chosen. An analysis of the literature showed that in endometriosis pathogenesis, the contribution of genetics has been well supported by many studies. The frequency of genotypes observed in the groups of the study population of 72 women was globally coherent with the law of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. For the SNP rs11031006 (FSHB), the endometriosis group did not show an increase in genotypic or allelic frequency due to this polymorphism compared to the control group (p = 0.9999, odds ratio (OR) = 0.000, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.000–15.000 and p = 0.731, OR = 1639, 95% CI, 0.39–683, respectively, for the heterozygous genotype and the polymorphic minor allele). For the SNP rs10859871 (VEZT), we found a significant difference in the frequency of the homozygous genotype in the control group compared to the affected women (p = 0.0111, OR = 0.0602, 95% CI, 0.005–0.501). For the SNP rs7521902 (WNT4), no increase in genotypic or allelic frequency between the two groups was shown (p = 0.3088, OR = 0.4133, 95% CI, 0.10–1.8 and p = 0.3297, OR = 2257, 95% CI, 0.55–914, respectively, for the heterozygous genotype and the polymorphic minor allele). Conclusion: An analysis of recent publications on the genetics of endometriosis showed a discrepancy in the results obtained in different populations. In the Sardinian population, the results obtained do not show a significant association between the investigated variants of the genes and a greater risk of developing endometriosis, although several other studies in the literature have shown the opposite. Anyway, the data underline the importance of evaluating genetic variants in different populations. In fact, in different ethnic groups, it is possible that specific risk alleles could act differently in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Bowel Endometriosis: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometriosis is a chronic condition primarily affecting young women of reproductive age. Although some women with bowel endometriosis may be asymptomatic patients typically report a myriad of symptoms such as alteration in bowel habits (constipation/diarrhoea) dyschezia, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia in addition to infertility. To date, there are no clear guidelines on the evaluation of patients with suspected bowel endometriosis. Several techniques have been proposed including transvaginal and/or transrectal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and double-contrast barium enema. These different imaging modalities provide greater information regarding presence, location and extent of endometriosis ensuring patients are adequately informed whilst also optimizing preoperative planning. In cases where surgical management is indicated, surgery should be performed by experienced surgeons, in centres with access to multidisciplinary care. Treatment should be tailored according to patient symptoms and wishes with a view to excising as much disease as possible, whilst at the same time preserving organ function. In this review article current perspectives on diagnosis and management of bowel endometriosis are discussed.

How can we manage patients over forty with endometriosis?

Peri/postmenopausal endometriosis is not as rare as once we thought. Accumulated data revealed that around 1/3-1/4 of women with surgically-diagnosed endometriosis after the age of 40. The uneasiness of the issue of malignant transformation or malignancy in such women created a challenge for us. Here the management strategy for women with endometriosis after the age of 40 is discussed in the light of scientific evidence.

Hormonal Replacement Therapy in Menopausal Women with History of Endometriosis: A Review of Literature

Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is effective in treating the symptoms of menopause. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity with a tendency towards invasion and infiltration. Being an estrogen-dependent disease, it tends to regress after menopause. Nevertheless, it affects up to 2.2% of postmenopausal women. Conclusive data are not available in the literature on the appropriateness of HRT in women with endometriosis or a past history of the disease. The hypothesis that exogenous estrogen stimulation could reactivate endometriotic foci has been proposed. The aim of this state-of-the-art review was to revise the current literature about endometriosis in perimenopause and menopause and to investigate the possible role of HRT in this setting of patients. An electronic databases search (MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Sciencedirect, the Cochrane Library at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Scielo) was performed, with the date range of from each database’s inception until May 2019. All of the studies evaluating the impact of different HRT regimens in patients with a history of endometriosis were selected. 45 articles were found: one Cochrane systematic review, one systematic review, five narrative reviews, two clinical trials, two retrospective cohort studies, 34 case reports and case series. Some authors reported an increased risk of malignant transformation of endometriomas after menopause in patients assuming HRT with unopposed estrogen. Low-quality evidence suggests that HRT can be prescribed to symptomatic women with a history of endometriosis, especially in young patients with premature menopause. Continuous or cyclic combined preparations or tibolone are the best choices. HRT improves quality of life in symptomatic post-menopausal women, who should not be denied the replacement therapy only due to their history of endometriosis. Based on low-grade literature evidence, we recommend to prescribe combined HRT schemes; tibolone could be considered.