Iris melanoma outcomes based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification in 78 consecutive patients

Effectiveness of treatment for iris melanoma: surgical versus radiotherapeutic approaches

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of preventing metastasis for each major treatment modality for iris melanoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred consecutive eyes with iris melanoma at a single tertiary referral centre for ocular oncology.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of eyes with iris melanoma, both with (n = 69 eyes) and without (n = 231 eyes) ciliary body extension, was undertaken for metastasis-free survival at 5, 10, and 20 years based on type of treatment, including globe-sparing surgical resection (n = 169 eyes), plaque radiotherapy (n = 74 eyes), or enucleation (n = 57 eyes).

RESULTS

For the total population, 5-, 10-, and 20-year metastasis-free survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 87%, respectively, and there was no difference in metastatic rates for tumours with versus without ciliary body extension (p = 0.95). Noninferiority was demonstrated for surgical resection and plaque radiotherapy, with metastasis-free survival rates of 98%, 97%, and 94% for surgical resection and 94%, 94%, and 89% for plaque radiotherapy (p = 0.002). The rates for globe salvage were 94%, 92%, and 90% for surgical resection and 94%, 86%, and 86% for plaque radiotherapy (p = 0.003). However, metastasis-free survival was worse in patients who underwent enucleation (86%, 67%, and NA; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis-free survival and globe salvage following plaque radiotherapy and surgical resection are not inferior to either, but eyes undergoing enucleation demonstrated a lower metastasis-free survival, likely because enucleation is performed for larger, more extensive melanomas, often with secondary glaucoma. In this analysis, iris melanoma with ciliary body involvement did not increase the risk of metastasis.

Cysts and tumours of the iris: Diagnostic tools and key management considerations-A review

The iris is a unique structure, with exquisite variations in colour and form. Pathological changes, specifically including iris cysts and tumours are relatively uncommon, difficult to diagnose, and yet potentially blinding or life-threatening. Based on a comprehensive literature review, with highly illustrated key case examples, this report aims to guide the clinician in filtering the differential diagnoses of iris cysts and tumours. Evaluation is in the context of key diagnostic clinical tools and management considerations. Diagnostic imaging techniques include serial anterior segment photography, ultrasound, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and iris fluorescein angiography, however, the roles of computerised topography and magnetic resonance imaging are also considered in this review. Management includes categorisation in terms of solid iris tumours (melanocytic vs. non-melanocytic), or iris cysts (primary vs. secondary) that may be usefully differentiated by clinical assessment, avoiding more invasive interventions. Cystic lesions are generally benign, although implantation cysts in particular cause significant complications and surgical challenges. Most solid tumours are melanocytic and also typically benign. However, in larger lesions, rapid growth, symptoms and complications more likely indicate malignancy, requiring further investigation.