Advances in the psychopharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder type I

The use of a smartphone app for self-monitoring by patients with bipolar disorder being treated in a primary care setting

Background

Self-monitoring and self-management are growing phenomena in the care of chronic illnesses, like bipolar disorder. A significant fraction of patients with bipolar disorder are cared for by primary care providers. The use of smart technology may be effective in this setting.

Method

KIOS-Bipolar, a smartphone app that proved superior in a randomized, controlled trial, was beta-tested for two-month periods in 12 patients with bipolar disorder who were under the care of a primary care clinic.

Results

Adherence to the app was 100%. Patients experienced improvements in depressive (-41%) and manic (-46%) symptoms and overall instability (-39%). Patients felt that the system was user-friendly with an average system usability score of 80.8 (range 48-100). Five participants (41.8%) gave a system usability score ≥ 90.

Discussion

This open trial suggests that utilization of a self-management tool may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder in the primary care setting.

Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Correlates of Lithium Treatment for Bipolar Disorder in Asia

BACKGROUND

As clinical practices with lithium salts for patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) are poorly documented in Asia, we studied the prevalence and clinical correlates of lithium use there to support international comparisons.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of use and dosing of lithium salts for BD patients across 13 Asian sites and evaluated bivariate relationships of lithium treatment with clinical correlates followed by multivariate logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

In a total of 2139 BD participants (52.3% women) of mean age 42.4 years, lithium salts were prescribed in 27.3% of cases overall, varying among regions from 3.20% to 59.5%. Associated with lithium treatment were male sex, presence of euthymia or mild depression, and a history of seasonal mood change. Other mood stabilizers usually were given with lithium, often at relatively high doses. Lithium use was associated with newly emerging and dose-dependent risk of tremors as well as risk of hypothyroidism. We found no significant differences in rates of clinical remission or of suicidal behavior if treatment included lithium or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings clarify current prevalence, dosing, and clinical correlates of lithium treatment for BD in Asia. This information should support clinical decision-making regarding treatment of BD patients and international comparisons of therapeutic practices.

Countering the declining use of lithium therapy: a call to arms

For over half a century, it has been widely known that lithium is the most efficacious treatment for bipolar disorder. Yet, despite this, its prescription has consistently declined over this same period of time. A number of reasons for this apparent disparity between evidence and clinical practice have been proposed, including a lack of confidence amongst clinicians possibly because of an absence of training and lack of familiarity with the molecule. Simultaneously, competition has grown within the pharmacological armamentarium for bipolar disorder with newer treatments promoting an image of being safer and easier to prescribe primarily because of not necessitating plasma monitoring, which understandably is appealing to patients who then exercise their preferences accordingly. However, these somewhat incipient agents are yet to reach the standard lithium has attained in terms of its efficacy in providing prophylaxis against the seemingly inevitable recrudescence of acute episodes that punctuates the course of bipolar disorder. In addition, none of these mimics have the additional benefits of preventing suicide and perhaps providing neuroprotection. Thus, a change in strategy is urgently required, wherein myths regarding the supposed difficulties in prescribing lithium and the gravity of its side-effects are resolutely dispelled. It is this cause to which we have pledged our allegiance and it is to this end that we have penned this article.

Evaluating lumateperone for its use in treating depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or II disorder in adults

INTRODUCTION

Lumateperone is a novel antipsychotic medication that has recently received approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of major depressive episodes of type I and II bipolar disorder. It is approved for use as monotherapy or as an adjunctive treatment to lithium or valproic acid.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical trials performed with lumateperone for bipolar disorder were reviewed. Additionally, pharmacodynamic actions of lumateperone are reviewed. Lumateperone is superior to placebo whether used alone or in combination with a mood stabilizer in patients with type I or type II bipolar disorder. It achieves this effect with minimal dopamine blockade-related side effects due to less than 50% dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. While the pharmacodynamic profile of lumateperone is unique, the mechanism of action in bipolar depression remains obscure.

EXPERT OPINION

Lumateperone is an antipsychotic with full antagonist effects at the post-synaptic D2, and partial agonist effects at the presynaptic D2. This unique profile allows for both antipsychotic and antidepressant effects at the same dose, which does not produce dopamine-related side effects. Consequently, lumateperone is exceptionally well tolerated compared to other antidepressant-acting antipsychotic agents. It is now the only agent approved as an adjunct to the mood stabilizer for bipolar II depression.

Existing and emerging pharmacological approaches to the treatment of mania: A critical overview

Manic episodes are a defining, frequent and dramatically disabling occurrence in the course of Bipolar Disorder type I. Current pharmacotherapy of mania lists a good number of agents, but differences in efficacy and safety profiles among these agents must be considered in order to tailor personalized therapies, especially when the long-term course of the illness is considered. There is wide room and need to ameliorate current pharmacological approaches to mania, but ongoing pharmacological research on the topic is scant. In this work we try to critically assess clinical factors and patients' characteristics that may influence the treatment choice for manic episodes. In addition, we conduct a narrative review on experimental pharmacology of bipolar mania and psychotic disorders, presenting a critical overview on agents which could represent treatment alternatives for a manic episode in the next future. Results show limited novel or ongoing research on agents acting as mood stabilizers (Ebselen, Valnoctamide and Eslicarbazepine did not reach statistical significance in demonstrating antimanic efficacy). As for the emerging experimental antipsychotic, some of them (including KarXT, SEP-363856, RO6889450, ALKS3831) have demonstrated good antipsychotic efficacy and a favorable safety profile, but little is known about their use in patients with bipolar disorder and specifically designed trials are needed. Lastly, some benefits for the treatment of mania could be expected to come in the next future from non-mood stabilizers/non-antipsychotic agents (especially PKC inhibitors like Endoxifen): long-term trials are needed to confirm positive results in terms of long-term efficacy and safety.