1
|
Song B, Oh S, Kim D, Cho YS, Moon IJ. Changes in Revision Cochlear Implantation and Device Failure Profiles. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 17:37-45. [PMID: 38228133 PMCID: PMC10933811 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As cochlear implantation (CI) experiences rapid innovations and its indications expand, the characteristics of revision CI (RCI) are evolving. This study investigated changes in the RCI profile and explored their clinical implications. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of all CIs performed at a tertiary medical institution between October 2001 and January 2023. The rates of and reasons for RCI were evaluated in relation to the manufacturer and device model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to examine cumulative and device survival curves. Cumulative and device survival rates were additionally analyzed based on age group, period of primary CI, and manufacturer. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between RCI and the device manufacturer. RESULTS Among 1,430 CIs, 73 (5.1%) required RCI. The predominant reason for RCI was device failure (40 of 73 RCIs [54.8%]), with an overall device failure rate of 2.8%. This was followed by flap-associated problems and migration (nine of 73 RCIs each [12.3%]). Flap retention issues emerged as a new cause in three cases (two involving the CI 632 and one involving the SYNCHRONY 2 implant), and six instances of electrode tip fold-over arose (four for the CI 600 series and two for the CI 500 series). The overall 10-year cumulative and device survival rates were 93.4% and 95.8%, respectively. After excluding models with recall issues, significant differences in cumulative (P =0.010) and device (P =0.001) survival rates were observed across manufacturers. CONCLUSION While the overall CI survival rate is stable, device failure persists as the predominant reason for RCI. Moreover, the types of complications leading to revision (including issues with flap retention and electrode tip fold-over) have shifted, particularly for newer implant models. Given the clinical importance of device failure and subsequent reoperation, clinicians should remain informed about and responsive to these trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bokhyun Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Subi Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doyun Kim
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Sang Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Joon Moon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oh H, Kim Y, Lee SJ, Carandang M, Song JJ, Choi BY. Two Discrete Types of Tip Fold-Over in Cochlear Implantation Using Slim Modiolar Electrodes: Influence of Cochlear Duct Length on Tip Fold-Over. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:1011-1014. [PMID: 37733985 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precise electrode positioning is crucial for achieving optimal audiological outcomes in cochlear implantation. The slim modiolar electrode (SME), a thin, flexible, and precurved electrode, exhibits favorable modiolar proximity. However, tip fold-over can affect optimal electrode placement. Herein, we share our experiences with tip fold-over in SMEs and present an analysis of conditions that may predispose to tip fold-over. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective medical record review. PATIENTS In total, 475 patients (671 ears) underwent cochlear implantation using SMEs (Nucleus CI532 or CI632 from Cochlear) performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary center between June 14, 2018, and December 1, 2022. INTERVENTIONS Intraoperative x-ray scans (cochlear view), operative records, and cochlear duct length (CDL) were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Tip fold-over patterns on plain x-ray images (proximal versus distal). RESULTS Electrode tip fold-over was observed in 18 (2.7%) of the 671 ears with SMEs. This fold-over occurred more frequently in cases with long CDL (>36 mm). Among the 14 cases with available initial x-rays before correction of the tip fold-over, half were classified as proximal and the other half as distal. A predilection for proximal tip fold-over was found in those with a CDL of 36 mm or longer, and longer CDLs were observed for proximal cases than for distal cases. Our pilot data suggest that identifying the type of tip fold-over can aid in correcting it more efficiently. CONCLUSIONS Tip fold-over of SME does not occur uniformly and is more common in ears with long CDL. This tendency is particularly pronounced for the proximal type of tip fold-over. Therefore, preoperative measurement of the CDL and meticulous examination of intraoperative imaging are essential for customized correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heonjeong Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Yehree Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Seung Jae Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Marge Carandang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tondo Medical Center, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou M, Mao S, Wu Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Liu X, Ling W, Li J, Cui B, Guo Y, Guo R, Huo W, Huang X. A flexible omnidirectional rotating magnetic array for MRI-safe transdermal wireless energy harvesting through flexible electronics. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadi5451. [PMID: 37585524 PMCID: PMC10431719 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi5451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-safe implantable wireless energy harvester offers substantial benefits to patients suffering from brain disorders, hearing impairment, and arrhythmias. However, rigid magnets in cutting-edge systems with limited numbers of rotation axis impose high risk of device dislodgement and magnet failure. Here, a flexible omnidirectional rotating magnetic array (FORMA) and a flexible MRI-safe implantable wireless energy-harvesting system have been developed. Miniaturized flexible magnetic balls 1 millimeter in diameter achieved by molding three-dimensional printed templates can rotate freely in elastomer cavities and supply a magnetic force of 2.14 Newtons at a distance of 1 millimeter between an implantable receiver and a wearable transceiver. The system can work stably under an acceleration of 9g and obtain a power output of 15.62 decibel milliwatts at a transmission frequency of 8 megahertz. The development of the FORMA may lead to life-long flexible and batteryless implantable systems and offers the potential to promote techniques for monitoring and treating acute and chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxing Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Sui Mao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Ziyue Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Ya Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Zhen Yang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Xinyu Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Wei Ling
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Jiameng Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Bixiao Cui
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing 100053, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of MRI and Brain Informatics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Rui Guo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Wenxing Huo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Xian Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, China
- Institute of Wearable Technology and Bioelectronics, Qiantang Science and Technology Innovation Center, 1002 23rd Street, Hangzhou 310018, China
- Flexible Wearable Technology Research Center, Institute of Flexible Electronics Technology of Tsinghua, 906 Yatai Road, Jiaxing 314033, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inoue T, Tona Y, Okano T, Omori K, Yamamoto N. Detection of Tip Fold-Over of the Slim Modiolar Electrode Using Intraoperative Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023. [PMID: 36939567 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the importance of mobile cone-beam computed tomography in detecting tip fold-over of a slim modiolar electrode within the cochlea during surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary medical center. METHODS From January 2020 to June 2022, 33 ears of 30 patients with normal cochlear morphology underwent cochlear implantation with slim modiolar electrodes and intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Furthermore, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images. RESULTS The tip fold-over of the electrodes was detected using mobile cone-beam computed tomography in 3 out of 33 ears (9.1%). We could not identify the tip fold-over by scouting plain X-ray images in 2 out of 3 cases before taking the cone-beam computed tomography images. Electrode removal and reinsertion were performed before wound closure and the successful reinsertion was confirmed by mobile cone-beam computed tomography. The folded electrode tips were located at 238.8°, 152°, and 185.8°. CONCLUSION Intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography is useful in detecting the tip fold-over of the slim modiolar electrodes during surgery. Therefore, it was possible to reinsert the electrodes in all cases before closing the wound, eliminating the need for revision surgeries. Moreover, the analysis of mobile cone-beam computed tomography images may help to elucidate the mechanisms of electrode tip fold-over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taishi Inoue
- Department of Otolaryngology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yosuke Tona
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Okano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Omori
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Otolaryngology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation. Ear Hear 2022; 44:566-571. [PMID: 36534657 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632). DESIGN Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores. RESULTS Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.
Collapse
|
6
|
Starovoyt A, Quirk BC, Putzeys T, Kerckhofs G, Nuyts J, Wouters J, McLaughlin RA, Verhaert N. An optically-guided cochlear implant sheath for real-time monitoring of electrode insertion into the human cochlea. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19234. [PMID: 36357503 PMCID: PMC9649659 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In cochlear implant surgery, insertion of perimodiolar electrode arrays into the scala tympani can be complicated by trauma or even accidental translocation of the electrode array within the cochlea. In patients with partial hearing loss, cochlear trauma can not only negatively affect implant performance, but also reduce residual hearing function. These events have been related to suboptimal positioning of the cochlear implant electrode array with respect to critical cochlear walls of the scala tympani (modiolar wall, osseous spiral lamina and basilar membrane). Currently, the position of the electrode array in relation to these walls cannot be assessed during the insertion and the surgeon depends on tactile feedback, which is unreliable and often comes too late. This study presents an image-guided cochlear implant device with an integrated, fiber-optic imaging probe that provides real-time feedback using optical coherence tomography during insertion into the human cochlea. This novel device enables the surgeon to accurately detect and identify the cochlear walls ahead and to adjust the insertion trajectory, avoiding collision and trauma. The functionality of this prototype has been demonstrated in a series of insertion experiments, conducted by experienced cochlear implant surgeons on fresh-frozen human cadaveric cochleae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasiya Starovoyt
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bryden C. Quirk
- grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia
| | - Tristan Putzeys
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greet Kerckhofs
- grid.7942.80000 0001 2294 713XBiomechanics Laboratory, Institute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.7942.80000 0001 2294 713XInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, 1200 Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Prometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Nuyts
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Imaging and Pathology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Research Center, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert A. McLaughlin
- grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia ,grid.1012.20000 0004 1936 7910School of Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009 Australia
| | - Nicolas Verhaert
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ,grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4–6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6–30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2–1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1–1.3%), 11% (9.2–13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5–3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Paul Van de Heyning
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee SY, Jeon H, Kim Y, Choi HY, Carandang M, Yoo HS, Choi BY. Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103382. [PMID: 35151931 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding residual hearing preservation and its natural course following cochlear implantation is important for developing rehabilitation strategies for hearing loss. However, non-uniform evaluation criteria and varying surgical skills pose challenges in fair comparison of the effect of different electrodes on residual hearing preservation. We compared the effect of a slim modiolar electrode (SME) and a slim straight electrode (SSE), implanted by a single surgeon, on progression of residual hearing using different parameters, based on cross-sectional and longitudinal audiological analyses. METHODS Patients with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz and who underwent minimally traumatic surgical techniques were included. The progression of residual hearing using threshold shifts, hearing preservation rate according to the HEARRING classification, and maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing potentially qualifying for a hybrid stimulation was analyzed up to five time points throughout the 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS Threshold shifts and hearing preservation rates according to the HEARRING classification of the electrodes were comparable from 3 months through 12 months postoperatively. Maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing, required for the usage of a hybrid stimulation, was similar for both electrodes. A substantial proportion of implantees with SME use a hybrid stimulation, resulting in long-term use. However, a difference in the pattern of postoperative residual hearing preservation between the two electrodes is possible, probably due to differences in their physical characteristics and location. Specifically, correlation analysis exhibited that significantly less tight modiolar proximity negatively affect the residual hearing preservation, albeit only at 3 months postoperatively, among patients with the SME. CONCLUSION Collectively, both SME and SSE implantation showed favorable residual hearing preservation. Our findings further refine the recently proposed hearing preservation with the SME and suggest that the physical characteristics and location of electrodes, in terms of electrode-to-modiolus distance, could affect loss of acoustic hearing in various ways.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim Y, Han JH, Yoo HS, Choi BY. Molecular aetiology of ski-slope hearing loss and audiological course of cochlear implantees. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:4871-4882. [PMID: 35212774 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07317-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A challenge for patients with ski-slope hearing loss is that hearing aids do not adequately amplify the mid-to-high frequencies necessary for speech perception and conversely, cochlear implant (CI) may damage low-frequency hearing. We aimed to describe the clinical profile of patients with ski-slope hearing loss, with a special focus on aetiology of such hearing loss and audiological course of low-frequency hearing after CI. METHODS We recruited hearing-impaired patients who visited a tertiary referral centre and met the criteria for ski-slope hearing loss patients from 2015 to 2021. Genetic testing was performed in all ski-slope hearing loss patients unless refused. Baseline audiograms of patients who continued to use hearing aids or who finally underwent CIs were reviewed. As for CI patients, outcome and hearing preservation rate were rigorously analysed. RESULTS Of 46 recruited patients with ski-slope hearing loss, 45 agreed to undergo genetic testing and causative variants were identified in 17 (37.8%) patients. The TMC1, MYO7A, and TMPRSS3 variants were the most common, while LRTOMT was newly identified as a causative gene. Twenty-five patients eventually received CI, while 13 continued to wear the hearing aid and 8 patients did not ever try hearing aids. CI in ski-slope hearing loss led to immediate and sufficient improvement of sentence recognition by as early as 3 months, however, the duration of hearing loss was inversely correlated with the sentence recognition score. The average hearing preservation rate (using the HEARRING classification) after CI was 53.0% (SD 30.0) and 45.6% (SD 31.1) at 1 year. Seventy-nine percent of implantees maintained functional low-frequency hearing (better than 85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz) eligible for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). A trend was found that patients with hair cell stereocilia-associated genetic variants may have a slightly better preservation, albeit with no statistical significance. CONCLUSION Detection rate of a molecular genetic aetiology of ski-slope hearing loss appears to be lower than other type of hearing loss reported in the literature. Especially with short hearing loss duration, CI in ski-slope hearing loss leads to immediate and sufficient speech improvement, while preserving functional low-frequency hearing eligible for EAS as many as in 79%. A certain genetic aetiology might be associated with a trend towards better low-frequency hearing preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yehree Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hee Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Soon Yoo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Yoon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Högerle C, Englhard A, Simon F, Grüninger I, Mlynski R, Hempel JM, Müller J. Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Over: Our Experience With Long and Flexible Electrode. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:64-71. [PMID: 34619728 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate if there is any incidence of electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long and flexible lateral wall electrodes implanted in two high-volume Cochlear Implant (CI) centers in Germany. In addition, a detailed literature review was performed to capture all the peer-reviewed publications reporting on tip fold-over with CI electrodes from different CI brands for comparison. METHODS Post-operative X-ray images of FLEX SOFT electrode from MED-EL in Stenver's view were retrospectively investigated for the presence of electrode tip fold-over from 378 consecutive cases in two high-volume CI centers in Germany. All patients were implanted between 2010 and 2018 by three individual experienced CI surgeons using round window and extended round window approach for CI electrode insertion. A literature review was performed following a thorough PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) search using the keywords "cochlear implant electrode tip fold-over" or "cochlear implant electrode tip roll-over" to capture articles that were published until December 2020 in English language only. Articles selection was based on electrode-related issues investigated only in-patient cases applying imaging modality. Those studies investigated tip fold-over in cadaveric temporal bones and cases with inner-ear malformation excluded. RESULTS No single case of tip fold-over was clinically detected from the retrospective investigation of post-operative X-ray images from 378 consecutive cases. The electrode angular insertion depth as measured applying the cochlear coordinate system, varied from a minimum of 560° to a maximum of 720°. The literature review on the tip fold-over issue resulted in 24 peer-reviewed published articles in total. Tip fold-over with pre-curved modiolar-hugging electrodes was reported in 85 cases out of 1,606 implantations making an incidence rate of 5.3%. With the straight lateral wall electrodes, the tip fold-over was reported in four cases out of 398 implantations making an incidence rate of 1%, not including the number of implantations reported in the current study. Otherwise it would be 0.5%. CONCLUSION Electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long flexible lateral wall electrodes is highly exceptional and this can be generalized to any of the straight lateral wall electrodes from any CI brand. The literature review on tip fold-over revealed an incidence rate of 5.3% with pre-curved or modiolar-hugging electrodes and 1% with straight lateral wall electrodes from CI brands. Including this series of 0% tip fold-over, the incidence rate of electrode tip fold-over with LW electrode type would be 0.5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalina Högerle
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Anna Englhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Florian Simon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Ivo Grüninger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner," Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - John-Martin Hempel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Joachim Müller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sunwoo W, Jeon HW, Choi BY. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22809. [PMID: 34815432 PMCID: PMC8611070 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01862-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Reducing electrode impedance is an important factor in improving the functional benefits of cochlear implants (CIs). The immediate effect of early switch-on within 24 h of surgery on impedance among CI recipients with various types of electrodes has been reported previously; however, the immediate change and the evolution of electrode impedances of slim modiolar electrodes after early switch-on within 24 h of implantation has not. Therefore, the focus of this retrospective cohort study of CI patients was to compare the effect of early switch-on (n = 36) and conventional switch-on (n = 72) 2–4 weeks post-operation on impedance. Compared with impedance measured intraoperatively, our results demonstrate a significant decrease in impedance from 11.5 to 8.9 kΩ (p < 0.001) at 2–4 weeks after implantation in the early switch-on group, which sharply contrasted with elevated impedance values for conventional switch-on 2–4 weeks after implantation (from 10.7 to 14.2 kΩ, p = 0.001). Notably, a comparatively lower impedance than the conventional switch-on protocol was observed for up to 2 months post-operation. Most importantly, a much earlier stabilization of impedance can be achieved with the early switch-on protocol coupled with the slim modiolar electrode array compared to the conventional switch-on protocol, offering the advantage of reducing the number of required mapping sessions in the early stages of rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woongsang Sunwoo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoung Won Jeon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Yoon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15135. [PMID: 34302030 PMCID: PMC8302625 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94668-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ludwig S, Riemann N, Hans S, Christov F, Ludwig JM, Saxe J, Arweiler-Harbeck D. Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:1233-1242. [PMID: 33830367 PMCID: PMC8897335 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS We compared 17 RH-30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E® phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Ludwig
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Niklas Riemann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Christov
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- ENT Practice Cologne-Bonn, Wesseling, Germany
| | - Johannes Maximilian Ludwig
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Judith Saxe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Copson B, Wijewickrema S, Ma X, Zhou Y, Gerard JM, O'Leary S. Surgical approach to the facial recess influences the acceptable trajectory of cochlear implantation electrodes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:137-147. [PMID: 33547488 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06633-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practical guidance to the operative surgeon by mapping the location, where acceptable straight-line virtual cochlear implant electrode trajectories intersect the facial recess. In addition, to investigate the influence of facial recess preparation, virtual electrode width and surgical approach to the cochlea on these available trajectories. METHODS The study was performed on imaging data from eight cadaveric temporal bones within the University of Melbourne Virtual Reality (VR) Temporal Bone Surgery Simulator. The facial recess was opened to varying degrees, and acceptable trajectory vectors with varying diameters were calculated for electrode insertions via cochleostomy or round window membrane (RWM). The percentage of acceptable insertion vectors through each location of the facial recess was visually represented using heatmaps. RESULTS Seven of the eight bones allowed for acceptable vector trajectories via both cochleostomy and RWM approaches. These acceptable trajectories were more likely to lie superiorly within the facial recess for insertion via the round window, and inferiorly for insertion via cochleostomy. Cochleostomy insertions required a greater degree of preparation and skeletonisation of the junction of the facial nerve and chorda tympani within the facial recess. The width of the virtual electrode had only marginal impact on the availability of acceptable trajectories. Heatmaps emphasised the intimate relationship the acceptable trajectories have with the facial nerve and chorda tympani. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the differences in the acceptable straight-line trajectories for electrodes when implanted via the round window or cochleostomy. There were notable exceptions to both surgical approaches, likely explained by the variation of hook region anatomy. The methodology used in this study holds promise for translation to patient specific surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Copson
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
| | - Sudanthi Wijewickrema
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Xingjun Ma
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Yun Zhou
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Jean-Marc Gerard
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Stephen O'Leary
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17714. [PMID: 33077822 PMCID: PMC7573622 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
A new slim modiolar electrode (CI532/632) has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than conventional electrodes. Better modiolar proximity has been proposed to yield better electrode discrimination capability and potentially better speech outcomes, necessitating its efficient measurement. Currently, intracochlear positional index (ICPI), the most reliable indicator for evaluating modiolar proximity, has been measured exclusively through ‘metal artifact-less’ cone beam CT. However, popular use of this index is precluded due to lack of cone beam CT in many institutions. Thus, eyes are now on elucidation of easy-to-measure indicators of modiolar proximity derived from conventional CT, which is accessible in all centers. We observed that enhanced tomographic resolution significantly reduces partial volume artifacts, providing better visualization of modiolus-electrode distance. Aided by ultra-high kernel specification with high-resolution index, we developed a novel and easy-to-measure, conventional CT-specific indicator, “modified ICPI”, for evaluation of modiolar proximity. Further, we showed that it closely correlates with the previously proposed parameter of modiolar proximity, the spiral diameter, measured from post-insertion radiograph, reiterating the value of X-ray-based spiral diameter. Through this study, we have taken a step toward the stage of immediate visual feedback regarding modiolar proximity and changes in insertion technique intraoperatively, ensuring optimal modiolar proximity.
Collapse
|
16
|
The influence of Slim Modiolar electrode on residual hearing in pediatric patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:2723-2732. [PMID: 32897440 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06342-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing preservation cochlear implantation is an established procedure in patients with low-frequency residual hearing, especially in pediatric cochlear implantation. More delicate, thin electrode arrays can minimize damage in the inner ear and enhance the possibility for residual hearing preservation. The Cochlear® CI532 electrode has been reported as an electrode with the potential for residual hearing preservation. No similar studies pertaining to hearing preservation in pediatric patients have appeared to date. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Cochlear® CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode allows the preservation of low-frequency residual hearing in children undergoing cochlear implantation. METHODS In this multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective clinical cohort study, medical data of 14 pediatric patients implanted with the CI532 were collected. All patients had residual low-frequency hearing (preoperative audiogram or ABR with at least one threshold better than 90 dB HL at 125, 250, 500, or 1000 Hz). Postoperative thresholds were obtained 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS Based on the HEARRING classification, 78.6% of children (11/14) had complete hearing preservation at the last follow-up visit (12 months after CI, or if not available, 6 months). A total of 21.4% (3/14) had partial hearing preservation. At the last follow-up visit, neither minimal hearing preservation nor loss of hearing was observed. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 13 out of 14 patients (93%). CONCLUSIONS The residual hearing preservation results in children were superior to the results previously reported in adults.
Collapse
|
17
|
Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes. Ear Hear 2020; 42:323-333. [PMID: 32826506 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent studies have shown that cochlear duct length (CDL) varies among individuals and could significantly influence the final position of the electrode and its trajectory in the cochlea. Given this, we hypothesized that the degree of modiolar proximity of novel slim modiolar electrodes, such as CI532 and CI632, can also be affected by CDL. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively evaluated individual CDL to determine if there is any significant correlation of CDL with degree of modiolar proximity. METHODS Fifty-one ears from 38 subjects implanted with slim modiolar electrodes by a single surgeon through the round window approach using the pull-back technique were included. Our cohort was classified according to the deafness onset (congenital versus postlingual) and the degree of modiolar proximity (less versus tight) with reference to the spiral diameter made by the slim modiolar electrodes in situ on transorbital x ray. We then analyzed the CDL and its metrics using a readily available surgical preplanning tool (OTOPLAN) to obtain comparable data. RESULTS Among 30 ears associated with congenital deafness, 9 ears (30%) showed less modiolar proximity, while none of the 21 ears from 19 subjects with postlingual deafness exhibited "less modiolar proximity" based on our criteria. In this study, CDL showed significant variation among subjects. Importantly, a significant inverse correlation between spiral diameter and CDL (ρ = -0.581, p < 0.001) was found, showing that shorter CDLs have longer spiral diameter and less modiolar proximity. Moreover, further pull-back technique characterized by pulling out the electrode a little bit more in cases with shorter CDL, if not always, exhibited tighter modiolar proximity. CONCLUSION A preponderance of less modiolar proximity of the electrode was observed exclusively among congenital deafness cases, demonstrated by a less tight spiral configuration even under the pull-back technique. Our data suggest that shorter CDL is associated with a less tight spiral configuration of slim modiolar electrodes postoperatively. Depending on the insertion technique, the differential degree of modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes can be alleviated in cases with short CDL, which justifies cochlear duct length-based customized insertion of slim modiolar electrodes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Spitzer ER, Waltzman SB, Landsberger DM, Friedmann DR. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays. Audiol Neurootol 2020; 26:17-26. [PMID: 32721977 DOI: 10.1159/000507975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown an advantage for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) in cochlear implant (CI) patients with residual hearing, but the degree of benefit can vary. The objective was to explore which factors relate to performance with and acceptance of EAS for CI users with conventional-length electrodes. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted for adults with an average threshold of 75 dB hearing loss or better across 250 and 500 Hz preoperatively (n = 83). All patients underwent cochlear implantation with a conventional-length electrode. Low-frequency audiometric thresholds were measured at initial activation as well as 3 and 12 months postoperatively to determine who met the criteria for EAS. Speech perception for CNC words and AzBio sentences in quiet and +10 dB SNR noise was evaluated 3 and 12 months after activation. RESULTS Speech perception in quiet and noise was similar regardless of whether or not the patient was eligible for EAS. Less than half of the patients who met the EAS criteria chose to use it, citing reasons such as physical discomfort or lack of perceived benefit. EAS users performed better on CNC words but not sentence recognition than EAS nonusers. CONCLUSIONS EAS use is dependent on audiologic and nonaudiologic issues. Hearing preservation is possible with conventional electrodes, but hearing preservation alone does not guarantee superior speech perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Spitzer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan B Waltzman
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David M Landsberger
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David R Friedmann
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Evolution of Care of Cancers of the Head and Neck Region: State of the Science in 2020. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061543. [PMID: 32545409 PMCID: PMC7352543 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancers that arise in the head and neck region are comprised of a heterogeneous group of malignancies that include carcinogen- and human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven mucosal squamous cell carcinoma as well as skin cancers such as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. These malignancies develop in critical areas for eating, talking, and breathing and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality despite advances in treatment. Understanding of advances in the management of these various cancers is important for all multidisciplinary providers who care for patients across the cancer care continuum. Additionally, the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated adaptations to head and neck cancer care to accommodate the mitigation of COVID-19 risk and ensure timely treatment. This review explores advances in diagnostic criteria, prognostic factors, and management for subsites including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and the various forms of skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and melanoma). Then, this review summarizes emerging developments in immunotherapy, radiation therapy, cancer survivorship, and the delivery of care during the COVID-19 era.
Collapse
|
20
|
Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:1625-1635. [PMID: 32140773 PMCID: PMC7198645 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05893-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores. METHODS Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels. CONCLUSIONS In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.
Collapse
|
21
|
Iso-Mustajärvi M, Sipari S, Löppönen H, Dietz A. Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 277:367-375. [PMID: 31673779 PMCID: PMC6981311 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05708-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the insertion results and hearing preservation of a novel slim modiolar electrode (SME) in patients with residual hearing. Methods We retrospectively collected the data from the medical files of 17 patients (18 ears) implanted with a SME. All patients had functional low frequency hearing (PTA (0.125–0.5 kHz) ≤ 80 dB HL). The insertion results were re-examined from the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Postoperative thresholds were obtained at the time of switch-on of the sound processors (mean 43 days) and at latest follow-up (mean 582 days). The speech recognition in noise was measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test preoperatively and at follow-up. Results The mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 395°. Neither scala dislocations nor tip fold over were detected. There were no total hearing losses. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 15/18 (83%) ears at switch-on and in 14/17 (82%) ears at follow-up. According to HEARRING classification, 55% (10/18) had complete HP at switch-on and 41% (7/17) still at follow-up. Thirteen patients (14 ears) were initially fitted with electric–acoustic stimulation and seven patients (8 ears) continued to use it after follow-up. Conclusions The preliminary hearing preservation results with the SME were more favorable than reported for other perimodiolar electrodes. The results show that the array may also be feasible for electro-acoustic stimulation; it is beneficial in that it provides adequate cochlear coverage for pure electrical stimulation in the event of postoperative or progressive hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Iso-Mustajärvi
- University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70210, Kuopio, Finland. .,Kuopio University Hospital, Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, KNK-klinikka, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Sini Sipari
- University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.,Kuopio University Hospital, Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, KNK-klinikka, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heikki Löppönen
- University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.,Kuopio University Hospital, Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, KNK-klinikka, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Aarno Dietz
- University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|