Tildrakizumab for treating psoriasis

Psoriasis Treatments: Emerging Roles and Future Prospects of MicroRNAs

Psoriasis, a widespread and chronic inflammatory skin disorder, is marked by its persistence and the lack of a definitive cure. The pathogenesis of psoriasis is increasingly understood, with ongoing research highlighting the intricate interplay of genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. Recent advancements have illuminated the pivotal role of microRNAs in orchestrating complex processes in psoriasis and other hyperproliferative skin diseases. This narrative review highlights the emerging significance of miRNAs as key regulators in psoriasis pathogenesis and examines their potential as therapeutic targets. We discuss current treatment approaches and the promising future of miRNAs as next-generation therapeutic agents for this condition.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Existing Trials and Real-Life Data

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, the only biologic drugs approved for HS are adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, authorized in 2015, and secukinumab, recently licensed. The management of this condition is challenging as the available treatments show variable results, and the course of the condition is often chronic-recurrent; therefore, it will be necessary for the future to identify new therapeutic targets for HS. In recent years, studies have focused on the development towards new therapeutic targets. The purpose of our review was to perform a comprehensive literature review of real-life data on anti-IL23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) in HS to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. We selected 64 articles, among which 32 had the characteristics that we were looking for in our review. To date, the positive data expressed in real-life experiences contrast with the three existing Phase 2 studies conducted so far, where it seems that these drugs may be useful only for a subgroup of patients with HS whose features need to be elucidated. Data from Phase 3 studies and other real-life experiences, perhaps more detailed and with higher numbers, will certainly be needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs.

A narrative review on subcutaneous injection components used for alopecia

BACKGROUND

Studies reporting the development and effectiveness of topical agents for alopecia are available. However, it was difficult to demonstrate a direct advantage of subcutaneous injection rather than topical application. Since existing articles lack information, future studies are needed to solve these problems and to narrow the knowledge gap.

AIMS

Present article is aimed to review of the possible materials used in subcutaneous injection for alopecia with a hope for better guiding the analytic application and further evaluating the effective component for alopecia management.

METHODS

A wide range of clinical articles was retrieved using electronic databases to determine the possible components used in subcutaneous injection and their potential mechanism of action.

RESULTS

Eight components from 19 articles were found to be used for alopecia via subcutaneous administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study illuminated the curative effects of possible substances and discussed the efficacy of subcutaneous injections.

Therapeutic Development Based on the Immunopathogenic Mechanisms of Psoriasis

Psoriasis, a complex inflammatory autoimmune skin disorder that affects 2–3% of the global population, is thought to be genetically predetermined and induced by environmental and immunological factors. In the past decades, basic and clinical studies have significantly expanded knowledge on the molecular, cellular, and immunological mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Based on these pathogenic mechanisms, the current disease model emphasizes the role of aberrant Th1 and Th17 responses. Th1 and Th17 immune responses are regulated by a complex network of different cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23; signal transduction pathways downstream to the cytokine receptors; and various activated transcription factors, including NF-κB, interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), and signal transducer and activator of transcriptions (STATs). The biologics developed to specifically target the cytokines have achieved a better efficacy and safety for the systemic management of psoriasis compared with traditional treatments. Nevertheless, the current therapeutics can only alleviate the symptoms; there is still no cure for psoriasis. Therefore, the development of more effective, safe, and affordable therapeutics for psoriasis is important. In this review, we discussed the current trend of therapeutic development for psoriasis based on the recent discoveries in the immune modulation of the inflammatory response in psoriasis.

Tildrakizumab in the treatment of psoriasis: latest evidence and place in therapy

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that is clinically characterized by scaly cutaneous plaques. New evidence suggests that dysregulation of interleukin (IL)-23, a key cytokine in the T-helper-17 pathway, plays a vital role in the development of psoriatic systemic inflammation. The novel biologic medication tildrakizumab is among the first drugs with specific action against IL-23 that has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Tildrakizumab has been shown in large randomized controlled trials to be effective in improving skin manifestations as well as enhancing quality of life outcomes in patients with psoriasis. Its simple dosing, prolonged duration of action, and mild adverse event profile make it a practical option for patients; however, only a small number of trials have investigated the clinical effectiveness of tildrakizumab, and long-term data regarding the drug's efficacy and safety are currently limited. Hence, further research is needed to better understand the risks and benefits of tildrakizumab. This review summarizes and analyzes phase I, phase II, and phase III clinical trials that investigate the mechanism, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of tildrakizumab. It also identifies areas in which additional studies are warranted to further elucidate the advantages of tildrakizumab over other biologic therapies.

Tildrakizumab for the treatment of psoriasis

Introduction: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated skin disease amenable to targeted immunotherapy. Tildrakizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19 and is approved for use in moderate to severe psoriasis. Areas covered: This article reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of tildrakizumab, administered subcutaneously every 12 weeks, in treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Expert commentary: In two phase 3 clinical trials, tildrakizumab showed a consistent low occurrence of adverse events, underlining safety and tolerance. The long half-life permits subcutaneous injections every 12 weeks. Seventy eight percent of patients achieved PASI 75 (a > 75% improvement from baseline PASI) at 28 weeks, 58% achieved PASI 90, 29% achieved PASI 100 and 70% achieved a Physician's Global Assessment score of clear or almost clear. A high proportion of patients maintained PASI response after 2 years of treatment. Tildrakizumab improved Dermatology Life Quality Index, psoriasis-related personal relationship problems and sexual difficulties. Baseline PASI score, PGA, and BMI were not predictive of PASI 90 response at week 12, however achievement of PASI 50 by week 8 was predictive of a PASI 90 response at week 12.

Review of safety and efficacy of approved systemic psoriasis therapies

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease which affects nearly 3% of the adult US population. Due to the chronic nature of the disease and need for long-term treatment, psoriasis is associated with substantial disease burden and negative impact on patients' quality of life. In the past, systemic agents such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin have been the mainstay treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Multiple new molecular targets have been recently identified, and novel biologic therapies directed at these targets have been approved leading to a paradigm shift in psoriasis management. However, despite the availability of several treatment options and continued introduction of highly efficacious biologics, undertreatment of psoriasis patients remains a huge problem. This can be largely attributed to several causes including high cost of biologics, lack of experience, and reluctance of practitioners to initiate or switch to systemic treatment regimens in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. In this article, we aim to provide a concise review of mechanism, safety, and efficacy of the approved systemic treatments for psoriasis.

A safety evaluation of guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG1λ antibody for the treatment of plaque psoriasis that inhibits interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit, reducing the proliferation of type 17 helper T (Th-17) cells and thus production of Th-17-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-17 and IL-22. Areas covered: In the following article, the mechanism of action and mainly the efficacy and safety profile of guselkumab available from results of trials will be discussed. We summarized these data after a literature review including PubMed search, relating proceedings and abstracts from relevant international conferences, assessment reports from European and United States regulatory agencies and treatment guidelines up to April 2018. Expert opinion: The central role of IL-23 in psoriasis pathogenesis is supported by genetic links of IL-23 and IL-23R alleles to psoriasis susceptibility; early clinical trials have demonstrated that sufficient inhibition of IL-23p19 results in rapid resolution of the disease. Targeting IL-23, may be responsible for the high efficacy and durable responses of guselkumab, avoiding some adverse effects of IL-17A blockade, like mucocutaneous candida infections or triggering/worsening of inflammatory bowel disease, experienced with agents acting selectively against this molecule and that seem to be class related.

Monoclonal antibodies inhibiting IL-12, -23, and -17 for the treatment of psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated skin condition that affects 3 to 4% of the adult US population, characterized by well-demarcated, erythematous plaques with silver scale. Psoriasis is associated with many comorbidities including cardiometabolic disease and can have a negative impact on quality of life. The current armamentarium of psoriasis treatment includes topical therapies, phototherapy, oral immunosuppressive therapies, and biologic agents. Over the past 2 decades, there has been rapid development of novel biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This article will review the role of IL-12, IL-23, and IL-17 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and the monoclonal antibodies (ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) that target these cytokines in the treatment of this disease.

Pharmacokinetics of Tildrakizumab (MK-3222), an Anti-IL-23 Monoclonal Antibody, After Intravenous or Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Subjects

Tildrakizumab, a high-affinity humanized IgG1k antibody that selectively binds interleukin (IL)-23 p19 subunit of cytokine IL-23 and neutralizes its function, is under investigation for treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to assess the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and safety/tolerability of single ascending doses of tildrakizumab after intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) dosing in healthy subjects. P05661 was a phase 1, single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled study of tildrakizumab IV doses of 0.1, 0.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg, or placebo. P05776 was a phase 1, single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled study of tildrakizumab SC doses of 50 or 200 mg, or placebo. After either single IV or SC dosing, tildrakizumab exhibited slow systemic clearance (CL), limited volume of distribution and a long t_1/2 . Both the C_max and the area under the curve (AUC) increased proportionally with doses from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg, or 50-200 mg. The bioavailability of SC dosing was ~80% (90% CI: 62-103%) for 50 mg and ~73% (90% CI: 46-115%) for 200 mg, respectively, versus 0.5 and 3 mg/kg IV. Across both studies, six of 43 evaluable subjects were positive for post-dose antidrug antibodies; two of these were positive for neutralizing antibodies. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild; the most frequent AEs included upper respiratory tract infection and headache. Single doses of tildrakizumab 0.1, 0.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg administered IV or single doses of 50 and 200 mg administered SC were safe and well tolerated in healthy adult subjects.

GATA3, HDAC6, and BCL6 Regulate FOXP3+ Treg Plasticity and Determine Treg Conversion into Either Novel Antigen-Presenting Cell-Like Treg or Th1-Treg

We conducted an experimental database analysis to determine the expression of 61 CD4+ Th subset regulators in human and murine tissues, cells, and in T-regulatory cells (Treg) in physiological and pathological conditions. We made the following significant findings: (1) adipose tissues of diabetic patients with insulin resistance upregulated various Th effector subset regulators; (2) in skin biopsy from patients with psoriasis, and in blood cells from patients with lupus, effector Th subset regulators were more upregulated than downregulated; (3) in rosiglitazone induced failing hearts in ApoE-deficient (KO) mice, various Th subset regulators were upregulated rather than downregulated; (4) aortic endothelial cells activated by proatherogenic stimuli secrete several Th subset-promoting cytokines; (5) in Treg from follicular Th (Tfh)-transcription factor (TF) Bcl6 KO mice, various Th subset regulators were upregulated; whereas in Treg from Th2-TF GATA3 KO mice and HDAC6 KO mice, various Th subset regulators were downregulated, suggesting that Bcl6 inhibits, GATA3 and HDAC6 promote, Treg plasticity; and (6) GATA3 KO, and Bcl6 KO Treg upregulated MHC II molecules and T cell co-stimulation receptors, suggesting that GATA3 and BCL6 inhibit Treg from becoming novel APC-Treg. Our data implies that while HDAC6 and Bcl6 are important regulators of Treg plasticity, GATA3 determine the fate of plastic Tregby controlling whether it will convert in to either Th1-Treg or APC-T-reg. Our results have provided novel insights on Treg plasticity into APC-Treg and Th1-Treg, and new therapeutic targets in metabolic diseases, autoimmune diseases, and inflammatory disorders.