Ligelizumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria

New biologics for food allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore role of emerging biologics, including ligelizumab, UB-221, dupilumab, and antialarmins, in food allergy management. With a focus on recent developments, we evaluate their promise in mitigating adverse events during oral immunotherapy (OIT), reducing allergic reactions, and addressing the limitations of current therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiimmunoglobulin E mAbs, exemplified by omalizumab, demonstrate efficacy in desensitization and safety improvement during multiallergen OIT. Next-generation antibodies like ligelizumab and UB-221 exhibit enhanced potency and unique mechanisms, holding promise for food allergy treatment. Dupilumab, targeting IL-4 receptor alpha, presents potential benefits in decreasing allergen-specific IgE and modifying the atopic march. Exploration of antialarmins, specifically anti-IL-33 (etokimab) and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab), reveals encouraging results, with etokimab showing early success in peanut allergy trials.

SUMMARY

Biologics hold promising potential for food allergy treatment. Tailoring therapeutic approaches based on shared decision-making becomes pivotal. While omalizumab remains a significant option, next-generation anti-IgE antibodies and agents targeting alarmins exhibit unique strengths. Dupilumab, despite limited success as monotherapy, shows promise as an adjunct for OIT. Careful consideration of treatment goals, patient preferences, and the evolving landscape of biologics will shape future clinical practice, offering allergists an expanded toolbox for personalized food allergy management.

Biologic therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria in pediatrics and adolescents: current landscape, challenges, and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) poses significant challenges, especially in pediatric and adolescent patients, impacting physical, emotional, and social well-being. Recent biologic breakthroughs offer promise, however, data on safety and efficacy in this population remain limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines current biologic treatments in pediatrics and adolescents with CSU and explores the rapidly emerging landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite omalizumab's approval for allergic asthma in children since 2009, its delayed approval for CSU raises questions. Ligelizumab, a next-generation anti-IgE mAb, showed effectiveness in adults but lacks pediatric studies. CT-P39, a biosimilar to omalizumab, demonstrates promise, yet adolescent-specific outcomes are undisclosed. Dupilumab's recent approval for atopic dermatitis in children from 6 months onwards signifies progress. Expert opinion underscores the scarcity of controlled trials in pediatric and adolescent CSU, emphasizing the need for comprehensive studies. Age-specific data and collaboration are crucial for addressing research gaps and expanding indications for pediatric CSU treatment. The recently validated UAS7 parameter in children marks a milestone for prospective clinical trials. Despite challenges, the biology therapy outlook for pediatric and adolescent CSU is promising. Importantly, studies indicate that pediatric CSU is at least as prevalent as in adults, highlighting the need for approved treatments in this population.

Resistant Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria - A Case Series Narrative Review of Treatment Options

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be extremely debilitating to the patient and challenging for the treating clinician. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (UK) recommendation of omalizumab for patients who fail to respond to high-dose anti-histamines has improved treatment options and quality of life. However, there is still lack of clear guidelines for treatment of patients resistant to standard and anti-IgE therapies.

Methods

We discuss the therapeutic strategies employed among nine extremely resistant CSU cases and the heterogeneity between guidelines from different societies.

Results

Patients with anti-histamine-resistant urticaria either remained on omalizumab or started on immunosuppressive drugs (dapsone or ciclosporin) when they stopped responding to omalizumab. We used clinical assessment, skin biopsies (when available) and previous published reports to consider dapsone (for predominantly neutrophilic infiltration), or ciclosporin at doses between 2 and 4 mg/kg/day. One patient with ciclosporin-resistant urticaria responded to mycophenolate mofetil. Two patients remain on long-term omalizumab due to its relative safety and efficacy including 1 patient with underlying antibody deficiency where omalizumab was preferred over risks of using immunosuppressive medications.

Conclusions

These case studies bring to light the real-world difficulties in managing patients with resistant CSU and the need for generating the evidence base on alternative therapeutic options such as synergistic use of biologics and immunosuppressive drugs.

Monoclonal Antibodies in Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: New Drugs for an Old Disease

Background: H1-antihistamines (H1AH) represent the current mainstay of treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, the response to H1AH is often unsatisfactory, even with increased doses. Therefore, guidelines recommend the use of omalizumab as an add-on treatment in refractory CSU. This paved the way for the investigation of targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in CSU. Methods: A literature review was conducted including papers published between 2009 and 2022 and ongoing trials about the efficacy and safety of mAbs as treatment for CSU. Results: Twenty-nine articles, a trial with preliminary results, and seventeen ongoing or completed clinical trials on the use of mAbs in CSU were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analysis, and real-life studies have proven the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab as a third-line treatment in refractory CSU. However, a percentage of patients remain unresponsive to omalizumab. Therefore, other mAbs, targeting different pathways, have been used off-label in case series and others are under investigation in RCTs. Most of them have showed promising results. Conclusions: Omalizumab remains the best choice to treat refractory CSU. Although results from other mAbs seem to be encouraging to achieve symptom control in refractory CSU, thus improving patients’ QoL, RCTs are needed to confirm their effectiveness and safety.

Current and Future Approaches in Management of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Using Anti-IgE Antibodies

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) considerably alters patients’ quality of life, often for extended periods, due to pruriginous skin lesions, impaired sleep, unexpected development of angioedema, and failure of conventional treatments in properly controlling signs and symptoms. Recent research focused on the development of new therapeutic agents with higher efficacy. Although the production of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies against certain allergens is not a characteristic of the disease, treatment with omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, proved efficient and safe in patients with moderate to severe chronic spontaneous urticaria uncontrolled by H1-antihistamines. Ligelizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, may also efficiently relieve symptoms of unresponsive chronic urticaria to standard therapies. This comprehensive review aims to present recently acquired knowledge on managing chronic spontaneous urticaria with new anti-IgE antibodies. We conducted extensive research on the main databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) with no restrictions on the years covered, using the search terms “anti-IgE antibodies”, “omalizumab”, “ligelizumab”, and “chronic spontaneous urticaria”. The inclusion criteria were English written articles, and the exclusion criteria were animal-related studies. ClinicalTrials.gov was also reviewed for recent relevant clinical trials related to CSU treatment. CSU is a challenging disease with a significant effect on patients’ quality of life. Current therapies often fail to control signs and symptoms, and additional treatment is needed. New biologic therapies against IgE antibodies and FcεRIα receptors are currently under investigation in advanced clinical trials. We reviewed recently published data on CSU management using these novel treatments. The development of new and improved treatments for CSU will lead to a more personalized therapeutical approach for patients and provide guidance for physicians in better understanding disease mechanisms. However, some agents are still in clinical trials, and more research is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of these treatments.

Pruritus: A Sensory Symptom Generated in Cutaneous Immuno-Neuronal Crosstalk

Pruritus or itch generated in the skin is one of the most widespread symptoms associated with various dermatological and systemic (immunological) conditions. Although many details about the molecular mechanisms of the development of both acute and chronic itch were uncovered in the last 2 decades, our understanding is still incomplete and the clinical management of pruritic conditions is one of the biggest challenges in daily dermatological practice. Recent research revealed molecular interactions between pruriceptive sensory neurons and surrounding cutaneous cell types including keratinocytes, as well as resident and transient cells of innate and adaptive immunity. Especially in inflammatory conditions, these cutaneous cells can produce various mediators, which can contribute to the excitation of pruriceptive sensory fibers resulting in itch sensation. There also exists significant communication in the opposite direction: sensory neurons can release mediators that maintain an inflamed, pruritic tissue-environment. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the sensory transduction of pruritus detailing the local intercellular interactions that generate itch. We especially emphasize the role of various pruritic mediators in the bidirectional crosstalk between cutaneous non-neuronal cells and sensory fibers. We also list various dermatoses and immunological conditions associated with itch, and discuss the potential immune-neuronal interactions promoting the development of pruritus in the particular diseases. These data may unveil putative new targets for antipruritic pharmacological interventions.

Emerging treatments for chronic urticaria

INTRODUCTION

Across the globe, chronic urticaria (CU), i.e. chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU), is common, long-persisting and difficult to manage. Still, at least one-fifth is not sufficiently controlled by guideline-recommended treatment with H1-antihistamines and add-on therapy with the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab.

AREAS COVERED

Using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Congress websites, and websites of the manufacturers, this review explored the pipeline, namely anti-IgE-, anti-cytokine-, anti-receptor biologics, and small molecules, in clinical development for CU.

EXPERT OPINION

The CU pipeline is promising. While three omalizumab biosimilars are investigated, the assumed early approval of ligelizumab will expand the effective and safe anti-IgE approach observed with omalizumab. For other anti-IgEs like UB-221, the development is behind. Data are too limited so far to clearly define the role of anti-cytokine and anti-cytokine receptor biologics such as dupilumab, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and CDX-0159, of which only dupilumab is actually investigated in phase 3. Among three selective oral BTK inhibitors, remibrutinib, rilzabrutinib, and fenebrutinib, the development of remibrutinib is most advanced (phase 3). As the pipeline addresses different targets, study results will give deeper insights into the pathomechanisms of CU. Hopefully, in the next future additional approved and also more targeted approaches will be available.

Anti-IgE for the Treatment of Chronic Urticaria

Urticaria and angioedema are very common. Management of chronic urticaria subtypes, which usually persist for many years, is challenging. Recent years have demonstrated that targeting IgE with antibodies provides a safe and efficient treatment approach. Whilst several anti-IgE antibodies have been developed, omalizumab is currently the only one approved for use. International and national guidelines recommend its use after failure of antihistamines at standard and increased dose. Whilst not yet approved, many new anti-IgE approaches are currently being investigated in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials. This non-systematic focused review summarizes current knowledge of omalizumab and other anti-IgE biologics in chronic urticaria using data extracted from PubMed, Google Scholar and clinical trial databases, clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrials.eu. For adults, there is good evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world data that symptomatic treatment with omalizumab is efficacious and safe in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), whereas evidence in chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU) and special populations is limited. Easy-to-use tools to identify non-responders and predict the required duration of treatment have not been established yet. Phase 2 b results of ligelizumab have not only demonstrated efficacy and safety but also superiority to omalizumab. Indeed, there is preliminary evidence that omalizumab non- or partial responders benefit from ligelizumab. Whereas further development of quilizumab was discontinued, other approaches, eg UB-221 or DARPins are under investigation. Anti-IgE treatment with omalizumab represents a landmark in the treatment of chronic urticaria, with and without angioedema, and there is light on the horizon suggesting success may come with various next-generation anti-IgE approaches.