Association between objective response rate and overall survival in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with radioembolization: a systematic literature review and regression analysis

Role of Radioembolization in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The liver is the most common site of metastasis for neuroendocrine tumors originating from the gastrointestinal tract. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) portend a worsening clinical course, making local management important. Local treatment options include surgery, thermal ablation, and trans-catheter intra-arterial therapies, such as radioembolization. Radioembolization is generally preferred over other embolotherapies in patients with colonized biliary systems. Current best practice involves personalized treatment planning, optimizing tumor radiation absorbed dose and minimizing radiation to the normal hepatic parenchyma. As part of a multidisciplinary approach, radioembolization is a versatile embolotherapy offering neoadjuvant, palliative, and ablative treatment options for patients with NELMs.

Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) in response assessment of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NET): a feasibility study

Background

In patients with hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) locoregional therapies such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are increasingly applied. Response evaluation remains challenging and previous studies assessing response with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have been inconclusive.

Purpose

To perform a feasibility study to evaluate if response assessment with quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with liver metastases of NETs after TARE will be possible.

Material and Methods

Retrospectively, 43 patients with 120 target lesions who obtained abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI 39±28 days before and 74±46 days after TARE were included. Intralesional ADC (ADC_min, ADC_max, and ADC_mean) were measured for a maximum number of three lesions per patient on baseline and post-interventional DWI. Tumor response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST.

Results

TARE resulted in partial remission (PR) in 23% (63%), in stable disease (SD) in 73% (23%), in progressive disease (PD) in 5% (7%) and in complete response (CR) in 0% (1%) according to RECIST 1.1 (mRECIST, respectively). ADC values increased significantly (P<0.005) after TARE in the PR group whereas there was no significant change in the PD group. Post-therapeutic ADC values of SD lesions increased significantly when evaluated by RECIST 1.1 but not if evaluated by mRECIST. Percentual changes of ADC_mean values were slightly higher for responders compared to non-responders (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ADC values seem to represent an additional marker for treatment response evaluation after TARE in patients with secondary hepatic NET. A conclusive study seems feasible though patient-based evaluation and overall survival and progression free survival as alternate primary endpoints should be considered.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10-20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. PREAMBLE: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Short- and Long-Term Assessment of Tumor Response of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases (NELM) Following Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE)

Simple Summary

TARE with ⁹⁰Yttrium has become a valuable treatment option for patients with unresectable NELMs. However, early evaluation of therapy response remains challenging as size-based response assessments (such as RECIST) are known to be limited, especially in slow-growing tumors. Alternatives such as quantitative evaluation of SUV of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and ADC of DWI-MRI have not been compared so far. We found that early percentage changes in SUV tumor-to-organ ratios on first follow-up after TARE could predict longer HPFS in patients with NELM and were superior to ΔSUVmax/SUVmean alone or to ΔADC.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SUV and ADC in assessing early response in patients with NELM following TARE. Thirty-two patients with pre- and postinterventional MRI with DWI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were included. ADC and SUV of three target lesions and of tumor-free spleen and liver tissue were determined on baseline and first follow-up imaging, and tumor to spleen (T/S) and tumor to liver (T/L) ratios were calculated. Response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST on first follow-up, and long-term response was defined as hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) over 6, 12, and <24 months. In responders, intralesional ADC values increased and SUV decreased significantly regardless of standard of reference for response assessment (mRECIST/RECIST/HPFS > 6/12/24 m). Using ROC analysis, ΔSUV T/S ratio (max/max) and ΔSUV T/L ratio (max/mean) were found to be the best and most robust metrics to correlate with longer HPFS and were superior to ΔADC. ΔT/S ratio (max/max) < 23% was identified as an optimal cut-off to discriminate patients with longer HPFS (30.2 m vs. 13.4 m; p = 0.0002). In conclusion, early percentage changes in SUV tumor-to-organ ratios on first follow-up seem to represent a prognostic marker for longer HPFS and may help in assessing therapeutic strategies.