Changing paradigms for targeted therapies against diffuse infiltrative gliomas: tackling a moving target

Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine: A New Frontier for the Treatment of Brain Tumors

Brain tumors are a widespread and serious neurological phenomenon that can be life- threatening. The computing field has allowed for the development of artificial intelligence (AI), which can mimic the neural network of the human brain. One use of this technology has been to help researchers capture hidden, high-dimensional images of brain tumors. These images can provide new insights into the nature of brain tumors and help to improve treatment options. AI and precision medicine (PM) are converging to revolutionize healthcare. AI has the potential to improve cancer imaging interpretation in several ways, including more accurate tumor genotyping, more precise delineation of tumor volume, and better prediction of clinical outcomes. AI-assisted brain surgery can be an effective and safe option for treating brain tumors. This review discusses various AI and PM techniques that can be used in brain tumor treatment. These new techniques for the treatment of brain tumors, i.e., genomic profiling, microRNA panels, quantitative imaging, and radiomics, hold great promise for the future. However, there are challenges that must be overcome for these technologies to reach their full potential and improve healthcare.

Lower-Grade Gliomas: Predicting DNA Methylation Subtyping and its Consequences on Survival with MR Features

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To explore associations between MR imaging features, DNA methylation subtyping, and survival in lower-grade gliomas (LGG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MR data from 170 patients generated with the Cancer Imaging Archive were reviewed. The correlation was evaluated by Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson Chi-Square and binary regression analysis. Survival analysis was conducted by using time-dependent ROC analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method (the worst prognosis subgroup).

RESULTS

Identified were 9 (5.3%) M1-subtype, 18 (10.6%) M2-subtype, 48 (28.2%) M3-subtype, 31 (18.2%) M4-subtype and 64 (37.6%) M5-subtype. Patients with M4-subtype had the shortest median OS (49.3 vs. 28.4) months(p < 0.05). The time-dependent ROC for the M4-subtype was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.95) for survival at 12 months, 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.94) for survival at 24 months, and 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.62-0.86) for survival at 36 months. After uni- and multivariate analysis, a nomogram was built based on proportion contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor, extranodular growth, volume_{_cutoff_median}, and location. For the prediction of M4-subtype, the nomogram showed good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886 (95% CI: 0.820-952) and was well calibrated. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, volume ≥60cm³ (OR: 0.200; p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.048-0.834) was associated with M1-subtype (AUC: 0.690). Hemorrhage (OR: 5.443; p = 0.002; 95%CI: 1.844-16.069) and volume > median (OR: 3.256; p = 0.05; 95%CI: 0.992-10.686) were associated with M2-subtype (AUC: 0.733). Proportion CE tumor<=5% (OR: 3.968; P=0.002; 95%CI: 1.634-9.635) was associated with M3-subtype (AUC: 0.632). Poorly-defined (OR: 2.258; p = 0.05; 95%CI: 1.000-5.101) and volume > median (OR: 2.447; p = 0.01; 95%CI: 1.244-4.813) were associated with M5-subtype (AUC: 0.645). Decision curve analysis indicated predictions for all models were clinically useful.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary radiogenomics analysis of lower-grade gliomas demonstrated associations between MR features and DNA methylation subtyping. The shortest survival was observed in patients with M4-subtype. And we have constructed nomogram that enables more accurate predictions of M4-subtype.