Probiotics for the neonate

Dealing with the remaining controversies of probiotic safety

A clear safety profile of probiotics in clinical practice is essential in decision-making for all stakeholders and regulators. Probiotics have been investigated in different target populations, conditions and age groups. This also includes the use of probiotics in critically ill patients. Despite promising results reported with the use of probiotics and synbiotics, there is still a lively discussion regarding the proper and safe use of probiotics among physicians, researchers and regulators. This doubt and debate was sparked by the high incidence in mortality reported in a study with critically ill patients. Whereas no causal relationship has been established since, safety of probiotic has been questioned. In response, an overwhelming body of evidence suggesting that probiotics are safe has been compiled. Moreover, data indicates that probiotics reduce the number of adverse events compared to the control. However, due to a lack of standardised safety reporting in clinical studies, a strong evidence base on probiotic safety remains to be established. Here, we will discuss: (1) the rationale for using probiotics in the critically ill; (2) what happened during the Dutch Pancreatitis trial; (3) what are the known safety risks of probiotics based on the available data; and finally (4) how standardisation in safety reporting can drive probiotic innovation. Building a strong safety profile for probiotic strains will solidify its use in individuals that can benefit the most from microbial modulation.

Role of lactoferrin in neonatal care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lactoferrin (LF) is present in breast milk and have numerous properties including antimicrobial, antiviral, antifungal, and anticancer. Recent studies have emphasized the role of LF in neonatal care Aims and objective: To evaluate the various roles of LF in neonatal care in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

The literature search was done for this systematic review by searching the electronic database namely Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Index Copernicus, African Index Medicus (AIM), Thomson Reuters (ESCI), Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), SCIWIN (Scientific World Index), Google Scholar, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System (LILACS), Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR), Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region (IMSEAR), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM), various sites for ongoing trials namely clinical trial registry ( www.clinicaltrials.gov , www.controlled-trials.com , Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.anzctr.org.au ), Indian Clinical Trials Registry ( http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials ), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry, and Platform ( http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/ ) and abstracts of conferences namely proceedings of Pediatric Academic Societies (American Pediatric Society, Society for Pediatric Research, and European Society for Pediatric Research).

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies were analyzed that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. Six duplicate publications were excluded from review. Four studies were excluded due to nonfulfillment of inclusion criteria. All of the studies had more than one outcome of interest. Four studies showed reduction in late onset sepsis (LOS), one showed reduction in invasive fungal infection (IFI), three showed significant decrease in incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), one showed reduction in NEC scares, and two showed decrease in mortality, and one showed decrease in combined death and/or NEC. Only one study evaluated role of LF for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) reduction and showed lower rate of VAP. Still the role of LF in Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is unclear.

CONCLUSION

LF has shown to be promising agent for reduction of LOS and NEC. The role of LF in prevention of neonatal mortality, BPD, and ROP needs further studies. The trials that are going on around the world may be able to give reply of this question in future.

Saccharomyces boulardii for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a randomized, controlled study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of orally administered Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) for reducing the incidence and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.

METHODS

A prospective, randomised controlled trial was conducted in infants with gestational age ≤32 weeks and birth weight ≤1500 g. The study group received S. boulardii supplementation, and the control group did not. The primary outcomes were death or NEC (Bell's stage ≥2), and secondary outcomes were feeding intolerance and clinical or culture-proven sepsis.

RESULTS

A total of 271 infants were enrolled in the study, 135 in the study group and 136 in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of death (3.7% vs. 3.6%, 95% CI of the difference, -5.20-5.25; p = 1.0) or NEC (4.4% vs. 5.1%, 95% CI, -0.65-5.12; p = 1.0) between the groups. However, feeding intolerance and clinical sepsis were significantly lower in the probiotic group compared with control.

CONCLUSION

Although Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation at a dose of 250 mg/day was not effective at reducing the incidence of death or NEC in VLBW infants, it improved feeding tolerance and reduced the risk of clinical sepsis.

Routine Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG administration in VLBW infants: a retrospective, 6-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

In preterm neonates, use of probiotic mixtures is increasingly popular and is effective in preventing NEC, fungal colonization, and improving feeding tolerance. However, concerns exist about safety and tolerability of long-lasting administration of living microrganisms to not-immunocompetent hosts. We report a 6-year, two-NICUs experience of routinary Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) use in VLBW infants.

METHODS

Clinical charts review, retrospective study of VLBW infants admitted to two Italian NICUs in the years 2003-2008. Standard protocol of LGG administration consisted of 3 x 10⁹ CFU/day, in single oral dose, since 4th day-of-life, for 4-to-6-week courses. Nutritional policy relied on administration of fresh, expressed mother's milk, supplementation with preterm formula if needed. Data about LGG safety and tolerability, infections, feeding tolerance, microbiological clinical and surveillance cultures were retrieved and analysed.

RESULTS

Complete data were obtained for 743 of 811 VLBW infants. Mean birth-weight was 1056 g; mean gestational age 29.5 weeks. A total of 17,108 LGG doses were administered (mean 23.1/infant). No adverse effects or intolerances putatively attributable to LGG occurred. Overall, 5350 clinical and surveillance cultures from 13 different sites/devices were performed (mean: 7.2 cultures from 6.5 different sites/infant). None ever grew LGG, or other Lactobacilli. No clinical sepsis episode was attributable to LGG. Full enteral feeding was achieved at 19.2 mean days-of-life; 73% of infants were exclusively/partially breastfed. Fourteen NEC cases occurred (=1.9%), with 5 (=0.7%) being>2b stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinary supplementation of probiotic LGG in a large, 6-year VLBW infants Italian cohort proved microbiologically safe and clinically well tolerated.