Demographic and perinatal outcome data of fetuses with SUA/PRUV

Diagnosis of single umbilical artery and risk of foetal congenital malformations by prenatal ultrasound: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Single umbilical artery (SUA) is strongly associated with foetal structural abnormalities; however, the exact pattern of this association has not been described. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of malformations in singleton pregnancies with SUA in China and to study the association between the absent side of the umbilical artery and foetal malformations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies for which routine first-trimester anatomical screening was performed at 11+ 0-13+ 6 gestational weeks and, if the pregnancy continued, a second-trimester scan was performed at 20+ 0-24+ 0 weeks. Data were extracted from records at the referral centre, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, between January 2011 and April 2019 (n = 47,894). Using logistic regression, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for malformations associated with SUA.

RESULTS

The incidence of SUA in our study was 2.0% (970/47,894). Of all foetuses with SUA, 387 (39.9%) had structural malformations. The malformation type varied, with cardiovascular complications being the most common. A robust association was observed between SUA and oesophageal stenosis or atresia (OR: 25.33), followed by cardiovascular (OR: 9.98-24.02), scoliosis (OR: 18.62), genitourinary (OR: 2.45-15.66), and brain malformations (OR: 4.73-9.12). The absence of the left umbilical artery (n = 445, 45.9%) was consistent with that of the right umbilical artery (n = 431, 44.4%). Furthermore, a significantly higher rate of an absent right than the left umbilical artery (p<0.01) was observed in SUA with foetal abnormalities than in SUA with no malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we observed a higher risk of various specific malformations in foetuses with SUA, and a strong association between SUA and oesophageal stenosis or atresia. The absence of the right umbilical artery was most common in foetuses with SUA and structural malformations. This study provides a reference for ultrasonographers in conducting foetal structural screening for pregnant women with SUA.

Incidence of congenital heart disease in fetuses diagnosed with single isolated umbilical artery. Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the proportion of heart disease in fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of a single isolated umbilical artery.

METHODS

We performed a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to the present. We assessed the risk of bias and performed a meta-analysis. We completed the subgroup analysis according to the region.

RESULTS

We found 1384 studies by the search strategy. After carefully reviewing the full-text, 15 studies were included. A total of 2008 fetuses with a single isolated umbilical artery were included, and 177 had cardiac malformations. There was an overall incidence of 9% 95%CI (0.05-0.14) I2 90%. The incidence by country of origin was between 5% and 19%. The most common heart disease reported was a ventricular septal defect. Seven studies were found describing 25 cases. We described other malformations, such as tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta, and hypoplastic left ventricle, among others.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of congenital heart disease in fetuses with a single isolated umbilical artery was high. In addition, half of these correspond to significant heart disease. Based on the above, we suggest that fetuses with a single isolated umbilical artery should have a complete anatomic evaluation emphasizing cardiac evaluation.

Persistent Right Umbilical Vein in Association With Single Umbilical Artery: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Persistent right umbilical vein (PRUV) and single umbilical artery (SUA) are developmental malformations of the vascular system. In isolation, these are not rare, but the presence of these two malformations together is not very common. When they are present together, there are increased chances of associated congenital anomalies, especially anomalies of the vascular system. So, when these two coexist, a detailed examination of all other organ systems, especially the cardiovascular system, should be conducted. The accurate evaluation of such vascular malformations during fetal life is needed to provide adequate antenatal counseling, the timing of delivery, and appropriate post-natal care. We report a case of a primigravida who was diagnosed with PRUV and SUA in the fifth month of gestation. In this article, we discuss this case's management with a literature review. The anomaly scan done at around 21 weeks revealed a two-vesseled umbilical cord with an SUA and PRUV. Apart from this, there were no other structural anomalies. The patient had preterm delivery at 35 weeks 5 days gestation period and delivered a 2.6 kg male baby.

Prenatal diagnosis of persistent right umbilical vein - Incidence and clinical impact. A prospective study

Background

Persistent right umbilical vein (PRUV) is usually an isolated finding but it may be accompanied by other fetal malformations.

Aims

We aimed to determine the incidence of prenatally diagnosed PRUV in a referral population, assess the neonatal outcome and discuss the findings together with those from previous publications.

Materials and methods

A total of 2360 women with low‐risk singleton pregnancies were examined in the second and third trimesters. A transabdominal convex volume transducer was used. B‐mode was applied in each patient. Scanning of the venous system included imaging of the target vessels with two‐dimensional colour Doppler mapping. The diagnosis of PRUV was made in a transverse section of the fetal abdomen. Three‐dimensional ultrasounds were performed as necessary, when anomalous cases were encountered.

Results

The incidence of PRUV in our population was 12/2360 = 0.5%, and it was higher than in other retrospective studies. In 75% (n = 9), PRUV was an isolated finding where delivery was uneventful and the postnatal outcome was favourable. In two cases PRUV was accompanied by omphalocele, and in one case by tetralogy of Fallot and single umbilical artery.

Conclusions

PRUV is an uncommon prenatal finding. Screening for this anomaly can be easily performed in all pregnant patients. A diagnosis of PRUV should be followed by a thorough fetal morphology scan in order to exclude any other malformations, especially those of the cardiovascular system.