Age at menarche and the risk of operative delivery

Early or late menarche is associated with reduced fecundability in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study

STUDY QUESTION

Is age at menarche associated with fecundability?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Both early (<11 years) and late (>15 years) menarche is associated with decreased fecundability.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous studies on age at menarche and fecundability have been inconclusive. Women with early or late menarche are at increased risks of gynaecological and autoimmune diseases that may affect their ability to conceive.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 67 613 pregnant women, participating in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study between 1999 and 2008, with self-reported information on age at menarche and time to pregnancy. We included planned pregnancies that were conceived either naturally or with the help of assisted reproductive technologies.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We calculated fecundability ratios (FRs) with 95% CIs representing the cycle-specific probability of conception by categories of age at menarche. FRs were adjusted for participants' pre-pregnancy body mass index, highest completed or ongoing education level, and age at initiation of trying to conceive.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We observed a 7% lower probability of conceiving during any given menstrual cycle up to 12 cycles in women with early or late menarche. Among women with menarche >15 years, the adjusted FR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), and among women with menarche <11 years, the adjusted FR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.99), when compared to women with menarche between 12 and 14 years.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study-population consisted of women pregnant in their second trimester, excluding those with persistent infertility. Recall of age at menarche and time to pregnancy may be inaccurate.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Both early (<11 years) and late (>15 years) menarche was associated with decreased fecundability. Women experiencing early menarche or late menarche may be counselled accordingly.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, and by Telemark Hospital Trust, Porsgrunn, Norway and was partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its centres of excellence funding scheme (project number 262700) and the Research Council of Norway (project no. 320656). The project was co-funded by the European Union (ERC, BIOSFER, 101071773). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. M.C.M. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 947684). The authors report no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Separate and combined effects of famine exposure and menarche age on metabolic syndrome among the elderly: a cross-sectional study in China

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have revealed multiple risk factors for metabolic syndrome. However, there are no consistent findings on the association between famine exposure, age at menarche, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. This cross-sectional study aimed to reveal the individual and combined effects of famine exposure and age at menarche on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among elderly women.

METHODS

Four thousand seven hundred seventy participants between 60 and 93 years of age were selected from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Statistical differences between the baseline characteristics of famine exposure, age at menarche, and metabolic syndrome were evaluated using the t-test, F-test, and Chi-square test. Three multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to test the association between famine exposure, age of menarche, and the odds ratio of metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred ninety-eight (46.08%) participants had metabolic syndrome, while 2572 (53.92%) participants did not. Furthermore, 3068 (64.32%) women reported onset of menarche under 15 years of age, while 1702 (35.68%) women reported onset of menarche above 16 years of age. Regarding the separate association of famine exposure and age of menarche with metabolic syndrome, in model three, the adolescence/adulthood famine exposure group vs. no famine exposure group odds ratio was 2.45 (95% CI 2.02, 2.97), and the older than 16 years vs. younger than 15 years group odds ratio was 1.23 (95% CI 1.09, 1.39), which was the highest odds ratio among the three models. Regarding the combined association of famine exposure and age of menarche with metabolic syndrome, in model three, among the age of menarche ≤ 15 years group, the adolescence/adulthood famine exposure vs. no famine exposure group odds ratio was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.91, 3.14); among the menarche age ≥ 16 years group, the adolescence/adulthood famine exposure stages vs. exposed group odds ratio was 3.27 (95% CI: 2.44, 4.38), which was the highest odds ratio among the three models.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggested that famine exposure and age at menarche, either separately or in combination, were positively associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among older women.

Is age at menarche a predictor of maternal birth trauma?

OBJECTIVE

Age at menarche and the interval between menarche and age at first vaginal birth have been shown to be associated with reproductive performance; however, their association with maternal birth trauma has not been studied. We aimed to determine whether age at menarche, age at first vaginal birth and their interval are associated independently with levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and external anal sphincter (EAS) defect.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the ultrasound volume datasets of 466 vaginally parous patients attending one of two tertiary urogynecological units in Australia. All patients had undergone a standardized interview and clinical examination using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging system, followed by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Tomographic ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate the LAM for avulsion and the EAS for significant defect.

RESULTS

Of the 466 women analyzed, LAM avulsion was diagnosed in 121 (26.0%) and significant EAS defect in 55 (11.8%). Logistic regression analysis showed no association between age at menarche and LAM avulsion (P = 0.67). Weak but significant associations were noted between LAM avulsion and age at first vaginal birth (odds ratio (OR), 1.070 (95% CI, 1.03-1.11); P = 0.0007) and between LAM avulsion and menarche-to-first-vaginal-birth interval (OR, 1.064 (95% CI, 1.02-1.11); P = 0.0018). No significant associations were noted between significant EAS defect and any of the evaluated variables (all P ≥ 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Age at menarche is not predictive of maternal birth trauma i.e. LAM avulsion and EAS residual defect. There was a statistically significant association between LAM avulsion and menarche-to-first-vaginal-birth interval; however, this was not stronger than the previously established association between LAM avulsion and age at first vaginal birth, arguing against any distinct effect of prolonged prepregnancy hormonal stimulation on the biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.