Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant

Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making: A qualitative study of families who delivered at the cusp of viability

OBJECTIVES

There is limited data regarding patients' experiences with periviable counseling. Exploring patient perspectives helps us improve provider communication and may aid in supporting high-quality decision-making. Our study explored patient-identified sources of support and conflict during discussions with their healthcare team when delivering during the periviable period with the goal of improving high-quality shared decision making (SDM).

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews of birthing people who delivered between 20 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks gestational age from 2010 to 2014. Interviews focused on shared decision making at the time of periviable birth with an emphasis on the three-talk model of SDM. Interviews were coded to perform thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 20 patients who delivered during the periviable period and 6 important others. Participants valued providers aiding in their emotional processing. Conversely, participants identified lack of clarity during counseling and an emphasis on hopelessness as barriers to SDM.

CONCLUSION(S)

Participants highlighted the importance of using easy-to-understand language and focusing on hope. Finally, families emphasized the importance of explicitly eliciting values that might inform their choice and the positive impact of nursing staff.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our findings underscore the importance of using a SDM model for periviability counseling and highlight areas for improvement.

Evaluating decision regret after extremely preterm birth

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about decision regret following extremely premature birth. We assessed decision regret in women who delivered an extremely premature infant, comparing decision regret scores based on resuscitation decision.

METHODS

Electronic survey assessment of decision regret using a validated tool included women who delivered at 22-25 completed weeks of gestation at two hospitals 2004-2019. Comparison of 'active care', 'comfort care' and 'other' groups was quantified and comments reviewed.

RESULTS

442 of 787 (56%) eligible women were contacted, 242 of 442 (55%) completed surveys, response rate 242 of 787 (31%). Women not contacted were younger (p=0.0001) and/or delivered in an earlier year (p=0.002). There was a higher percentage of white women who completed the survey (p=0.004). Decision regret was elevated in all groups, varied widely, but was lower in 'active care' compared with 'comfort care' (Decision Regret Score 14 vs 39, p<0.0001). Lower decision regret occurred in women who recalled a prenatal consult (p=0.014) or identified as the primary decision-maker compared with women who perceived the doctor had a major role (p=0.02) or made the decision (p<0.0001). Lower decision regret occurred in women whose infant was alive at survey completion compared with women whose infant died in the hospital (p<0.0001) or after discharge (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Decision regret was elevated in all groups. Women who recalled prenatal consultation, identified as the primary decision-maker, chose intensive care and/or whose infant survived had lower regret scores.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04074525.

The impact of standardization of care for neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation

OBJECTIVE

Determine the impact of standardization of care and counseling on survival and morbidities of neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 244 neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation between 2015 and 2023 in a large healthcare system. The primary outcome was survival of neonates receiving intensive care to NICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included morbidities and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Neonates born at 22-23 weeks received more intensive care after care standardization (OR 5.4 (95% CI 2.3-12.6), p < 0.0001). Survival remained stable (aOR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32-2.7), p = 0.89) despite more neonates born at 22 weeks receiving intensive care. Resource utilization remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardizing counseling and care increased the provision of antenatal steroids and intensive care for neonates born at 22 weeks gestation. This allowed neonates born at 22 weeks to survive to discharge without increasing morbidity and resource utilization.

Association of gestational day with antenatal management and the mortality and respiratory outcomes of extremely preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

Perinatal epidemiological studies and outcomes are often reported on gestational week thresholds. This study aims to quantify and investigate the association of each gestational day at birth on antenatal management, mortality and respiratory outcomes of extremely preterm infants.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using National Neonatal Research Database.

SETTING

England and Wales.

PATIENTS

26 098 infants born <28 weeks of gestational age (GA) and admitted to neonatal units from 2010 to 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Antenatal care and outcome measures for each gestational day were described with 95% CI determined using Agresti-Coull method. χ2 test for trend assessed the trends across gestational day. Analysis of means assessed if outcome on each gestational day differed from the overall outcome for that gestational week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality and respiratory disease.

RESULTS

Neonatal admissions peaked at the start of each gestational week. Caesarean section was the most common birth mode from 26+1 to 26+4 weeks GA. Mortality and severe respiratory morbidity decreased with each day of gestation within the gestational week threshold (p<0.01). Mortality at the beginning and end of each gestational week differed from the overall mortality for that gestational week (p=0.03 to <0.001) in infants <27+0 weeks GA. Mortality was higher in infants <26+0 weeks GA born to mothers without complete antenatal corticosteroid course or born in centres without neonatal intensive care units.

CONCLUSIONS

Each day of gestation is important for extremely preterm infant outcomes. Perinatal decision-making, counselling and reporting should avoid broad gestational weeks and include day of gestation.

Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify factors birthing parents consider related to potential resuscitation of a periviable infant.

STUDY DESIGN

Birthing parents who received a prenatal consult from a newborn intensive care unit provider between 22.0 and 24.6 weeks gestational age were eligible to participate in a semi-structured interview focused on their periviable decision making. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

RESULT

Qualitative analysis shows that birthing parents attribute their decision to a balance between vitality and suffering, with the balance point influenced by various elements. While parents described the choice they made, none reported that the information they received during the prenatal consult had a significant impact.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the minimal impact that information given during a periviable consult has on parental decision making. Information from this study can be used to develop an improved model of perinatal consultation.

Supporting parents' emotional and mental health in the antenatal consultation

Supporting parents' emotional and mental health is crucial during antenatal consultations, in which expectant parents often receive serious news about their infant and sometimes face complex antenatal or postnatal decision-making. Being considerate of the circumstances to mitigate barriers and stressors, utilizing clear and sensitive language, and personalizing counseling and decision-making to support parents' pluralistic values are strategies that individual neonatologists can use to promote parents' mental wellness in these encounters. Partnership with clinicians of other disciplines and professions in antenatal consultations can help in providing additional medical information and parent support; however, care must be coordinated within the team to ensure that confusing or conflicting counseling is avoided. In addition to improving communication skills for these encounters as individuals and teams, opportunities also exist to enhance support of parents' mental health at the institutional and national level.

"It feels like you have to choose one or the other": a qualitative analysis of obstetrician focus groups on periviability counseling

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to gain knowledge and ascertain challenges about periviability counseling among obstetricians to inform curricular development.

METHODS

Focus groups were utilized. A series of open-ended questions was posed to each group of obstetricians; responses were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were analyzed by two coders using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four focus groups were convened. Prominent themes included: (1) Obstetrician knowledge about neonatal outcomes is limited, (2) Periviability counseling is both time intensive and time-challenged, (3) Patient processing of information relies on the content, delivery and patient readiness, and (4) Obstetrician bias is toward advocating for maternal safety, which may run counter to parental instinct to "do everything." The last theme was specifically focused on the role of cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Curricula focused on improving obstetrician periviability counseling should focus on neonatal outcomes, the role of cesarean delivery, and utilization of shared decision-making.

A Patient Interview-Based Needs Assessment and Evaluation of Experiences with Periviable Pregnancies

Given the complex ethical and emotional nature of births during the periviable period for both health care providers and families, this investigation sought to identify strategies for improved counseling of pregnant patients facing preterm birth at the cusp of viability at a tertiary care center in Hawai'i. As part of a larger quality improvement project on periviability counseling, 10 patients were interviewed during either individual or small focus groups using a progression of hypothetical scenarios. Interviews were analyzed independently by 3 investigators to identify themes of patient experience and potential areas for improvement when counseling patients who are carrying periviable pregnancies. Several common themes emerged from the interviews. Patients expressed the desire for more information throughout the process delivered in a jargon-free manner with unified messaging from the medical teams, and emotional support. These findings add to a limited body of literature which addresses patient perceptions of interactions with health care providers in the face of uncertainty, particularly in a Pacific Islander population. The authors recommend increasing provider training and developing a more structured process to counsel pregnant women facing periviable pregnancy loss to improve the patient experience.

How do Clinicians View the Process of Shared Decision-Making with Parents Facing Extremely Early Deliveries? Results from an Online Survey

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to better understand how neonatology (Neo) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians approach the process of shared decision-making (SDM) with parents facing extremely premature (<25 weeks estimated gestational age) delivery during antenatal counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

Attending physicians at U.S. centers with both Neo and MFM fellowships were invited to answer an original online survey about antenatal counseling for extremely early newborns. Preferences for conveying information are reported elsewhere. Here, we report clinicians' self-assessments of their ability to engage in deliberations and decision-making and perceptions of what is important to parents in the SDM process. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed respondents' views with respect to individual characteristics, such as specialty, gender, and years of clinical experience.

RESULTS

In total, 74 MFMs and 167 Neos representing 94% of the 81 centers surveyed responded. Neos versus MFMs reported repeat visits with parents less often (<0.001) and agreed that parents were more likely to have made delivery room decisions before they counseled them less often (p < 0.001). Respondents reported regularly achieving most goals of SDM, with the exception of providing spiritual support. Most respondents reported that spiritual and religious views, risk to an infant's survival, and the infant's quality of life were important to parental decision-making, while a physician's own personal choice and family political views were reported as less important. While many barriers to SDM exist, respondents rated language barriers and family views that differ from those of a provider as the most difficult barriers to overcome.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into how consultants from different specialties and demographic groups facilitate SDM, thereby informing future efforts for improving counseling and engaging in SDM with parents facing extremely early deliveries and supporting evidence-based training for these complex communication skills.

KEY POINTS

· Perceptions differed by specialty and demographics.. · Parents' spiritual needs were infrequently met.. · Barriers to shared decision-making exist..

Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment (WWLST): an under recognised factor in the morbidity or mortality of periviable infants?-a narrative review

Background and Objective

The morbidity and mortality of infants born extremely preterm varies substantially across networks, within countries and throughout the globe. Most of the literature tends to focus on the management at birth and choices around active resuscitation of extremely preterm infants. Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment (WWLST) is an important and central process in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and practices vary substantially. As such, our objective in this review was to explore whether end of life decisions also contribute to variations in the morbidity and mortality of periviable infants.

Methods

This narrative literature review is based on studies from the last 15 years found using several searches of medical databases (OVID Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Systematic Reviews) performed between March 2021 and December 2023.

Key Content and Findings

Just as outcomes in periviable infants vary, the rates of and processes behind WWLST differ in the periviable population. Variation increases as gestational age decreases. Parental involvement is crucial to share decision making but the circumstances and rates of parental involvement differ. Strict guidelines in end-of-life care may not be appropriate, however there is a need for more targeted guidance for periviable infants as a specific population. The current literature available relating to periviable infants or WWLST is minimal, with many datasets rapidly becoming outdated.

Conclusions

Further research is needed to establish the role of WWLST in variation of periviable infants' outcomes. The unification of data, acquisition of more recent datasets and inclusion of variables relating to end-of-life decisions in data collection will aid in this process.

Attitudes and values towards decisions at the margin of viability among expectant mothers at risk for preterm birth

AIM

To explore how expectant mothers at risk for preterm birth would like to be involved in decision-making at the margin of viability and what they would base their decisions on.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study included a mixed-methods post-hoc analysis alongside a previously reported randomised clinical trial. Expectant mothers between 280/7 and 366/7 weeks' gestation who were hospitalised for risk of preterm birth responded to written case vignettes of an impending preterm birth at the margin of viability. Participants responded to closed and open-ended questions that were theoretically coded for attitudes and values towards shared decision-making.

RESULTS

Sixty-four expectant mothers were included in the analysis, 36 provided written perspectives. Decision-making was perceived as an enormous burden and a potential source of guilt and regret. Weighing personal values in terms of 'fighting for the baby' and 'quality of life' were used to inform the decision-making process. Explicitly stating that any decision is a good decision, empowerment through co-constructing shared decisions rather than simply presenting choices, sharing the clinicians' personal views, and honest, and empathetic counselling were perceived as supportive.

CONCLUSION

Mothers at risk for preterm birth provided specific insights into their decision-making patterns that may be helpful to clinicians.

Uncharted territory: a narrative review of parental involvement in decision-making about late preterm and early term delivery

Almost 30% of live births in England and Wales occur late preterm or early term (LPET) and are associated with increased risks of adverse health outcomes throughout the lifespan. However, very little is known about the decision-making processes concerning planned LPET births or the involvement of parents in these. This aim of this paper is to review the evidence on parental involvement in obstetric decision-making in general, to consider what can be extrapolated to decisions about LPET delivery, and to suggest directions for further research.A comprehensive, narrative review of relevant literature was conducted using Medline, MIDIRS, PsycInfo and CINAHL databases. Appropriate search terms were combined with Boolean operators to ensure the following broad areas were included: obstetric decision-making, parental involvement, late preterm and early term birth, and mode of delivery.This review suggests that parents' preferences with respect to their inclusion in decision-making vary. Most mothers prefer sharing decision-making with their clinicians and up to half are dissatisfied with the extent of their involvement. Clinicians' opinions on the limits of parental involvement, especially where the safety of mother or baby is potentially compromised, are highly influential in the obstetric decision-making process. Other important factors include contextual factors (such as the nature of the issue under discussion and the presence or absence of relevant medical indications for a requested intervention), demographic and other individual characteristics (such as ethnicity and parity), the quality of communication; and the information provided to parents.This review highlights the overarching need to explore how decisions about potential LPET delivery may be reached in order to maximise the satisfaction of mothers and fathers with their involvement in the decision-making process whilst simultaneously enabling clinicians both to minimise the number of LPET births and to optimise the wellbeing of women and babies.

The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint

The Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has far-reaching implications that go beyond the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. The ruling and subsequent laws and bills impact many specialties and have implications for healthcare as a whole. The rapidly changing medicolegal landscape has significant bearings on and implications for the fields of neonatology and pediatrics. These rulings have an impact on the patient-physician relationship and a shared decision-making approach to care. Furthermore, there are significant sequelae of forced birth and resuscitation. This review provides a clinically relevant update of the current medicolegal landscape and applications to the practice of neonatology.

Effect of Presenting Survival Information as Text or Pictograph During Periviable Birth Counseling: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether presenting a 30% or a 60% chance of survival in different survival information formats would influence hypothetical periviable birth treatment choice and whether treatment choice would be associated with participants' recall or their intuitive beliefs about the chances of survival.

STUDY DESIGN

An internet sample of women (n = 1052) were randomized to view a vignette with either a 30% or 60% chance of survival with intensive care during the periviable period. Participants were randomized to survival information presented as text-only, in a static pictograph, or in an iterative pictograph. Participants chose intensive care or palliative care and reported their recall of the chance of survival and their intuitive beliefs about their infant's chance of survival.

RESULTS

There was no difference in treatment choice by presentation with a 30% vs 60% chance of survival (P = .48), by survival information format (P = .80), or their interaction (P = .18). However, participants' intuitive beliefs about chance of survival significantly predicted treatment choice (P < .001) and had the most explanatory power of any participant characteristic. Intuitive beliefs were optimistic and did not differ by presentation of a 30% or 60% chance of survival (P = .65), even among those with accurate recall of the chance of survival (P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should recognize that parents may use more than outcome data to make treatment choices and in forming their own, often-optimistic, intuitive beliefs about their infant's chance of survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04859114.

A scoping review of parental values during prenatal decisions about treatment options after extremely premature birth

AIM

To describe what is known in the literature about parental perspectives in making prenatal decisions regarding treatment after birth at the limit of viability, as a better understanding of parental values can help professionals support parents as they decide.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant literature from 1 January 2010 to 22 April 2022 on parental decision making. Data were extracted from selected studies and organised into themes. The final themes were formed through collaboration with the parents of a premature infant born at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 15,159 papers examined, 17 were included. Parental perspectives were described in terms of long-term outcomes for the infant, survival, protection against the burden of neonatal treatment, long-term impact on the family, religion and spiritual beliefs, to do everything possible, hope, sense of responsibility, wanting the best, doing what is right, giving a chance and the influence of experience.

CONCLUSION

The extracted parental perspectives show the complexity of these decisions. Some perspectives were clear, but others were multi-interpretable. Increasing the understanding of common parental perspectives can help improve shared prenatal decisions and lead to further improvement and personalisation of the process.

A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives on Prenatal Counseling at Extreme Prematurity

OBJECTIVE

To determine parental preferred language, terminology, and approach after prenatal counseling for an anticipated extremely preterm delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Pregnant persons (and their partners) admitted at 220/7-256/7 weeks of estimated gestation participated in post antenatal-counseling semistructured interviews to explore preferred language and decision-making approaches of their antenatal counseling session. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis of the data was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine interviews were conducted representing 28 total prenatal consults. Analysis identified 2 overarching themes impacting the whole counseling experience: the need for reassurance and compassionate communication, while parents traveled along a dynamic decision-making journey they described as fluid and ever-changing. Related themes included the following: (1) Finding Balance: parents reported the importance of balancing positivity and negativity as well as tailoring the amount of information, (2) The Unspoken: parents described assumptions and inferences surrounding language, resuscitation options, and values that can cloud the counseling process, (3) Making the Intangible Tangible: parents reported the importance of varied communication strategies, for example, visuals to better anticipate and prepare, and (4) Team Synergism: Parents expressed desire for communication and consistency among and between teams, which increased trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents facing extremely premature delivery generally did not report remembering specific terminology used during prenatal consultation but rather how the language and counseling approach made them feel and affected the decision-making process. These findings have implications for further research and educational intervention design to improve clinicians' counseling practices to better reflect parental preferences and ultimately improve counseling outcomes.

Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize and describe important elements of decision-making during antenatal consultation for threatened preterm delivery at the margin of gestational viability.

STUDY DESIGN

Data sources including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus were searched. We included all qualitative literature published on decision-making from 1990 to July 2021. Two authors independently screened and evaluated each study using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist; studies reaching moderate and high quality were included. We developed an extraction tool to collect and categorize data from each qualitative article, then used thematic analysis to analyze and describe the findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles incorporating the views of 504 providers and 352 parents were included for final review. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main themes describing the experience of health care providers and parents participating in decision-making: factors that influence decision-making, information sharing, building a partnership, and making the decision. Parents and providers were not always in agreement upon which elements were most essential to the process of decision-making. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative literature highlighting key factors which are important during antenatal counseling can inform and guide providers through the process of shared decision-making. Communicating clear, honest, and balanced information; avoiding artificially dichotomized options; and focusing on partnership building with families will help providers use the antenatal consultation to reach personalized decisions for each infant.

Active Treatment of Infants Born at 22-25 Weeks of Gestation in California, 2011-2018

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate and trend of active treatment in a population-based cohort of infants born at 22-25 weeks of gestation and to examine factors associated with active treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

This observational study evaluated 8247 infants born at 22-25 weeks of gestation at hospitals in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative between 2011 and 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to relate maternal demographic and prenatal factors, fetal characteristics, and hospital level of care to the primary outcome of active treatment.

RESULTS

Active treatment was provided to 6657 infants. The rate at 22 weeks was 19.4% and increased with each advancing week, and was significantly higher for infants born between days 4 and 6 at 22 or 23 weeks of gestation compared with those born between days 0 and 3 (26.2% and 78.3%, respectively, vs 14.1% and 65.9%, respectively; P < .001). The rate of active treatment at 23 weeks increased from 2011 to 2018 (from 64.9% to 83.4%; P < .0001) but did not change significantly at 22 weeks. Factors associated with increased odds of active treatment included maternal Hispanic ethnicity and Black race, preterm premature rupture of membranes, obstetrical bleeding, antenatal steroids, and cesarean delivery. Factors associated with decreased odds included lower gestational age and small for gestational age birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

In California, active treatment rates at 23 weeks of gestation increased between 2011 and 2018, but rates at 22 weeks did not. At 22 and 23 weeks, rates increased during the latter part of the week. Several maternal and infant factors were associated with the likelihood of active treatment.

Patient Decisions Regarding Fetal Monitoring in the Periviable Period and Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Management of delivery at periviable gestation requires complex counseling and decision making, including difficult choices about monitoring and potential cesarean delivery (CD) for fetal benefit. Our objective was to characterize decisions that patients make regarding fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit when delivering in the periviable period, and associations with perinatal and obstetric outcomes. We hypothesize that a significant number of patients forgo monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit in the periviable period when offered the opportunity to do so.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of nonanomalous singleton pregnancies delivering between 23^0/7 and 25^6/7 weeks at a tertiary care center from 2015 to 2020 as based on our institutional clinical practice. Since 2015, these patients are offered the ability to accept or decline fetal monitoring, potential CD for fetal benefit, and active resuscitation of a liveborn neonate. The frequency of patients desiring potential CD for fetal benefit was identified, and associations with CD and intrapartum demise were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were included. Seventy-eight percent (n = 39) desired monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, and 84% (n = 42) desired resuscitation if the neonate was born alive. This varied by gestational age: 55% (6/11) of patients delivering between 23^0/7 and 23^6/7 weeks desired fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, while 90% (19/21) of patients delivering between 25^0/7 and 25^6/7 weeks desired fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit (p = 0.02). Sixty-nine percent of pregnancies in which potential CD for fetal benefit was desired resulted in CD (27/39), of which 85% were classical (23/27). Intrapartum fetal demise occurred in 45% (5/11) of pregnancies in which monitoring was not performed.

CONCLUSION

While a majority of patients delivering between 23^0/7 and 25^6/7 weeks desired monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, this varied significantly by gestational age. The decision to perform monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit was associated with a high frequency of CD, while the decision to forgo monitoring was associated with high frequency of intrapartum demise.

KEY POINTS

· Patients desires vary in the setting of periviable delivery.. · Periviable monitoring is associated with cesarean delivery.. · Forgoing monitoring is associated with intrapartum demise..

Trends in Active Treatment of Live-born Neonates Between 22 Weeks 0 Days and 25 Weeks 6 Days by Gestational Age and Maternal Race and Ethnicity in the US, 2014 to 2020

IMPORTANCE

Birth in the periviable period between 22 weeks 0 days and 25 weeks 6 days' gestation is a major source of neonatal morbidity and mortality, and the decision to initiate active life-saving treatment is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the frequency of active treatment among live-born neonates in the periviable period has changed over time and whether active treatment differed by gestational age at birth and race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Serial cross-sectional descriptive study using National Center for Health Statistics natality data from 2014 to 2020 for 61 908 singleton live births without clinical anomalies between 22 weeks 0 days and 25 weeks 6 days in the US.

EXPOSURES

Year of delivery, gestational age at birth, and race and ethnicity of the pregnant individual, stratified as non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latina, and non-Hispanic White.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Active treatment, determined by whether there was an attempt to treat the neonate and defined as a composite of surfactant therapy, immediate assisted ventilation at birth, assisted ventilation more than 6 hours in duration, and/or antibiotic therapy. Frequencies, mean annual percent change (APC), and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Of 26 986 716 live births, 61 908 (0.2%) were periviable live births included in this study: 5% were Asian/Pacific Islander, 37% Black, 24% Hispanic, and 34% White; and 14% were born at 22 weeks, 21% at 23 weeks, 30% at 24 weeks, and 34% at 25 weeks. Fifty-two percent of neonates received active treatment. From 2014 to 2020, the overall frequency (mean APC per year) of active treatment increased significantly (3.9% [95% CI, 3.0% to 4.9%]), as well as among all racial and ethnic subgroups (Asian/Pacific Islander: 3.4% [95% CI, 0.8% to 6.0%]); Black: 4.7% [95% CI, 3.4% to 5.9%]; Hispanic: 4.7% [95% CI, 3.4% to 5.9%]; and White: 3.1% [95% CI, 1.1% to 4.4%]) and among each gestational age range (22 weeks: 14.4% [95% CI, 11.1% to 17.7%] and 25 weeks: 2.9% [95% CI, 1.5% to 4.2%]). Compared with neonates born to White individuals (57.0%), neonates born to Asian/Pacific Islander (46.2%; risk difference [RD], -10.81 [95% CI, -12.75 to -8.88]; aRR, 0.82 [95% CI, [0.79-0.86]), Black (51.6%; RD, -5.42 [95% CI, -6.36 to -4.50]; aRR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.92]), and Hispanic (48.0%; RD, -9.03 [95% CI, -10.07 to -7.99]; aRR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.85]) individuals were significantly less likely to receive active treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

From 2014 to 2020 in the US, the frequency of active treatment among neonates born alive between 22 weeks 0 days and 25 weeks 6 days significantly increased, and there were differences in rates of active treatment by race and ethnicity.

Individualised decision making: interpretation of risk for extremely preterm infants-a survey of UK neonatal professionals

BACKGROUND

The British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) published a revised framework for perinatal management of extremely preterm infants (EPIs) in 2019. We aimed to assess UK neonatal professionals' interpretation of elements of this framework, as well as the consistency of their estimates of outcome for EPIs.

METHODS

An online survey gave participants five cases involving anticipated extremely preterm birth with different favourable and unfavourable risk factors. Respondents were asked to assign a risk category and management option using the BAPM framework and to estimate the chance of survival if the baby received active resuscitation and the chance of severe disability if they survived.

RESULTS

Respondents were consistent in interpretation of risk categories. The majority would follow parental wishes about management. Management decisions did not always correspond with risk assessment, with less inclination to recommend palliative (comfort) care. There were wide estimates of survival or severe disability (5%-90%) with consultants providing lower estimates of severe disability than other groups.

CONCLUSION

UK neonatal professionals deferred to parental wishes in the cases presented, indicating an emphasis on shared decision making. However, they did not necessarily use the risk stratification approach for management decisions. Variation in estimates of outcome raises questions about the accuracy of informed decision making and suggests support is needed for UK clinicians to incorporate risk factors into individualised counselling. There may be value in validating existing online risk calculators for UK infants or in developing a UK specific risk model.

Prognostic value of clinicians' predictions of neonatal outcomes in counseling at the margin of gestational viability

Within antenatal counseling sessions at the margin of gestational viability, clinicians frequently to use population-based outcome data and statistical models to guide the decision-making process. These tools often utilize non-modifiable prenatal factors to estimate outcomes based on population averages. However, most parents prefer individualized predictions, which cannot be supported by these models. Additionally, prognostic accuracy is limited by institutional practices surrounding active management of infants at the margin of viability. Throughout the literature, parental perspectives emphasize the importance of communicating subjective information, such as providing hope and supporting personal values, over the importance of accurate prognostic information from the clinician. In this review we aim to describe the value of clinician prognoses in the decision-making process at the margin of gestational viability and emphasize the importance of addressing parental values during the counseling process, regardless of the expected outcome.

Dutch guidelines on care for extremely premature infants: Navigating between personalisation and standardization

OBJECTIVE

There is no international consensus on what type of guideline is preferred for care at the limit of viability. We aimed to conceptualize what type of guideline is preferred by Dutch healthcare professionals: 1) none; 2) gestational-age-based; 3) gestational-age-based-plus; or 4) prognosis-based via a survey instrument. Additional questions were asked to explore the grey zone and attitudes towards treatment variation.

FINDING

769 surveys were received. Most of the respondents (72.8%) preferred a gestational-age-based-plus guideline. Around 50% preferred 24^+0/7 weeks gestational age as the lower limit of the grey zone, whereas 26^+0/7 weeks was the most preferred upper limit. Professionals considered treatment variation acceptable when it is based upon parental values, but unacceptable when it is based upon the hospital's policy or the physician's opinion.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the current Dutch guideline, our results suggest that there is a preference to take into account individual factors besides gestational age.

Teaching Antenatal Counseling Skills via Video Conference

Neonatologists provide counseling to expectant parents to prepare them for the birth and subsequent medical care that their extremely preterm, or otherwise medically complex newborn may require. The skills required to conduct these sensitive conversations are often taught to neonatology trainees via direct observation or simulated scenarios in advance of counseling actual patients. This technical report details how we taught antenatal counseling skills to junior neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows via video conferencing during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This approach could be used to effectively prepare future trainees to perform antenatal counseling.

User-testing of a decision-support tool for parents facing threatened periviable delivery: The Periviable GOALS decision aid

BACKGROUND

To report user-centered design methods and stakeholder acceptability ratings of the Periviable GOALS (Getting Optimal Alignment around Life Support) decision aid (DA).

METHODS

'Experienced' and 'expectant' mothers engaged in content and design refining sessions. Five videos (10 families) were embedded in the DA to highlight life after delivery. User-testing sessions were conducted with mothers and providers to assess acceptability. End-user testing was conducted with hospitalized women facing potential periviable delivery to assess acceptability and feasibility in the clinical setting.

RESULTS

108 participants engaged in sessions from July 2017-January 2020. Twenty-seven refining sessions resulted in a DA providing survival estimates, neonatal outcomes descriptions, and values clarification exercises. Five white and five black women participated in the videos; six having surviving children (ages 16 months-4 years). Twelve mothers, 16 providers, and six hospitalized women evaluated acceptability. 95.1 % found the content "just right," 94.9 % rated the videos "good" or "excellent," and 97.2 % believed GOALS would support families in periviable decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the importance of developing a DA that is acceptable for patient use with direct involvement of stakeholders.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The GOALS DA may prepare families to engage in shared decision-making to facilitate more patient-centered models of periviable care.

Factors Associated With Maternal and Neonatal Interventions at the Threshold of Viability

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the influence of maternal sociodemographic, medical, and pregnancy characteristics on decisions to offer or receive antepartum and neonatal interventions with deliveries occurring at 22-23 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

This is a case-control study of U.S. live births at 22 0/7-23 6/7 weeks of gestation using National Center for Health Statistics vital statistics birth records from 2012 to 2016. We analyzed three outcomes in the treatment of periviable delivery: 1) maternal interventions (cesarean delivery, maternal hospital transfer or antenatal corticosteroid administration), 2) neonatal interventions (neonatal intensive care unit admission, surfactant administration, antibiotic administration, or assisted ventilation), and 3) combined interventions (at least one maternal and at least one neonatal intervention). Logistic regression estimated the influence of characteristics on interventions received.

RESULTS

Of 19,844,580 U.S. live births from 2012 to 2016, 24,379 (0.12%) occurred at 22-23 weeks of gestation. Of these, 37.5% received maternal interventions, 51.7% received neonatal interventions, and 28.0% received combined interventions. Rates of births receiving at least one intervention were 38.9% and 78.3% for 22 and 23 weeks of gestation, respectively. Preeclampsia was the factor most positively associated with interventions. Other factors positively associated with interventions were increasing maternal age, Medicaid, low educational attainment, multiparity, twin gestation, and infertility treatment. Some factors had opposite influences on maternal compared with neonatal interventions. The presence of birth defects was positively associated with maternal interventions but negatively associated with neonatal interventions, whereas being of black race was negatively associated with maternal interventions but positively associated with neonatal interventions.

CONCLUSION

Maternal and neonatal interventions occur frequently at the threshold of viability, especially at 23 weeks of gestation where the occurrence of interventions exceeds 50%. This study identifies sociodemographic and medical factors associated with using interventions with periviable deliveries. These data elucidate observed practice patterns in the management of periviable births and may assist providers in the counseling of women at risk of periviable birth.

Values clarification: Eliciting the values that inform and influence parents' treatment decisions for periviable birth

BACKGROUND

Values clarification can assist families facing the threat of periviable delivery in navigating the complexity of competing values related to death, disability, and quality of life (QOL).

OBJECTIVE

We piloted values clarification exercises to inform resuscitation decision making and qualitatively assess perceptions of QOL.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-method study of women with threatened periviable delivery (22 0/7-24 6/7 weeks) and their important others (IOs). Participants engaged in three values clarification activities as part of a semi-structured interview-(a) Card sorting nine conditions as an acceptable/unacceptable QOL for a child; (b) Rating/ranking seven common concerns in periviable decision making (scale 0-10, not at all to extremely important); and (c) "Agreed/disagreed" with six statements regarding end-of-life treatment, disability, and QOL. Participants were also asked to define "QOL" and describe their perceptions of a good and poor QOL for their child. Analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4 and NVivo 12.

RESULTS

All mild disabilities were an acceptable QOL, while two-thirds of participants considered long-term mechanical ventilation unacceptable. Although pregnant women rated "Impact on Your Physical/Mental Health" (average 5.6) and IOs rated "Financial Concerns" the highest (average 6.6), both groups ranked "Financial Concerns" as the most important concern (median 5.0 and 6.0, respectively). Most participants agreed that "Any amount of life is better than no life at all" (pregnant women 62.1%; IOs 75.0%) and disagreed that resuscitation would cause "Too much suffering" for their child (pregnant women 71.4%; IOs 80.0%). Half were familiar with the phrase "QOL". Although the majority described a good QOL in terms of emotional well-being (eg "loved", "happy", "supported"), a poor QOL was described in terms of functionality (eg "dependent" and "confined"). Additionally, financial stability emerged as a distinctive theme when IOs discussed poor QOL.

CONCLUSION

The study offers important insights on parental perspectives in periviable decision making and potential values clarification tools for decision support.

Regional and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Perinatal Interventions Among Periviable Births

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether there are: 1) regional differences in three perinatal interventions that reflect active treatment among periviable gestations and 2) racial-ethnic differences in the receipt of these perinatal interventions after accounting for hospital region.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on neonates born at 776 U.S. centers that participated in the Vermont Oxford Network (2006-2017) with a gestational age of 22-25 weeks. The primary outcome was postnatal life support. Secondary outcomes included maternal administration of antenatal corticosteroids and cesarean delivery. We examined rates and 99% CI of the three outcomes by region. We also calculated the adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 99% CIs for the three outcomes by race and ethnicity within each region using modified Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation.

RESULTS

Major regional variation exists in the use of the three interventions at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation but not at 24 and 25 weeks. For example, at 22 weeks of gestation, rates of life support in the South (38.3%; 99% CI 36.3-40.2) and the Midwest (32.7%; 99% CI 30.4-35.0) were higher than in the Northeast (20.2%; 99% CI 17.6-22.8) and the West (22.2%; 99% CI 20.0-24.4). Particularly in the Northeast, black and Hispanic neonates born at 22 or 23 weeks of gestation had a higher provision of postnatal life support than white neonates (at 22 weeks: black: aRR 1.84 [99% CI 1.33-2.56], Hispanic: aRR 1.80 [1.23-2.64]; at 23 weeks: black: aRR 1.14 [99% CI 1.08-1.20], Hispanic: aRR 1.12 [1.05-1.19]). In the West, black and Hispanic neonates born at 23 weeks of gestation also had a higher provision of life support (black: aRR 1.11 [99% CI 1.03-1.19]; Hispanic: aRR 1.10 [1.04-1.16]).

CONCLUSION

Major regional variation exists in perinatal interventions when managing 22- and 23-week neonates. In the Northeast and the West regions, minority neonates born at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation had higher provision of postnatal life support.

Periviability: A Review of Key Concepts and Management for Perinatal Nursing

One of the most complex clinical problems in obstetrics and neonatology is caring for pregnant women at the threshold of viability. Births near viability boundaries are grave events that carry a high prevalence of neonatal death or an increased potential for severe lifelong complications and disabilities among those who survive. Compared with several decades ago, premature infants receiving neonatal care by today's standards have better outcomes than those born in other eras. However, preterm labor at periviability represents a more complex counseling and management challenge. Although preterm birth incidence between 20/7 and 25/7 weeks has remained unchanged, survival rates at earlier gestational ages have increased as perinatal and neonatal specialties have become more adept at caring for this at-risk population. Women face difficult choices about obstetric and neonatal interventions in light of uncertainties around survival and outcomes. This article reviews current neonatal statistics in reference to short- and long-term outcomes, key concepts in obstetric clinical management of an anticipated periviable birth, and counseling guidance to ensure shared-decision making.

Online Information About Periviable Birth: Quality Assessment

BACKGROUND

Over 20,000 parents in the United States face the challenge of participating in decisions about whether to use life support for their infants born on the cusp of viability every year. Clinicians must help families grasp complex medical information about their baby's immediate prognosis as well as the risk for significant long-term morbidity. Patients faced with this decision want supplemental information and frequently seek medical information on the Internet. Empirical evidence about the quality of websites is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the quality of online information available about periviable birth and treatment options for infants born at the cusp of viability.

METHODS

We read a counseling script to 20 pregnant participants that included information typically provided by perinatal and neonatal providers when periviable birth is imminent. The women were then asked to list terms they would use to search the Internet if they wanted additional information. Using these search terms, two reviewers evaluated the content of websites obtained via a Google search. We used two metrics to assess the quality of websites. The first was the DISCERN instrument, a validated questionnaire designed to assess the quality of patient-targeted health information for treatment choices. The second metric was the Essential Content Tool (ECT), a tool designed to address key components of counseling around periviable birth as outlined by professional organizations. DISCERN scores were classified as low quality if scores were 2, fair quality if scores were 3, and high quality if scores were 4 or higher. Scores of 6 or higher on the ECT were considered high quality. Interreviewer agreement was assessed by calculated kappa statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 97 websites were reviewed. Over half (57/97, 59%) were for-profit sites, news stories, or personal blogs; 28% (27/97) were government or medical sites; and 13% (13/97) were nonprofit or advocacy sites. The majority of sites scored poorly in DISCERN questions designed to assess the reliability of information presented as well as data regarding treatment choices. Only 7% (7/97) of the websites were high quality as defined by the DISCERN tool. The majority of sites did not address the essential content defined by the ECT. Importantly, only 18% of websites (17/97) indicated that there are often a number of reasonable approaches to newborn care when faced with periviable birth. Agreement was strong, with kappa ranging from .72 to .91.

CONCLUSIONS

Most information about periviable birth found on the Internet using common search strategies is of low quality. News stories highlighting positive outcomes are disproportionately represented. Few websites discuss comfort care or how treatment decisions impact quality of life.

Evaluating the Use of a Decision Aid for Parents Facing Extremely Premature Delivery: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess decisional conflict and knowledge about prematurity among mothers facing extreme premature delivery when the counseling clinicians were randomized to counsel using a validated decision aid compared with usual counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized trial, clinicians at 5 level III neonatal intensive care units in the US were randomized to supplement counseling using the decision aid or to counsel mothers in their usual manner. We enrolled mothers with threatened premature delivery at 22^0/7 to 25^6/7 weeks of gestation within 7 days of their counseling. The primary outcome was the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) score. One hundred mothers per group were enrolled to detect a clinically relevant effect size of 0.4 in the Decisional Conflict Scale. Secondary outcomes included knowledge about prematurity; scores on the Preparedness for Decision Making scale; and acceptability.

RESULTS

Ninety-two clinicians were randomized and 316 mothers were counseled. Of these, 201 (64%) mothers were enrolled. The median gestational age was 24.1 weeks (IQR 23.7-24.9). In both groups, DCS scores were low (16.3 ± 18.2 vs 16.8 ± 17, P = .97) and Preparedness for Decision Making scores were high (73.4 ± 28.3 vs 70.5 ± 31.1, P = .33). There was a significantly greater knowledge score in the decision aid group (66.2 ± 18.5 vs 57.2 ± 18.8, P = .005). Most clinicians and parents found the decision aid useful.

CONCLUSIONS

For parents facing extremely premature delivery, use of a decision aid did not impact maternal decisional conflict, but it significantly improved knowledge of complex information. A structured decision aid may improve comprehension of complex information.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01713894.