Twins versus singleton pregnancies: outcomes in small for gestational age late preterm deliveries

Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm Singleton and Multiple Births -Single Center Experience

Objective. To compare mortality and major neonatal morbidities between singleton preterm infants and preterm infants of multiple gestations born <33 weeks' gestation. Method. Case-control study of preterm multiples and singletons <33 weeks' born at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City Riyadh (KAMC-R) between January 2017 and December 2020. Out-born infants and infants with lethal congenital abnormalities were excluded from the study. Mortality and major neonatal morbidities including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), sepsis and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were compared between preterm singletons and multiples. Results. A total of 803 preterm infants were included: 567 (70.6%) were singletons, 158 (19.6%) were twins and 36 (4.5%) infants were higher multiples. Adjusted mortality before hospital discharge was significantly higher among preterm infants of multiple gestations compared to preterm singletons (12.3% vs 7.9%; P = .003; AOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7). Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) needing treatment was significantly higher among preterm infants of multiple pregnancies compared to preterm singletons (11% vs 6.5%, P = .033, AOR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.04-2.99). In addition, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks post menstrual age (PMA) (29.7% vs 20.5%; P = .003; AOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5) and culture positive sepsis (24.2% vs 17.5%; P = .044; AOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.01-2.2) were significantly higher among preterm infants of multiple pregnancy. There were no differences in mortality and adverse neonatal outcomes between twins and higher multiples. Conclusion. Preterm infants of multiple gestations suffered higher mortality and neonatal morbidities compared to preterm singleton infants despite a higher utilization of maternal antenatal steroids and better antenatal care.

Twin charts should be the standard reference to assess growth in twin pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Twin pregnancies are characterized by slower growth velocity compared with singletons, especially during the third trimester and, therefore, tend to be smaller than singletons. Growth surveillance is instrumental in the identification of twin pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes. Whether the phenomenon of slow growth is an adaptive physiological response or represents pathological growth lag, is controversial. In this review, we focus on the evidence related to the types of growth charts employed for twin pregnancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consistent evidence has emerged over the past few years from large independent cohorts in different countries suggesting that twin-specific standards perform better in identifying growth-restricted twin pregnancies at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, without resulting in an increase in interventions or iatrogenic prematurity.

SUMMARY

The current evidence supports the use of twin-specific reference charts. Concerted efforts should be made to derive prospective evidence from large multicentre studies on various aspects of the implementation of twin-specific standards.

Severity of small-for-gestational-age and morbidity and mortality among very preterm neonates

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between small for gestational age (SGA) severity and morbidity and mortality in a contemporary, population of very preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis of a California statewide database evaluated singleton infants born during 2008-2018 at 24-32 weeks' gestation, with a birthweight <15th percentile. We analyzed neonatal outcomes in relation to weight for gestational age (WGA) and symmetry of growth restriction.

RESULTS

An increase in WGA by one z-score was associated with decreased major morbidity or mortality risk (aRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.77) and other adverse outcomes. The association was maintained across gestational ages and did not differ by fetal growth restriction diagnosis. Symmetric growth restriction was not associated with neonatal outcomes after standardizing for gestational age at birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing SGA severity had a significant impact on neonatal outcomes among very preterm infants.

Chorionicity, birth weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in uncomplicated twin pregnancies delivered from 36 weeks

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between chorionicity, birth weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in uncomplicated twin pregnancies progressing to at least 36 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective single centre cohort study of all twin pregnancies referred to our twin clinic between 2011 and 2018. Outcome details were obtained from the computerized maternity and neonatal records. The primary outcome was incidence of composite neonatal morbidity according to chorionicity. We also determined the incidence of composite neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with birth weight discordance. Logistic regression was used to identify and adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-five twin pregnancies (286 dichorionic, 99 monochorionic) were included. Gestational age at birth was significantly lower in pregnancies complicated by neonatal morbidity (p = 0.013) compared with those which were not. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, gestational age at birth (p = 0.031) and birth weight discordance (p = 0.004), but not chorionicity (p = 0.626) were independently associated with neonatal morbidity.

CONCLUSION(S)

In uncomplicated twin pregnancies chorionicity is not associated with neonatal morbidity. Gestational age at birth is the major determinant of neonatal outcome while the clinical impact of weight discordance seems marginally significant.

Assessment of different thresholds of birthweight discordance for early neonatal outcomes: retrospective analysis of 2348 twin pregnancies

Background

The optimal threshold of birthweight discordance (BWD) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between BWD at different thresholds and early neonatal outcomes and to assess their predictive accuracy.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using a birthweight data with the chorionicity information of 2348 liveborn twin pairs at a gestational age of ≥26 weeks, from 2012 to 2018. The percentage of BWD was calculated by dividing the actual birthweight difference by the weight of the larger twin and multiplying by 100. Outcomes of interest included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), ventilator support and a composite outcome combining major morbidities and neonatal death. Logistic regression models were performed to estimate the association between neonatal outcomes and BWD with different thresholds (≥15.0%, ≥20.0%, ≥25% and ≥ 30%). Generalized estimated equation (GEE) models were used to address intertwin correlation. Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) models were established to draw the dose-response relationship between BWD and the odds ratios of outcomes. Clustered receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the predictive accuracy.

Results

Of 2348 twin pairs, including 1946 dichorionic twin pairs and 402 monochorionic twin pairs, BWD was significantly associated with NICU admission, regardless of the thresholds used. The incidence of NRDS, ventilator support and the composite outcome were significantly higher when a threshold of ≥20% or greater was chosen. The dose-response relationship showed nonlinear growth in the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with increasing BWD. ROC analyses showed a low significant AUROC of 0.569 (95% CI: 0.526–0.612) for predicting NICU admission but no significant AUROCs for predicting other outcomes. A BWD of ≥30% provided a moderate increase in the likelihood of NICU admission [positive likelihood ratio (LR⁺) = 5.77].

Conclusion

Although BWD is independently associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, it is not a single predictor for neonatal outcomes given the weak discriminative ability to predict neonatal outcomes. A cutoff of 30% is more practical for risk stratification among twin gestations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04417-4.

Should twin-specific growth charts be used to assess fetal growth in twin pregnancies?

One of the hallmarks of twin pregnancies is the slower rate of fetal growth when compared with singleton pregnancies during the third trimester. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and whether it represents pathology or benign physiological adaptation are currently unclear. One important implication of these questions relates to the type growth charts that should be used by care providers to monitor growth of twin fetuses. If the slower growth represents pathology (ie, intrauterine growth restriction caused uteroplacental insufficiency), it would be preferable to use a singleton growth chart to identify a small twin fetus that is at risk for perinatal mortality and morbidity. If, however, the relative smallness of twins is the result of benign adaptive mechanisms, it is likely preferable to use a twin-based charts to avoid overdiagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies. In the current review, we addressed this question by describing the differences in fetal growth between twin and singleton pregnancies, reviewing the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms responsible for slower fetal growth in twins, summarizing available empirical evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the 2 types of charts for intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies, and addressing the question of whether uncomplicated dichorionic twins are at an increased risk for fetal death when compared with singleton fetuses. We identified a growing body of evidence that shows that the use of twin charts can reduce the proportion of twin fetuses identified with suspected intrauterine growth restriction by up to 8-fold and can lead to a diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction that is more strongly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders than a diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction based on a singleton-based chart without compromising the detection of twin fetuses at risk for adverse outcomes caused by uteroplacental insufficiency. We further found that small for gestational age twins are less likely to experience adverse perinatal outcomes or to have evidence of uteroplacental insufficiency than small for gestational age singletons and that recent data question the longstanding view that uncomplicated dichorionic twins are at an increased risk for fetal death caused by placental insufficiency. Overall, it seems that, based on existing evidence, the of use twin charts is reasonable and may be preferred over the use of singleton charts when monitoring the growth of twin fetuses. Still, it is important to note that the available data have considerable limitations and are primarily derived from observational studies. Therefore, adequately-powered trials are likely needed to confirm the benefit of twin charts before their use is adopted by professional societies.

Developmental outcomes in small-for-gestational age twins using a singleton vs twin birthweight reference in Upstate KIDS

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist about the potential developmental delays in appropriately grown twins; furthermore, twins may be at higher risk of developmental delay than singletons. Small-for-gestational age is a risk factor for developmental delay and is based on singleton birthweight references, which may misclassify small-for-gestational age in a subset of appropriately grown twins.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of developmental delay in twins classified as small-for-gestational age according to the twin and singleton birthweight references (<10th percentile).

STUDY DESIGN

In a birth cohort (2008-2010) of twins (n=1790) and singletons (n=3829) where parents completed Ages & Stages Questionnaires for child development between 4 and 36 months, we used a US population-based birthweight reference to categorize singletons and twins as small-for-gestational age. Uncertain small-for-gestational age twins were defined as small-for-gestational age by a singleton reference (<10th percentile) and not by a twin reference, and twin-reference small-for-gestational age twins were defined as small-for-gestational age by a twin reference. Adjusted generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the odds of failure on any Ages & Stages Questionnaires domain and on each of the 5 domains (fine motor, gross motor, communication, personal-social, and problem-solving domains); random intercepts accounted for repeated measures and twin clustering.

RESULTS

Compared with non-small-for-gestational age twins (>10th percentile), uncertain small-for-gestational age twins did not have higher odds of Ages & Stages Questionnaires failure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.80). Compared with non-small-for-gestational age singletons, both twin-reference and uncertain small-for-gestational age twins had higher odds of Ages & Stages Questionnaires failure, with the highest risk conferred to twin-reference small-for-gestational age twins (twin-reference adjusted odds ratio, 3.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.94-5.10]; uncertain adjusted odds ratio, 2.35 [95% confidence interval, 1.69-3.26]; P<.01 for trend). Results remained consistent when limiting analyses to term births (≥37 weeks' gestation).

CONCLUSION

Although a singleton reference may overestimate small-for-gestational age in twins, the findings indicated that a singleton birthweight reference may be appropriate for twins because it identifies more twins at risk of developmental delay than a twin reference.

The effect of gestational weight gain on perinatal outcomes among Chinese twin gestations based on Institute of Medicine guidelines

BACKGROUND

Gestational weight gain (GWG) has implications for perinatal outcomes, the guidelines for maternal weight gain, however, remain understudied among twin pregnancies. This study aimed to assess the associations between perinatal outcomes and GWG among twin pregnancies, based on the US institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with viable twins ≥26 weeks of gestation, was conducted in Foshan, China, during July 2015 and June 2018. Maternal BMI was categorized based on Chinese standard and GWG was categorized as below, within and above the IOM 2009 recommendations. Underweight women were excluded for analysis. Perinatal outcomes were compared among these groups. To assess the independent impact of GWG on the perinatal outcomes, conventional multivariable regression and general estimated equation (GEE) were utilized for maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 645 mothers with twin pregnancies were included, of whom 15.0, 41.4 and 43.6% gained weight below, within and above guidelines, respectively. Compared to weight gain within guidelines, inadequate weight gain was associated with increased risks in spontaneous preterm birth < 37 weeks (aOR:3.55; 95% CI: 1.73-7.28) and < 35 weeks (aOR:2.63; 95% CI: 1.16-5.97). Women who gained weight above guidelines were more likely to have gestational hypertension disorder (aOR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.32-4.21), pre-eclampsia (aOR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.29-5.21) and have fetuses weighted >90th percentile and less likely to have fetuses weighted < 2500 g and < 1500 g.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance of gestational weight gain within the normal range could decrease the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the causality between pre-eclampsia and gestational weight gain requires further investigations.

Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Neonates Born With an Isolated Single Umbilical Artery

Objective: To investigate pregnancy outcomes of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates born with isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) compared to SGA neonates without iSUA. Study Design: This was a population-based retrospective cohort analysis. The study group was defined as a singleton SGA neonate born with iSUA, while an SGA neonate without iSUA comprised the comparison group. We evaluated adverse perinatal outcomes in all SGA neonates born at the Soroka University Medical Center between the years 1998-2013. Multiple gestations, fetuses with known congenital malformations or chromosomal abnormalities and patients with lack of prenatal care were excluded from the study. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Results: Of 12,915 SGA deliveries, 1.2% (162) were complicated with iSUA. Women in the study group were older with a significantly lower gestational age at delivery compared with the comparison group. Rates of women who conceived after infertility treatments were higher in the study group. Additionally, patients in the study group had significantly higher rates of preterm deliveries, placental abruption, cord prolapse, non-reassuring fetal heart rates and cesarean delivery were noted in the study group. These neonates had a significantly lower birth weight (1988.0 ± 697 vs. 2388.3 ± 481 p < 0.001) and higher rates of low APGAR scores at the first and fifth minutes after birth compared with controls. Perinatal mortality was also found to be significantly higher among SGA neonates complicated with iSUA. Preterm delivery as well as perinatal mortality were found independently associated with iSUA among SGA neonates (aOR 4.01, 95% CI 2.88-5.59, aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.25-4.01, respectively). Conclusion: SGA pregnancies complicated with iSUA are at higher risk for adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes as compared to SGA pregnancies without iSUA.