1
|
James S, Ratcliffe SE, Assifi AR, Botfield J, Black K, Hanson M, Mazza D. Lifestyle risk reduction engagement during interconception: a qualitative descriptive study of women's preferences. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2025:bmjsrh-2024-202518. [PMID: 39890447 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention and self-management of lifestyle risks can reduce non-communicable disease risks and improve the health of mothers and their children. We explored Australian women's preferences for lifestyle risk reduction engagement during the interconception period. METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive interview study between February and May 2022. Women and people who have been pregnant and intended to have more children were recruited. We asked participants about their preferences for lifestyle risk reduction between pregnancies. Following reflexive thematic analysis, we conceptualised findings using the COM-B system. RESULTS Among 17 participants, most had given birth to one child and intended to have another child in 1 to 2 years. Our analysis found that most described lifestyle risk reduction engagement through nutrition and exercise, informed by personal experiences and their health goals for a future pregnancy/child. Key attributes affecting engagement in lifestyle risk reduction activities included their feasibility and practicality, habits and routines, motivation, pregnancy planning, and the source and quality of information. Participants' capacity and capability to engage in lifestyles supportive of interconception health were varied and influenced by juggling the routines of work, finances, health and evolving caring responsibilities. Community-based influences, including the availability of recreational infrastructure, the level of support provided by partners/family/peers and culture, also influenced participants' engagement in lifestyle risk reduction activities. CONCLUSIONS For lifestyles that encourage interconception health, maximising participants' capability and opportunities required motivation and access to infrastructure supportive of healthy meal options and exercise, health services and community networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon James
- Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care Centre of Research Excellence (SPHERE CRE), Department of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah E Ratcliffe
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anisa Rojanapenkul Assifi
- Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care Centre of Research Excellence (SPHERE CRE), Department of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Botfield
- Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care Centre of Research Excellence (SPHERE CRE), Department of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten Black
- Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Hanson
- Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care Centre of Research Excellence (SPHERE CRE), Department of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
James S, Watson C, Bernard E, Rathnasekara GK, Mazza D. Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2023; 73:e949-e957. [PMID: 37903638 PMCID: PMC10633660 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman's life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women's health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. AIM To explore GP perspectives about ICC. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. METHOD Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South-Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi- structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. RESULTS Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman's presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. CONCLUSION Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon James
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria; Head, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Victoria
| | - Cathy Watson
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Elodie Bernard
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria; Head, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Victoria
| | - Greasha K Rathnasekara
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria; Head, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Victoria
| | - Danielle Mazza
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria; Head, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
James S, Moulton JE, Assifi A, Botfield J, Black K, Hanson M, Mazza D. Women's needs for lifestyle risk reduction engagement during the interconception period: a scoping review. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 49:274-281. [PMID: 36849222 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unhealthy lifestyle is responsible for many chronic conditions, and antenatal engagement with women about lifestyle behaviours can be too late to prevent some adverse pregnancy outcomes and subsequent childhood risks. To reduce the risk of future adverse outcomes, the interconception period is an opportunity to implement positive health changes. The aim of this scoping review was to explore women's needs for lifestyle risk reduction engagement during the interconception period. METHODS The JBI methodology guided our scoping review. Six databases were searched for peer-reviewed, English-language research papers published between 2010 and 2021 on topics including perceptions, attitudes, lifestyle, postpartum, preconception and interconception. Title-abstract and full text screening was independently undertaken by two authors. Included papers' reference lists were searched to find additional papers. The main concepts were then identified using a descriptive and tabular approach. RESULTS A total of 1734 papers were screened and 33 met our inclusion criteria. Most included papers (82%, n=27) reported on nutrition and/or physical activity. Papers identified interconception through postpartum and/or preconception. Women's self-management needs for lifestyle risk reduction engagement during interconception included: informational needs, managing competing priorities, physical and mental health, self-perception and motivation, access to services and professional support, and family and peer networks. CONCLUSIONS There is a range of challenges for women to engage in lifestyle risk reduction during interconception. To enable women's preferences for how lifestyle risk reduction activities can be enacted, issues including childcare, ongoing and tailored health professional support, domestic support, cost and health literacy need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon James
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica E Moulton
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anisa Assifi
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica Botfield
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten Black
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Specialty of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Hanson
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Southampton, UK
| | - Danielle Mazza
- SPHERE CRE, Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Admiraal LAC, Rosman AN, Dolhain RJEM, West RL, Mulders AGMGJ. Facilitators and barriers of preconception care in women with inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatic diseases: an explorative survey study in a secondary and tertiary hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:238. [PMID: 35321664 PMCID: PMC8944158 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04560-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Preconception care (PCC) is care prior to conception to optimize parental health, and health of the future child, through biomedical and behavioral changes. Providing PCC to all women with a wish to conceive will improve perinatal health. PCC is especially important for women with a chronic disease, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic diseases (RD). At present PCC is not part of routine care for these women. The aim of this study is to identify facilitators and barriers on a patient and professional level regarding the provision of PCC in women with IBD and RD. Methods An explorative survey study among women with IBD and RD, their treating physicians and obstetric professionals was performed. Patients with a wish to conceive, pregnant women or those with a recent pregnancy (< 1 year ago) visiting the outpatient clinic of a secondary and tertiary hospital and involved physicians and obstetric professionals were eligible. Results A total of 71% of the IBD patients (n = 22/31) and 35% of the RD patients (n = 20/58) received a PCC consultation. PCC consultation was considered easy to enter, short in time and patients felt comfortable. Patients (71% IBD; 62% RD) preferred a personal PCC consultation with their disease specific specialist together with an obstetrician. Patients specifically wanted to receive information about the safety of medication use and disease activity following delivery. Of the included healthcare professionals 67% (n = 31) agreed PCC was applicable to their patients. Main barrier to providing PCC was lack of time and unavailability of professionals. In total 41% (n = 16) of obstetric professionals felt they had the knowledge and skills to provide PCC compared to 33% (n = 1) and 75% (n = 3) of gastroenterologists and rheumatologists, respectively. Conclusion Lack of awareness and urgency for the effectuation can be seen as important barriers for implementation of PCC. Due to the explorative nature generalisation of the results is not allowed. In the future, adaptation of the curricula of healthcare professionals by implementing interventions for pregnancy planning and preparation will generate awareness. Modelling of the impact of PCC might prove useful in resolving the lack of urgency for PCC realization. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04560-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A C Admiraal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Sp-4469, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A N Rosman
- Department of Health Care Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Postbus, 25035 3001, HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J E M Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R L West
- Department of Gastroenterology, Franciscus Gasthuis, PO Box 10900, BA, 3004, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A G M G J Mulders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Sp-4469, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|