Chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancies at risk for a molecular disorder

Abnormal chromosomes identification using chromosomal microarray

In this study, we presented a case series to highlight the chromosomal microarray (CMA) in identifying chromosomal abnormalities which is undetectable by conventional karyotyping or known abnormal chromosomes without clear diagnosis. Extensive studies showed that CMA was gradually accepted as a prenatal invasive testing during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic effect of CMA for foetuses with abnormal chromosomes unrecognised by conventional karyotyping. Pregnant women who need prenatal diagnosis with all indications were enrolled in this study. For aberrant cytogenetic findings that cannot be defined by routine karyotyping, single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) was used. Six cases with abnormal karyotype were included in the study. With higher resolution of translocation breakpoints, CMA could detect smaller chromosomal imbalances that were undetectable by karyotyping. This study highlights the value of CMA for the detection of submicroscopic abnormalities in foetuses that cannot be detected by conventional karyotyping. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Chromosomal microarray (CMA) offers additional diagnostic benefits by revealing submicroscopic imbalances or copy number variations (CNVs) that are too small to be identified on a standard G-banded chromosome preparation.What do the results of this study add? We added a case series to highlight the CMA in identifying chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by conventional karyotyping or known abnormal chromosomes without clear diagnosis.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study highlights the value of CMA in the case of associated foetuses with submicroscopic abnormalities that cannot detect by conventional karyotyping.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.