Women's compliance with ultrasound in labor: a prospective observational study

The role of ultrasonographic-guided insertion of cervical ripening balloon: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Cervical ripening balloon (CRB) is a frequently used technique for non-pharmacologically induction of labor (IOL) in presence of an unfavorable cervix. Successful ripening requires a correct placement of the CRB in the cervical canal. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound-guided CRB insertion results more effective in inducing cervical changes than speculum-guided placement.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including 90 singleton nulliparous pregnancies undergoing mechanical IOL. In 45 women CRB was placed under ultrasonographic control and in 45 under speculum view. The primary outcome was to evaluate any difference in cervical ripening or spontaneous onset of labor at CRB between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were: the duration of labor as expressed as the time interval between CRB insertion and delivery and the rate of cesarean section.

RESULTS

The basal characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. After the CRB removal the percentage of women achieving a Bishop score >4 or entering in labor were significantly higher in ultrasonographic assisted group than in the speculum guided group (80 % vs 55.5 % p = 0.023). Bishop score at CRB removal resulted significantly higher in the ultrasonographic assisted group (median 5 vs 2; p = 0.0001) as well its individual changes before and after CRB insertion (median 3 vs 2; p = 0.006). The duration of labor resulted significantly shorter in ultrasound assisted group (median hours 33 vs median 40 p = 0.017), while no differences were found in the incidence of cesarean section (33.3 % vs37.7 %; p = 0.825).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided CRB placement induces a better ripening of the cervix resulting in a reduced requirement of using a secondary method of IOL and a shorter duration of labor.

2D-transperineal ultrasound in delivery room: Contribution in assessing labor progress, predicting outcome of labor and recognizing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). A systematic review

AIMS

Ultrasound is used in the delivery room to assess fetal head position, engagement during labor, and anal sphincter injuries in the immediate postpartum period. The transperineal approach allows for direct visualization of the structures of interest without altering anatomical landmarks. Various ultrasound measurements during labor have been described in the literature, and their use varies widely across maternity units. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on relevant ultrasound parameters for the management of labor and delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed articles indexed in MEDLINE from 1990 to 2022, selecting those that evaluated transperineal ultrasound during labor for term singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation.

RESULTS

We identified 124 articles out of 394 references, including 4 randomized controlled trials, 108 prospective studies, 6 cross-sectional studies, and 6 retrospective studies. The Angle of Progression (AOP) is better documented and appears more reliable than the Head-Perineum Distance (HPD) for diagnosing engagement, monitoring labor, and predicting its outcome. The HPD is easier to perform but shows inconsistencies in the literature. The Head Progression Distance (HPrD) shows good performance but requires further studies before routine use, as does Head-Symphysis Distance (HSD). Recent studies show a growing interest in ultrasound biofeedback of fetal head progression to improve pushing efforts as well as screening for Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS).

CONCLUSIONS

Transperineal ultrasound is a minimally invasive technique that can be used routinely in the delivery room. It can aid in monitoring labor, predicting the mode of delivery, and may serve as valuable biofeedback to optimize pushing during expulsion.

The predictive role of serial transperineal sonography during the first stage of labor for cesarean section

OBJECTIVES

Head to perineum distance (HPD) and angle of progression (AOP) are sonographic markers which have been investigated for the evaluation of labor progress. Here, we aimed to evaluate the predictive role of serially measured AOP and HPD during the first stage of labor in labor progress both in nulliparous and multiparous patients. Also, we firstly compared this role for labor progress.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study including 299 patients. Patients were grouped as vaginal delivery (n=247) and cesarean section (n=52). Demographic and obstetric characteristics, HPD and AOP values, and vaginal examination findings were recorded and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Slower changes in HPD and AOP values were detected in cesarean group. A HPD >38 mm predicted cesarean section with 86.9 % sensitivity and 59.2 % specificity (AUC=0.782, p<0.001) whereas AOP ≤117° predicted cesarean section with 93.5 % sensitivity and 65.1 % specificity in all patients (AUC=0.877, p<0.001). A HPD >37 mm predicted cesarean section with 84.2 % sensitivity and 55.2 % specificity (AUC=0.763, p<0.001) while AOP ≤110° predicted it with 82.7 % sensitivity and 73.3 % specificity in nulliparous patients (AUC=0.862, p<0.001). In multiparous patients, HPD>39 mm predicted cesarean section with 95.5 % sensitivity and 62.5 % specificity (AUC=0.824, p<0.001) and AOP ≤109° predicted cesarean section with 87.9 % sensitivity and 78.2 % specificity (AUC=0.909, p<0.001). AOP had superior predictive role than HPD in both nulliparous and multiparous groups (p<0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that differences in labor progress could be determined by using serial intrapartum sonography. However, more research is needed for the implementation of sonopartogram to the clinical obstetric practice.

Current practice of ultrasound in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of a national survey

OBJECTIVES

Although frequently employed in the delivery room, current guidelines do not recommend the use of ultrasound in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the routine use of ultrasonography during PPH.

METHODS

A questionnaire, composed by a series of questions that assess participant characteristics and ultrasound use during PPH, was sent to members of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology currently employed in obstetrical units. Answers were subsequently grouped based on participant characteristics.

RESULTS

Based on the responses of 200 participants it was found that ultrasound was routinely employed by 67 % of participants during PPH, by 85 % if Retained Products of Conception (RPOC) was suspected, by 67 % during Bakri balloon placement and by 69 % during curettage procedures. Routine ultrasound use was higher amongst participants working in hospitals with a higher number of deliveries, by those with more years of experience using ultrasound in labor, and by those that had attended specific postgraduate training courses.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of recommendations in the current guidelines, the results of this survey show that ultrasound seems to be commonly employed by maternal fetal medicine practitioners in the management of PPH.

A national survey on current practice of ultrasound in labor ward

OBJECTIVES

Use of ultrasonography has been suggested as an accurate adjunct to clinical evaluation of fetal position and station during labor. There are no available reports concerning its actual use in delivery wards. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current practice regarding the use of ultrasonography during labor.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to members of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology employed in delivery wards. The qFeuestionnaire was made up of 22 questions evaluating participant characteristics and the current use of ultrasound in labor in their hospital of employment. The answers were grouped according to participant characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 200 participants replied. Ultrasound was considered useful before an operative vaginal delivery by 59.6 % of respondents, while 51.8 and 52.5 % considered it useful in the management of prolonged first and second stages of labor, respectively. The major indication for ultrasound use during labor was the assessment of fetal occiput position. The major difficulties in its application were the perceived lack of training and the complexity of the ultrasound equipment use. Participants that reported fewer difficulties were those employed in hospitals with a higher number of deliveries or having delivery units with more years of experience using ultrasound in labor, or those who had attended specific training courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that, despite the reported evidence of a higher accuracy of ultrasound compared to clinical evaluation in assessing fetal position and station, its use is still limited, even amongst maternal-fetal medicine practitioners specialized in ultrasonography.

Validation of an automated software (Smartpelvic™) in assessing hiatal area from three dimensional transperineal pelvic volumes of pregnant women: comparison with manual analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the agreement between a manual and an automatic technique in assessing levator hiatus area (LHA) during pregnancy from three-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor volumes obtained by trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS).

METHODS

3D volumes were acquired during rest, maximum pelvic floor contraction and Valsalva maneuver from 66 pregnant women. Manual selection of LHA and automatic software (Smart Pelvic™) were applied on TPUS volume starting from a C-plane view. To evaluate intra- and inter-observer variability measurements of LHA were performed twice by the same operator and once by a second sonographer. Reference hiatal contours obtained manually by the first operator were compared with the automated ones. Reproducibility was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

LHA measurement, using automatic software, achieved excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility in pregnant women both at rest and after dynamic analysis (ICC>0.9). Further, an excellent agreement resulted between manual selection of the LHA and automatic imaging (ICC>0.9). The average time taken to obtain LHA manually was significantly longer when compared to the automatic analysis (p≤0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Smart pelvic software resulted from a reliable method for automatically measuring the LHA, showing high reproducibility and accuracy.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression

Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.

Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire

Introduction

Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an" obstetric violence", because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU.

Methods

In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/satisfaction and the" obstetric violence". IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered.

Results

74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less "violence" has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that "violence" (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease.

Conclusions

In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE.

How to Reach the Best Ultrasound Performance in the Delivery Room

Ultrasonography is an instrument that is present in the maternal-fetal assessment throughout pregnancy and with widely documented benefits, but its use in intrapartum is becoming increasingly relevant. From the assessment of labor progression to the assessment of placental disorders, ultrasound can be used to correlate with physiological findings and physical examination, as its benefit in the delivery room cannot yet be proven. There are still few professionals with adequate training for its use in the delivery room and for the correct interpretation of data. Thus, this article aims to present a review of the entire applicability of ultrasound in the delivery room, considering the main stages of labor. There is still limited research in evidence-based medicine of its various possible uses in intrapartum, but it is expected that further studies can bring improvements in the quality of maternal and neonatal health during labor.

Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation

This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation in labor ward and improve the clinical management of labor. Ultrasound in labor can be performed using a transabdominal or a transperineal approach depending upon which parameters are being assessed. During transabdominal imaging, fetal anatomy, presentation, liquor volume, and placental localization can be determined. The transperineal images depict images of the fetal head in which calculations to determine a proposed fetal head station can be made.

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term

BACKGROUND

Routine vaginal examinations are undertaken at regular time intervals during labour to assess whether labour is progressing as expected. Unusually slow progress can be due to underlying problems, described as labour dystocia, or can be a normal variation of progress. Evidence suggests that if mother and baby are well, length of labour alone should not be used to decide whether labour is progressing normally. Other methods to assess labour progress include intrapartum ultrasound and monitoring external physical and behavioural cues. Vaginal examinations can be distressing for women, and overdiagnosis of dystocia can result in iatrogenic morbidity due to unnecessary intervention. It is important to establish whether routine vaginal examinations are effective, both as an accurate measure of physiological labour progress and to distinguish true labour dystocia, or whether other methods for assessing labour progress are more effective. This Cochrane Review is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness, acceptability, and consequences of routine vaginal examinations compared with other methods, or different timings, to assess labour progress at term.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Register (which includes trials from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and conference proceedings) and ClinicalTrials.gov (28 February 2021). We also searched the reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of vaginal examinations compared with other methods of assessing labour progress and studies assessing different timings of vaginal examinations. Quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion. We excluded cross-over trials and conference abstracts.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed all studies identified by the search for inclusion in the review. Four review authors independently extracted data. Two review authors assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four studies that randomised a total of 755 women, with data analysed for 744 women and their babies. Interventions used to assess labour progress were routine vaginal examinations, routine ultrasound assessments, routine rectal examinations, routine vaginal examinations at different frequencies, and vaginal examinations as indicated. We were unable to conduct meta-analysis as there was only one study for each comparison.  All studies were at high risk of performance bias due to difficulties with blinding. We assessed two studies as high risk of bias and two as low or unclear risk of bias for other domains. The overall certainty of the evidence assessed using GRADE was low or very low.  Routine vaginal examinations versus routine ultrasound to assess labour progress (one study, 83 women and babies) Study in Turkey involving multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour. Routine vaginal examinations may result in a slight increase in pain compared to routine ultrasound (mean difference -1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.10 to -0.48; one study, 83 women, low certainty evidence) (pain measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in reverse: zero indicating 'worst pain', 10 indicating no pain). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; augmentation of labour; spontaneous vaginal birth; chorioamnionitis; neonatal infection; admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Routine vaginal examinations versus routine rectal examinations to assess labour progress (one study, 307 women and babies) Study in Ireland involving women in labour at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low. Compared with routine rectal examinations, routine vaginal examinations may have little or no effect on: augmentation of labour (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.68; one study, 307 women); and spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.06; one study, 307 women). We found insufficient data to fully assess: neonatal infections (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.07; one study, 307 babies); and admission to NICU (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.73; one study, 307 babies). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; chorioamnionitis; maternal pain. Routine four-hourly vaginal examinations versus routine two-hourly examinations (one study, 150 women and babies) UK study involving primiparous women in labour at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low. Compared with routine two-hourly vaginal examinations, routine four-hourly vaginal examinations may have little or no effect, with data compatible with both benefit and harm, on: augmentation of labour (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.57; one study, 109 women); and spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.26; one study, 150 women). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes: positive birth experience; chorioamnionitis; neonatal infection; admission to NICU; maternal pain. Routine vaginal examinations versus vaginal examinations as indicated (one study, 204 women and babies)  Study in Malaysia involving primiparous women being induced at term. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as low. Compared with vaginal examinations as indicated, routine four-hourly vaginal examinations may result in more women having their labour augmented (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.31; one study, 204 women). There may be little or no effect on: • spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.59; one study, 204 women); • chorioamnionitis (RR 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.21; one study, 204 women); • neonatal infection (RR 4.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 35.87; one study, 204 babies); • admission to NICU (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.63 to 6.56; one study, 204 babies). The study did not assess our other primary outcomes of positive birth experience or maternal pain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on these findings, we cannot be certain which method is most effective or acceptable for assessing labour progress. Further large-scale RCT trials are required. These should include essential clinical and experiential outcomes. This may be facilitated through the development of a tool to measure positive birth experiences. Data from qualitative studies are also needed to fully assess whether methods to evaluate labour progress meet women's needs for a safe and positive labour and birth, and if not, to develop an approach that does.

Antepartum ultrasound prediction of failed vacuum-assisted operative delivery: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Failed vacuum-assisted delivery (VD) is associated with increased risk of maternal perineal trauma and neonatal morbidity. Knowledge of the risk factors related to failed VD is essential in the clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of different ante-partum ultrasound parameters in predicting the risk of failed VD prior to the onset of Labor and to test the diagnostic performance of a multiparametric model including pregnancy and Labor characteristics, ante and intra-partum ultrasound in anticipating failed VD.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by VD undergoing a dedicated ultrasound assessment at 36-38 weeks of gestation. Head circumference (HC), estimated fetal weight (EFW) and subpubic angle and (SPA) were recorded before the onset of Labor. At the time of the VD, occiput position, head perineum distance (HPD) and angle of progression (AOP) were also recorded. Multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to explore the strength of association and test the diagnostic accuracy of different maternal, Labor and ultrasound characteristics in predicting g failed VD.

RESULTS

Four hundred eight pregnancies with successful and 26 with failed VD were included in the analysis. Fetuses experiencing failed VD had a larger HC (1.21 versus 1.07 MoM; p = .0001), a higher EFW z-value (0.56 versus 0.33 z values; p = .002) and a narrower SPA (114 versus 122 p = .0001) compared to those having a successful VD. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, maternal height (aOR 0.89 95% CI 0.76-0.98), nulliparity (aOR: 1.14 95% CI 1.06-1.36), HC MoM (aOR: 1.24 95% CI 1.13-1.55) and SPA angle (aOR: 0.82 95% CI 0.67-0.95), but not EFW (p = .08) were independently associated with failed VD. When intrapartum ultrasound variables were added to the multivariate model, fetal occipital position (aOR: 1.45 95th CI 1.11-1.99) and HPD (aOR: 0.77 95th CI 0.44-0.96) were independently associated with failed VD. A multiparametric model integrating pregnancy and Labor characteristics and ante-partum ultrasound variables had an AUC of 0.837 (95% CI 0.797-0.876) for the prediction of failed VE. The addition of intra-partum ultrasound variables to the prediction model, improved the accuracy for failed VD provided by maternal and antepartum ultrasound characteristics with an AUC of 0.913 (0.888-0.937).

CONCLUSION

Antepartum prediction of failed VD is feasible. HC, SPA but not EFW are independently associated and predictive of failed VD. Adding these variables to a multiparametric model including maternal and intrapartum ultrasound parameters improves the diagnostic accuracy for failed VD.