Earlier and improved screening for impending fetal compromise

Etiology and Ontogeny of Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Practice and Research

Cerebral palsy (CP) has been recognized as a group of neurologic disorders with varying etiologies and ontogenies. While a percentage of CP cases arises during labor, the expanded use of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) to include prevention of CP has resulted in decades of vastly increased interventions that have not significantly reduced the incidence of CP for infants born at term in the USA. Litigation alleging that poor obstetrical practice caused CP in most of these affected children has led to contentious arguments regarding the actual etiologies of this condition and often resulted in substantial monetary awards for plaintiffs. Recent advances in genetic testing using whole exome sequencing have revealed that at least one-third of CP cases in term infants are genetic in origin and therefore not labor-related. Here, we will present and discuss previous attempts to sort out contributing etiologies and ontogenies of CP, and how these newer diagnostic techniques are rapidly improving our ability to better detect and understand such cases. In light of these developments, we present our vision for an overarching spectrum for proper categorization of CP cases into that the following groups: (1) those begun at conception from genetic causes (nonpreventable); (2) those stemming from adverse antenatal/pre-labor events (possibly preventable with heightened antepartum assessment); (3) Those arising from intrapartum events (potentially preventable by earlier interventions); (4) Those occurring shortly after birth (possibly preventable with closer neonatal monitoring); (5) Those that appear later in the postnatal period from non-labor-related causes such as untreated infections or postnatal intracranial hemorrhages.

Resistance to Change

Advances in medical technology do not follow a smooth process and are highly variable. Implementation can occasionally be rapid, but often faces varying degrees of resistance resulting at the very least in delayed implementation. Using qualitative comparative analysis, we have evaluated numerous technological advances from the perspective of how they were introduced, implemented, and opposed. Resistance varies from benign - often happening because of inertia or lack of resources to more active forms, including outright opposition using both appropriate and inappropriate methods to resist/delay changes in care. Today, even public health has become politicized, having nothing to do with the underlying science, but having catastrophic results. Two other corroding influences are marketing pressure from the private sector and vested interests in favor of one outcome or another. This also applies to governmental agencies. There are a number of ways in which papers have been buried including putting the thumb on the scale where reviewers can sabotage new ideas. Unless we learn to harness new technologies earlier in their life course and understand how to maneuver around the pillars of obstruction to their implementation, we will not be able to provide medical care at the forefront of technological capabilities.

Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index

Electronic fetal monitoring, particularly in the form of cardiotocography, forms the centerpiece of labor management. Initially successfully designed for stillbirth prevention, there was hope to also include prediction and prevention of fetal acidosis and its sequelae. With the routine use of electronic fetal monitoring, the cesarean delivery rate increased from <5% in the 1970s to >30% at present. Most at-risk cases produced healthy babies, resulting in part from considerable confusion as to the differences between diagnostic and screening tests. Electronic fetal monitoring is clearly a screening test. Multiple attempts have aimed at enhancing its ability to accurately distinguish babies at risk of in utero injury from those who are not and to do this in a timely manner so that appropriate intervention can be performed. Even key electronic fetal monitoring opinion leaders admit that this goal has yet to be achieved. Our group has developed a modified approach called the "Fetal Reserve Index" that contextualizes the findings of electronic fetal monitoring by formally including the presence of maternal, fetal, and obstetrical risk factors and increased uterine contraction frequencies and breaking up the tracing into 4 quantifiable components (heart rate, variability, decelerations, and accelerations). The result is a quantitative 8-point metric, with each variable being weighted equally in version 1.0. In multiple previously published refereed papers, we have shown that in head-to-head studies comparing the fetal reserve index with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' fetal heart rate categories, the fetal reserve index more accurately identifies babies born with cerebral palsy and could also reduce the rates of emergency cesarean delivery and vaginal operative deliveries. We found that the fetal reserve index scores and fetal pH and base excess actually begin to fall earlier in the first stage of labor than was commonly appreciated, and the fetal reserve index provides a good surrogate for pH and base excess values. Finally, the last fetal reserve index score before delivery combined with early analysis of neonatal heart rate and acid/base balance shows that the period of risk for neonatal neurologic impairment can continue for the first 30 minutes of life and requires much closer neonatal observation than is currently being done.

Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring

The delivery of healthy babies is the primary goal of obstetric care. Many technologies have been developed to reduce both maternal and fetal risks for poor outcomes. For 50 years, electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been used extensively in labor attempting to prevent a large proportion of neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy. However, even key opinion leaders admit that EFM has mostly failed to achieve this goal. We believe this situation emanates from a fundamental misunderstanding of differences between screening and diagnostic tests, considerable subjectivity and inter-observer variability in EFM interpretation, failure to address the pathophysiology of fetal compromise, and a tunnel vision focus. To address these suboptimal results, several iterations of increasingly sophisticated analyses have intended to improve the situation. We believe that part of the continuing problem is that the focus of EFM has been too narrow ignoring important contextual issues such as maternal, fetal, and obstetrical risk factors, and increased uterine contraction frequency. All of these can significantly impact the application of EFM to intrapartum care. We have recently developed a new clinical approach, the Fetal Reserve Index (FRI), contextualizing EFM interpretation. Our data suggest the FRI is capable of providing higher accuracy and earlier detection of emerging fetal compromise. Over time, artificial intelligence/machine learning approaches will likely improve measurements and interpretation of FHR characteristics and other relevant variables. Such future developments will allow us to develop more comprehensive models that increase the interpretability and utility of interfaces for clinical decision making during the intrapartum period.

Total intrapartum fetal reperfusion time (fetal resilience) and neonatal acidemia

OBJECTIVE

The main objective is to study the predictive capacity of intrapartum total fetal reperfusion (fetal resilience) by itself or in combination with other parameters as a predictor of neonatal acidemia.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study was carried out at the Miguel Servet University Hospital (Zaragoza, Spain) on a cohort of 5694 pregnant women between June 2017 and October 2018. Maternal, perinatal, and cardiotocographic records were collected. Two reviewers blindly described the monitors with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) categorizations and parameters and the non-ACOG parameters. Neonatal acidemia was defined as pH <7.10. The parameters analyzed to predict acidemia were evaluated using the sensitivity for specificity 90% value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

We recorded 192 infants with acidemia, corresponding to a global acidemia rate of 3.4%. Of these, 72 were excluded for lack of criteria, leaving 120 patients with arterial acidemia included in the study and 258 in the control group. The sensitivity (specificity 90%) of detection of acidemia was 42% for the ACOG III categorization (AUC, 0.524: 95% CI, 0.470-0.578), 24% for fetal reperfusion (AUC, 0.704: 95% CI, 0.649-0.759), 27% for total area of decelerations (AUC, 0.717: 95% CI, 0.664-0.771) and 50% for the multivariate model built from total reperfusion time (AUC, 0.826: 95% CI, 0.783-0.869). The total reperfusion time corresponding to a false negative rate of 10% is 23.75 min, with 28% of fetuses above this time. The AUC and sensitivity for a false negative rate of 10% are equivalent for deceleration area and time of reperfusion (p = .504).

CONCLUSION

The total reperfusion time (fetal resilience) and total deceleration area are non-ACOG parameters with a good predictive ability for neonatal acidemia, higher than the ACOG III classification and without statistical differences between them. The discrimination ability of total reperfusion time can be improved using a multivariate model. As a cutoff for its use we suggest 23.75 min in 30 min corresponding to an acidemic classification rate of 90%. New parameters in combination with other maternal, obstetrics, or fetal variables, are required for the interpretation of fetal well-being.

Mid forceps did not cause "compromised babies" - "compromise" caused forceps: an approach toward safely lowering the cesarean delivery rate

OBJECTIVE

Over 5 decades, Cesarean Delivery rates (CDR) have risen 6-fold while vaginal operative deliveries [VODs] decreased from >20% to ∼3%. Poor outcomes (HIE and cerebral palsy) haven't improved. Potentiating the virtual abandonment of forceps (F), particularly midforceps (Mid), were allegations about various poor neonatal outcomes. Here, we evaluate VOD and CDR outcomes controlling for prior fetal risk metrics (PR) ascertained an hour before birth.

METHODS

Our 45-year-old database from a labor research unit of moderate/high risk laboring patients (288 NSVDs, 120 Lows, 30 Mids, and 32 CDs) had multiple fetal scalp samples for base excess (BE), pH, cord blood gases (CB), and umbilical artery bloods. ANOVA established relationships between birth methods and outcomes (Cord blood BE and pH and 1 and 5 min Apgar scores); correlations, and two-step multiple regression assessed PR for delivery method and neonatal outcomes. The main outcome measures were correlations of outcome measures with fetal scalp sample BE and pH up to an hour before delivery and fetal reserve index scores scored concurrently.

RESULTS

NSVDs had the best immediate neonatal outcomes with significantly higher CB pH and BE as compared to forceps and CDs. However, controlling for PR revealed: (1) PR at 1 h before delivery correlated with delivery mode, i.e. the decrements in outcomes were already present before the delivery was performed; and (2) The presumed deleterious effects of interventional deliveries, per se, were significantly reduced, and (3) Fetal Reserve Index predicted neonatal outcomes better than fetal scalp sample BE, pH, or delivery mode.

CONCLUSION

The historical belief that MF deliveries caused poorer outcomes than NSVDs seems mostly backwards. Appreciating PR's impact on delivery routes, and when appropriate, properly performing VODs could safely reduce CDR. If our approach lowered CDR by only ∼2%, in the United States about 80,000 CDs might be avoided, saving ∼$750 Million yearly. In the post pandemic world, safely apportioning medical expenses will be even more critical than previously.