1
|
Berger R, Stelzl P, Maul H. Administration of Antenatal Corticosteroids: Optimal Timing. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84:48-58. [PMID: 38205043 PMCID: PMC10781581 DOI: 10.1055/a-2202-5363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in significantly reducing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) depends crucially on the timing. It is successful if delivery takes place between 24 hours and seven days following administration; after this period, the side effects seem to predominate. In addition, an increased rate of mental impairment and behavioral disorders are observed in children born full-term after ACS administration. The optimal timing of ACS administration depends crucially on the given indication; to date, it has been achieved in only 25-40% of cases. ACS administration is always indicated in PPROM, in severe early pre-eclampsia, in fetal IUGR with zero or reverse flow in the umbilical artery, in placenta previa with bleeding, and in patients experiencing premature labor with a cervical length < 15 mm. The risk of women with asymptomatic cervical insufficiency giving birth within seven days is very low. In this case, ACS should not be administered even if the patient's cervical length is less than 15 mm, provided that the cervix is closed and there are no other risk factors for a premature birth. The development of further diagnostic methods with improved power to predict premature birth is urgently needed in order to optimize the timing of ACS administration in this patient population. Caution when administering ACS is also indicated in women experiencing premature labor who have a cervical length ≥ 15 mm. Further studies using amniocentesis are needed in order to identify the patient population with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity/intra-amniotic infection (MIAC/IAI), and to define threshold values at which delivery is indicated. ACS administration is not performed as an emergency measure, usually not even before transfer to a perinatal center. Therefore, whenever possible, the indication for ACS administration should be determined by a clinician who is highly experienced in perinatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Berger
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Marienhaus Klinikum St. Elisabeth, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universitäten Mainz und Maastricht, Neuwied,
Germany
| | - Patrick Stelzl
- Universitätsklinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und gynäkologische Endokrinologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz,
Austria
| | - Holger Maul
- Frauenkliniken, Asklepios Kliniken Barmbek, Wandsbek und Nord-Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitta K, Tsakiridis I, Kapetanios G, Pavlaki A, Tarnanidis E, Dagklis T, Athanasiadis A, Mamopoulos A. Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes of Preterm Deliveries: A Retrospective Study in Greece. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:10. [PMID: 38276044 PMCID: PMC10820495 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Preterm birth is a significant concern in obstetrics and neonatology since preterm neonates are at higher risk of various health complications and may require specialized care. The optimal mode of delivery in preterm birth is a matter of debate. This study aimed to evaluate the mode of delivery in preterm neonates and the associated neonatal outcomes. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including all preterm neonates born between January 2010 and December 2020 at the 3rd Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. The mode of delivery in relation to gestational age groups and the cause of preterm birth were analyzed. Neonatal outcomes were also evaluated according to gestational age, indication and mode of delivery. Results: A total of 1167 preterm neonates were included in the study; the majority of them were delivered via cesarean section (76.1%). Most of the preterm neonates (n = 715; 61.3%) were delivered at 32+0-36+6 weeks, while cesarean section was the most common mode of delivery after 28+0 weeks. Furthermore, spontaneous onset of labor (OR: 6.038; 95% CI: 3.163-11.527; p < 0.001), multiple gestation (OR: 1.782; 95% CI: 1.165-2.227; p = 0.008) and fetal distress (OR: 5.326; 95% CI: 2.796-10.144; p < 0.001) were the main causes of preterm delivery at 32+0-36+6 weeks. The overall mortality rate was 8.1% among premature neonates. Regarding morbidity, 919 (78.7%) neonates were diagnosed with respiratory disorders, 129 (11.1%) with intraventricular hemorrhage and 30 (2.6%) with necrotizing enterocolitis. Early gestational age at delivery was the main risk factor of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Notably, the mode of delivery did not have any impact on neonatal survival (OR: 1.317; 95% CI: 0.759-2.284; p = 0.328), but preterm neonates born via cesarean section were at higher risk of respiratory disorders, compared to those born via vaginal delivery (OR: 2.208; 95% CI: 1.574-3.097; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Most preterm deliveries occurred in the moderate-to-late preterm period via cesarean section. Early gestational age at delivery was the main prognostic factor of neonatal morbidity and mortality, while the mode of delivery did not have any impact on neonatal survival. Future research on the mode of delivery of the preterm neonates is warranted to establish definitive answers for each particular gestational age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriaki Mitta
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Ioannis Tsakiridis
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Georgios Kapetanios
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Antigoni Pavlaki
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Efthymios Tarnanidis
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Themistoklis Dagklis
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Apostolos Athanasiadis
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Apostolos Mamopoulos
- Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.M.); (G.K.); (E.T.); (T.D.); (A.A.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|