Tackling the gap in platelet inhibition with oral antiplatelet agents in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Gastric protection in cardiological practice: an Italian survey on the prescriptive attitude

BACKGROUND

Gastric protection is commonly considered in patients who use medications able to damage gastric mucosa, mainly NSAIDs, antiplatelets, and anticoagulants. Therefore, cardiologists may frequently prescribe drugs to protect the stomach from damaging medications. The present survey investigated the attitude toward using gastric protection by a panel of Italian cardiologists.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire included three sections concerning practical problems on this issue in clinical practice facing patients with cardiological disorders. The questionnaire was administered in three successive months.

RESULTS

Ninety Italian cardiologists completed the questionnaire. They all consider gastric protection, mainly when prescribing potentially noxious medications. Usually, cardiologists prescribe proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in 60% of their patients. Alginates and mucosal protectors are less considered. As a rule, cardiologists request investigations if the initial treatment fails. Moreover, the safety issue is carefully assessed. Furthermore, this survey experience significantly affected the approach to managing patients who require gastric protection. The participants carefully considered the prescriptive appropriateness of gastric protectors, mainly concerning the PPIs use. Consequently, PPIs were discontinued when inappropriate. A new medical device with triple action (antacid, mucosal protectors, and anti-reflux) contributed to this new attitude.

CONCLUSIONS

The present survey underscored that the appropriateness in prescribing gastric protectors is clinically relevant. In addition, a longitudinal survey experience contributed to change the practical approach by highlighting the prescriptive appropriateness of PPIs, and using a new medical device with multiple gastroprotective activities.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Parenteral P2Y12 Inhibitors: Rationale, Evidence, and Future Directions

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of the combination of aspirin and an inhibitor of the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor for ADP, remains among the most investigated treatments in cardiovascular medicine. While a substantial amount of research initially stemmed from the observations of late and very late stent thrombosis events in the first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) era, DAPT has been recently transitioning from a purely stent-related to a more systemic secondary prevention strategy. Oral and parenteral platelet P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are currently available for clinical use. The latter have been shown to be extremely suitable in drug-naïve patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), mainly because oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are associated with delayed efficacy in patients with STEMI and because pre-treatment with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors is discouraged in NSTE-ACS, and in patients with recent DES implantation and in need of urgent cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. More definitive evidence is needed, however, about optimal switching strategies between parenteral and oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and about newer potent subcutaneous agents that are being developed for the pre-hospital setting.

Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Antiplatelet therapy is key to reducing local thrombotic complications and systemic ischaemic events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but it is inevitably associated with increased bleeding. The continuous refinement in stent technologies, together with the high incidence of ischaemic recurrences after PCI and the understanding of prognostic implications associated with bleeding, have led to a substantial evolution in antiplatelet treatment regimens over the past decades. Numerous investigations have been conducted to better stratify patients undergoing PCI according to their ischaemic and bleeding risks and to implement antithrombotic regimens accordingly. Evidence from these investigations have resulted in a number of antithrombotic treatment options as recommended by recent guidelines. In this State-of-the-Art review we provide the rationale, summarise the evidence, and discuss current and future directions of antiplatelet treatment regimens after PCI.

Nanocarrier-Based Management of Venous and Arterial Thrombosis

Cardiovascular diseases represent the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with recent epidemiological studies revealing an increasing trend of prevalence and incidence globally. Among cardiovascular disorders, both arterial and venous thrombosis and particularly their acute life-threating complications such as ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are responsible for more than 25% of all deaths worldwide. The modern approach following progresses in anticoagulant, thrombolytic and antiaggregant therapies has significantly improved the prognoses of these conditions in the last past decades. However, several challenges still remain such as achieving the optimal drug concentration at the injured site, reducing the shortcomings of drug resistance and the incidence of life-threatening hemorrhages. Nanomedicine is a well-known field of medicine in which atomic and molecular structures ranging between 0.1–100 nm are used in various domains due to their specific mechanical, electrical, thermal and magnetic properties. Recent experimental and clinical evidence have shown that nanotechnology could be a safe, effective and an appealing approach for various non-cardiovascular and cardiovascular diseases such as thromboembolic conditions. In this review, we have described the most promising nanotechnology-based approaches not only for the diagnosis, but also for the treatment of vascular thrombotic diseases.