Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: what is the evidence on dosing regimens?

Management strategies for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the management of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen in intensive care; the main related infections are nosocomial pneumonias, then bloodstream infections. Antimicrobial resistance is common; despite new antibiotics, it is associated with increased mortality, and can lead to a therapeutic deadlock.

SUMMARY

Carbapenem resistance in difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA) strains is primarily mediated by loss or reduction of the OprD porin, overexpression of the cephalosporinase AmpC, and/or overexpression of efflux pumps. However, the role of carbapenemases, particularly metallo-β-lactamases, has become more important. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam are useful against DTR phenotypes (noncarbapenemase producers). Other new agents, such as aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam or cefiderocol, or colistin, might be effective for carbapenemase producers. Regarding nonantibiotic agents, only phages might be considered, pending further clinical trials. Combination therapy does not reduce mortality, but may be necessary for empirical treatment. Short-term treatment of severe P. aeruginosa infections should be preferred when it is expected that the clinical situation resolves rapidly.

Use of Newer and Repurposed Antibiotics against Gram-Negative Bacteria in Neonates

Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health problem globally with multidrug resistant Gram negative (MDR-GN) bacteria being the main representatives. The emergence of these pathogens in neonatal settings threatens the well-being of the vulnerable neonatal population given the dearth of safe and effective therapeutic options. Evidence from studies mainly in adults is now available for several novel antimicrobial compounds, such as new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam), although old antibiotics such as colistin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin are also encompassed in the fight against MDR-GN infections that remain challenging. Data in the neonatal population are scarce, with few clinical trials enrolling neonates for the evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and dosing of new antibiotics, while the majority of old antibiotics are used off-label. In this article we review data about some novel and old antibiotics that are active against MDR-GN bacteria causing sepsis and are of interest to be used in the neonatal population.

Clinical Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Critical Care Patients in Taiwan

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical use and side effects of fosfomycin in critically ill patients in Taiwan. Forty-two patients (mean age, 69.9 years; female, 69%) who received fosfomycin were included from a teaching hospital in Taiwan from January 2021 to December 2021. We analyzed the prescription pattern of intravenous fosfomycin and evaluated patient safety profiles, clinical successes, and microbiological cure rates. The main indication was urinary tract infections (35.6%), and the most frequently identified pathogen was Escherichia coli (18.2%). The overall clinical success was 83.4%, with one multidrug-resistant pathogen isolated from eight patients (19.0%). The average dose of fosfomycin given was 11.1 ± 5.2 g/day. The average duration of therapy was 8.7 ± 5.9 days, with a median duration of 8 days, where fosfomycin was mostly (83.3%) given in combination. Fosfomycin was given 12 hourly to a maximum number (47.6%) of cases. The incidence rates of adverse drug reactions (hypernatremia and hypokalemia) were 33.33% (14/42) and 28.57% (12/42), respectively. The overall survival rate was 73.8%. Intravenous fosfomycin may be an effective and safe antibiotic to use in combination with other drugs for empirical broad-spectrum or highly suspected multidrug-resistant infections in critically ill patients.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli Urosepsis: A Review

Escherichia coli is a versatile commensal and pathogenic member of the human microflora. As the primary causative pathogen in urosepsis, E. coli places an immense burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To further exacerbate the issue, multi drug resistance (MDR) has spread rapidly through E. coli populations, making infections more troublesome and costlier to treat. This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the development of MDR in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and explore the existing evidence of current and emerging treatment strategies. While some MDR strains maybe treated with β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as cephalosporins, cephamycin, temocillin and fosfomycin, current treatment strategies for many MDR UPEC strains are reliant on carbapenems. Carbapenem overreliance may contribute to the alarming dissemination of carbapenem-resistance amongst some UPEC communities, which has ushered in a new age of difficult to treat infections. Alternative treatment options for carbapenem resistant UPEC may include novel β-lactam-β-lactamase or carbapenemase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides or fosfomycin. For metallo-β-lactamase producing strains (e.g., NDM, IMP-4), combinations of cefazidime-avibacam with aztreonam have been used. Additionally, the emergence of new antimicrobials brings new hope to the treatment of such infections. However, continued research is required to successfully bring these into the clinic for the treatment of MDR E. coli urosepsis.

Investigation of In-vitro Efficacy of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates and Effect of Glucose 6-Phosphate on Sensitivity Results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro efficacy of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin against extensively drug-resistant Enterobacterales strains and the effect of glucose 6-phosphate (G6-P) on sensitivity results.

MATERIAL METHOD

Thirty-two extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia strains were included in the study. Detection of the carbapenemase genes was performed using the Gene-Xpert® System Carba R® kit. Susceptibility of IV fosfomycin was assessed using the agar dilution method. The agar dilution method was repeated using Muller-Hinton Agar medium without G6-P to assess the effect of G6-P on sensitivity results.

RESULTS

All strains in the study produced carbapenemases and were resistant to all drugs tested, including carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime. Fosfomycin resistance was detected in 3 (9.3%) strains. When the sensitivity test was repeated without G6-P, fosfomycin resistance was detected in 82.7% of the fosfomycin-susceptible strains. The Gene-Xpert® System showed NDM-1 in 46.8%, OXA-48 in 18.7%, KPC in 3.1%, and NDM-1 + OXA-48 in 21.8% of the strains. OXA-48 was detected in one of the resistant strains, and none of the viable genes were detected in two of the resistant strains.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that IV fosfomycin is a potentially important treatment alternative for infections caused by common resistant strains. Accurate results may not be obtained unless G6-P is used in the agar dilution method for in vitro susceptibility studies of fosfomycin.

Pandrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review of current epidemiology, prognosis and treatment options

BACKGROUND

The literature on the epidemiology, mortality and treatment of pandrug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is scarce, scattered and controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To consolidate the relevant literature and identify treatment options for PDR GNB infections.

METHODS

A systematic search in MEDLINE, Scopus and clinical trial registries was conducted. Studies reporting PDR clinical isolates were eligible for review if susceptibility testing for all major antimicrobials had been performed. Characteristics and findings of retrieved studies were qualitatively synthesized.

RESULTS

Of 81 studies reviewed, 47 (58%) were published in the last 5 years. The reports reflected a worldwide dissemination of PDR GNB in 25 countries in 5 continents. Of 526 PDR isolates reported, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=175), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=172) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=125) were most common. PDR GNB were typically isolated in ICUs, but several studies demonstrated wider outbreak potential, including dissemination to long-term care facilities and international spread. All-cause mortality was high (range 20%-71%), but appeared to be substantially reduced in studies reporting treatment regimens active in vitro. No controlled trial has been performed to date, but several case reports and series noted successful use of various regimens, predominantly synergistic combinations, and in selected patients increased exposure regimens and newer antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR GNB are increasingly being reported worldwide and are associated with high mortality. Several treatment regimens have been successfully used, of which synergistic combinations appear to be most promising and often the only available option. More pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and outcome studies are needed to guide the use of synergistic combinations.

Central nervous system infections and antimicrobial resistance: an evolving challenge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing threat to patients also in nosocomial central nervous system (CNS) infections. The present review focusses on optimizing intravenous treatment in order to achieve sufficient concentrations of antibiotics in the different compartments of the CNS when the causative pathogens have reduced sensitivity to antibiotics or/and the impairment of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-brain barrier is mild.

RECENT FINDINGS

Experience has been gathered with treatment protocols for several established antibiotics using increased doses or continuous instead of intermittent intravenous therapy. Continuous infusion in general does not increase the average CSF concentrations (or the area under the concentration-time curve in CSF) compared to equal daily doses administered by short-term infusion. In some cases, it is postulated that it can reduce toxicity caused by high peak plasma concentrations. In case reports, new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were shown to be effective treatments of CNS infections.

SUMMARY

Several antibiotics with a low to moderate toxicity (in particular, β-lactam antibiotics, fosfomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, vancomycin) can be administered at increased doses compared to traditional dosing with low or tolerable adverse effects. Intrathecal administration of antibiotics is only indicated, when multiresistant pathogens cannot be eliminated by systemic therapy. Intravenous should always accompany intrathecal treatment.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Etiology and antibiotic treatment

Carbapenem antibiotics were first introduced in the 1980s and have long been considered the most active agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as organisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Infections caused by CRE have shown a higher mortality rate than those caused by bacteria sensitive to carbapenem antibiotics. Current antibiotic guidelines for the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are insufficient, and rapid de-escalation of empiric antibiotic treatment is not widely recognized. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics, epidemiology and possible treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by CRE.

Cure of Limb-Threatening XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection: Combining Genome Sequencing, Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring, and Surgical Debridement

We describe a case of limb-threatening osteomyelitis and metalware infection with carbapenemase-producing extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa successfully cured with aggressive surgical debridement and combined intravenous fosfomycin and colistin. Real-time therapeutic drug monitoring was used to maximize probability of efficacy and minimize potential for toxicity.

Evaluation of Intravenous Fosfomycin Disodium Dosing Regimens in Critically Ill Patients for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections Using Monte Carlo Simulation

There are limited intravenous fosfomycin disodium (IVFOS) dosing regimens to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections. This study aimed to use Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for evaluation of IVFOS dosing regimens in critically ill patients with CRE infections. The dosing regimens in critically ill patients with various creatinine clearance were evaluated with MCS using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of fosfomycin against CRE clinical isolates in Thailand and the 24 h area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve over the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC) of ≥21.5 to be a target for IVFOS. The achieved goal of the probability of target attainment (PTA) and a cumulative fraction of response (CFR) were ≥90%. A total of 129 non-duplicated CRE clinical isolates had MIC distributions from 0.38 to >1024 mg/L. IVFOS 8 g every 8 h, 1 h, or 4 h infusion, could achieve approximately 90% PTA of AUC0-24/MIC target to treat CRE infections with MICs ≤ 128 mg/L. According to PTA target, an IVFOS daily dose to treat carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli based on Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints for urinary tract infections and one to treatment for CRE infections based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were 16 g/day and 8 g/day, respectively. All dosing regimens of IVFOS against CRE achieved CFR ≤ 70%. This study proposes the IVFOS dosing regimens based on CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints for the treatment of CRE infections. However, further clinical studies are needed to confirm the results of these findings.

Therapeutic Options for Infections due to vanB Genotype Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Enterococci are ubiquitous, facultative, anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria that mainly reside, as part of the normal microbiota, in the gastrointestinal tracts of several animal species, including humans. These bacteria have the capability to turn from a normal gut commensal organism to an invasive pathogen in patients debilitated by prolonged hospitalization, concurrent illnesses, and/or exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The majority of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections are linked to the vanA genotype; however, outbreaks caused by vanB-type VREs have been increasingly reported, representing a new challenge for effective antimicrobial treatment. Teicoplanin, daptomycin, fosfomycin, and linezolid are useful antimicrobials for infections due to vanB enterococci. In addition, new drugs have been developed (e.g., dalbavancin, telavancin, and tedizolid), new molecules will soon be available (e.g., eravacycline, omadacycline, and oritavancin), and new treatment strategies are progressively being used in clinical practice (e.g., combination therapies and bacteriophages). The aim of this article is to discuss the pathogenesis of infections due to enterococci harboring the vanB operon (vanBVRE) and their therapeutic, state-of-the-art, and future treatment options and provide a comprehensive and easy to use review for clinical purposes.

The role of fosfomycin for multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, an increasing interest in using fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GNB) infections have been registered, especially when none or only a few other active alternatives remained available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fosfomycin may remain active against a considerable proportion of MDR-GNB. In observational studies, a possible curative effect of oral fosfomycin monotherapy has been described for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) and bacterial prostatitis caused by MDR-GNB, whereas intravenous fosfomycin has been mostly used in combination with other agents for various type of severe MDR-GNB infections. The ZEUS randomized controlled trial (RCT) has started to provide high-level evidence about the possible use of fosfomycin for complicated UTI caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing GNB, but no results of large RCT are currently available to firmly guide the use of fosfomycin for carbapenem-resistant GNB.

SUMMARY

Fosfomycin is an important therapeutic option for MDR-GNB infections. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical research is needed to optimize its use.

Fosfomycin for bacterial prostatitis: a review

There has been growing interest in fosfomycin for the treatment of bacterial prostatitis due to evidence suggesting that it achieves adequate prostatic concentrations for antimicrobial effect, has activity against resistant micro-organisms, and has a low-toxicity profile. This review evaluated the current clinical evidence for fosfomycin in acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis to elucidate the clinical implications of fosfomycin in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published in the English language from January 1984 to November 2019. The inclusion criteria were met if the study reported the use of fosfomycin (more than one dose) to treat bacterial prostatitis. Ten observational studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The evidence for the use of fosfomycin in acute bacterial prostatitis is sparse. The majority of the available evidence is for chronic bacterial prostatitis caused by Escherichia coli. Despite the implementation of variable dosing regimens, extended courses of fosfomycin appear to be safe and effective in achieving clinical and microbiological cure. In these studies, the use of fosfomycin was restricted to cases of treatment failure, intolerance to first-line therapy, or multi-resistant organisms. However, given the development of resistant organisms and the undesirable adverse effects of many first-line therapeutic options, fosfomycin has the potential to be considered as an effective first-line alternative for acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis in the future. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials, would be helpful to firmly establish its optimal dosing regimen, efficacy and place in therapy.

Intrathecal Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapies

Intrathecal administration of anti-infectives is indicated in central nervous system infections by multiresistant pathogens when drugs that can reach adequate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations by systemic therapy are not available. Antibiotics that readily pass the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and/or that have low toxicity allowing an increase in the daily dosage should not be used for intrathecal therapy. Intrathecal therapy is accompanied by systemic treatment. Antibacterials indispensable for intrathecal therapy include aminoglycosides, colistin, daptomycin, tigecycline, and vancomycin. Limited experience suggests the utility of the antifungals amphotericin B and caspofungin. Intraventricular administration ensures distribution throughout the CSF compartment, whereas intralumbar dosing often fails to attain adequate antibiotic concentrations in the ventricles. The individual dose is determined by the estimated size of the CSF space and by the estimated clearance from CSF. For moderately lipophilic anti-infectives with a molecular weight above approximately 1,000 g/mol, as well as for hydrophilic drugs with a molecular weight above approximately 400 g/mol, one daily dose is normally adequate. The ventricular drain should be clamped for 15 to 120 min to facilitate the distribution of the anti-infective in the CSF space. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the trough levels is necessary only in cases of therapeutic failure.

Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing concern due to limited treatment options. Knowledge of the common uropathogens in addition to local susceptibility patterns is essential in determining appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy of UTIs. The recommended first-line empiric antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 5-day course of nitrofurantoin, a 3-g single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine, or a 5-day course of pivmecillinam. High rates of resistance for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin preclude their use as empiric treatment of UTIs in several communities, particularly if patients who were recently exposed to them or in patients who are at risk of infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales. Second-line options include oral cephalosporins such as cephalexin or cefixime, fluoroquinolones and β-lactams, such as amoxicillin-clavulanate. Current treatment options for UTIs due to AmpC- β -lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. Treatment oral options for UTIs due to ESBLs-E coli include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin while pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin are treatment oral options for ESBLs- Klebsiella pneumoniae. Parenteral treatment options for UTIs due to ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriales include piperacillin-tazobactam (for ESBL-E coli only), carbapenems including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, and sulopenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, fosfomycin, sitafloxacin, and finafloxacin. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, colistin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam and amoxicillin-clavulanate, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, tigecycline are treatment options for UTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE). Treatment options for UTIs caused by multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas spp. include fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems including imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem, and fosfomycin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, cefiderocol, and colistin. It is important to use the new antimicrobials wisely for treatment of UTIs caused by MDR-organisms to avoid resistance development.