Establishment and potential use of woody species in treatment wetlands

Woody and herbaceous wastes for the remediation of polluted waters of wetlands

Plants wastes play an important role during water remediation in wetlands. Plant waste is made into biochar, which is usually used directly or as a water biofilter to remove pollutants. While, the water remediation effect of combination for biochar from woody and herbaceous wastes coupling with substrate types in CWs have not been fully explored. To explore the water remediation effect of combination for biochar coupling with substrate on pH, Turbidity, COD, NH₄⁺-N, TN and TP, four plant configuration modes combining seven woody plants and eight herbaceous plants (Plants A, Plants B, Plants C, Plants D) were coupled with three substrate types (Substrate 1, Substrate 2, Substrate 3) as 12 experiment groups, using water detection methods and significant differences test (LSD) to analyze. Results showed: (1) Compared to Substrate 3, Substrate 1 and Substrate 2 removed significantly higher in pollutants concentration (p < 0.05); (2) NH₄⁺-N final concentration in Plants C and Plants D were both significantly lower than Plants A and Plants B coupling with Substrate 1 and Substrate 2 (p < 0.05). The TN final concentration of Plants C was significantly lower than Plants A in Substrate 1 (p < 0.05), and Plants A's turbidity was significantly lower than Plants C and Plants D's in Substrate 2 (p < 0.05); (3) The pollutants removal of group A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, D1 and D2 were significantly higher than other experiment groups (p < 0.05). Group A2, B2, C1 and D1 had the best water remediation effect and better stability of plant community. Findings in this study will be beneficial for remediating polluted water and building sustainable wetlands.

Wetland Construction, Restoration, and Integration: A Comparative Review

In response to the global loss and degradation of wetland ecosystems, extensive efforts have been made to reestablish wetland habitat and function in landscapes where they once existed. The reintroduction of wetland ecosystem services has largely occurred in two categories: constructed wetlands (CW) for wastewater treatment, and restored wetlands (RW) for the renewal or creation of multiple ecosystem services. This is the first review to compare the objectives, design, performance, and management of CW and RW, and to assess the status of efforts to combine CW and RW as Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW). These wetland systems are assessed for their ecological attributes and their relative contribution to ecosystem services. CW are designed to process a wide variety of wastewaters using surface, subsurface, or hybrid treatment systems. Designed and maintained within narrow hydrologic parameters, CW can be highly effective at contaminant transformation, remediation, and sequestration. The ecosystem services provided by CW are limited by their status as high-stress, successionally arrested systems with low landscape connectivity and an effective lifespan. RW are typically situated and designed for a greater degree of connection with regional ecosystems. After construction, revegetation, and early successional management, RW are intended as self-maintaining ecosystems. This affords RW a broader range of ecosystem services than CW, though RW system performance can be highly variable and subject to invasive species and landscape-level stressors. Where the spatial and biogeochemical contexts are favorable, ICW present the opportunity to couple CW and RW functions, thereby enhancing the replacement of wetland services on the landscape.

Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate)

Constructed wetland (CW) represents an efficient eco-technological conglomerate interweaving water security, energy possibility and environmental protection. In the context of wastewater treatment technologies requiring substantial efficiency at reduced cost, chemical input and low environmental impact, applications of CW is being demonstrated at laboratory and field level with reasonably high contaminant removal efficiency and ecological benefits. However, along with the scope of applications, role of individual wetland component has to be re-emphasized through related research interventions. Hence, this review distinctively explores the concerns for extracting maximum benefit of macrophyte (focusing on interface of pollutant removal, root radial oxygen loss, root iron plaque, endophyte-macrophyte assisted treatment in CW, and prospects of energy harvesting from macrophyte) and role of biofilm (effect on treatment efficiency, composition and factors affecting) in a CW. Another focus of the review is on recent advances and developments in alternative low-cost substrate materials (including conventional type, industrial by-products, organic waste, mineral based and hybrid type) and their effect on target pollutants. The remainder of this review is organized to discuss the concerns of CW with respect to wastewater type (municipal, industrial, agricultural and farm wastewater). Attempt is made to analyze the practical relevance and significance of these aspects incorporating all recent developments in the areas to help making informed decisions about future directions for research and development related to CW.