Race-Conscious Bioethics: The Call to Reject Contemporary Scientific Racism

Pro-Con Debate: Perioperative Research Should Be Color-Blind

Profound racial and ethnic disparities have been documented in health and health care outcomes in recent decades. Some researchers have erroneously ascribed these inequities to biological variations, prompting debate as to how, or even if, race and ethnicity should be included as an outcome variable. Color blindness is a racial ideology with roots in constitutional law that posits that equality is best achieved by disregarding the racial and ethnic characteristics of the individual. Color consciousness, in contrast, approaches disparities with the knowledge that experiences related to one's race and ethnicity influence an individual's health and well-being. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the concept of color blindness and debate its use as an approach in medicine and research.

Epigenetic citizenship and political claims-making: the ethics of molecularizing structural racism

Epigenetics has generated excitement over its potential to inform health disparities research by capturing the molecular signatures of social experiences. This paper highlights the concerns implied by these expectations of epigenetics research and discusses the possible ramifications of 'molecularizing' the forms of social suffering currently examined in epigenetics studies. Researchers working with oppressed populations-particularly racially marginalized groups-should further anticipate how their results might be interpreted to avoid fueling prejudiced claims of biological essentialism. Introducing the concept of 'epigenetic citizenship,' this paper considers the ways environmentally responsive methylation cues may be used in direct-to-consumer testing, healthcare, and biopolitical interactions. The conclusion addresses the future of social epigenetics research and the utility of an epigenetic citizenship framework.

Race-based medicine in the point-of-care clinical resource UpToDate: A systematic content analysis

Background

Race-based practices in medical education and clinical care may exacerbate health inequities. Misguided use of race in popular point-of-care clinical decision-making tools like UpToDate® may promote harmful practices of race-based medicine. This article investigates the nature of mentions of Black/African American race in UpToDate®.

Methods

We conducted a systematic content analysis of UpToDate® articles mentioning Black or African American race to assess for biological interpretations of racial categories. Following a simple text search for the terms "Black" and "African American" in UpToDate® on January 24 and March 19, 2020, respectively, removal of duplicates yielded an analytical sample of 208 documents. We adopted a deductive coding approach and systematically applied 16 a priori codes to all documents, refining the codebook to achieve a final inter-rater reliability of 0.91. We then developed these codes into two themes: (1) biologization of race and (2) racialized research and practice.

Findings

Biologization of race occurred nearly universally across all documents (93.3%), with discussions of inherent physiological differences between racial groups and presentation of epidemiologic disparities without context emerging most frequently. Sixty-eight documents (32.7%) included codes related to racialized biomedical research and clinical practice, including references to racialized patterns of behavior and cultural practices, insufficient data on Black populations, research limiting study to a specific racial group, and race-based clinical practices guidelines.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that UpToDate® articles often inappropriately link Black race to genetics or clinical phenotype-without considering socio-structural variables or the health effects of structural racism-thus perpetuating a false narrative that race is inherently biological. UpToDate® articles may also promote unequal treatment by recommending race-based clinical practices. Such racial essentialism risks exacerbating racialized health inequities.

Funding

The study is supported by the Health Policy Research Scholars Program, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Medical Scientist Training Program, National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the JPB Foundation, the Minnesota Population, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and the Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity at the University of Minnesota.

A Legacy of Scientific Racism: William Osler's "An Alabama Student"

William Osler's essay "An Alabama Student" made John Young Bassett (1804-1851) a widely admired avatar of idealism in medicine. However, Bassett fiercely attacked the idea that all humans are members of the same species (known as monogenesis) and asserted that Black inferiority was a justification for slavery. Antebellum physician-anthropologists bequeathed a legacy of scientific racism that in subtler forms still runs deep in American society, including in the field of medicine.