A method for quantitative risk appraisal for pesticide risk assessments

Data collection initiatives of the crop protection industry - A mission to improve non-dietary risk assessment in Europe

Plant protection products (PPPs) undergo rigorous safety assessments. In Europe, non-dietary risk assessments for operators, workers, bystanders and residents are highly conservative as this area of exposure science has historically been data poor. CropLife Europe (CLE) companies have collaborated to generate new data and pool existing data to refine the approaches prescribed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance on non-dietary exposure (2022). This article summarises key activities, beginning with the development of the Agricultural Operator Exposure Model (AOEM) and covers projects which refine current approaches to bystander, resident and re-entry worker assessment, including the Bystander Resident Orchards Vineyards (BROV) project, improvements to the Bystander and Resident Exposure Assessment Model for spray drift (BREAM), proposals for refined vapour inhalation assessments, and a meta-analysis of Dislodgeable Foliar Residue (DFR) data. A study quantifying the benefits of using closed transfer systems, an appraisal of the inherent compounded conservatism in current risk assessment paradigms and the development of a new seed treatment model by the SeedTROPEX taskforce are also introduced. These industry-led activities underscore the critical role of non-dietary exposure in the registration process for PPPs and reflect an ongoing commitment to provide farmers with effective crop protection solutions while ensuring safety.

Quantifying exposure source allocation factors of pesticides in support of regulatory human health risk assessment

One of the challenges while assessing the aggregate exposure risk of pesticides is quantifying exposure doses from various exposure pathways. To address this issue, a regulatory screening approach is proposed for evaluating pesticide allocation factors (AFs) for major exposure pathways for rural and urban residents. This was achieved by integrating dynamiCrop and other screening models to estimate the potential human intake of residues from major crops at harvest, livestock products, and main environmental media (air, water, and soil). The AFs were calculated from the average daily dose factors (ADDFs) of pesticides via major exposure pathways, where a large AF of an exposure pathway indicates that a greater margin of exposure should be given to that exposure pathway. The simulated results for many current-use pesticides showed that the ingestion of crops had pesticide AFs close to 1.0, which indicated that the crop exposure pathway contributed to a significant portion of the total exposure to pesticides. In contrast, for legacy pesticides with high lipophilicity and low degradability in the environment, the simulated AFs for major environmental compartments (air, freshwater, and soil) accounted for relatively large exposures. As legacy pesticides have been banned globally, exposure pathways via the food web and environmental media cannot be neglected because of their high lipophilicity and environmental persistence. Although other factors such as geographical conditions and living habits should be considered to improve the spatial resolution of the model, the method proposed in this study can serve as a preliminary tool to conduct screening-level risk assessments for populations by considering the allocated exposure to pesticides via major exposure pathways.

Compounded conservatism in European re-entry worker risk assessment of pesticides

We review the risk parameters and drivers in the current European Union (EU) worker risk assessment for pesticides, for example considering crop maintenance, crop inspection or harvesting activities, and show that the current approach is very conservative due to multiple worst-case default assumptions. As a case study, we compare generic exposure model estimates with measured worker re-entry exposure values which shows that external cumulative exposure is overpredicted by about 50-fold on average. For this exercise, data from 16 good laboratory practice (GLP)-compliant worker exposure studies in 6 crops were evaluated with a total number of 184 workers. As generic overprediction does not allow efficient risk management or realistic risk communication, we investigate how external exposure can be better predicted within the generic model, and outline options for possible improvements in the current methodology. We show that simply using averages achieves more meaningful exposure estimates, while still being conservative, with an average exposure overprediction of about 9-fold. Overall, EU risk assessment includes several numerically unaccounted "hidden safety factors", which means that workers are well protected; but simultaneously risk assessments are biased towards failing due to compounded conservatism. This should be considered for further global or regional guidance developments and performing more exposure-relevant risk assessment.

Risk assessment of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) in cosmetics

N-nitrosamines and their precursors found in cosmetics may be carcinogenic in humans. Thus the aim of this study was to carry out risk assessment for N-nitrosamines (N-nitrosodiethanolamine [NDELA], N-nitrosodiethylamine [NDEA]) and amines (triethanolamine [TEA], diethanolamine [DEA]) levels in cosmetics determined using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) procedures. NDELA and NDEA concentrations were present at levels of "not detected" (N.D.) to 596.5 μg/kg and N.D. to 40.9 μg/kg, respectively. TEA and DEA concentrations ranged from N.D. to 860 μg/kg and N.D. to 26.22 μg/kg, respectively. The nitrite concentration (3-2250 mg/l), number of nitrosating agents to a maximum 5, and pH (3.93-10.09) were also assessed. The impact of N-nitrosamine formation on the levels of TEA, DEA, nitrite, and other nitrosating agents was also examined. N-nitrosamine concentrations correlated with the number of nitrosating agents and nitrite concentrations. Data demonstrated that higher nitrite concentrations and a greater number of nitrosating agents increased NDELA and NDEA yields. Further, the presence of TEA and DEA exerted a significant influence on N-nitrosamine formation. Risk assessments, including the margin of exposure (MOE) and lifetime cancer risk (LCR) for N-nitrosamines and margin of safety (MOS) for amines, were calculated using product type, use pattern, and concentrations. Exposure to maximum amounts of NDELA and NDEA resulted in MOE > 10,000 (based upon the benchmark dose lower confidence limit 10%) and LCR <1 × 10-5, respectively. In addition, TEA and DEA concentrations in cosmetic samples resulted in MOS values >100. Therefore, no apparent safety concerns were associated with cosmetic products containing NDELA, NDEA, TEA, and DEA in this study. However, since amines and nitrosating agents produce carcinogenic nitrosamines, their use in cosmetics needs to be minimized to levels as low as technically feasible.

Imidacloprid affects rat liver mitochondrial bioenergetics by inhibiting FoF1-ATP synthase activity

Imidacloprid (IMD) is a neonicotinoid insecticide widely used in crops, pets, and on farm animals for pest control. Several studies were conducted examining the adverse effects of IMD on animals often exhibiting hepatic damage. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of IMD on bioenergetics of mitochondria isolated from rat liver. Imidacloprid (50-200 µM) produced a concentration-dependent decrease in oxygen consumption and ATP production without markedly affecting mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). Oxygen consumption experiments showed that IMD did not significantly affect the respiratory chain, and this was similar to findings with oligomycin and carboxyatractyloside, suggesting a direct action on F_oF₁-ATP synthase and/or the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT). Imidacloprid inhibited F_oF₁-ATP synthase activity only in disrupted mitochondria and induced a partial inhibition of ADP-stimulated depolarization of the MMP. Our results indicate that IMD interacts specifically with F_oF₁-ATP synthase resulting in functional inhibition of the enzyme with consequent impairment of mitochondrial bioenergetics. These effects of IMD on mitochondrial bioenergetics may be related to adverse effects of this insecticide on the liver.

Risk assessment of benzalkonium chloride in cosmetic products

A risk assessment of benzalkonium chloride (BAC) was conducted based upon its toxicological profile and exposure evaluation. Since 1935, BAC has been used in a wide variety of products such as disinfectants, preservatives, and sanitizers. It is well-established that BAC is not genotoxic nor does it display tumorigenic potential, but safety concerns have been raised in local usage such as for ocular and intranasal applications. The Foundation of Korea Cosmetic Industry Institute (KCII) reported that in a hair conditioner manufactured as a cosmetic or personal product in South Korea, BAC was present at concentrations of 0.5-2%. The systemic exposure dosage (SED) was determined using the above in-use concentrations and a risk assessment analysis was conducted. The Margin of Safety (MOS) values for hair conditioners were calculated to be between 621 and 2,483. The risk of certain personal and cosmetic products was also assessed based upon assumptions that BAC was present at the maximal level of regulation in South Korea and that the maximal amount was used. The MOS values for the body lotion were all above 100, regardless of the application site. Collectively, data indicate that there are no safety concerns regarding use of products that contain BAC under the current concentration restrictions, even when utilized at maximal permitted levels. However, a chronic dermal toxicity study on BAC and comprehensive dermal absorption evaluation needs to be conducted to provide a more accurate prediction of the potential health risks to humans.