Modification of the in vitro activities of amosite asbestos by surface derivatization

An update on the detoxification processes for silica particles and asbestos fibers: successess and limitations

Inhalation of asbestos fibers and crystalline silica produces a number of diseases including fibrosis and cancer. Investigations into the mechanisms involved in mineral particle-induced toxicity indicated the importance of their surfaces in the pathological consequences. Masking of the surface sites has therefore featured prominently in a number of detoxification processes that have been investigated. The majority of the detoxification processes were, however, conducted to elucidate the involvement of a particular surface site in the toxicity of a specific mineral. Others were investigated with the aim of large industrial applications to be applied during mining, handling, processing, transporting, and disposing of minerals. It can be concluded that, to date, there is no single detoxification process that could be applied universally to all different types of mineral particles. Those that have shown some success could not completely abolish all adverse effects. Further elucidation of mechanisms of particle-induced toxicity may open new possibilities for detoxification processes.

In vitro biological effects of clay minerals advised as substitutes for asbestos

We studied one sample of commercial sepiolite and two samples of commercial vermiculite--clay minerals proposed as replacements for asbestos--and tested in vitro their abilities to activate complement, to lyse erythrocytes, and to elicit the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) with human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) or bovine alveolar macrophages (AM); their behavior was compared with that of asbestos fibers obtained from the Union International Contra Cancer (UICC) as reference standards, as well as with kaolinite and illite, main members of the clay mineral family. Since in short-term in vitro tests the biological activity of mineral particles seems especially related to the active sites on their surface, we first measured the specific surface area of each mineral. Sepiolite was unreactive in two of the three tests we used (complement activation and ROS production) and able to lyse a minimal percentage of red blood cells. Vermiculite was shown to be incapable of activating complement, to have a moderate hemolytic activity and a high ability to elicite ROS production, although lower than that of chrysotile. Sepiolite, therefore, might be of more interest than vermiculite, given the low level of biological effects detected during the tests used to compare both clay minerals with asbestos fibres. The ROS production does not seem to require phagocytosis. A high ROS production was observed with kaolinite: this result casts doubt on the ability of pathogenic mineral dusts in vitro to induce a greater release of ROS than nonpathogenic mineral dusts.

In vitro correlates of mineral dust toxicity

In vitro studies of mineral fibres have shown that these materials are capable of causing the production of free radical damage (measured by the accumulation of thiobarbituric acid-reactive material) in a way that does not depend on fibre morphology but rather on a surface property, probably the presence of iron. The DNA-damaging activities of the same dusts were measured in an assay based on the production of single-stranded DNA. Activity in this assay was again not dependent on the presence of fibres. In contrast the cytotoxicity of mineral fibres towards V79-4 cells correlated better with in vivo tumorigenicity than did either of the above activities. The activity of fibres against a macrophage-like cell demonstrated that both fibre morphology and chemical properties are important determinants of biological activity.

Does asbestos exposure cause gastrointestinal cancer?

The relationship between asbestos exposure and gastrointestinal malignancies is unlike the well-established correlation between occupational asbestos exposure and the subsequent development of pleuropulmonary neoplasms and mesotheliomas. Cohort studies on occupationally exposed workers suggest an association between asbestos and gastrointestinal cancer, but evaluation of dose-response, tissue analysis, animal experiment, and cell culture data yield inconsistent conclusions. No simplistic cause-effect relationship can be ascribed to asbestos at the present time, and the answer to the question, "Does asbestos exposure cause cancer?" must await the results of additional studies.

Arachidonic acid release and prostaglandin synthesis in a macrophage-like cell line exposed to asbestos

A macrophage-like cell line (P388D1) has been treated with asbestos and the release of arachidonic acid and its metabolites has been studied using two methods. In the first monolayer cultures of the cells were labelled with tritiated arachidonic acid and the release of label into the medium was quantified: secondly the synthesis and release of prostaglandins E2 and F2 alpha were followed using radioimmune assay. Crocidolite asbestos caused the greatest release of tritium while the medium from chrysotile-treated cultures contained more of both prostaglandins. Both of the fibrous dusts were significantly more active in both test systems than were the two 'inert' materials--titanium dioxide and milled sample of crocidolite. It is suggested that these phenomena are due to the effect of mineral dusts on phospholipase activity and that differences in this activity are associated with differences in the pathogenicity of various mineral dusts.