High frequency of concurrent anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA but not anti-C3b antibodies in patients with Lupus Nephritis

Clinical Relevance of Anti-C3 and Anti-C4 Autoantibodies in Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

Complement system overactivation is pivotal in lupus nephritis (LN) pathophysiology. Considering that anti-C3 autoantibodies play a significant role in LN pathophysiology, we explored them as disease activity biomarkers and compared them to the ones against the homologous protein, C4.

Methods

We investigated the presence of anti-C3 and anti-C4 IgG autoantibodies in a LN cohort (N = 85 patients) and monitored their changes over time. We correlated autoantibody presence with clinical parameters. We conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses (N = 295 samples, 8 years follow-up) to explore associations between autoantibodies and disease progression. Antigen-specific anti-C3 or anti-C4 IgG were purified from plasma by affinity chromatography and their reactivity was tested for cross-reactivity against purified C3 or C4 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

The reactivity against C3 was independent of C4. Our study revealed distinct roles for anti-C3 and anti-C4 in LN. Anti-C3 IgG exhibited stronger clinical correlations than anti-C4, showing associations with hypocomplementemia, anti-dsDNA, class IV LN, and active disease according to British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) renal score. In a longitudinal analysis, anti-C3 positivity at initial sampling predicted present and future disease exacerbation alone and even better when combined with anti-dsDNA, as indicated by a transition to BILAG category A.

Conclusion

Our research provides insights into anti-C3/C3b and anti-C4 autoantibodies in LN, revealing that they are often not cross-reactive. Anti-C3 utility as disease activity biomarkers is underscored by its stronger clinical associations and predictive value for future flares. Combining anti-C3 and anti-dsDNA out-performs the 2 factors alone, suggesting that the incorporation of anti-C3/C3b quantification into routine clinical practice could improve LN management.

Precise Targeting of Autoantigen-Specific B Cells in Lupus Nephritis with Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T Cells

Despite conventional therapy, lupus nephritis (LN) remains a significant contributor to short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. B cell abnormalities and the production of autoantibodies against nuclear complexes like anti-dsDNA are recognised as key players in the pathogenesis of LN. To address the challenges of chronic immunosuppression associated with current therapies, we have engineered T cells to express chimeric autoantibody receptors (DNA-CAART) for the precise targeting of B cells expressing anti-dsDNA autoantibodies. T cells from LN patients were transduced using six different CAAR vectors based on their antigen specificity, including alpha-actinin, histone-1, heparan sulphate, or C1q. The cytotoxicity, cytokine production, and cell-cell contact of DNA-CAART were thoroughly investigated in co-culture experiments with B cells isolated from patients, both with and without anti-dsDNA positivity. The therapeutic effects were further evaluated using an in vitro immune kidney LN organoid. Among the six proposed DNA-CAART, DNA4 and DNA6 demonstrated superior selectively cytotoxic activity against anti-dsDNA+ B cells. Notably, DNA4-CAART exhibited improvements in organoid morphology, apoptosis, and the inflammatory process in the presence of IFNα-stimulated anti-dsDNA+ B cells. Based on these findings, DNA4-CAART emerge as promising candidates for modulating autoimmunity and represent a novel approach for the treatment of LN.

Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus - a focus on organ damage

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is complex autoimmune disease with heterogenous manifestations, unpredictable disease course and response to treatment. One of the critical needs in SLE management is the identification of reliable biomarkers that can aid in early diagnosis, accurate monitoring of disease activity, and assessment of treatment response.

AREAS COVERED

In the current review, we focus on the commonly affected organs (skin, kidney, and nervous system) in SLE to summarize the emerging biomarkers that show promise in disease diagnosis, monitoring and treatment response assessment. The subtitles within each organ domain were determined based on the most relevant and promising biomarkers for that specific organ damage.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers have the potential to significantly benefit the management of SLE by aiding in diagnosis, disease activity monitoring, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. However, despite decades of research, none has been validated and implemented for routine clinical use. Novel biomarkers could lead to the development of precision medicine for SLE, guide personalized treatment, and improve patient outcomes. Challenges in biomarker research in SLE include defining clear and clinically relevant questions, accounting for the heterogeneity of SLE, and confirming initial findings in larger, multi-center, multi-ethnic, independent cohorts that reflect real-world clinical scenarios.

Decipher the Immunopathological Mechanisms and Set Up Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Traditionally, LN is regarded as an immune complex (IC) deposition disease led by dsDNA-anti-dsDNA-complement interactions in the subendothelial and/or subepithelial basement membrane of glomeruli to cause inflammation. The activated complements in the IC act as chemoattractants to chemically attract both innate and adaptive immune cells to the kidney tissues, causing inflammatory reactions. However, recent investigations have unveiled that not only the infiltrating immune-related cells, but resident kidney cells, including glomerular mesangial cells, podocytes, macrophage-like cells, tubular epithelial cells and endothelial cells, may also actively participate in the inflammatory and immunological reactions in the kidney. Furthermore, the adaptive immune cells that are infiltrated are genetically restricted to autoimmune predilection. The autoantibodies commonly found in SLE, including anti-dsDNA, are cross-reacting with not only a broad spectrum of chromatin substances, but also extracellular matrix components, including α-actinin, annexin II, laminin, collagen III and IV, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Besides, the glycosylation on the Fab portion of IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies can also affect the pathogenic properties of the autoantibodies in that α-2,6-sialylation alleviates, whereas fucosylation aggravates their nephritogenic activity. Some of the coexisting autoantibodies, including anti-cardiolipin, anti-C1q, anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies, may also enhance the pathogenic role of anti-dsDNA antibodies. In clinical practice, the identification of useful biomarkers for diagnosing, monitoring, and following up on LN is quite important for its treatments. The development of a more specific therapeutic strategy to target the pathogenic factors of LN is also critical. We will discuss these issues in detail in the present article.

Diagnostic test accuracy of novel biomarkers for lupus nephritis-An overview of systematic reviews

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with multiorgan inflammatory involvement and a mortality rate that is 2.6-fold higher than individuals of the same age and sex in the general population. Approximately 50% of patients with SLE develop renal impairment (lupus nephritis). Delayed diagnosis of lupus nephritis is associated with a higher risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, the need for replacement therapy, and mortality. The initial clinical manifestations of lupus nephritis are often discrete or absent and are usually detected through complementary tests. Although widely used in clinical practice, their accuracy is limited. A great scientific effort has been exerted towards searching for new, more sensitive, and specific biomarkers in recent years. Some systematic reviews have individually evaluated new serum and urinary biomarkers tested in patients with lupus nephritis. This overview aimed to summarize systematic reviews on the accuracy of novel serum and urinary biomarkers for diagnosing lupus nephritis in patients with SLE, discussing how our results can guide the clinical management of the disease and the direction of research in this area.

METHODS

The research question is "What is the accuracy of the new serum and urinary biomarkers studied for the diagnosis of LN in patients with SLE?". We searched for systematic reviews of observational studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of new serum or urinary biomarkers of lupus nephritis. The following databases were included: PubMed, EMBASE, BIREME/LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, including gray literature found via Google Scholar and PROQUEST. Two authors assessed the reviews for inclusion, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias (ROBIS tool).

RESULTS

Ten SRs on the diagnostic accuracy of new serum and urinary BMs in LN were selected. The SRs evaluated 7 distinct BMs: (a) antibodies (anti-Sm, anti-RNP, and anti-C1q), (b) cytokines (TWEAK and MCP-1), (c) a chemokine (IP-10), and (d) an acute phase glycoprotein (NGAL), in a total of 20 review arms (9 that analyzed serum BMs, and 12 that analyzed BMs in urine). The population evaluated in the primary studies was predominantly adults. Two SRs included strictly adults, 5 reviews also included studies in the paediatric population, and 4 did not report the age groups. The results of the evaluation with the ROBIS tool showed that most of the reviews had a low overall risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 10 SRs of evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary biomarkers for lupus nephritis. Among the BMs evaluated, anti-C1q, urinary MCP-1, TWEAK, and NGAL stood out, highlighting the need for additional research, especially on LN diagnostic panels, and attempting to address methodological issues within diagnostic accuracy research. This would allow for a better understanding of their usefulness and possibly validate their clinical use in the future.

REGISTRATION

This project is registered on the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42020196693).

Comparison of circulating miR-148a and miR-126 with autoantibodies as biomarkers of lupus nephritis in patients with SLE

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the main manifestation of systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and autoantibodies could be suitable candidate biomarkers of LN. This study evaluates the expression of circulating miR-148a and miR-126 along with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and anti-C3b autoantibodies in SLE patients with LN (SLE + LN). 30 women with SLE, 30 women with SLE + LN, and 25 women as healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in this study. The plasma expression of selected miRNAs was evaluated by real-time PCR. The serum level of anti-dsDNA, C1q, and C3b antibodies was measured by the ELISA. The expression of miR-148a was significantly increased in SLE and SLE+LN groups compared with the control group. No significant difference was found in the expression of miR-126 among the groups. The frequency of autoantibodies was significantly higher in the SLE + LN group than SLE. The Higher levels of circulating miR-148a in the SLE samples compared with the HCs suggest that this miRNA could be a reliable biomarker for SLE patients (with or without LN). Also, autoantibodies against dsDNA, C1q, and, C3 could be used for the prediction of SLE nephritis, independently. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Cell type-specific mechanistic target of rapamycin-dependent distortion of autophagy pathways in lupus nephritis

Pro-inflammatory immune system development, metabolomic defects, and deregulation of autophagy play interconnected roles in driving the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Lupus nephritis (LN) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE. While the causes of SLE have not been clearly delineated, skewing of T and B cell differentiation, activation of antigen-presenting cells, production of antinuclear autoantibodies and pro-inflammatory cytokines are known to contribute to disease development. Underlying this process are defects in autophagy and mitophagy that cause the accumulation of oxidative stress-generating mitochondria which promote necrotic cell death. Autophagy is generally inhibited by the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a large protein kinase that underlies abnormal immune cell lineage specification in SLE. Importantly, several autophagy-regulating genes, including ATG5 and ATG7, as well as mitophagy-regulating HRES-1/Rab4A have been linked to lupus susceptibility and molecular pathogenesis. Moreover, genetically-driven mTOR activation has been associated with fulminant lupus nephritis. mTOR activation and diminished autophagy promote the expansion of pro-inflammatory Th17, Tfh and CD3⁺CD4^-CD8^- double-negative (DN) T cells at the expense of CD8⁺ effector memory T cells and CD4⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs). mTOR activation and aberrant autophagy also involve renal podocytes, mesangial cells, endothelial cells, and tubular epithelial cells that may compromise end-organ resistance in LN. Activation of mTOR complexes 1 (mTORC1) and 2 (mTORC2) has been identified as biomarkers of disease activation and predictors of disease flares and prognosis in SLE patients with and without LN. This review highlights recent advances in molecular pathogenesis of LN with a focus on immuno-metabolic checkpoints of autophagy and their roles in pathogenesis, prognosis and selection of targets for treatment in SLE.

Diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus: current insights

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis still constitute an unmet need for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Focusing on recent findings, this review summarises the current landscape of biomarkers in lupus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Urine activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) exhibited good diagnostic ability in SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) whereas cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) showed promise in neuropsychiatric SLE. Urine ALCAM, CD163 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) may be useful in surveillance of LN. Urine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 was found to predict treatment response in SLE, and urine CD163 and NGAL treatment response in LN. Serum complement component 3 (C3) and urinary VCAM-1 have been reported to portend long-term renal prognosis in LN.

SUMMARY

NGAL holds promise as a versatile biomarker in SLE whereas urine ALCAM, CD163 and VCAM-1 displayed good performance as biomarkers in LN. The overall lack of concerted corroboration of leading candidates across multiple cohorts and diverse populations leaves the current biomarker landscape in SLE in an urgent need for further survey and systematic validation.

A scoping review of autoantibodies as biomarkers for canine autoimmune disease

Background

Autoantibody biomarkers are valuable tools used to diagnose and manage autoimmune diseases in dogs. However, prior publications have raised concerns over a lack of standardization and sufficient validation for the use of biomarkers in veterinary medicine.

Objectives

Systematically compile primary research on autoantibody biomarkers for autoimmune disease in dogs, summarize their methodological features, and evaluate their quality; synthesize data supporting their use into a resource for veterinarians and researchers.

Animals

Not used.

Methods

Five indices were searched to identify studies for evaluation: PubMed, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, Agricola, and SCOPUS. Two independent reviewers (AET and ELC) screened titles and abstracts for exclusion criteria followed by full‐text review of remaining articles. Relevant studies were classified based on study objectives (biomarker, epitope, technique). Data on study characteristics and outcomes were synthesized in independent data tables for each classification.

Results

Ninety‐two studies qualified for final analysis (n = 49 biomarker, n = 9 epitope, and n = 34 technique studies). A high degree of heterogeneity in study characteristics and outcomes reporting was observed. Opportunities to strengthen future studies could include: (1) routine use of negative controls, (2) power analyses to inform sample sizes, (3) statistical analyses when appropriate, and (4) multiple detection techniques to confirm results.

Conclusions

These findings provide a resource that will allow veterinary clinicians to efficiently evaluate the evidence supporting the use of autoantibody biomarkers, along with the varied methodological approaches used in their development.