1
|
Sood N, Stetter C, Kunselman A, Jasani S. The relationship between perceptions of electronic health record usability and clinical importance of social and environmental determinants of health on provider documentation. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 3:e0000428. [PMID: 38206900 PMCID: PMC10783763 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Social and environmental determinants of health (SEDH) data in the electronic health record (EHR) can be inaccurate and incomplete. Providers are in a unique position to impact this issue as they both obtain and enter this data, however, the variability in screening and documentation practices currently limits the ability to mobilize SEDH data for secondary uses. This study explores whether providers' perceptions of clinical importance of SEDH or EHR usability influenced data entry by analyzing two relationships: (1) provider charting behavior and clinical consideration of SEDH and (2) provider charting behavior and ease of EHR use in charting. We performed a cross-sectional study using an 11-question electronic survey to assess self-reported practices related to clinical consideration of SEDH elements, EHR usability and SEDH documentation of all staff physicians, identified using administrative listserves, at Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center during September to October 2021. A total of 201 physicians responded to and completed the survey out of a possible 2,478 identified staff physicians (8.1% response rate). A five-point Likert scale from "never" to "always" assessed charting behavior and clinical consideration. Responses were dichotomized as consistent/inconsistent and vital/not vital respectively. EHR usability was assessed as "yes" or "no" responses. Fisher's exact tests assessed the relationship between charting behavior and clinical consideration and to compare charting practices between different SEDHs. Cumulative measures were constructed for consistent charting and ease of charting. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) compared SDH and EDH with respect to each cumulative measure and was quantified using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our results show that provider documentation frequency of an SEDH is associated with perceived clinical utility as well as ease of charting and that providers were more likely to consistently chart on SDH versus EDH. Nuances in these relationships did exist with one notable example comparing the results of smoking (SDH) to infectious disease outbreaks (EDH). Despite similar percentages of physicians reporting that both smoking and infectious disease outbreaks are vital to care, differences in charting consistency and ease of charting between these two were seen. Taken as a whole, our results suggest that SEDH quality optimization efforts cannot consider physician perceptions and EHR usability as siloed entities and that EHR design should not be the only target for intervention. The associations found in this study provide a starting point to understand the complexity in how clinical utility and EHR usability influence charting consistency of each SEDH element, however, further research is needed to understand how these relationships intersect at various levels in the SEDH data optimization process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Sood
- Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Christy Stetter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Allen Kunselman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sona Jasani
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patra BG, Sharma MM, Vekaria V, Adekkanattu P, Patterson OV, Glicksberg B, Lepow LA, Ryu E, Biernacka JM, Furmanchuk A, George TJ, Hogan W, Wu Y, Yang X, Bian J, Weissman M, Wickramaratne P, Mann JJ, Olfson M, Campion TR, Weiner M, Pathak J. Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2716-2727. [PMID: 34613399 PMCID: PMC8633615 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Social determinants of health (SDoH) are nonclinical dispositions that impact patient health risks and clinical outcomes. Leveraging SDoH in clinical decision-making can potentially improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. Despite increased interest in capturing SDoH in electronic health records (EHRs), such information is typically locked in unstructured clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) is the key technology to extract SDoH information from clinical text and expand its utility in patient care and research. This article presents a systematic review of the state-of-the-art NLP approaches and tools that focus on identifying and extracting SDoH data from unstructured clinical text in EHRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A broad literature search was conducted in February 2021 using 3 scholarly databases (ACL Anthology, PubMed, and Scopus) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 6402 publications were initially identified, and after applying the study inclusion criteria, 82 publications were selected for the final review. RESULTS Smoking status (n = 27), substance use (n = 21), homelessness (n = 20), and alcohol use (n = 15) are the most frequently studied SDoH categories. Homelessness (n = 7) and other less-studied SDoH (eg, education, financial problems, social isolation and support, family problems) are mostly identified using rule-based approaches. In contrast, machine learning approaches are popular for identifying smoking status (n = 13), substance use (n = 9), and alcohol use (n = 9). CONCLUSION NLP offers significant potential to extract SDoH data from narrative clinical notes, which in turn can aid in the development of screening tools, risk prediction models, and clinical decision support systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Braja G Patra
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mohit M Sharma
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Veer Vekaria
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Prakash Adekkanattu
- Information Technologies and Services, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Olga V Patterson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Lauren A Lepow
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Euijung Ryu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joanna M Biernacka
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Thomas J George
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - William Hogan
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, and
| | - Yonghui Wu
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Myrna Weissman
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priya Wickramaratne
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - J John Mann
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Olfson
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas R Campion
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Information Technologies and Services, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Weiner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jyotishman Pathak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang LWY, Ng WY, Foo LL, Liu Y, Yan M, Lei X, Zhang X, Ting DSW. Deep learning-based natural language processing in ophthalmology: applications, challenges and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2021; 32:397-405. [PMID: 34324453 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Artificial intelligence (AI) is the fourth industrial revolution in mankind's history. Natural language processing (NLP) is a type of AI that transforms human language, to one that computers can interpret and process. NLP is still in the formative stages of development in healthcare, with promising applications and potential challenges in its applications. This review provides an overview of AI-based NLP, its applications in healthcare and ophthalmology, next-generation use case, as well as potential challenges in deployment. RECENT FINDINGS The integration of AI-based NLP systems into existing clinical care shows considerable promise in disease screening, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring, amongst others. Stakeholder collaboration, greater public acceptance, and advancing technologies will continue to shape the NLP landscape in healthcare and ophthalmology. SUMMARY Healthcare has always endeavored to be patient centric and personalized. For AI-based NLP systems to become an eventual reality in larger-scale applications, it is pertinent for key stakeholders to collaborate and address potential challenges in application. Ultimately, these would enable more equitable and generalizable use of NLP systems for the betterment of healthcare and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Yan Ng
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Lian Foo
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yong Liu
- Institute of High Performance Computing, A STAR
| | - Ming Yan
- Institute of High Performance Computing, A STAR
| | | | | | - Daniel Shu Wei Ting
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schultz MA, Walden RL, Cato K, Coviak CP, Cruz C, D'Agostino F, Douthit BJ, Forbes T, Gao G, Lee MA, Lekan D, Wieben A, Jeffery AD. Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review. Comput Inform Nurs 2021; 39:654-667. [PMID: 34747890 PMCID: PMC8578863 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Data science continues to be recognized and used within healthcare due to the increased availability of large data sets and advanced analytics. It can be challenging for nurse leaders to remain apprised of this rapidly changing landscape. In this article, we describe our findings from a scoping literature review of papers published in 2019 that use data science to explore, explain, and/or predict 15 phenomena of interest to nurses. Fourteen of the 15 phenomena were associated with at least one paper published in 2019. We identified the use of many contemporary data science methods (eg, natural language processing, neural networks) for many of the outcomes. We found many studies exploring Readmissions and Pressure Injuries. The topics of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Acceptance, Burnout, Patient Safety, and Unit Culture were poorly represented. We hope that the studies described in this article help readers: (1) understand the breadth and depth of data science's ability to improve clinical processes and patient outcomes that are relevant to nurses and (2) identify gaps in the literature that are in need of exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anne Schultz
- Author Affiliations: California State University (Dr Schultz); Annette and Irwin Eskind Family Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University (Ms Walden); Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University School of Nursing (Dr Cato); Grand Valley State University (Dr Coviak); Global Health Technology & Informatics, Chevron, San Ramon, CA (Mr Cruz); Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy (Dr D'Agostino); Duke University School of Nursing (Mr Douthit); East Carolina University College of Nursing (Dr Forbes); St Catherine University Department of Nursing (Dr Gao); Texas Woman's University College of Nursing (Dr Lee); Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing (Dr Lekan); University of Wisconsin School of Nursing (Ms Wieben); and Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr Jeffery)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen Y, Bhagwandass H, Branchcomb T, Galvez SA, Grande I, Lessing J, Mollanazar M, Ourhaan N, Oueini R, Sasser M, Valdes IL, Jadubans A, Hollmann J, Maguire M, Usmani S, Vouri SM, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Adkins LE, Goodin AJ. Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Scoping Literature Review on Evolving Clinical and Scientific Definitions. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2020; 22:246-262. [PMID: 33031943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) with chronic opioid therapy (COT) is controversial. There is a lack of consensus on how COT is defined resulting in unclear clinical guidance. This scoping review identifies and evaluates evolving COT definitions throughout the published clinical and scientific literature. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. A total of 227 studies were identified from 8,866 studies published between January 2000 and July 2019. COT definitions were classified by pain population of application and specific dosage/duration definition parameters, with results reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Approximately half of studies defined COT as "days' supply duration >90 days" and 9.3% defined as ">120 days' supply," with other days' supply cut-off points (>30, >60, or >70) each appearing in <5% of total studies. COT was defined by number of prescriptions in 63 studies, with 16.3% and 11.0% using number of initiations or refills, respectively. Few studies explicitly distinguished acute treatment and COT. Episode duration/dosage criteria was used in 90 studies, with 7.5% by Morphine Milligram Equivalents + days' supply and 32.2% by other "episode" combination definitions. COT definitions were applied in musculoskeletal CNCP (60.8%) most often, and typically in adults aged 18 to 64 (69.6%). The usage of ">90 days' supply" COT definitions increased from 3.2 publications/year before 2016 to 20.7 publications/year after 2016. An increasing proportion of studies define COT as ">90 days' supply." The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria, suggesting that contemporary COT definitions are increasingly conservative. PERSPECTIVE: This study summarized the most common, current definition criteria for chronic opioid therapy (COT) and recommends adoption of consistent definition criteria to be utilized in practice and research. The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria overall, suggesting that COT definition criteria are increasingly stringent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Shen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Hemita Bhagwandass
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Tychell Branchcomb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Sophia A Galvez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivanna Grande
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Julia Lessing
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Mikela Mollanazar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Natalie Ourhaan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Razanne Oueini
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Sasser
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivelisse L Valdes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ashmita Jadubans
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Josef Hollmann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Maguire
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Silken Usmani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Scott M Vouri
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Juan M Hincapie-Castillo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Lauren E Adkins
- University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Amie J Goodin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|