E6 viral protein ratio correlates with outcomes in human papillomavirus related oropharyngeal cancer

The imprint of viral oncoproteins on the variable clinical behavior among human papilloma virus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

Human papilloma virus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) are variable in their progression, immune landscape, treatment responses, and clinical outcomes. Their behavior is impacted not only by differences in host genomic alterations but also by diversity in levels and activity of HPV-encoded oncoproteins. Striking differences in HPV mRNA levels are found among HPV+ OPSCCs and likely derive in part from variations in the structurally diverse mix of integrated and episomal HPV genomes they often contain. Viral oncoprotein levels and function are also impacted by differential splicing of the two long polycistronic transcripts of HPV16, the HPV type within most HPV+ OPSCCs. Further variation in viral oncoprotein function arises from the distinct lineages and sub-lineages of HPV16, which encode polymorphisms in functionally important portions of oncogenes. Here we review the limited current knowledge linking HPV mRNA expression and splicing to differences in oncoprotein function that likely influence OPSCC behavior. We also summarize the evolving understanding of HPV16 physical genome state and genetic variants and their potential contributions to HPV oncoprotein levels and function. Addressing considerable remaining challenges in defining the quantitative and qualitative imprint of HPV oncoproteins on each OPSCC holds promise to guide personalization of therapy for this disease.

Structure and transcription of integrated HPV DNA in vulvar carcinomas

HPV infections are associated with a fraction of vulvar cancers. Through hybridization capture and DNA sequencing, HPV DNA was detected in five of thirteen vulvar cancers. HPV16 DNA was integrated into human DNA in three of the five. The insertions were in introns of human NCKAP1, C5orf67, and LRP1B. Integrations in NCKAP1 and C5orf67 were flanked by short direct repeats in the human DNA, consistent with HPV DNA insertions at sites of abortive, staggered, endonucleolytic incisions. The insertion in C5orf67 was present as a 36 kbp, human-HPV-hetero-catemeric DNA as either an extrachromosomal circle or a tandem repeat within the human genome. The human circularization/repeat junction was defined at single nucleotide resolution. The integrated viral DNA segments all retained an intact upstream regulatory region and the adjacent viral E6 and E7 oncogenes. RNA sequencing revealed that the only HPV genes consistently transcribed from the integrated viral DNAs were E7 and E6*I. The other two HPV DNA+ tumors had coinfections, but no evidence for integration. HPV-positive and HPV-negative vulvar cancers exhibited contrasting human, global gene expression patterns partially overlapping with previously observed differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative cervical and oropharyngeal cancers. A substantial fraction of the differentially expressed genes involved immune system function. Thus, transcription and HPV DNA integration in vulvar cancers resemble those in other HPV-positive cancers. This study emphasizes the power of hybridization capture coupled with DNA and RNA sequencing to identify a broad spectrum of HPV types, determine human genome integration status of viral DNAs, and elucidate their structures.

Salivary HPV Persistence Following Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection following treatment of HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken at The Ottawa Hospital (Ottawa, ON, Canada), a tertiary academic hospital and regional cancer center. Adult patients who were diagnosed with HPV + OPSCC between the years of 2014 and 2016 and treated with curative intent, and who were alive and willing to consent were eligible for inclusion. A saliva assay was used to test for the presence of HPV DNA in a random sample of patients. qPCR was used to amplify DNA from saliva samples.

RESULTS

Saliva samples were obtained from 69 patients previously treated with HPV + OPSCC. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. 5 patients tested positive for HPV: 2 were positive for HPV-16, 2 for HPV-18, and 1 "other" HPV type. No patient in our study cohort had suffered recurrence post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to demonstrate the prevalence of persistent oncogenic HPV DNA in saliva following treatment for HPV + OPSCC. This prevalence appears to be low, despite the fact that persistent HPV infection is a precursor for the development of HPV + OPSCC. This finding raises questions about what factors influence the clearance or persistence of HPV DNA in saliva after treatment for HPV + OPSCC, and may add to our understanding about the longitudinal effects of HPV infection in these cancers.

Significant association between host transcriptome-derived HPV oncogene E6* influence score and carcinogenic pathways, tumor size, and survival in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogenes E6, E7, and shorter isoforms of E6 (E6*) are known carcinogenic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Little is known regarding E6* functions.

METHODS

We analyzed RNA-seq data from 68 HNSCC HPV type 16-positive tumors to determine host genes and pathways associated with E6+E7 expression (E6E7) or the percent of full-length E6 (E6%FL). Influence scores of E6E7 and E6%FL were used to test for associations with clinical variables.

RESULTS

For E6E7, we recapitulated all major known affected pathways and revealed additional pathways. E6%FL was found to affect mitochondrial processes, and E6%FL influence score was significantly associated with overall survival and tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV E6E7 and E6* result in extensive, dose-dependent compensatory effects and dysregulation of key cancer pathways. The switch from E6 to E6* promotes oxidative phosphorylation, larger tumor size, and worse prognosis, potentially serving as a prognostic factor for HPV-positive HNSCC.

Comparative RNA sequencing reveals that HPV16 E6 abrogates the effect of E6*I on ROS metabolism

High-risk Human Papillomavirus infections are responsible for anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Alternative splicing is an important mechanism controlling HPV16 gene expression. Modulation in the splice pattern leads to polycistronic HPV16 early transcripts encoding a full length E6 oncoprotein or truncated E6 proteins, commonly named E6*. Spliced E6*I transcripts are the most abundant RNAs produced in HPV-related cancers. To date, the biological function of the E6*I isoform remains controversial. In this study, we identified, by RNA sequencing, cellular targets deregulated by E6*I, among which genes related to ROS metabolism. Concomitantly, E6*I-overexpressing cells display high levels of ROS. However, co-overexpression of both E6 and E6*I has no effect on ROS production. In HPV16-infected cells expressing different E6/E6*I levels, we show that the newly identified targets CCL2 and RAC2 are increased by E6*I but decreased by E6 expression, suggesting that E6 abrogates the effect of E6*I. Taken together, these data support the idea that E6*I acts independently of E6 to increase ROS production and that E6 has the ability to counteract the effects of E6*I. This asks the question of how E6*I can be considered separately of E6 in the natural history of HPV16 infection.

Comparative analysis of HPV16 gene expression profiles in cervical and in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is the major cause of cervical cancer and of a fraction of oropharyngeal carcinoma. Few studies compared the viral expression profiles in the two types of tumor. We analyzed HPV genotypes and viral load as well as early (E2/E4, E5, E6, E6*I, E6*II, E7) and late (L1 and L2) gene expression of HPV16 in cervical and oropharyngeal cancer biopsies. The study included 28 cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and ten oropharyngeal SCC, along with pair-matched non-tumor tissues, as well as four oropharynx dysplastic tissues and 112 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia biopsies. Viral load was found higher in cervical SCC (<1 to 694 copies/cell) and CIN (<1 to 43 copies/cell) compared to oropharyngeal SCC (<1 to 4 copies/cell). HPV16 E2/E4 and E5 as well as L1 and L2 mRNA levels were low in cervical SCC and CIN and undetectable in oropharynx cases. The HPV16 E6 and E7 mRNAs were consistently high in cervical SCC and low in oropharyngeal SCC. The analysis of HPV16 E6 mRNA expression pattern showed statistically significant higher levels of E6*I versus E6*II isoform in cervical SCC (p = 0.002) and a slightly higher expression of E6*I versus E6*II in oropharyngeal cases. In conclusion, the HPV16 E5, E6, E6*I, E6*II and E7 mRNA levels were more abundant in cervical SCC compared to oropharyngeal SCC suggesting different carcinogenic mechanisms in the two types of HPV-related cancers.

Subtypes of HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancers Are Associated with HPV Characteristics, Copy Number Alterations, PIK3CA Mutation, and Pathway Signatures

PURPOSE

There is substantial heterogeneity within human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck cancer (HNC) tumors that predispose them to different outcomes; however, the molecular heterogeneity in this subgroup is poorly characterized due to various historical reasons.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed unsupervised gene expression clustering on deeply annotated (transcriptome and genome) HPV(+) HNC samples from two cohorts (84 total primary tumors), including 18 HPV(-) HNC samples, to discover subtypes and characterize the differences between subgroups in terms of their HPV characteristics, pathway activity, whole-genome somatic copy number alterations, and mutation frequencies.

RESULTS

We identified two distinct HPV(+) subtypes (namely HPV-KRT and HPV-IMU). HPV-KRT is characterized by elevated expression of genes in keratinocyte differentiation and oxidation-reduction process, whereas HPV-IMU has strong immune response and mesenchymal differentiation. The differences in expression are likely connected to the differences in HPV characteristics and genomic changes. HPV-KRT has more genic viral integration, lower E2/E4/E5 expression levels, and higher ratio of spliced to full-length HPV oncogene E6 than HPV-IMU; the subgroups also show differences in copy number alterations and mutations, in particular the loss of chr16q in HPV-IMU and gain of chr3q and PIK3CA mutation in HPV-KRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our characterization of two subtypes of HPV(+) HNC tumors provides valuable molecular level information that point to two main carcinogenic paths. Together, these results shed light on stratifications of the HPV(+) HNCs and will help to guide personalized care for HPV(+) HNC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4735-45. ©2016 AACR.