Driver monitoring systems (DMS): The future of impaired driving management?

Effect of CannEpil® on simulated driving performance and co-monitoring of ocular activity: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Medicinal cannabis products containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are increasingly accessible. Yet, policy guidelines regarding fitness to drive are lacking, and cannabinoid-specific indexations of impairment are underdeveloped.

AIMS

To determine the impact of a standardised 1 mL sublingual dose of CannEpil^®, a medicinal cannabis oil containing 100 mg cannabidiol (CBD) and 5 mg THC on simulated driving performance, relative to placebo and whether variations in vehicle control can be indexed by ocular activity.

METHODS

A double-blind, within-subjects, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial assessed 31 healthy fully licensed drivers (15 male, 16 female) aged between 21 and 58 years (M = 38.0, SD = 10.78). Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), standard deviation of speed (SDS) and steering variability were assessed over time and as a function of treatment during a 40 min simulated drive, with oculomotor parameters assessed simultaneously. Oral fluid and plasma were collected at 30 min and 2.5 h.

RESULTS

CannEpil did not significantly alter SDLP across the full drive, although increased SDLP was observed between 20 and 30 min (p < 0.05). CannEpil increased SDS across the full drive (p < 0.05), with variance greatest at 20-30 min (p < 0.001). CannEpil increased fixation duration (p < 0.05), blink rate (trend p = 0.051) and decreased blink duration (p < 0.001) during driving. No significant correlations were observed between biological matrices and performance outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

CannEpil impairs select aspects of vehicle control (speed and weaving) over time. Alterations to ocular behaviour suggest that eye tracking may assist in determining cannabis-related driver impairment or intoxication. Australian and New Zealand Clinician Trials Registry, https://anzctr.org.au(ACTRN12619000932167).

The prevalence of alcohol use and risky driving practises among individuals who consume sedatives nonmedically: findings from the NESARC-III

Background: Worldwide, 1.3 million people die because of a road traffic collision each year, with over half (57.7%) of such deaths in the United States involving a psychoactive substance. The prevalence of drink-drivers is slowly declining; however, the number of drivers under the influence of other drugs, such as sedatives, continues to rise.Objectives: This study aimed to examine alcohol use and risky driving practices among individuals who consume sedatives nonmedically.Methods: A total of 36,309 US adults (48.1% male) who participated in wave 3 (2012) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions were included for analysis.Results: Overall, 827 respondents reported past-year nonmedical sedative use. Almost two-third (64.9%) of these individuals exceeded recommended drinking guidelines and 42.5% met the criteria for a past-year DSM-5 alcohol use disorder. When controlling for demographic, lifestyle, and health factors, they were 1.84 times as likely to drink-drive (95% confidence interval = 1.46-2.33, p < .001) compared to those not using sedatives or using them as prescribed. Among those who reported both drink-driving and driving under the influence of sedatives in the last 12 months, 68.1% met the criteria for a past-year DSM-5 sedative use disorder.Conclusion: Several driving outcomes relevant to road safety, such as driving under the influence of alcohol or sedatives, are impacted by sedative consumption. Given that individuals who consume sedatives nonmedically may be unaware or misperceive the impacts of substance use on safe driving, interventions to reduce such behavior should be targeted among this high-risk group.

European NCAP Program Developments to Address Driver Distraction, Drowsiness and Sudden Sickness

Driver distraction and drowsiness remain significant contributors to death and serious injury on our roads and are long standing issues in road safety strategies around the world. With developments in automotive technology, including driver monitoring, there are now more options available for automotive manufactures to mitigate risks associated with driver state. Such developments in Occupant Status Monitoring (OSM) are being incorporated into the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) Safety Assist protocols. The requirements for OSM technologies are discussed along two dimensions: detection difficulty and behavioral complexity. More capable solutions will be able to provide higher levels of system availability, being the proportion of time a system could provide protection to the driver, and will be able to capture a greater proportion of complex real-word driver behavior. The testing approach could initially propose testing using both a dossier of evidence provided by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) alongside selected use of track testing. More capable systems will not rely only on warning strategies but will also include intervention strategies when a driver is not attentive. The roadmap for future OSM protocol development could consider a range of known and emerging safety risks including driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, cognitive distraction, and the driver engagement requirements for supervision and take-over performance with assisted and automated driving features.