CRISPR-Cas type II-based Synthetic Biology applications in eukaryotic cells

Unleashing the potential: type I CRISPR-Cas systems in actinomycetes for genome editing

Covering: up to the end of 2023Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are widely distributed, found in over 40% of bacteria and 80% of archaea. Among genome-sequenced actinomycetes (particularly Streptomyces spp.), 45.54% possess type I CRISPR-Cas systems. In comparison to widely used CRISPR systems like Cas9 or Cas12a, these endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems have significant advantages, including better compatibility, wide distribution, and ease of operation (since no exogenous Cas gene delivery is needed). Furthermore, type I CRISPR-Cas systems can simultaneously edit and regulate genes by adjusting the crRNA spacer length. Meanwhile, most actinomycetes are recalcitrant to genetic manipulation, hindering the discovery and engineering of natural products (NPs). The endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems in actinomycetes may offer a promising alternative to overcome these barriers. This review summarizes the challenges and recent advances in CRISPR-based genome engineering technologies for actinomycetes. It also presents and discusses how to establish and develop genome editing tools based on type I CRISPR-Cas systems in actinomycetes, with the aim of their future application in gene editing and the discovery of NPs in actinomycetes.

Designing artificial synthetic promoters for accurate, smart, and versatile gene expression in plants

With the development of high-throughput biology techniques and artificial intelligence, it has become increasingly feasible to design and construct artificial biological parts, modules, circuits, and even whole systems. To overcome the limitations of native promoters in controlling gene expression, artificial promoter design aims to synthesize short, inducible, and conditionally controlled promoters to coordinate the expression of multiple genes in diverse plant metabolic and signaling pathways. Synthetic promoters are versatile and can drive gene expression accurately with smart responses; they show potential for enhancing desirable traits in crops, thereby improving crop yield, nutritional quality, and food security. This review first illustrates the importance of synthetic promoters, then introduces promoter architecture and thoroughly summarizes advances in synthetic promoter construction. Restrictions to the development of synthetic promoters and future applications of such promoters in synthetic plant biology and crop improvement are also discussed.

Design of Gene Boolean Gates and Circuits with Convergent Promoters

Gene digital circuits are the subject of many research works due to their various potential applications, from hazard detection to medical diagnostic. Moreover, a remarkable number of techniques, developed in electronics, can be used for the construction of biological digital systems. In our previous works, we showed how to automatize the design and modeling of gene digital circuits whose gates were based on transcription and translation regulation. In this chapter, we illustrate how Boolean gates could be implemented by following a particular architecture, the convergent promoter one, rather diffuse in nature but seldom adopted in Synthetic Biology. Beside gate design, we also explain how to extend our previous modeling approach, based on composable parts and pools of molecules, to quantitatively describe and simulate this particular kind of digital biological devices.

A Mutated Nme1Cas9 Is a Functional Alternative RNase to Both LwaCas13a and RfxCas13d in the Yeast S. cerevisiae

CRISPR–Cas systems provide powerful biological tools for genetic manipulation and gene expression regulation. Class 2 systems, comprising type II, type V, and type VI, have the significant advantage to require a single effector Cas protein (Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 respectively) to cleave nucleic acids upon binding the crRNA. Both Cas9 and Cas12 recognize DNA and induce a double-strand break in it. In contrast, Cas13 bind and cleave RNA exclusively. However, some Cas9 homologs have shown RNase activity as well. Here, we harnessed Nme1Cas9, LwaCas13a, and RfxCas13d to carry out gene downregulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by triggering mRNA degradation. To avoid potential DNA damage, we mutated Nme1Cas9 into d_16ANme1Cas9 that lost the nuclease activity of the RuvC domain but retained the active HNH domain, able to act on the target DNA strand and, therefore, on the corresponding transcript. Our results showed that d_16ANme1Cas9 is a functional RNase in vivo, although with moderate activity since it provoked a fluorescence reduction from 21% to 32%. Interestingly, d_16ANme1Cas9 works in a PAM-independent way nor demands helper PAMmer molecules. LwaCas13a and RfxCas13d appeared substantially unfunctional in S. cerevisiae, though they were shown to perform well in mammalian cells. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the working in vivo of a variant of Nme1Cas9 as an RNase and the issues connected with the usage of Cas13 proteins in S. cerevisiae.

Type II anti-CRISPR proteins as a new tool for synthetic biology

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas (CRISPR-associated proteins) system represents, in prokaryotes, an adaptive and inheritable immune response against invading DNA. The discovery of anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs), which are inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas, mainly encoded by phages and prophages, showed a co-evolution history between prokaryotes and phages. In the past decade, the CRISPR-Cas systems together with the corresponding Acrs have been turned into a genetic-engineering tool. Among the six types of CRISPR-Cas characterized so far, type II CRISPR-Cas system is the most popular in biotechnology. Here, we discuss about the discovery, the reported inhibitory mechanisms, and the applications in both gene editing and gene transcriptional regulation of type II Acrs. Moreover, we provide insights into future potential research and feasible applications.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Promoter Engineering before and during the Synthetic Biology Era

Simple Summary

Promoters are DNA sequences where the process of transcription starts. They can work constitutively or be controlled by environmental signals of different types. The quantity of proteins and RNA present in yeast genetic circuits highly depends on promoter strength. Hence, they have been deeply studied and modified over, at least, the last forty years, especially since the year 2000 when Synthetic Biology was born. Here, we present how promoter engineering changed over these four decades and discuss its possible future directions due to novel computational methods and technology.

Abstract

Synthetic gene circuits are made of DNA sequences, referred to as transcription units, that communicate by exchanging proteins or RNA molecules. Proteins are, mostly, transcription factors that bind promoter sequences to modulate the expression of other molecules. Promoters are, therefore, key components in genetic circuits. In this review, we focus our attention on the construction of artificial promoters for the yeast S. cerevisiae, a popular chassis for gene circuits. We describe the initial techniques and achievements in promoter engineering that predated the start of the Synthetic Biology epoch of about 20 years. We present the main applications of synthetic promoters built via different methods and discuss the latest innovations in the wet-lab engineering of novel promoter sequences.

Aptamers, Riboswitches, and Ribozymes in S. cerevisiae Synthetic Biology

Among noncoding RNA sequences, riboswitches and ribozymes have attracted the attention of the synthetic biology community as circuit components for translation regulation. When fused to aptamer sequences, ribozymes and riboswitches are enabled to interact with chemicals. Therefore, protein synthesis can be controlled at the mRNA level without the need for transcription factors. Potentially, the use of chemical-responsive ribozymes/riboswitches would drastically simplify the design of genetic circuits. In this review, we describe synthetic RNA structures that have been used so far in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We present their interaction mode with different chemicals (e.g., theophylline and antibiotics) or proteins (such as the RNase III) and their recent employment into clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats–CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas) systems. Particular attention is paid, throughout the whole paper, to their usage and performance into synthetic gene circuits.

Establishment and application of a CRISPR-Cas12a assisted genome-editing system in Zymomonas mobilis

BACKGROUND

Efficient and convenient genome-editing toolkits can expedite genomic research and strain improvement for desirable phenotypes. Zymomonas mobilis is a highly efficient ethanol-producing bacterium with a small genome size and desirable industrial characteristics, which makes it a promising chassis for biorefinery and synthetic biology studies. While classical techniques for genetic manipulation are available for Z. mobilis, efficient genetic engineering toolkits enabling rapidly systematic and high-throughput genome editing in Z. mobilis are still lacking.

RESULTS

Using Cas12a (Cpf1) from Francisella novicida, a recombinant strain with inducible cas12a expression for genome editing was constructed in Z. mobilis ZM4, which can be used to mediate RNA-guided DNA cleavage at targeted genomic loci. gRNAs were then designed targeting the replicons of native plasmids of ZM4 with about 100% curing efficiency for three native plasmids. In addition, CRISPR-Cas12a recombineering was used to promote gene deletion and insertion in one step efficiently and precisely with efficiency up to 90%. Combined with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), CRISPR-Cas12a system was also applied to introduce minor nucleotide modification precisely into the genome with high fidelity. Furthermore, the CRISPR-Cas12a system was employed to introduce a heterologous lactate dehydrogenase into Z. mobilis with a recombinant lactate-producing strain constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study applied CRISPR-Cas12a in Z. mobilis and established a genome editing tool for efficient and convenient genome engineering in Z. mobilis including plasmid curing, gene deletion and insertion, as well as nucleotide substitution, which can also be employed for metabolic engineering to help divert the carbon flux from ethanol production to other products such as lactate demonstrated in this work. The CRISPR-Cas12a system established in this study thus provides a versatile and powerful genome-editing tool in Z. mobilis for functional genomic research, strain improvement, as well as synthetic microbial chassis development for economic biochemical production.

Anti-CRISPR-based biosensors in the yeast S. cerevisiae

Background

Anti-CRISPR proteins are expressed by phages as a reaction to the bacterial CRISPR–Cas defense system. Recently, the structures of anti-CRISPR proteins have been determined, and their diverse functions have been clarified. Anti-CRISPR proteins such as LmAcrIIA2 and LmAcrIIA4 interact with the SpCas9:gRNA system and occlude the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) recognition site, thereby preventing SpCas9:gRNA from binding to the DNA. Hence, anti-CRISPR proteins represent a powerful means to control and modulate the activity of SpCas9 and its nuclease-deficient version dSpCas9. LmAcrIIA2 and LmAcrIIA4 have been shown to be efficient inhibitors of SpCas9 in Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and mammalian cells. To date, there have been no reports of anti-CRISPR-based synthetic gene circuits engineered into yeast cells.

Results

We constructed in the yeast S. cerevisiae synthetic biosensors based on the anti-CRISPR–dSpCas9:gRNA interaction. Upon induction with galactose or β-estradiol, anti-CRISPR proteins (LmAcrIIA4, LmAcrIIA2, and StAcrIIA5) produced an enhancement in fluorescence expression by preventing the dSpCas9–Mxi1:gRNA complex from binding to the DNA. We found that LmAcrIIA2 performed as well as LmAcrIIA4 in S. cerevisiae, whereas StAcrIIA5, which had previously been tested in bacteria only, had non-negligible negative effects on yeast cell growth. The efficiency of anti-CRISPR-based biosensors was strongly dependent on the means by which the guide RNAs were produced. The best performance, as measured by the increase in fluorescence, was achieved using a “ribozyme–gRNA–ribozyme” expression cassette under the control of the yeast constitutive ADH1 promoter.

Conclusions

This work demonstrates that anti-CRISPR proteins are effective dSpCas9 suppressors in yeast cells. In particular, LmAcrIIA2 and LmAcrIIA4 could be employed as new components of yeast synthetic gene circuits.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13036-018-0101-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.