Freezing for the future: Transgender youth respond to medical fertility preservation

The experience of transfeminine adolescents and their parents regarding fertility preservation via testicular sperm extraction (TESE): a qualitative study

STUDY QUESTION

How do transfeminine adolescents and their parents experience fertility preservation via testicular sperm extraction (TESE)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Participants experienced the TESE process positively when provided with appropriate guidance to navigate the decisional dilemma between preserving future biological parenthood and the pressure to start puberty suppression early.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Sperm banking through ejaculation is not feasible for all transfeminine adolescents due to genital dysphoria and early puberty; for this group, TESE is the only alternative. However, during early puberty, they must postpone or pause puberty suppression until spermatogenesis is fully developed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

All consecutive TESE patients in our centre and their parents were invited to participate. Between December 2022 and May 2023, we included 6 adolescents and 10 parents. We used a qualitative approach based on semi-structured interviews to study the experience of the transfeminine adolescents and their parents.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Transfeminine adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria in early puberty (Tanner stage ≥2) who underwent TESE before the start of puberty suppression or gender-affirming hormones participated in this study. The interviews were recorded, manually transcribed and analysed using reflective thematic analysis focusing on understanding the participants' experiences of puberty and fertility preservation and the various factors and social processes influencing their decision to undergo TESE.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Transfeminine adolescents decide to undergo invasive fertility preservation because of a possible, future desire for parenthood. Parents stressed the importance of preventing future decisional regret. They both saw masturbation to obtain a semen sample as unreachable. Even though TESE is a surgical procedure with possible complications and pain afterwards, this alternative seemed less dysphoric to them.Adolescents had to postpone the start of puberty suppression, waiting for spermatogenesis to complete. Given the unpredictable development of puberty, they felt a lot of stress and anxiety during this period and were primarily concerned about the lowering of their voice. Because of this puberty-related stress, they were constantly balancing their motivations for fertility preservation against the early start of puberty suppression to prevent unwanted irreversible pubertal body changes. To support this decisional dilemma, adolescents and their parents need adequate communication with each other and their healthcare providers to reflect on their stress for pubertal change. Furthermore, close, continuous surveillance of their current mental state by their parents, together with their psychologist and pubertal development by their physicians, is needed. Despite the challenging decision and postponement of puberty suppression, they retrospectively experienced it positively without any regret.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

All adolescents successfully underwent TESE, with viable spermatozoa obtained and without complications. This may result in a more positive reflective experience regarding fertility preservation. Furthermore, the perspectives of adolescents with the intention of TESE but who already started with puberty suppression before the preservation were not included.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study helps healthcare providers improve their counselling and guidance of transfeminine adolescents who consider postponing puberty suppression for fertility preservation via TESE. The adolescents and their parents know more clearly what to expect during fertility preservation. Specific peer-support programs may facilitate the decision process for upcoming adolescents.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used for this study. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services Among Transgender People: A Meta-Synthesis

The availability and accessibility of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for transgender individuals are crucial. This population is deprived of health care due to rejection, stigma, gender-based discrimination, confidentiality, and violence. This review attempts to provide readers with an account of the fundamental problems that the transgender population faces regarding experiences of SRH. This meta-synthesis review applied the Social-Ecological Model (SEM) to address trans individuals' SRH factors. The databases were searched using "SRH" and "transgender" keywords. Fifty studies were finally selected. All studies were qualitative, including 36 semi-structured/ in-depth interviews, two focus group studies, and 12 interviews and focus group studies. The Social-Ecological Model application illustrates the impact of individual, interpersonal, institutional, and social factors on the condition of SRH among transgender individuals. This meta-synthesis reinforces multiple levels of factors that influence the SRH of transgender individuals. These include limited information, lack of awareness, low socioeconomic status, stigma and discrimination, and social deprivation. Interventions are urgently needed to provide better sexual and reproductive well-being for transgender individuals.

Update on bioethical, medical and fertility issues in gender incongruence during transition age

PURPOSE

Many issues still remain unresolved in the management of pubertal patients with gender incongruence (GI). The aim of this review is to discuss the main aspects of the treatment of these patients to provide a practical approach for clinicians.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search within PubMed was performed to provide updates of available evidence regarding the impact on bioethical, medical and fertility issues in gender incongruence during transition age.

RESULTS

Gender Affirming Hormone Treatment (GAHT) and Gender Affirming Surgery (GAS) can induce unsatisfaction with change, future regrets, and the risk of infertility. This raises ethical issues especially in the management of pubertal patients that remain unresolved. Therapy with GnRH analogues (GnRHa) is intended to delay puberty, so as to give the adolescent a longer period of time to decide whether to continue with the treatments. At the level of physical changes, this therapy may have an effect on bone mineralization and body composition; however, long-term longitudinal data are not yet available. An important feature related to the use of GnRHa is the risk of fertility. Gamete cryopreservation is the most established method of fertility preservation (FP) and should be counselled to transgender adolescents. However, these patients are not always interested in having biological children.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current evidence, there is a need to conduct further research to clarify certain issues and to standardize clinical practice and improve counselling in transgender adolescent decision making and avoid regrets in the future.

Reproductive and Fertility Knowledge and Attitudes Among Transgender and Gender-Expansive Youth: A Replication and Extension

Purpose

This study sought to replicate and expand a previous pilot investigation of reproductive knowledge, attitudes toward fertility and parenthood, and sources of information on these topics among transgender and gender-expansive (TGE) youth.

Methods

The Yale Pediatric Gender Program (YPGP) Reproductive Knowledge and Experiences Survey (YPGP-RKES) was administered to 70 TGE adolescents receiving care at an interdisciplinary clinic providing gender-affirming health care at an academic medical center. Data gathered included sources of information on reproduction and fertility, concerns about future parenthood and reproduction, and interest in different types of parenthood.

Results

Over a third (39.1%) of participants reported it was important to them to have a child one day, while only a small proportion (23.2%) reported an interest in biological parenthood. A plurality of participants (37.3%) reported at least one concern about future fertility. The number of reproductive concerns did not differ by age or treatment (puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormones vs. no treatment) status. With respect to needs for more information and sources of information, most (56.5%) participants received information about fertility issues before this study, with the most cited source of information being online research.

Conclusions

The current study replicated and extended previous findings on the reproductive attitudes and knowledge of TGE adolescents. Understanding the informational needs and priorities of adolescent TGE patients presenting for medical treatment will allow providers to give more robust patient education. This will, in turn, facilitate patients' ability to provide fully informed consent for treatment that aligns with their fertility and reproductive priorities and goals.

Fertility preservation and realignment in transgender women

Medical care for transgender people is multi-faceted and attention to individual reproductive aspirations and planning are an essential, yet often overlooked aspect of care. Given the impact of hormonal therapy and other gender affirmation procedures on reproductive function, extensive counselling and consideration of fertility preservation is recommended prior to their commencement. This review article explores the reproductive aspirations of transgender women and considers the current disparity between stated desires regarding utilisation of fertility preservation services. Current fertility preservation options and prospective treatments currently showing promise in the research arena are explored.

Desire for genetically related children among transgender and gender-diverse patients seeking gender-affirming hormones

Objective

To assess predictors of desire for genetically related children among a national cohort of reproductive-age transgender and gender-diverse patients aged 18 to 44 years initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy for the first time.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

National telehealth clinic.

Patients

A cohort of patients from 33 US states initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy. A total of 10,270 unique transgender and gender-diverse patients-aged 18 to 44 years (median age 24 years), with no prior use of gender-affirming hormone therapy-completed clinical intake forms between September 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022.

Interventions

Patient sex assigned at birth, insurance status, age, and geographic location.

Main Outcome Measures

Self-reported desire for children using own genetic material.

Results

Transgender and gender-diverse patients seeking gender-affirming medical treatments who are open to having genetically related children are an important population to identify and appropriately counsel. Over one quarter of the study population reported being interested in or unsure about having genetically related children, with 17.8% reporting yes and 8.4% unsure. Male-sex-assigned-at-birth patients had 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.25, 1.41) times higher odds of being open to having genetically related children compared with female-sex-assigned-at-birth patients. Those with private insurance had 1.13 (95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.37) times higher odds of being open to having genetically related children compared with those without insurance.

Conclusions

These findings represent the largest source of self-reported data on the desire for genetically related children among reproductive-age adult transgender and gender-diverse patients seeking gender-affirming hormones. Guidelines recommend that providers offer fertility-related counseling. These results indicate that transgender and gender-diverse patients, particularly male-sex-assigned-at-birth individuals and patients with private insurance, could benefit from counseling regarding the impacts of gender-affirming hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries on fertility.

Supporting Gender-Related Medical Decision Making for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Scoping Review

Purpose

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals and their families face numerous challenging decisions. To better understand their decision processes, we conducted a scoping review of the existing literature and of decision-support tools in use at pediatric gender-care clinics.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus CINAHL, PsychINFO, and EBM Reviews for studies that were original research focused on decisions, decision making, or decision support for TGD individuals and/or their families. All studies were reviewed for inclusion by at least two researchers. Additionally, we reviewed clinical tools used to support decision making by TGD youth and their families.

Results

We retrieved 3306 articles. Thirty-two met criteria for data extraction. Studies focused on three major decisions: gender-confirming surgery, fertility preservation, and gender-affirming hormone therapy. Several themes that cut across clinical topics emerged: decision-making processes, decision-making roles, and sources of decision support. Only three articles focused on decision-support interventions, two of which discussed development of support tools and one evaluated a class designed to help with surgical decision making. None of the clinical tools reviewed met criteria for a decision aid.

Conclusions

There is a dearth of studies related to decision support interventions, an absence validated by the resources currently in clinical use. This scoping review suggests an opportunity for the development of tools to aid in the decision-making processes for TGD youth and their families.

Access to fertility preservation for trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa New Zealand

There is a growing need for healthcare professionals to discuss fertility preservation options with trans and non-binary people before commencing medical transition as part of informed consent-based models of care. In this article, we adapt the Five-A framework of healthcare access to examine fertility preservation information and services. To do so, we present an analysis of data from Counting Ourselves, the first comprehensive national survey in Aotearoa New Zealand of trans and non-binary people's health and the first study exploring their access to cryopreservation information and services. Among 419 participants who had received gender-affirming hormones or surgery, 33.7% received information about options for fertility preservation and 15.8% accessed fertility preservation services. Findings from the study indicate the need for greater understanding of trans and non-binary people's desire for genetically related children, and what type of information and form of delivery would be most helpful to ensure equitable outcomes in relation to decision-making around fertility and future family-building.

Fertility preservation in transgender and non-binary adolescents and young adults

Although 37.5-51% of transgender adults state they would've considered freezing gametes before gender-affirming therapy if offered and 24-25.8% of transgender adolescents express interest in having biological children, less than 5% of transgender adolescents have opted for fertility preservation. We sought to assess fertility preservation utilization in our multidisciplinary adolescent gender clinic. We also aimed to identify fertility preservation utilization and interest among non-binary adolescents and young adults. A retrospective review was conducted of patients seen in the Stanford Pediatric & Adolescent Gender Clinic from October 2015 through March 2019 who were >10 years of age at initial visit. All individuals with documented discussion of fertility preservation were offered referral for formal fertility preservation consultation but only 24% of patients accepted. Only 6.8% of individuals subsequently underwent fertility preservation (n = 9). Transfeminine adolescents are more likely to pursue fertility preservation than transmasculine adolescents (p = 0.01). The rate of fertility preservation in non-binary adolescents did not significantly differ from those in transfeminine adolescents (p = 1.00) or transmasculine adolescents (p = 0.31). Although only one non-binary individual underwent fertility preservation, several more expressed interest with 36% accepting referral (n = 4) and 27% being seen in consultation (n = 3). Despite offering fertility preservation with designated members of a gender clinic team, utilization remains low in transgender adolescents. Additionally, non-binary adolescents and their families are interested in fertility preservation and referrals should be offered to these individuals. Further studies and advocacy are required to continue to address fertility needs of transgender adolescents.

Transgender and Gender Diverse Fertility Choices: Supporting the Decision-Making Process for Adolescents and Young Adults

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively examine the fertility-related decision making process of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and their parents, in the setting of pursing gender affirming treatments.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-five TGD AYAs and 6 parents of TGD AYAs participated in a focus group or individual semistructured interviews focused on participants' experience learning about the effects of gender affirming treatments on fertility as well as the process of making a fertility preservation decision. Using open coding, data were analyzed in an iterative process identifying emerging themes and relationships. A decisional satisfaction score was collected and/or coded for each participant.

RESULTS

Four broad themes related to the decision-making process were identified: (1) Critical steps include awareness, gathering information, and conversations; (2) External constraints limit choices; (3) Expanding the conversation beyond preservation; and (4) Emotional distress, conflict, and decisional satisfaction. Despite reporting emotional distress or conflict during the decision, TGD AYAs and parents of TGD AYAs generally reported a high level of satisfaction with their fertility preservation decision.

CONCLUSIONS

There are specific ways health care professionals and family members can support TGD AYAs in their fertility-related decision making process. Decisional satisfaction was common, regardless of whether TGD AYAs chose to pursue fertility preservation or not.

Predicting successful sperm retrieval in transfeminine adolescents after testicular biopsy

PURPOSE

Increasing numbers of transgender adolescents are receiving gender-affirming treatments (GAT). Given GAT can impair reproductive function, clinical guidelines advise prior counselling regarding fertility preservation (FP). For transgender adults assigned male at birth, FP is usually achieved via a masturbatory sample and sperm cryopreservation. This is less straightforward in transgender adolescents, since they may not be developmentally ready to masturbate and/or masturbation may cause unacceptable gender dysphoria. Testicular biopsy represents an alternative method for sperm retrieval in these adolescents, but for those in early/mid puberty, it is difficult to predict whether sperm will be found. The purpose of this study was therefore to identify factors that predict successful sperm retrieval for cryopreservation via testicular biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at a tertiary-referral pediatric gender service. Subjects were included if they'd received a testicular biopsy in association with the commencement of GAT between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was successful sperm retrieval, and potential predictors included age, testicular volume and serum testosterone, LH and FSH levels.

RESULTS

Of 25 subjects who received a biopsy prior to starting any GAT, 17 had successful sperm retrieval. While age, testosterone, LH and FSH levels showed minimal differences, testicular volume was significantly higher in those with successful sperm retrieval, and a threshold of ≥ 10 mL showed 92% sensitivity and 71% specificity in predicting successful retrieval. An additional 6 patients received a biopsy after starting puberty suppression and before commencement of oestrogen, and one of these individuals had sperm successfully retrieved despite > 2 years of regular puberty suppression.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that testicular volume is most useful in predicting successful sperm retrieval following testicular biopsy in transgender adolescents and are likely to be of relevance to other young people undertaking FP, including those with cancer.

Transgender men's fertility preservation: experiences, social support, and the quest for genetic parenthood

Transgender people assigned female at birth may undergo fertility preservation by egg or embryo freezing, usually prior to gender affirming treatment. In this binational ethnographic study, four transgender men were included as part of a larger comparative project on fertility preservation. In-depth ethnographic interviews allowed informants to talk freely about their fertility preservation experiences, and the circumstances that had enabled them to pursue this option. Prominent in men's accounts were the importance of genetic parenthood and the role of social support from others in the fertility preservation process. Indeed, in all cases, social support-from parents, siblings, partners, peers, physicians and employers-was critical, effectively enabling young transgender men to embark on their fertility preservation journeys and undergo the physically taxing process. This study illustrates the power of thriving through relationships that were critical in young transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation.

Gender Diverse Youth on Fertility and Future Family: A Qualitative Analysis

PURPOSE

Gender-affirming treatment for transgender and nonbinary adolescents has been shown to decrease anxiety, depression, and suicidality, but treatments have medical consequences. Specifically, hormone replacement and pubertal blocking may impact patients' fertility and childbearing capabilities. We interviewed gender diverse adolescents regarding their thoughts on family and fertility.

METHODS

We completed semistructured interviews with 23 gender diverse adolescents recruited from the Seattle Children's Gender Clinic. Interviewees included transfeminine, transmasculine, and nonbinary youth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's theory of thematic analysis, a flexible framework for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Gender diverse adolescents have myriad views on fertility, but four main themes were identified: (1) an interest in future family, including ideas regarding adoption and biological children; (2) barriers to fertility, including cost and procedure-related dysphoria; (3) factors unique to the developmental stage of adolescents, including the age discordance of making fertility decisions as a teenager and parental influence on decision-making; and (4) suggestions for clinicians approaching fertility counseling with adolescents considering hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Many gender diverse youth asserted an interest in building families, although the process of fertility preservation remains fraught. Relative to other studies, our participants were hopeful, imaginative, and interested in having children. Participants wanted to receive specific counseling on fertility, to receive help navigating the logistics of fertility preservation, and to be listened to when their hopes for children (or no children) were stated. Further research is needed to create care paradigms that address fertility of transgender youth in an affirming, developmentally appropriate manner.

Take the T out, put the T in: Gender-affirming hormones in youth

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of adolescents are seeking gender care at clinics and hospital programs, and requesting gender-affirming hormonal treatment. The interventions can either include suppression of testosterone and introduction of estrogen, or suppression of estrogen and introduction of testosterone.

AIMS

This review article focuses on the psychosocial experiences of youth who have completed their endogenous puberty and are now requesting one of these two forms of gender-affirming hormonal treatment. We investigate the comparative profiles of these two subgroups of transgender/gender-expansive youth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of research data, established standards of care and practice guidelines, and clinical observations.

RESULTS

Differences and similarities are noted and discussed in several realms: gender-related experiences prior to receiving hormonal treatment; the relationship between the physical changes and psychological experiences that accompany the introduction of testosterone or suppression of testosterone with replacement with estrogen; the intrapersonal and interpersonal implications of the treatment; considerations of fertility preservation for future family building; the role of the family in the decision-making process prior to starting a course of hormone therapy; and the capacity of youth to make informed decisions about these partially irreversible medical interventions.

DISCUSSION

Medical providers who offer gender-affirming hormonal care to youth should work with the family and allied professionals to assure that the youth's gender health is enhanced, barriers to care are removed, and mental health risks are reduced, whether the T is coming out or going in.

CONCLUSION

The cohort of youth who come to medical providers after completing puberty, and request gender-affirming hormones in the form of increases or reductions in T have a great deal in common, and also extensive variation among them.

Effective fertility counselling for transgender adolescents: a qualitative study of clinician attitudes and practices

OBJECTIVE

Fertility counselling for trans and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents has many complexities, but there is currently little guidance for clinicians working in this area. This study aimed to identify effective strategies for-and qualities of-fertility counselling for TGD adolescents based on clinicians' experiences.

DESIGN

We conducted qualitative semi-structured individual interviews in 2019 which explored clinician experiences and fertility counselling practices, perspectives of the young person's experience and barriers and facilitators to fertility preservation access. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

SETTING

This qualitative study examined experiences of clinicians at the Royal Children's Hospital-a tertiary, hospital-based, referral centre and the main provider of paediatric TGD healthcare in Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

We interviewed 12 clinicians from a range of disciplines (paediatrics, psychology, psychiatry and gynaecology), all of whom were involved with fertility counselling for TGD adolescents.

RESULTS

Based on clinician experiences, we identified five elements that can contribute to an effective approach for fertility counselling for TGD adolescents: a multidisciplinary team approach; shared decision-making between adolescents, their parents and clinicians; specific efforts to facilitate patient engagement; flexible personalised care; and reflective practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of these different elements can inform and hopefully improve future fertility counselling practices for TGD adolescents, but further studies examining TGD adolescents' experiences of fertility counselling are also required.

Family building desires among transgender and gender expansive adolescents: A longitudinal family-level analysis

Introduction

Professional societies state that Transgender and gender expansive (TGE) adolescents and their families should be counseled about future family building options prior to initiating gender affirming therapy. While emerging data show that TGE adolescents have diverse desires regarding future family building, little is known regarding how these preferences are developed in a larger ecological context.

Aim

The current study used Ecological Systems Theory as a framework to describe the family building attitudes of TGE adolescents, their caregivers, and their siblings.

Methods

Participants were recruited from community-based venues in the New England region of the U.S. to participate in the TTFN Project, a longitudinal community-based mixed methods study. The sample for the current study included 84 family members from 30 families (30 TGE adolescents, 11 siblings, 44 caregivers). All participants completed a semi-structured qualitative interview about family building attitudes and desires for TGE and cisgender adolescents at two waves across 6-8 months. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a combination of immersion/crystallization, thematic analysis, and template organizing style approaches. The Transgender Youth Fertility Attitudes Questionnaire (TYFAQ) was employed to quantitatively describe the family building attitudes of TGE adolescents and their families.

Results

Eight themes corresponding to the levels of the ecological systems model - individual-level (perceived reproductive potential, reproductive identity), family-level (communication about family building, familial experiences and expectations), community-level (community support and role models; community expectations and norms), and societal/institutional-level (medicalization of family building, external sociopolitical factors) - were developed from the interviews. Results from the TYFAQ indicated that compared to cisgender adolescents, TGE adolescents were less likely to value having biological children and more likely to consider adoption in comparison to their cisgender siblings.

Discussion

Findings emphasize the importance of using Ecological Systems Theory to understand the family building attitudes and desires of TGE adolescents and their families.

Reproductive desires in transgender and gender diverse adults: A cross-sectional study in Thailand

Objective: To explore the desires and barriers to fertility preservation among transgender women and gender diverse people assigned male at birth in Thailand. Material and methods: This study is a cross-sectional study in clinic-based setting. The data was obtained from a questionnaire. Three hundred and three participants visiting the Gender Care Clinic at Chiang Mai University Hospital and Mplus clinics between April 2019 and December 2019 were included. Of these, 199 were transgender women and 104 were gender diverse people assigned male at birth. Results: The overall parental desire was 30.4% which was similar across the 2 groups (p = 0.897). A genetically related child was preferred in 40.9% of transgender women and 50.5% of gender diverse group (p = 0.115). Factors impacting a parental desire were a good relationship with family (OR 2.905, 95%CI 1.315-6.420, p = 0.008), being in a stable relationship (OR 4.183, 95%CI 1.738-10.069, p < 0.001) and belief in a positive attitude of society toward LGBTQ parenting (OR 2.572, 95%CI 1.207-5.479, p = 0.014). Access to fertility preservation services was low. The majority of transgender women (75.3%) and gender diverse people (95.2%) never received a consultation regarding fertility. The utilization rate of fertility treatments was 5.3% in our study. Conclusion: Transgender women and gender diverse people assigned male at birth have parental desires for a genetically related child. However, access to reproductive information, consultation and services were very limited. Social support along with competent health services might increase access to reproductive services in transgender and gender diverse populations.

Formative development of a fertility decision aid for transgender adolescents and young adults: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study

PURPOSE

No educational and decision support tools exist to aid transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents and young adults (AYA) in making decisions about fertility preservation in the context of initiating gender-affirming medical care that can impair fertility. This study identified critical content areas and learning objectives to include in a decision aid about fertility preservation targeted for TNB AYA.

METHODS

Delphi methodology was leveraged to engage 80 multidisciplinary experts in reproductive medicine and pediatric transgender health care in a two round consensus building procedure. Proposed content areas rated as "probably keep" or "definitely keep" by 75% of experts were retained. Proposed learning objectives reaching 75% agreement on ratings of importance and priority were also identified.

RESULTS

The Delphi procedure identified five priority content areas (Basic Reproduction; Gender-Affirming Medical Interventions: Impacts on Fertility; Established Fertility Preservation Options; Benefits and Risks of Established Fertility Preservation Procedures; Alternative Pathways to Parenting) and 25 learning objectives to prioritize in a fertility-related decision aid for TNB AYA.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary panel of experts achieved agreement around content areas and learning objectives to incorporate into a decision aid about fertility preservation for TNB AYA.

Fertility Counseling for Transgender Adolescents: A Review

International guidelines in transgender health recommend fertility counseling before the commencement of puberty suppression, estrogen, or testosterone, given the potential for these treatments to impair fertility. However, these recommendations provide little actual guidance to clinicians. Consequently, differences in knowledge and attitudes may lead to clinicians adopting different approaches and goals in the fertility counseling they provide. This review draws attention to the disparity between the rates of desire for genetic parenthood among transgender individuals and the actual rates of fertility preservation (FP) and examines different factors in fertility counseling that affect clinical practice and contribute to this disparity. These factors include how a lack of strong evidence-for the effects of hormone therapy on future fertility and success rates of some FP options-impacts upon counseling, transgender peoples' experiences of fertility counseling and preservation, consideration of a young person's developmental stage and the roles of parents and clinicians in the decision-making process, considerations shaping transgender adolescents' decisions to preserve fertility, and access barriers to FP. In doing so, this review highlights the complexities and issues that clinicians must consider when providing fertility counseling to transgender adolescents and-in part-helps to address the lack of detailed clinical guidelines in this area.

Parental desire and fertility preservation in assigned male at birth transgender people living in Belgium

Introduction: Transgender people who chose to proceed with gender affirming hormonal and/or surgical therapy, may face reduced options for fulfilling their parental desire in the future. The ideas and concerns of adult transgender people regarding fertility preservation and parental desire have never been reported in a large, non-clinical sample of assigned male at birth (AMAB) transgender people. Methods: A web-based survey on fertility and parenthood in (binary and non-binary) transgender people was conducted in Belgium. AMAB people were selected for this analysis. Results: We included 254 AMAB persons, of which 196 (77.2%) self-identified as transgender women (TW), 14 (5.5%) as cross-dressers and 44 (17.3%) as gender non-binary (GNB) people. Fifty-five (21.6%) respondents had a current/future parental desire, parental desire was already fulfilled in 81 (31.9%) and not present in 57 people (22.4%) (other: 19.2%). TW were more likely to express a parental desire, compared to GNB people and cross-dressers (P = 0.004). In total, 196 AMAB people previously sought medical assistance, of which 30 (15.3%) considered the loss of fertility due to the transitioning process undesirable. The majority (68.2%) did not want fertility preservation (FP). Fourteen people (9.8%) had proceeded with FP. The main reasons not to proceed with FP included not feeling the need (70; 68.0%), not desiring a genetic link with (future) child(ren) (20; 19.4%) and having to postpone hormone treatment (15; 14.6%). TW were more likely to have a parental desire and to have cryopreserved or to consider cryopreserving gametes, compared to GNB people. Conclusion: Parental desire and FP use were lower in the current non-clinical sample than in previous research on clinical samples. This can possibly be explained by the barriers transgender people face when considering fertility options, including postponing hormone therapy. Also, GNB persons have different needs for gender affirming treatment and FP.

Fertility preservation for transgender adolescents and young adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Many transgender individuals choose to undergo gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) and/or sex reassignment surgery (SRS) to alleviate the distress that is associated with gender dysphoria. Although these treatment options often succeed in alleviating such symptoms, they can also negatively impact future reproductive potential.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the available psychosocial and medical literature on fertility preservation (FP) for transgender adolescents and young adults (TAYAs), to identify gaps in the current research and provide suggestions for future research directions.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic review of English peer-reviewed papers published from 2001 onwards, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines, was conducted. Four journal databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase and Ovid PsychINFO) were used to identify all relevant studies exploring psychosocial or medical aspects of FP in TAYAs. The search strategy used a combination of subject headings and generic terms related to the study topic and population. Bibliographies of the selected articles were also hand searched and cross-checked to ensure comprehensive coverage. All selected papers were independently reviewed by the co-authors. Characteristics of the studies, objectives and key findings were extracted, and a systematic review was conducted.

OUTCOMES

Included in the study were 19 psychosocial-based research papers and 21 medical-based research papers that explore fertility-related aspects specific for this population. Key psychosocial themes included the desire to have children for TAYAs; FP discussions, counselling and referrals provided by healthcare providers (HCPs); FP utilization; the attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of TAYAs, HCPs and the parents/guardians of TAYAs; and barriers to accessing FP. Key medical themes included fertility-related effects of GAHT, FP options and outcomes. From a synthesis of the literature, we conclude that there are many barriers preventing TAYAs from pursuing FP, including a lack of awareness of FP options, high costs, invasiveness of the available procedures and the potential psychological impact of the FP process. The available medical data on the reproductive effects of GAHT are diverse, and while detrimental effects are anticipated, the extent to which these effects are reversible is unknown.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

FP counselling should begin as early as possible as a standard of care before GAHT to allow time for informed decisions. The current lack of high-quality medical data specific to FP counselling practice for this population means there is a reliance on expert opinion and extrapolation from studies in the cisgender population. Future research should include large-scale cohort studies (preferably multi-centered), longitudinal studies of TAYAs across the FP process, qualitative studies of the parents/guardians of TAYAs and studies evaluating the effectiveness of different strategies to improve the attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of HCPs.

Fertility Preservation Legislation in the United States: Potential Implications for Transgender Individuals

Gender-affirming hormones may compromise gonadal function leading to subfertility or infertility. Fertility preservation (FP; i.e., egg and sperm "freezing") before starting hormones offers future options to transgender individuals. In the United States, FP is extremely expensive and rarely covered by medical insurance; state-specific laws govern required benefits. Recent changes in insurance mandates in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, and Rhode Island have expanded FP coverage, but implications of these changes for transgender individuals are unclear. State-by-state advocacy to expand insurance coverage for FP in individuals whose medically necessary treatments compromise fertility should consider the needs of transgender individuals desiring biological parenthood.

Perspectives on fertility preservation and parenthood among transgender youth and their parents

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the views of young people (YP) with gender dysphoria and their parents concerning fertility preservation and reproductive and life priorities.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study assessed knowledge of potential effects of treatments for gender dysphoria on fertility, current and future life priorities and preferences regarding future fertility/parenting options among YP and parents.

RESULTS

A total of 79 YP (81% assigned female at birth [AFAB], 19% assigned male at birth [AMAB], aged 12-18 years, 68% between ages 16 years and 18 years) and 73 parents participated. The top current life priority for YP among eight options was being in good health; the least important priority was having children. Anticipated life priorities 10 years from now were ranked similarly. Parents' rankings paralleled the YP responses; however, parents ranked having children as a significantly higher priority for AFAB compared with AMAB YP in 10 years. The majority of YP (66% AFAB, 67% AMAB) want to be a parent in the future. However, most do not envision having a biological child. A large majority (72% AFAB, 80% AMAB) were open to adoption. None of the YP surveyed pursued fertility preservation.

CONCLUSION

Fertility is a low current and future life priority for transgender YP. The majority of YP wish to become parents but are open to alternative strategies for building a family. These data may explain in part the reported low rates of fertility preservation among this population. Further studies are needed to assess if life priorities change over time.