Safety of sodium hyaluronate eye drop with C12-benzalkonium chloride

Sodium hyaluronate promotes proliferation, autophagy, and migration of corneal epithelial cells by downregulating miR-18a in the course of corneal epithelial injury

Corneal epithelium can resist the invasion of external pathogenic factors to protect the eye from external pathogens. Sodium hyaluronate (SH) has been confirmed to promote corneal epithelial wound healing. However, the mechanism by which SH protects against corneal epithelial injury (CEI) is not fully understood. CEI model mice were made by scratching the mouse corneal epithelium, and in vitro model of CEI were constructed via curettage of corneal epithelium or ultraviolet radiation. The pathologic structure and level of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression were confirmed by Hematoxylin and Eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. CTGF expression was detected by an IHC assay. The levels of CTGF, TGF-β, COLA1A, FN, LC3B, Beclin1, and P62 expression were monitored by RT-qPCR, ELISA, Western blotting or immunofluorescence staining. Cell proliferation was detected by the CCK-8 assay and EdU staining. Our results showed that SH could markedly upregulate CTGF expression and downregulate miR-18a expression in the CEI model mice. Additionally, SH could attenuate corneal epithelial tissue injury, and enhance the cell proliferation and autophagy pathways in the CEI model mice. Meanwhile, overexpression of miR-18a reversed the effect of SHs on cell proliferation and autophagy in CEI model mice. Moreover, our data showed that SH could induce the proliferation, autophagy, and migration of CEI model cells by downregulating miR-18a. Down-regulation of miR-18a plays a significant role in the ability of SH to promote corneal epithelial wound healing. Our results provide a theoretical basis for targeting miR-18a to promote corneal wound healing.

Corneal damage and its recovery after instillation of preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops

Purpose: Latanoprost ophthalmic solution is highly effective as a therapeutic agent for glaucoma and is applied worldwide. However, harmful effects on the corneal surface have been reported regarding the commercially available latanoprost ophthalmic solution. Corneal surface toxicity may be caused by the added preservative of the ophthalmic solution. In order to ascertain whether latanoprost itself can damage the cornea or if this is solely due to the added preservatives, this study attempted to determine the corneal changes that occur at different time periods following usage of preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops.Materials and methods: Preservative-free latanoprost eye drops (Monoprost^®) or preserved latanoprost eye drops (Xalatan^®) containing 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) were instilled in the corneas of rabbits. For each of the two different eye drop solutions, the rabbits used in this experiment were divided into three exposure groups: 1 minute, 24 hour, and 1 week groups. Corneal transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were examined immediately (1 minute) after instillation, at 24 hours after instillation, and at 24 hours after 1 week of daily instillations of latanoprost. Hank's balanced salt solution was used in the control group.Results: The mean corneal TER of the control group was 933.8 ± 279.0 Ω cm². In preservative-free latanoprost instilled corneas, there was no significant decrease in the TER or morphological changes at any of the time points, with the relative TER values of 117 ± 38%, 100 ± 34%, and 93 ± 21% for 1 minute, 1 day, and 1 week time points, respectively. In preserved latanoprost instilled corneas, SEM showed that only the immediate group exhibited superficial cell damage and a significant decrease in the corneal TER compared to the controls and other time points and to the immediate preservative-free latanoprost corneas. In the preserved latanoprost groups, the relative TER values were 18 ± 5%, 110 ± 28%, and 92 ± 10%, for the three respective observation time points.Conclusions: Preservative-free latanoprost can be safely instilled to the corneal epithelium. Latanoprost with 0.02% BAC has an immediate deleterious impact on the corneal epithelium; however, it disappears within 24 hours after instillation.