Targeted tumour therapy induced papulopustular rash and other dermatologic side effects: a retrospective study

Facial Papulopustular Eruption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with EGFR Inhibitors

Papulopustular rash (PPR) is the most frequent cutaneous adverse event during treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRis). Although often mild in severity, it can impair patients' quality of life and may also be a reason for discontinuing or changing the dose of the antineoplastic treatment. During COVID-19 pandemics, the use of surgical masks drastically increased and it had an impact on the face skin microenvironment, favoring the worsening of dermatological pathologies. We reported the relapse of PPR in patients treated with EGFR inhibitors who consistently wore face masks (>6 hours/day). All the patients developed the PPR within 6 months of starting mask use. Compared to the PPR occurred previously, after mask use, the skin eruption was more severe and affected mainly those regions of the face which came into contact with the mask. Patients received topical or systemic treatment, obtaining complete response in 65.7% of the cases. The establishment of an early treatment for the PPR allows continuing the oncologic treatment, without any suspension which could result in a decreased oncologic outcome. In conclusion, when using these devices, it is recommended to use special precautions, particularly in oncologic patients, by using a daily prophylactic skincare and replacing masks regularly with regular and frequent breaks.

Benefit from Almonertinib after Osimertinib treat EGFR 19 exon deletion NSCLC induced Severe rash: a case report

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been recommended as a first-line treatment of EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Skin rash is one of the most common side effects of osimertinib, and can have an impact on patients' quality of life and follow-up. However, there are few reports on the safety and efficacy of switching therapy with osimertinib and the other three generations of TKIs. In this paper, we present a case of NSCLC with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) and MET gene amplification who developed a severe rash after 2 months of treatment with osimertinib that did not recur after switching to replacement therapy with aumonertinib. Our findings indicate that aumonertinib is as effective as osimertinib in treating EGFR19del, while also exhibiting a lower occurrence of adverse skin reactions. This may result in an improved quality of life for patients.

Acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents in antineoplastic therapy: A review

BACKGROUND

Various biologic agents targeting specific molecules present new treatment options for various tumors. Acneiform eruption is a very common skin reaction to these agents. Although not life-threatening, acneiform eruption can affect patients' emotional and social lives. In very exceptional cases, it can lead to cancer therapy interruption.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the incidence rate, clinical characteristics, pathogenesis, and current management of acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents.

METHODS

This review was carried out through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane searching terms 'acneiform eruption', 'papulopustular eruption' or 'acne-like rash' and 'skin toxicity', 'cutaneous toxicity', 'skin reactions', 'dermatological toxicities', 'target therapy,' or 'drug therapy'.

RESULTS

Of the 73 articles matched our search terms, 61 were original articles and 12 were case reports or case series. Acneiform eruption is most commonly observed in patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Typical lesions consist of erythematous papules and pustules without comedones, accompanying with burning, pruritus, or xerosis. The pathogenesis involves inflammation and abnormalities of the follicular epithelium, where a disorder in EGFR signaling plays a key role. The treatment of acneiform eruption depends on the severity of the rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recognition and effective management of this cutaneous adverse reaction can prevent unnecessary reduction and discontinuation of drug use and improve patient survival and quality of life. Close collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists is important to optimize therapy and improve patient survival.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis presenting clinically as bullous pyoderma gangrenosum following leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin chemotherapy: a rare case report and literature review

There are no published cases about bullous pyoderma gangrenosum induced by leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy. With the increasing incidence of gastric and colorectal cancers and the increased usage of targeted therapies, some cutaneous adverse effects may become common. An 84-year-old male presented to our clinic with multiple ulcerative plaques covered with hemorrhagic crusts on both extremities after several FOLFOX chemotherapy sessions for gastric cancer and liver metastasis. Two weeks later, multiple bullae also appeared, especially on the acral areas. The histopathology examination was compatible with acute leukocytoclastic vasculitis. The FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen is increasingly administered considering the rising incidence of gastrointestinal cancers. Hence, our understanding of its possible side effects and complications must be heightened.

First Report of Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE or Baboon Syndrome) After Erenumab Application for Migraine Prevention

INTRODUCTION

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), formerly also called baboon syndrome, is characterized by symmetrical erythematous rash with typical localization in the gluteal and intertriginous areas. A type IV delayed hypersensitivity immune response is thought to be responsible for its development. CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are a new class of drugs for the prevention of migraine. We present the first case of SDRIFE occurring in temporal relation to the use of erenumab for migraine prevention.

CASE

A 48-year-old female patient with migraine received erenumab 140 mg subcutaneously in the thigh area for the prevention of migraine in repetitive cycles, each 1 month apart. Initially, the patient experienced no side effects. After the third cycle, a masseuse incidentally noticed a reddish, circular rash in the buttock area during a back massage. There were no other symptoms. The skin changes resolved spontaneously. Two years later, approximately 40 h after reapplication of erenumab 140 mg, the patient experienced a severe pain in the buttock area centered over the anal crease. The area of pain extended in a circular pattern with approximately 20 cm in diameter. The pain started abruptly and reached a severe intensity within about 30 min. Sitting on the buttocks was no longer possible for the patient. There was marked allodynia and hyperpathia in the entire buttocks region. A flat, broad-based blister-like skin swelling developed in this region. The blisters began opening up on the fourth day after the onset of the skin reaction. In addition, there was a pronounced redness in the entire buttock area. Here, the patient felt a strong burning pain, similar to a scald.

RESULTS

The symptoms lasted for a period of 10 days. From this point on, they fully subsided under concomitant therapy with prednisolone.

CONCLUSION

SDRIFE as a rare dermatological side effect should be considered in the monitoring of skin lesions during migraine prophylaxis. In view of the high migraine prevalence, knowledge of this uncommon syndrome is important. It is crucial to recognize the relationship between the medication and the circumscribed exanthema occurring distant from the injection site.

Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced cutaneous side effects in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous side effects are commonly seen in cancer chemotherapy. As new chemotherapy drugs are developed, the frequency and the diversity of these cutaneous side effects increase. For this reason, identification and management of these side effects are an important part of the treatment of cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate mucocutaneous side effects of conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy agents that are used in cancer patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 231 cancer patients, who received single or combination chemotherapy at the oncology department of our hospital between 2013 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed, and mucocutaneous side effects we evaluated.

RESULTS

The ages of the patients varied between 27 and 90 years with a median age of 60 years. Of the patients, 136 (58.9%) were women, and 95 (41.1%) were men. Combination chemotherapy was applied to 174 patients (71.9%). Mucocutaneous side effects were present in 558 patients. The most common side effect was alopecia, which was observed in 158 patients (65.6%). This was followed by mucositis (39.4%), hand-foot syndrome (35.3%), papulopustular rash (22%), dermatitis (18.3%), xerosis (14.1%), nail disorders (12%), and others.

CONCLUSIONS

Although chemotherapy-induced cutaneous side effects are not usually life-threatening, they may lead to the development of morbidity and discontinuance or termination of the treatment. Therefore, these side effects should be well managed to improve the quality of life of cancer patients.

Comparison of Anticancer Drug Toxicities: Paradigm Shift in Adverse Effect Profile

The inception of cancer treatment with chemotherapeutics began in the 1940s with nitrogen mustards that were initially employed as weapons in World War II. Since then, treatment options for different malignancies have evolved over the period of last seventy years. Until the late 1990s, all the chemotherapeutic agents were small molecule chemicals with a highly nonspecific and severe toxicity spectrum. With the landmark approval of rituximab in 1997, a new horizon has opened up for numerous therapeutic antibodies in solid and hematological cancers. Although this transition to large molecules improved the survival and quality of life of cancer patients, this has also coincided with the change in adverse effect patterns. Typically, the anticancer agents are fraught with multifarious adverse effects that negatively impact different organs of cancer patients, which ultimately aggravate their sufferings. In contrast to the small molecules, anticancer antibodies are more targeted toward cancer signaling pathways and exhibit fewer side effects than traditional small molecule chemotherapy treatments. Nevertheless, the interference with the immune system triggers serious inflammation- and infection-related adverse effects. The differences in drug disposition and interaction with human basal pathways contribute to this paradigm shift in adverse effect profile. It is critical that healthcare team members gain a thorough insight of the adverse effect differences between the agents discovered during the last twenty-five years and before. In this review, we summarized the general mechanisms and adverse effects of small and large molecule anticancer drugs that would further our understanding on the toxicity patterns of chemotherapeutic regimens.