Current evaluation and management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps

Biological therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease. High proportions of patients with CRSwNP characterized by type 2 inflammation fail to gain adequate control with conventional treatment. The application of biologics in clinics and assessments of novel biologics in clinical trials are blooming in expectations to fulfill the unmet medical needs of patients with CRSwNP with type 2 inflammation.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive search of PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for the most recent evidence, we thoroughly summarize current advances in biological therapies for treating patients with CRSwNP.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, biological therapy has been in the spotlight in clinical studies on CRSwNP. Biologics have proven to be efficacious in reducing nasal polyp size, alleviating CRSwNP-related symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing the need for systemic corticosteroids or endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. The considerable efficacy and safety profile of biologics has offered patients with refractory CRSwNP another treatment option. However, some concerns remain to be addressed. Aspects such as the position of biological therapy in the management of CRSwNP, traits of patients suitable for certain biologics, etc. necessitate efforts to elucidate these unknowns in order to provide patients with tailored therapy.

Long-term effects of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A step towards clinical remission

Background and objectives

Clinical remission, defined as the absence of disease activity and symptoms, is an emerging goal in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of dupilumab on patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, and explore the potential for achieving clinical remission.

Methods

A two-year prospective study was conducted on 109 patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, who were eligible for dupilumab as an add-on therapy. Comprehensive assessments, including clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations, were performed before and after treatment. Clinical remission of CRSwNP was defined as 12 months of dupilumab treatment, no exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS), no need for nasal sinus operation, no anosmia or hyposmia, a Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score under 20, and a Lund-Mackay score (LMS) below 10. For those with comorbid asthma, clinical remission was defined as an asthma control test (ACT) score of 19 or higher, no asthma exacerbations, and no need for OCS.

Results

Dupilumab significantly improved CRSwNP outcomes in both groups, including SNOT-22 scores, nasal polyp size (LMS), and anosmia/hyposmia. Comorbid asthma was highly prevalent (79.8%), and patients with asthma had significantly larger nasal polyps, both before and after dupilumab therapy, despite similar symptom improvement. Higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) levels, along with anosmia/hyposmia, predicted larger polyp size. Dupilumab also significantly improved asthma outcomes, increasing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and decreasing FeNO. Clinical remission was achieved in 11% of patients, with a slightly lower rate in those with asthma (7.3%).

Conclusion

Dupilumab treatment can achieve clinical remission in CRSwNP. However, comorbid asthma appears to reduce the likelihood of remission and is associated with larger nasal polyps, even with similar symptom improvement. Asthma may independently influence polyp development, potentially impacting long-term outcomes in CRSwNP.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease: molecular mechanism, management and treatment

It has been estimated that Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD) previously named as Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (A-ERD) affects around 1.4 million persons in the United States. Its prevalence in asthmatic patients has widely been underestimated, as a considerable number of patients would need an aspirin provocation test to confirm the diagnosis. N-ERD physiopathology is somehow complex, but basically involves an imbalance in the arachidonic acid metabolite pathway. The syndrome is characterized by the presence of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and NSAID and aspirin intolerance. Despite maximal and comprehensive medical treatment, the disease tends to be severe, with difficult to treat asthma and highly aggressive and recurrent ethmoidal polyposis. Recently, monoclonal antibodies aimed at reducing type 2 inflammation have demonstrated very promising results on disease control. The goal of this review is to provide the most recent published advances and evidence on physiopathology, diagnostic protocols and therapeutic strategies of N-ERD.

Effect of Dupilumab on Radiological Remission in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyp: A One Step Forward Toward Clinical Remission

Background and Objectives

 While achieving complete radiological improvement in patients with nasal polyps is often observed following surgical resection, the impact of biologic therapy, specifically dupilumab, on polyp size is an area of great interest. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) by assessing nasal polyps using the computed tomography (CT) staging system, Lund-Mackay score (LMS).

Methods

 A two-year prospective cohort study was conducted on 29 patients diagnosed with CRSwNP and asthma and eligible for dupilumab as an add-on therapy. The study involved comprehensive assessments of patients before biologic initiation and after the study. These assessments included clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations.

Results

Dupilumab treatment reduces LMS across sinuses (p<0.001) and improves nasal obstruction (p=0.001). Blood eosinophil count (BEC) predicts persistent sinus obstruction, doubling the likelihood per unit increase (odds ratio: 1.67, p=0.02). BEC levels identify persistent nasal obstruction (AUC: 76%, p=0.04), with a cutoff point above 255.5 cells per microliter, revealing a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42%. The probability of persistent nasal obstruction at the 20th month is 55%, regardless of prior nasal polyp surgery (p=0.41).

Conclusion

Dupilumab led to significant radiological improvements in patients with CRSwNP, demonstrating a potential role of radiological remission, irrespective of prior nasal polyp surgery. Additionally, BEC levels may guide the likelihood of persistent nasal obstruction.

Causal analysis between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been shown to be potentially closely related, but the relationship between these conditions, particularly the possibility of a causal link, is not fully understood. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal relationship between these two disorders.

METHODS

We extracted genome-wide association study data sets for GERD and CRS from publicly available gene summaries, and used MR to conduct a causal inference analysis. The main robustness test used in this study included MR-Egger regression, a leave-one-out sensitivity test, and multivariate MR (MVMR).

RESULTS

GERD increased the risk of developing CRS by 36%, based on the inverse-variance weighted method, a statistically significant association (odds ratio [OR] 1.360, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.179-1.568, P < 0.001). Other MR assessment methods, such as weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode, similarly observed a significant increase in the risk of CRS occurrence (OR 1.434, 95% CI 1.186-1.734, P < 0.001; OR 1.927, 95% CI 1.166-3.184, P = 0.013; and OR 1.910, 95% CI 1.222-2.983, P = 0.006, respectively). No significant bias was found in the heterogeneity or pleiotropy tests (P = 0.071 and P = 0.700, respectively). Even after excluding possible mediators using MVMR, GERD appeared to significantly increase the risk of developing CRS (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.008-1.023, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new, significant evidence that GERD is genetically associated with a higher incidence rate of CRS. However, further research is needed to elucidate the potential underlying biological mechanisms of this relationship.

Novel insights into central compartment atopic disease - a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a newly recognized variant subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although CCAD has been reported to be correlated with allergy, there is still a considerable gap in our knowledge regarding CCAD.

AREAS COVERED

We have conducted a thorough analysis of the literature on CCAD. This review provides current understanding and therapeutic strategies of CCAD. In this article, we will review the clinical presentations and parameters, allergy-related etiology, endotypes, and recommended management of CCAD.

EXPERT OPINION

CCAD is considered as an aeroallergen-driven type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pattern. Although CCAD can be diagnosed by endoscopy and radiology, as well as allergen test, pathogenesis and management strategies leave much to be desired, and further studies are needed.

Inflammation resolution and specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators in chronic rhinosinusitis

INTRODUCTION

In chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), a complex pathophysiology results from varied pro-inflammatory stimuli but is consistently characterized by classic cellular, molecular, and microbial alterations. Normally, endogenous specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPM) actively promote resolution of inflammation through numerous pathways, including those involved in host antimicrobial defense. However, these pathways appear to be disrupted in CRS.

AREAS COVERED

This paper describes features of CRS in the context of chronic tissue inflammation, and potential mechanisms by which specialized pro-resolving mediators promote active resolution of tissue inflammation.

EXPERT OPINION

Temporal phases of resolution must be tightly regulated to successfully resolve inflammation in CRS while preserving tissue functions such as barrier maintenance and special sensory function. Dysregulation of SPM enzymatic pathways has been recently shown in CRS and is associated with disease phenotypes and microbial colonization patterns. Current research in animal models and in vitro human cell culture, as well as human dietary studies, demonstrate relevant changes in cell signaling with lipid mediator bioavailability. Further clinical research may provide insight into the therapeutic value of this approach in CRS.

Laser nasal surgery (Review)

Laser nasal surgery has been an elusive subject in the last 10 to 15 years It was considered as a potential surgical staple for nasal surgery in the 1980s; however, it did not become one due to technical difficulties. Laser therapy has reemerged as an alternative to classical endoscopic surgery, and otorhinolaryngology surgeons are considering the benefits that it can offer. The advantages of this procedure are shorter hospitalization time, lack of nasal packing, high procedural precision with tissue sparing, and the unique capability of reducing both bacterial and fungal colonization at the level of the paranasal sinus. Therefore, laser therapy appears to be an invaluable tool for clinical practice. Due to the absence of a guaranteed cure for reoccurring nasal polyposis, laser therapy is worth investigating. For this therapy to evolve, an improved understanding of laser types and the effects that they produce is required. By investing in further developments of the equipment, the technique may become more widely used. With the current accelerated rate of technological evolution and robotic capabilities, laser nasal surgery may become a gold standard in future years. The aim of the present review is to evaluate whether it is worth investing in nasal laser surgery as a future alternative to current treatment standards.