The frontal pelvic plane provides a valid reference system for implantation of the acetabular cup: spatial orientation of the pelvis in different positions

"Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty" - a retrospective radiological study

PURPOSE

Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely used clinically for assessing the centre of rotation of the hip.

METHOD

A retrospective measurement of the lateral and cranial distance of the KTF to the centre of hip rotation was performed on the basis of 250 X-ray images of patients who had undergone THA. In addition, the dependence of these distances on pelvic tilt was determined in 16 patients by means of virtual X-ray projections based on pelvic CTs.

RESULTS

It was shown that the distance of the KTF from the centre of hip rotation in the horizontal plane is gender-dependent (men: 42.8 ± 6.0 mm vs. women: 37.4 ± 4.7 mm; p < 0.001) and age-dependent (Pearson correlation  - 0.114; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the vertical and horizontal distances are subject to variation depending on height (Pearson correlation 0.14; p < 0.05 and 0.40; p < 0.001, respectively) and weight (Pearson correlation 0.158; p < 0.05). The distance between the KTF and the centre of hip rotation varies slightly depending on pelvic tilt.

CONCLUSION

The KTF is not a sufficiently valid landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after THA. It is influenced by many different disturbance variables. However, it is largely robust against changes in pelvic tilt, so that it can be used as a reference point when comparing different intraindividual radiographs to assess the change in the centre of rotation due to implantation or to detect cup migration.

Does Patient-specific Functional Pelvic Tilt Affect Joint Contact Pressure in Hip Dysplasia? A Finite-element Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

Although individual and postural variations in the physiologic pelvic tilt affect the acetabular orientation and coverage in patients with hip dysplasia, their effect on the mechanical environment in the hip has not been fully understood. Individual-specific, finite-element analyses that account for physiologic pelvic tilt may provide valuable insight into the contact mechanics of dysplastic hips, which can lead to further understanding of the pathogenesis and improved treatment of this patient population.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

We used finite-element analysis to ask whether there are differences between patients with hip dysplasia and patients without dysplasia in terms of (1) physiologic pelvic tilt, (2) the pelvic position and joint contact pressure, and (3) the morphologic factors associated with joint contact pressure.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, 82 patients underwent pelvic osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia. Seventy patients with hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle ≥ 0° and < 20° on supine AP pelvic radiographs) were included. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis, femoral head deformity, prior hip or supine surgery, or poor-quality imaging were excluded. Thirty-two patients (32 hips) were eligible to this finite-element analysis study. For control groups, we reviewed 33 female volunteers without a history of hip disease. Individuals with frank or borderline hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle < 25°) or poor-quality imaging were excluded. Sixteen individuals (16 hips) were eligible as controls. Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons measured sagittal pelvic tilt (the angle between the anterior pelvic plane and vertical axis: anterior pelvic plane [APP] angle) and acetabular version and coverage using pelvic radiographs and CT images. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities, evaluated using the kappa value and intraclass correlation coefficient, were good or excellent. We developed individual-specific, finite-element models using pelvic CT images, and performed nonlinear contact analysis to calculate the joint contact pressure on the acetabular cartilage during the single-leg stance with respect to three pelvic positions: standardized (anterior pelvic plane), supine, and standing. We compared physiologic pelvic tilt between patients with and without dysplasia using a t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test with a Bonferroni correction was used to compare joint contact pressure between the three pelvic positions. We correlated joint contact pressure with morphologic parameters and pelvic tilt using the Pearson or the Spearman correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The APP angle in the supine and standing positions varied widely among individuals. It was greater in patients with hip dysplasia than in patients in the control group when in the standing position (3° ± 6° versus -2° ± 8°; mean difference 5° [95% CI 1° to 9°]; p = 0.02) but did not differ between the two groups when supine (8° ± 5° versus 5° ± 7°; mean difference 3° [95% CI 0° to 7°]; p = 0.06). The mean pelvic tilt was 6° ± 5° posteriorly when shifting from the supine to the standing position in patients with hip dysplasia. The median (range) maximum contact pressure was higher in dysplastic hips than in control individuals (in standing position; 7.3 megapascals [MPa] [4.1 to 14] versus 3.5 MPa [2.2 to 4.4]; difference of medians 3.8 MPa; p < 0.001). The median maximum contact pressure in the standing pelvic position was greater than that in the supine position in patients with hip dysplasia (7.3 MPa [4.1to 14] versus 5.8 MPa [3.5 to 12]; difference of medians 1.5 MPa; p < 0.001). Although the median maximum joint contact pressure in the standardized pelvic position did not differ from that in the standing position (7.4 MPa [4.3 to 15] versus 7.3 MPa [4.1 to 14]; difference of medians -0.1 MPa; p > 0.99), the difference in the maximum contact pressure varied from -3.3 MPa to 2.9 MPa, reflecting the wide range of APP angles (mean 3° ± 6° [-11° to 14°]) when standing. The maximum joint contact pressure in the standing position was negatively correlated with the standing APP angle (r = -0.46; p = 0.008) in patients with hip dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings that individual and postural variations in the physiologic pelvic tilt affect joint contact pressure in the hip, future studies on the pathogenesis of hip dysplasia and joint preservation surgery should not only include the supine or standard pelvic position, but also they need to incorporate the effect of the patient-specific pelvic tilt in the standing position on the biomechanical environment of the hip.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We recommend assessing postural change in sagittal pelvic tilt when diagnosing hip dysplasia and planning preservation hip surgery because assessment in a supine or standard pelvic position may overlook alterations in the hip's contact mechanics in the weightbearing positions. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of patient-specific functional pelvic tilt on the degeneration process of dysplastic hips, the acetabular reorientation maneuver, and the clinical result of joint preservation surgery.

The influence of sagittal pelvic malrotation on transverse acetabular ligament guided cup orientation: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates frequently present pelvic malrotation. The aim of this study is to analyze how pelvic malrotation influence transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) guided cup orientation and investigate whether pelvic malrotation produce different clinical outcomes after THA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of THA patients (144 hips) who use TAL as a guidance for cup positioning from March 2017 to January 2020. The patients were divided into normal pelvis (NP) group and backward pelvis (BP) group by sagittal pelvic malrotation assessed by APPA, the angle between the vertical and the APP on standing lateral pelvic radiographs preoperatively. Cup anteversion and inclination and that out of the safe zones were measured and compared in two groups. The demographic data, clinical results, and complications of patients were also compared.

Results

Backward pelvic malrotation were found in 60.6 % of this cohort of THA candidates. The mean angle of both inclination and anteversion in BP group were significantly larger than that in NP group. The rate of cup for anteversion and inclination above the safe zone in BP group was significantly larger than that in NP group. There were 4 patients in BP group recording anterior hip dislocation after surgery. Other complications were not observed at last follow-up.

Conclusions

Backward pelvis malrotation may increase TAL guided cup inclination and anteversion, which were inclined to became outlier above the safe zone. This likely increase the rates of dislocation after THA. For the patients with pelvis malrotation, cup positioning should be performed individually instead of guided by TAL.

Knee Valgus Versus Knee Abduction Angle: Comparative Analysis of Medial Knee Collapse Definitions in Female Athletes

The knee valgus angle (KVA) is heavily researched as it has been shown to correlate to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries when measured during jumping activities. Many different methods of KVA calculation are often treated as equivalent. The purpose of this study is to elucidate differences between these commonly used angles within and across activities to determine if they can indeed properly be treated as equivalent. The kinematics of 23 female athletes, D1 soccer, D1 basketball, and club soccer (height = 171.2 ± 88.9 cm, weight = 66.3 ± 8.6 kg, age = 19.8 ± 1.9 years), was analyzed using a motion capture system during activities related to their sport and daily living. The abduction KVA, measured using body fixed axes, only correlated to the two-dimensional (2D) global reference frame angle (KVA 2G) in three of the six activities (walking, squatting, and walking down stairs), and one out of six in the three-dimensional (3D) measurements (jogging). This suggests that the abduction KVA does not always relate to other versions of KVA. The KVA with reference to the pelvis coordinate system (KVA 2P) correlated to the KVA 2G in six out of six activities (r = 0.734  ±  0.037, P << 0.001) suggesting the pelvis can be utilized as a reference plane during rotating tasks, such as run-to-cut, when a fixed global system is less meaningful. Not all measures of KVA are equivalent and should be considered individually. A thorough understanding of the equivalence or nonequivalence of various measures of KVA is essential in understanding ACL injury risk.

Accuracy and Precision of an Ultrasound-Based Device to Measure the Pelvic Tilt in Several Positions

OBJECTIVES

A new ultrasound-based device is proposed to measure the patient-specific pelvic tilt in different daily positions. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of this device as well as the intraobserver and interobserver precisions.

METHODS

The accuracy was assessed by performing several tilt measurements with the device on a testing mechanical bench. The error was defined as the difference between the tilt measured with the device and the tilt provided by this test bench. Three physicians, a novice, an intermediate, and an expert user, were also asked to perform 10 measurements on 3 healthy volunteers with low, medium, and high body mass indices to analyze the intraobserver and interobserver precisions. These 10 measurements were performed in the standing, sitting, and supine positions.

RESULTS

The mean accuracy of the device ± SD was 1.1° ± 0.7° (range, 0°-4.0°). The interobserver and intraobserver precisions were excellent whatever the body mass index and good to excellent according to the positions. There was no learning curve, and the time required to complete the measurements was approximately 5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents an accurate and precise noninvasive device for measurement of the pelvic tilt in different positions.

Effect of sagittal pelvic tilt on joint stress distribution in hip dysplasia: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Physiologic pelvic tilt can change acetabular orientation and coverage in patients with hip dysplasia. In this study, we aimed to clarify the impact of change in sagittal pelvic tilt on joint stress distribution in dysplastic hips.

METHODS

We developed patient-specific finite element models of 21 dysplastic hips and 21 normal hips. The joint contact area, contact pressure, and equivalent stress of the acetabular cartilage were assessed at three pelvic tilt positions relative to the functional pelvic plane: 10° anterior tilt, no tilt, and 10° posterior tilt.

FINDINGS

The mean contact area was 0.6-0.7 times smaller, the mean maximum contact pressure was 1.8-1.9 times higher, and the mean maximum equivalent stress was 1.3-2.8 times higher in dysplastic hips than in normal hips at all three pelvic positions. As the pelvis tilted from 10° anterior to 10° posterior, the mean contact area decreased, and the mean maximum contact pressure and median maximum equivalent stress increased. The latter two changes were more significant in dysplastic hips than in normal hips (total increment was 1.3 MPa vs. 0.4 MPa, P = 0.001, and 3.6 MPa vs. 0.4 MPa, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean equivalent stress increased in the anterosuperior acetabulum during posterior pelvic tilt in dysplastic and normal hips, while the change was not significant in the superior and posterosuperior acetabulum in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

Sagittal pelvic tilt alters the loading environment and joint stress distribution of the hip joint and may impact the degeneration process in dysplastic hips.

The Influence of Pelvic Tilt on the Anteversion Angle of the Acetabular Prosthesis

The concept of the "safe area" of the acetabular prosthesis has a long history and has been recognized by many scholars. It is generally believed that postoperative hip dislocation rate is low, when the acetabular anteversion angle is placed in the range of 15° ± 10°. Despite this, hip dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty. In recent years, more and more scholars have paid attention to the influence of pelvic tilt on the acetabular anteversion angle. The concept of acetabular anteversion changes as the pelvic tilt changes, and is challenging the traditional acetabular prosthesis "safe area." This study summarized the potential influencing factors of pelvic tilt and discussed the influence of the phenomenon on the anteversion angle of total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular prosthesis based on the literature review. We conclude that from the supine position to standing, followed by sitting, the pelvis tends to move backward. Pelvic sagittal activity, lumbar disease (ankylosing spondylitis), lumbar fusion (lumbar fusion, spine-pelvic fusion), and other factors related to the tilt are THA risk factors for postoperative dislocation and revision. With the change of body position, the degree of acetabular anteversion is directly related to the degree of pelvic tilt. The acetabular anteversion varies greatly, which leads to increased hip prosthesis wear and even hip dislocation. The lateral X-ray of the spine and pelvis is recommended in supine, standing, and sitting positions before THA. In addition, the pelvic tilt should be regarded as a reference of the acetabular prosthesis in the preoperative planning of THA.

Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objective

To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions.

Methods

A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA).

Results

A total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position.

Does Acetabular Coverage Vary Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Patients with Hip Dysplasia?

BACKGROUND

Although variation in physiologic pelvic tilt may affect acetabular version and coverage, postural change in pelvic tilt in patients with hip dysplasia who are candidates for hip preservation surgery has not been well characterized, and its clinical importance is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to determine (1) postural changes in sagittal pelvic tilt between the supine and standing positions; (2) postural changes in the acetabular orientation and coverage of the femoral head between the supine and standing positions; and (3) patient demographic and morphologic factors associated with sagittal pelvic tilt.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2016, 102 patients underwent pelvic osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia. All patients had supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs and pelvic CT images taken during their preoperative examination. Ninety-five patients with hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle < 20°) younger than 60 years old were included. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis, other hip disease, prior hip or spine surgery, femoral head deformity, or inadequate imaging were excluded. Sixty-five patients (64%) were eligible for participation in this retrospective study. Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons (TT and MF) investigated sagittal pelvic tilt, spinopelvic parameters, and acetabular version and coverage using pelvic radiographs and CT images. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities, evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.90 to 0.98, 0.93 to 0.99, and 0.87 to 0.96, respectively), were excellent. Demographic data (age, gender, and BMI) were collected by medical record review. Sagittal pelvic tilt was quantified as the angle formed by the anterior pelvic plane and a z-axis (anterior pelvic plane angle). Using a 2D-3D matching technique, we measured the change in sagittal pelvic tilt, acetabular version, and three-dimensional coverage between the supine and standing positions. We correlated sagittal pelvic tilt with demographic and CT measurement parameters using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Although functional pelvic tilt varied widely among individuals, the pelvis of patients with hip dysplasia tilted posteriorly from the supine to the standing position (mean APP angle 8° ± 6° versus 2° ± 7°; mean difference -6°; 95% CI, -7° to -5°; range -17° to 4.1°; p < 0.001; paired t-test).The pelvis tilted more than 5° posteriorly from the supine to the standing position in 39 patients (60%), and the change was greater than 10° in 12 (18%). In the latter subgroup of patients, the mean acetabular anteversion angle increased (22° ± 5° versus 27° ±5°; mean difference 5°; 95% CI, 4°-6°; p < 0.001) and the mean anterosuperior acetabular sector angle notably deceased from the supine to the standing position (91° ± 11° versus 77° ± 14°; mean difference -14°; 95% CI, -17° to -11°; p < 0.001; paired t-test). Postural change in pelvic tilt was not associated with any of the studied demographic or morphologic parameters, including patient age, gender, BMI, and acetabular version and coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, the pelvis tilted posteriorly from the supine to the standing position in patients with hip dysplasia, resulting in increased acetabular version and decreased anterosuperior acetabular coverage in the standing position. Thus, assessment with a supine AP pelvic radiograph may overlook changes in acetabular version and coverage in weightbearing positions. We recommend assessing postural change in sagittal pelvic tilt when diagnosing hip dysplasia and planning hip preservation surgery. Further studies are needed to determine how postural changes in sagittal pelvic tilt affect the biomechanical environment of the hip and the clinical results of acetabular reorientation osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study.

Variations in pelvic dimensions: An anatomical and computed tomography study

The anterior pelvic plane (APP) is a useful anatomical reference with both clinical and research applications in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. It is used as a marker for computer-assisted total hip replacement and image-guided assessment of the hip center in clinical gait analysis. Despite its common use, no published data exist on the variations in height and width in an adult population. The aim of this study was to determine the range of dimensions for the anterior pelvic plane found in the Scottish adult population. Thirty-five human cadavers and 100 pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Pelvic height and width were measured, and the ratios were determined. The mean width and height for combined cadaver and CT pelves were found to be 238.0 mm (SD 20.1, range 188.3-273.8) and 92.7 mm (SD 10.5, range 71.2-114.7), respectively. The mean width-to-height ratio for all pelves was 2.59 (SD 0.31, range 1.73-3.50). There were no statistically significant differences in means between males and females. The variations of APP dimensions within an adult population are presented. These will be of value in the validation of algorithms for computer navigation and hip joint center calculation in total hip arthroplasty and gait analysis. Furthermore, differences in dimensions between cadaveric and CT measurements have been shown which may have implications for further research and the validity of reference data dependent on data-point acquisition. Clin. Anat. 31:981-987, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pelvic Tilt Angle Differences Between Symptom-Free Young Subjects and Elderly Patients Scheduled for THA: The Rationale for Tilt-Adjusted Acetabular Cup Implantation

Background:

The question whether Pelvic Tilt (PT) angles measured in the supine position are adequate for the alignment of the acetabular cup without an adjustment for anatomical differences between patients is of clinical importance. The aim of this work was to test for factors that can significantly affect PT angles.

Methods:

In the present retrospective cohort comparison, the PT angles of 12 Symptom-Free Young Subjects (SFYS) and 45 patients scheduled for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) were compared. The data was collected during two studies with the use of a novel smartphone-based navigated ultrasound measurement system. Multi-factorial analysis of variance was run to determine which factors significantly affect PT.

Results:

Body position (F= 126.65; P< 0.001) and group (SFYS vs. THA patients) (F= 17.52; P< 0.001) had significant main effects on PT. There was also a significant interaction between body position and group (F= 25.59; P< 0.001). The mean PT increased by 8.1° from an interiorly to a neutral tilted position (P< 0.001) and 21.4° from a neutral to a posteriorly tilted position (P< 0.001) with the transition from the supine into the upright position for the SFYS and THA patients, respectively.

Conclusion:

In both groups, PT changed significantly with a transition from the supine to the upright position. A position-dependent mean PT increase in the patient group showed that acetabular cup alignment based on PT in the supine position is not reliable without taking into consideration the inclination of the pelvis in standing position. This may lead to instability and dislocations.

Correct Assessment of Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty From Plane Radiographs

BACKGROUND

Correct positioning of the cup is an important factor in total hip arthroplasty. Assessing its position from a plain anteroposterior pelvic radiograph is known to be hampered by systemic errors. This study focuses on developing a correction method to adjust for these potential sources of error and to eliminate them based on a 3D geometric analysis.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 113 (66 male, 47 female) pelvices were reconstructed and virtually projected onto a plain radiograph with varying rotational and translational positions. Thus cup inclination and anteversion as measured on a 2D-radiograph and in the 3D environment were correlated. Projected offset of the symphysis from the mid-sacrum served as a mean to measure pelvic right/left-rotation. Pelvic tilt was determined from the projected height of the contour of the small pelvis. Correction formulas were verified by projecting a gimbal-mounted artificial pelvis with a cup implanted in a known position.

RESULTS

We found gender-specific formulas that correct for malrotated and off-centered radiographs. Applying these formulas cup inclination was assessed as close as 1.3° (±1.90°) to the true 3D value and cup anteversion as close as 1° (±1.91°) although deviations between directly measured plain values and corrected values rose up to 18°.

CONCLUSION

Inherent effects of central projection and malrotations due to pelvic tilt, pelvic rotation, and noncentered radiographs are corrected. Evaluation of radiographic inclination and anteversion of acetabular cups from plain 2D-radiographs show improved precision. Real values are approached better than 1.3° when applying our correction formulas.

Preoperative Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Anterior Pelvic Plane for Personalized Total Hip Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Correct positioning of the acetabular component is a key factor in minimizing the risk of dislocation after total hip replacement (THR) surgery. A "safe" orientation of the cup is usually defined by 2 angles measured between its geometric axis and the anterior pelvic plane. However, in the current state-of-the-art approach to THR surgery, the intraoperative orientation of the anterior pelvic plane cannot be measured. Even less is known about the functional orientation of the pelvis, which determines the postoperative orientation of the cup during the patient's everyday activities. The aim of this article is to present an original approach to personalized THR surgery, in which the necessary measurements are done preoperatively without interfering with the surgical work flow, and the individual orientation of the cup is obtained without navigation using standard tools that are available in the operating room.

METHODS

To quantify the effect of the anatomic conditions on the final orientation of the cup, we measured the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in 43 patients scheduled for THR using a newly developed noninvasive method based on ultrasonography and mobile devices.

RESULTS

Our results confirm a large variability of the pelvic orientation in both supine and standing positions. We further show how this variability affects the final position of the cup and discuss its consequences for the patient. Finally, we explore a few practical solutions for individualized cup placement, including our own approach, which is based on tilting of the operating table.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we show that the common guidelines used today for cup implantation can only be effectively applied to a small portion of the population. In most cases, it is crucial that the orientation of the cup is readjusted for the particular anatomy of the individual patient.

Pelvic Tilt Displacement Before and After Artificial Hip Joint Replacement Surgery

BACKGROUND

Prediction of pelvic displacement before total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for accurate acetabular implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of contralateral joint conditions on pelvic displacement after THA.

METHODS

A total of 355 cases that underwent computed tomography before and after THA for osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia were assessed. The pelvic plane was based on preoperative and postoperative day 1 computed tomography images. The displacement in the anteversion direction was expressed as +. Subjects with a minimal joint space <2 mm in the contralateral hip joint were in group N; subjects with ≥2 mm were in group W; subjects with THA were in group P; and subjects who underwent THA simultaneously on both sides were in group B. The Bartlett test was used when conducting the equal variance test among the groups. The F test was used for pairwise comparison. A P value <.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Groups N, W, P, and B had 49, 227, 55, and 24 cases, respectively, and their displacements were -0.2° ± 2.7°, 0.8° ± 3.9°, 0.5° ± 2.6°, and 1.1° ± 4.0°, respectively; the variance between the groups was significantly different (P = .0001). The differences between groups W and N (P = .0020), between groups W and P (P = .0003), and between groups P and B (P = .0086) were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

When the contralateral joint space is wide, the variance of the displacement is high. The contralateral joint affects pelvic displacement.

Application of Navigated Ultrasound for Assessment of the Anterior Pelvic Plane in Patients With Degenerative Hip Diseases

OBJECTIVES

Correct positioning of the acetabular cup is the key for successful total-hip replacement. In common clinical practice, the target alignment of the cup is defined with respect to the anterior pelvic plane. In patients with substantial anterior pelvic plane inclination, this condition may lead to inappropriate distribution of the load on the cup, as most of the forces exerted within the hip joint act along the vertical axis. With the known pelvic inclination, it is possible to readjust the position of the cup with respect to the individual posture of the patient. In this work, we present the first clinical evaluation of a new approach to measurement of the pelvic tilt angle using navigated ultrasound.

METHODS

In our method, the ultrasound probe is tracked with an optical localizer implemented on a handheld mobile device. The method was tested by taking preoperative measurements from 20 patients with osteoarthritis in standing, sitting, and supine positions.

RESULTS

The mean values of the measured angles were consistent with the corresponding results reported by other authors.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the noninvasiveness of the method and affordability of the hardware used in our system, it can be used in preoperative and postoperative measurements of pelvic orientation for supporting surgery planning and evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Fluoroscopic Views for a More Accurate Placement of Iliosacral Screws: An Experimental Study

OBJECTIVES

Misperception on the fluoroscopic image showing a well-placed iliosacral (IS) screw can occur, when the screw is in reality misplaced. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and highlight examples of misperception and suggest alternative inlet and outlet views to confirm adequate IS screw placement.

METHODS

We used 9 different pelvic plastic models. In 8 of those models, IS screws were purposely misplaced: exiting anterior at the midportion of the S1 body, exiting at the lateral aspect of the anterior S1 body, abutting posterior to S1 body, exiting posterior to the S1 body, exiting superior to the far-side of the sacral ala, exiting superior to the S1 body, exiting partially in the S1 foramen, exiting completely in the S1 foramen. One model was used as control with correct screw placement. Different outlet and inlet views were tested to accurately detect important anatomic landmarks and avoid fake phenomenon (FP) using 3 different angles.

RESULTS

Misperception occurred in 3 models: (1) penetration at the midportion of the anterior border of S1, (2) penetration of the superior sacrum ala, and (3) partial penetration of S1 foramen. In the first situation, misperception could be avoided when the "anterior inlet view" was obtained. In the other 2 situations, misperception could be avoided using specific outlet views herein described.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight that misperception can occur using standard inlet and outlet views. We suggest using 2 variations of the inlet views and 3 variations of the outlet views to avoid misperception in clinical practice.

Acetabular component navigation in lateral decubitus based on EOS imaging: A preliminary study of 13 cases

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular component navigation classically requires palpation of the bone landmarks defining the anterior pelvic plane (APP) (anterior superior iliac spine [ASIS] and pubis), the recording of which is not very reliable when performed in lateral decubitus. The objectives of the current experimental study were: (1) to assess the clinical feasibility of NAVEOS navigation (based on EOS imaging) in lateral decubitus; and (2) to compare precision versus classical APP-based navigation (NAVAPP).

HYPOTHESIS

Iliac plane navigation using EOS is as reliable as APP navigation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A continuous prospective series of 13 total hip replacements were implanted in lateral decubitus under APP-guided navigation (NAVAPP). Planning used preoperative EOS measurement. The ASIS, pubis and ipsilateral posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) were located and exported to the navigator. Intra-operatively, NAVEOS landmarks (acetabular center, ASIS and PSIS on the operated side) were palpated. Postoperatively, cup inclination and anteversion with respect to the APP were measured on EOS imaging (SterEOS3D software). The SterEOS3D measurements were compared to those of the performed NAVAPP and simulated NAVEOS navigations.

RESULTS

Three patients were excluded for technical reasons. In the remaining 10, inclination on NAVAPP and SterEOS3D differed by a median 4° (range, 0-12°), and on NAVEOS versus SteEOS3D by 5° (range, 2-10°); anteversion on NAVAPP and SterEOS3D differed by a median 4.5° (range, 0-12°), and on NAVEOS versus SteEOS3D by 4° (range, 0-14°).

CONCLUSION

Precision was comparable between NAVEOS and classical navigation. NAVEOS simplifies cup navigation in lateral decubitus on initial acquisition. These results require validation on a larger sample.

Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement - when is the safe zone not safe?

An acetabular prosthesis orientated outside the 'safe zone' is one of the key contributing factors in increasing complications after total hip replacement (THR). Although acetabular orientation is routinely assessed using supine x-rays, standing x-rays have been proposed because a change in body position alters pelvic tilt and therefore acetabular orientation. This study aimed to assess whether acetabular components orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine can also be outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Thirty patients (12M, 18F) had lateral and antero-posterior pelvic x-rays taken in standing and supine positions six weeks post THR. Pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation (anteversion and inclination) were measured and compared with respect to the limits of the 'safe zone'. In standing, the pelvis was relatively posteriorly tilted and both acetabular anteversion and inclination increased (p<0.0001). In 16 patients the acetabulum was orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine but outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Patients were significantly more likely to be outside the 'safe zone' in standing than when supine (p<0.0001).

Clinical experience with computer navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty

The biomechanically and anatomically correct placement of hip prostheses components is the main challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. The orientation of the cup and stem with the restoration of leg length, offset and hip centre is hampered by the defect situations frequently present. In primary hip arthroplasty, it has been demonstrated that the components can be accurately positioned using computer-navigated procedures. However, such procedures could also be of considerable benefit in revision hip arthroplasty. Systems that not only detect anatomical landmarks using pointers but also use image data for referencing may provide a possible solution for the defect situation. Literature about navigation in revision arthroplasty is very rare. This article comprises general considerations on this subject and presents our experience and possible clinical applications.

Changes of gluteus medius muscle in the adult patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip

Background

The gluteus medius muscle is essential for gait and hip stability. Changes that occur in the gluteus medius muscles in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are not well understood. A better understanding of DDH related changes will have positive repercussions toward hip soft tissue reconstruction.

Methods

19 adult patients with unilateral DDH scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were assessed for: cross-sectional area (CSA), radiological density (RD) and the length of gluteus medius using computed tomograhpy(CT) (scanned before THA). Hip abductor moment arm and gluteus medius activation angle were also measured via hip anteroposterior radiographs.

Results

Both CSA and RD of gluteus medius muscle were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in the affected hip compared to the control. In the affected hip, the length of the gluteus medius muscle was reduced by 8-11 % (p < 0.05) while the gluteus medius activation angle was significantly increased (p < 0.05) and the hip abductor moment arm was decreased (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The gluteus medius showed substantial loss of CSA, RD as well as decreased length in patients with DDH in the affected hip. These changes should be considered in both hip reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation training in patients with DDH.

Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), accurately positioning the cup is crucial for achieving an adequate postoperative range of motion and stability. For 47 THA cases in which the inferomedial rim of the cup had been positioned parallel to the transverse acetabular ligament, we retrospectively performed the measurements of the radiographic cup anteversion angle relative to the anterior pelvic plane using 3-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography. The mean anteversion angle was 21.2°, with no significant difference detected in mean cup anteversion between the dysplastic hip group (15 hips) and the control group (15 hips). We suggest that the transverse acetabular ligament is a practical anatomical landmark for determining cup anteversion in THA for both dysplastic and nondysplastic hip cases.

Change in pelvic tilt angle 2 to 4 years after total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in pelvic tilt angle (PA) in the sagittal plane in the standing and supine positions for 2 to 4 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 21 male and 65 female patients were investigated before and after THA yearly over 2 to 4 years. Both the standing and supine PA significantly posteriorly tilted after THA. The difference in PA between the standing and supine positions (dPA) significantly increased after THA. Although the PA in the standing and supine positions plateaued 1 year after THA, the dPA gradually increased. In addition, the percentage of patients who showed a difference of more than 10° in dPA tended to increase yearly. In particular, elderly female patients who showed posterior tilt in PA in the standing or supine positions or a large dPA before THA tended to show a dPA of more than 10° after THA.

Combined multi-body and finite element investigation of the effect of the seat height on acetabular implant stability during the activity of getting up

An important question in assessing the stability of a total hip arthroplasty is the effect of daily physical activities of patients. The aim of this study is to examine these effects when standing up from three different seat heights. A musculoskeletal body model has been modified to simulate the three different seat heights. The calculated muscle forces have been transferred to a finite element model of a pelvis. The pelvis model was created from a hemipelvis CT dataset. As an implant component, a metal socket with a polyethylene insert was used. A primary implantation situation was modelled. For the analysed patient activities the highest hip contact forces and the highest micromotions occur at the beginning of the motion. The results of this study show that standing up from a certain seat height can have a significant influence on the micromotions in the implant-bone interface.

Automated pelvic anatomical coordinate system is reproducible for determination of anterior pelvic plane

Most of computer-assisted planning systems need to determine the anatomical axis based on the anterior pelvic plane (APP). We analysed that our new system is more reproducible for determination of APP than previous methods. A pelvic model bone and two subjects suffering from hip osteoarthritis were evaluated. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) images were scanned with various rotations by MDCT scanner. The pelvic rotation was calibrated using silhouette images. APP was determined by an optimisation technique. The values of variation of APP caused by pelvic rotation were analysed with statistical analysis. APP determination with calibration and optimisation was most reproducible.The values of variance of APP were within 0.05° in model bone and 0.2° even in patient pelvis. Furthermore, the values of variance of APP with calibration/optimisation were significantly lower in comparison without calibration/optimisation. Both calibration and optimisation are actually required for determination of APP. This system could contribute to the evaluation of hip joint kinematics and computer-assisted surgery.

Cup positioning in total hip arthoplasty: spatial alignment of the acetabular entry plane

PURPOSE

Correct cup positioning is one of the keys for successful total hip replacement. There are mechanical and computer assistant guides for correct cup positioning in the market. To optimize the cup positioning, the use of navigation systems is recommended. The aim of this study was to compare spatial orientation of the acetabulary entry plane in relation to tables plane which is used by mechanical guides as well as anterior pelvic plane used for cup orientation by navigation systems.

METHODS

CT raw data of 80 Caucasians (160 acetabuli) (done in supine position) with osteoartritic hips were collected. 3-D pelvic reconstruction was generated using Amira software (Visage Imaging Berlin, Germany). Anterior pelvic plane and acetabulary entry plane were defined by reliable anatomical landmarks. Spatial orientation were calculated by a custom made program code for the Amira software.

RESULTS

There were no differences between anterior pelvic plane and table's plane as well as spatial orientation of acetabulary entry plane of both acetabuli in relation to anterior pelvic plane or table's plane. Furthermore, there was no correlation between age, sex or body mass index and spatial orientation of the acetabulary entry plane as well.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mechanical alignment guides for cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty based on table's plane in patient's supine position is a successful method to achieve proper cup orientation.

A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Conventional radiography is the primary imaging tool for routine follow-up of total hip replacements, but the reliability of this method has been questioned. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of commonly used measurements of the position of hip prostheses on postoperative radiographs with use of tools available on all standard picture archiving and communication system workstations.

METHODS

Fifty anteroposterior pelvic and lateral hip radiographs that were made after a unilateral total hip arthroplasty were included in this study. Acetabular inclination, lateral offset, lower-limb length, center of rotation, and femoral stem angle were independently assessed by two observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each measurement.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated excellent reliability for acetabular angle (r = 0.95), lower-limb length (r = 0.91), and lateral offset (r = 0.95) measurements and good reliability for center of rotation (r = 0.73) and lateral femoral stem angle (r = 0.68) measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The position of total hip replacements can be reliably assessed with use of simple electronic tools and standard radiology workstations.

Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

PURPOSE

Determination of the cup orientation after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing may provide important information in the postoperative follow-up. We present a mathematical method based on a previously described approach to assess the version and inclination of the cup in the metal-on-metal bearing without a separate software computation from plain radiographs. The aim of the study was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of this method.

METHODS

Calculation of version and inclination were done twice for 20 hip resurfacings by four observers. Intra-observer reliability was estimated by mean error and correlation of the two sets of measurement for version and inclination. Bland-Altman plots, intra-class coefficient and mean error were used to assess the inter-observer reliability of the measurements.

RESULTS

Intra-observer correlation for version measurement ranged from 0.74 to 0.94. Correlation for inclination varied between 0.94 and 0.97. Upper and lower limits of agreement in Bland-Altman plots for version measurements between observers ranged from 4.1 to 7.2 degrees and from -3.2 to -8.3 degrees, respectively. For inclination measurements the upper and lower limits ranged from 3.1 to 5.3 degrees and from -2.7 to -6.0 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean errors, correlation coefficients and 95% limits of agreement were on an acceptable level. We believe that this method is applicable for clinical use.

Is vertical-center-anterior angle equivalent to anterior coverage of the hip?

We investigated whether the vertical-center-anterior (VCA) angle measured on the false-profile view of the hip represents true anterior coverage by computer simulation using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) in 100 hips without osteoarthritic changes. True anterior coverage angle on the sagittal plane was measured in the pelvic coordinate system. Two types of VCA angle were measured on the digital reconstructed radiographs: the anterior point of the VCA angle was defined as the foremost aspect of the acetabulum, denoted VCA-1, whereas the anterior edge of the dense shadow of the subchondral bone of the acetabulum was defined as VCA-2. In the normal hips, VCA-1 was consistent with anterior coverage angle (r = 0.88, Spearman rank test), whereas VCA-2 underestimated the anterior coverage (r = 0.72). In the dysplastic hips, VCA-2 did not always indicate true anterior coverage (r = 0.64), whereas VCA-1 overestimated the anterior coverage (r = 0.002). Although VCA-1 in normal hips shows true anterior coverage, the VCA angle does not indicate true anterior coverage in dysplastic hips, and VCA angle measurement in dysplastic hips should be used carefully.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Navigation in hip joint revision endoprosthetics]

The exact anatomical and biomechanical demands of correct positioning of prostheses can be critical for hip joint revision endoprosthetics. Preoperative planning cannot always be implemented due to the intraoperative situation. The reconstruction of the hip center, the correct alignment of the acetabulum and the shaft is difficult, especially in large defect situations. An exact positioning of the implant is possible for primary hip joint replacement by computer-assisted procedures. Although the potential benefits of revision endoprosthetics make sense, there are as yet only few publications which as a rule are limited to positioning of the acetabulum. It will be possible to further optimize revision endoprosthetics by analysis of the impingement, determination of alterations in leg length, measurement of shaft antetorsion and other parameters, by additionally incorporating shaft navigation and implant data. Navigation should, however, only be understood as an aid to orientation and does not supplant lack of knowledge and experience on the side of the operator. Information on positioning of the implant must therefore come from the operator.

Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature

The correct determination of cup orientation in THA regarding the intraoperative as well as the postoperative assessment due to the pelvic tilt and rotation with inexact incorporation of the pelvis is uncertain. The anterior pelvic plane (APP) seems to be the most reliable reference frame and computer-assisted navigation systems seem to provide the best tool for correct implantation to date. For the intraoperative assessment of the APP, the exact determination of the bony landmarks is mandatory. For the standard plain radiography, standardized positioning of the patient and approximation of pelvic tilt by a lateral view are mandatory. An additional CT must be carried out for certain indications. More emphasis has to be given to the individuality of pelvic tilt and range of motion.

Toward a dynamic approach of THA planning based on ultrasound

The risk of dislocation after THA reportedly is minimized if the acetabular implant is oriented at 45 degrees inclination and 15 degrees anteversion with respect to the anterior pelvic plane. This reference plane now is used in computer-assisted protocols. However, this static approach may lead to postoperative instability because the dynamic variations of the pelvis influence effective cup orientation and are not taken into account in this approach. We propose an ultrasound tool to register the preoperative dynamics of the pelvis for THA planning during computer-assisted surgery. To assess this pelvic behavior and its consequences on implant orientation, we tested a new 2.5-dimensional ultrasound-based approach. The pelvic flexion was registered in sitting, standing, and supine positions in 20 subjects. The mean values were -25.2 degrees +/- 5.8 degrees (standard deviation), 2.4 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees , and 6.8 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees , respectively. The mean functional anteversion varied by 26 degrees and the mean functional inclination by 12 degrees depending on the pelvic flexion. We therefore recommend including dynamic pelvic behavior to minimize dislocation risk. The notion of a safe zone should be revisited and extended to include changes with activity.

Acetabular version and long posterior wall cup in total hip replacement

This study discusses the definition of operative, anatomic and radiographic acetabular anteversion and their effect on a long posterior wall cup. In this cadaveric study, anteversion was modelled radiographically with a Charnley double wire marker Long Posterior Wall (LPW) cup and the position of the long posterior wall was studied with relation to different anteversion angles, and also correlated with computer generated line diagrams of the acetabular cup. The position of a long posterior wall varies when different types of anteversion are applied. By increasing the operative anteversion the long posterior wall comes to lie inferiorly and the advantage of the long posterior wall is lost. In light of prior confusion with definitions and in an attempt to make the terms more relevant to the surgical technique we propose the simplified alternate terms of 'flexion-anteversion' previously called 'operative anteversion', 'internal rotation-anteversion' previously called 'anatomic anteversion' and 'combined anteversion' previously called 'radiographic anteversion'. If the surgeon elects to use LPW it is important to understand the effect of each type of anteversion on eventual position of the raised wall.

Influence of the sagittal balance of the spine on the anterior pelvic plane and on the acetabular orientation

The Anterior Pelvic Plane (APP), defined by the anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic tubercle, was commonly used as reference for positioning and postoperative evaluation of the orientation of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty. APP was assumed to be vertical, but was not observed always so, mostly because of associated spinal diseases inducing perturbations in the harmony of the sagittal balance of the pelvi-spinal unit. Consequently a sagittal rotation of the pelvis occurs, and so a tilt of the APP which alters directly the orientation of the cup in upright position. An analysis of the APP tilt related to the sagittal balance of the spine was provided and its implication on the cup orientation. It appeared essential for an individual adjustment of the cup positioning to avoid a functional mal-position which can lead to an increased risk of dislocation and impingement.

Validation of a simple radiographic method to determine variations in pelvic and acetabular cup sagittal plane alignment after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Orientation of acetabular component, influenced by pelvic tilt, body position, and individual variations affects the outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently available methods of evaluation are either imprecise or require advanced image processing. We analyzed intersubject and intrasubject variability of pelvic tilt, measured by sagittal sacral tilt (ST) and its relationship with acetabular component tilt (AT) by using a simple method based on standard radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ST was measured on lateral radiographs of pelvis including lumbosacral spine obtained in supine, sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus position for 40 asymptomatic THA patients and compared to computed tomography (CT) data obtained in supine position. AT was measured on lateral radiographs (measured acetabular tilt: MAT) in each position and compared to measurement of AT on CT and an indirectly calculated AT (CAT).

RESULTS

Mean ST changed from supine to sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus positions as follows: 26.5 +/- 15.5 degrees (range 4.6-73.4 degrees ), 8.4 +/- 6.2 degrees (range 0.6-24.5 degrees ), and 13.4 +/- 8.4 degrees (range 0.1-24.2 degrees ; p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, p = 0.006). The MAT on radiographs was not significantly different from the MAT measured on CT (p = 0.002) and the CAT (p = 0.06). There is a good correlation between change in ST and MAT in sagittal plane (r = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of ST on radiographs is a simple and reliable method to track changes in pelvic tilt in different body positions. There is significant intersubject and intrasubject variation of ST and MAT with postural changes and it may explain causes of impingement or instability following THA, which could not be previously explained.

Navigated non-image-based positioning of the acetabulum during total hip replacement

We tested the hypothesis that the non-image-based navigation system used in our department was able to measure accurately the 3D positioning of the acetabular cup of a total hip replacement (THR) and to increase the accuracy of its implantation during THR. We studied 50 consecutive navigated implantations of a THR and compared the intra-operative measurement of the cup by the navigation system to the post-operative measurement by computed tomography (CT) scan. The mean difference between the navigated and CT scan measurements for cup inclination was 2 degrees . The mean difference between the navigated and CT-scan measurements for cup flexion was 4 degrees . These differences were significant but considered to be clinically irrelevant in most cases. A total of 73% of the cases were within the safe zone defined prior to the study. The non-image-based system used allows a precise orientation of the cup during THR.

Accuracy considerations in navigated cup placement for total hip arthroplasty

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) technology has recently been introduced to overcome problems resulting from acetabular component malpositioning in total hip arthroplasty. Available navigation modules can conceptually be categorized as computer tomography (CT) based, fluoroscopy based, or image-free. The current study presents a comprehensive accuracy analysis on the computer assisted placement accuracy of acetabular cups. It combines analyses using mathematical approaches, in vitro testing environments, and an in vivo clinical trial. A hybrid navigation approach combining image-free with fluoroscopic technology was chosen as the best compromise to CT-based systems. It introduces pointer-based digitization for easily assessable points and bi-planar fluoroscopy for deep-seated landmarks. From the in vitro data maximum deviations were found to be 3.6° for inclination and 3.8° for anteversion relative to a pre-defined test position. The maximum difference between intraoperatively calculated cup inclination and anteversion with the postoperatively measured position was 4° and 5°, respectively. These data coincide with worst cases scenario predictions applying a statistical simulation model. The proper use of navigation technology can reduce variability of cup placement well within the surgical safe zone. Surgeons have to concentrate on a variety of error sources during the procedure, which may explain the reported strong learning curves for CAOS technologies.

Hemispheric cups do not reproduce acetabular rim morphology

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas impingement is a recurrent complication following THA, caused by muscle friction against a protrusive prosthetic cup.This study was designed to quantify the dimensional variations in acetabular rim profiles, with particular regard to the iliopubic valley, in order to suggest means to prevent iliopsoas impingement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

34 cadaver pelvises were analyzed using a hip navigation system. The morphometric data were processed to plot profiles of all acetabular rims with particular regard to the shape and depth of the psoas valley.

RESULTS

The acetabular rim is an asymmetric succession of 3 peaks and 3 troughs. The psoas valley is a salient feature in most pelvises and there is only a weak correlation between its depth (mean 3.8 mm, SD 2.0) and acetabular diameter, anteversion, or inclination.

INTERPRETATION

It would be difficult to obviate the anterior overlap of the acetabulum using a hemispheric cup, a fortiori in certain morphotypes, without compromising range of motion or risk of dislocation. The solution for prevention of iliopsoas impingement would be to adapt cup design to acetabular anatomy, which may require different implants for the right and left sides, and hence a doubled inventory.