Re-arthrodesis after primary ankle fusion: 134/1,716 cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of arthrodesis with various fixation methods in the treatment of advanced ankle osteoarthritis

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of arthrodesis with various fixation methods in the treatment of advanced ankle osteoarthritis. Thirty-two patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle (mean age 59.91±6.16 years) took part in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups - Ilizarov apparatus (21 patients) and screw fixation (11 patients). Each group was also divided into subgroups based on etiology - posttraumatic and nontraumatic. The AOFAS and VAS scales were compared in the preoperative and postoperative periods. It was found that screw fixation was more effective in the treatment of late stages of osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle during the postoperative period. Comparison of the AOFAS and VAS scales showed no significant differences between the groups in the preoperative period (p = 0.838; p = 0.937). After 6 months, the results were better in the screw fixation group (p = 0.042; p = 0.047). Complications were observed for a third of the patients (10 patients). 6 patients had pain in the operated limb (4 patients in the Ilizarov apparatus group). Three patients in the Ilizarov apparatus group developed a superficial infection, and one developed a deep infection. Different etiology did not affect the postoperative efficacy of arthrodesis. The choice of the type of should be related to a clear protocol for the presence of complications. When choosing the type of fixation for arthrodesis, a patient's condition as well as a surgeon's preferences should be taken into account.

Total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis for patients aged 50-85 years with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: the TARVA RCT

Background

We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and complication rates of total ankle replacement with those of arthrodesis (i.e. ankle fusion) in the treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

Methods

This was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, non-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis who were aged 50-85 years and were suitable for both procedures were recruited from 17 UK hospitals and randomised using minimisation. The primary outcome was the change in the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain scores between the preoperative baseline and 52 weeks post surgery.

Results

Between March 2015 and January 2019, 303 participants were randomised using a minimisation algorithm: 152 to total ankle replacement and 151 to ankle fusion. At 52 weeks, the mean (standard deviation) Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score was 31.4 (30.4) in the total ankle replacement arm (n = 136) and 36.8 (30.6) in the ankle fusion arm (n = 140); the adjusted difference in the change was -5.6 (95% confidence interval -12.5 to 1.4; p = 0.12) in the intention-to-treat analysis. By week 52, one patient in the total ankle replacement arm required revision. Rates of wound-healing issues (13.4% vs. 5.7%) and nerve injuries (4.2% vs. < 1%) were higher and the rate of thromboembolic events was lower (2.9% vs. 4.9%) in the total ankle replacement arm than in the ankle fusion arm. The bone non-union rate (based on plain radiographs) in the ankle fusion arm was 12.1%, but only 7.1% of patients had symptoms. A post hoc analysis of fixed-bearing total ankle replacement showed a statistically significant improvement over ankle fusion in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score (-11.1, 95% confidence interval -19.3 to -2.9; p = 0.008). We estimate a 69% likelihood that total ankle replacement is cost-effective compared with ankle fusion at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained over the patient's lifetime.

Limitations

This initial report contains only 52-week data, which must therefore be interpreted with caution. In addition, the pragmatic nature of the study means that there was heterogeneity between surgical implants and techniques. The trial was run across 17 NHS centres to ensure that decision-making streams reflected the standard of care in the NHS as closely as possible.

Conclusions

Both total ankle replacement and ankle fusion improved patients' quality of life at 1 year, and both appear to be safe. When total ankle replacement was compared with ankle fusion overall, we were unable to show a statistically significant difference between the two arms in terms of our primary outcome measure. The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial is inconclusive in terms of superiority of total ankle replacement, as the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted treatment effect includes both a difference of zero and the minimal important difference of 12, but it can rule out the superiority of ankle fusion. A post hoc analysis comparing fixed-bearing total ankle replacement with ankle fusion showed a statistically significant improvement of total ankle replacement over ankle fusion in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score. Total ankle replacement appears to be cost-effective compared with ankle fusion at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained over a patient's lifetime based on long-term economic modelling.

Future work

We recommend long-term follow-up of this important cohort, in particular radiological and clinical progress. We also recommend studies to explore the sensitivity of clinical scores to detect clinically important differences between arms when both have already achieved a significant improvement from baseline.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN60672307 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02128555.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Total Ankle Replacement Versus Arthrodesis for End-Stage Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

End-stage ankle osteoarthritis causes severe pain and disability. There are no randomized trials comparing the 2 main surgical treatments: total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle fusion (AF).

OBJECTIVE

To determine which treatment is superior in terms of clinical scores and adverse events.

DESIGN

A multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial. (ISRCTN registry number: 60672307).

SETTING

17 National Health Service trusts across the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS

Patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, aged 50 to 85 years, and suitable for either procedure.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to TAR or AF surgical treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was change in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing (MOXFQ-W/S) domain scores between baseline and 52 weeks after surgery. No blinding was possible.

RESULTS

Between 6 March 2015 and 10 January 2019, a total of 303 patients were randomly assigned; mean age was 68 years, and 71% were men. Twenty-one patients withdrew before surgery, and 281 clinical scores were analyzed. At 52 weeks, the mean MOXFQ-W/S scores improved for both groups. The adjusted difference in the change in MOXFQ-W/S scores from baseline was -5.6 (95% CI, -12.5 to 1.4), showing that TAR improved more than AF, but the difference was not considered clinically or statistically significant. The number of adverse events was similar between groups (109 vs. 104), but there were more wound healing issues in the TAR group and more thromboembolic events and nonunion in the AF group. The symptomatic nonunion rate for AF was 7%. A post hoc analysis suggested superiority of fixed-bearing TAR over AF (-11.1 [CI, -19.3 to -2.9]).

LIMITATION

Only 52-week data; pragmatic design creates heterogeneity of implants and surgical techniques.

CONCLUSION

Both TAR and AF improve MOXFQ-W/S and had similar clinical scores and number of harms. Total ankle replacement had greater wound healing complications and nerve injuries, whereas AF had greater thromboembolism and nonunion, with a symptomatic nonunion rate of 7%.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute for Health and Care Research Heath Technology Assessment Programme.

Takedown of Ankle Fusions and Conversion to Total Ankle Replacements

BACKGROUND

With ankle replacements gaining credibility, there is a small subset of patients who might benefit from a conversion of an ankle fusion to a replacement. The objective of this study is to present clinical and radiographic results of patients who had their ankle fusion converted to total ankle arthroplasty (TAA).

METHODS

Patients presented to the senior author with ongoing ankle pain following fusion or increasing pain after a period of relative comfort after an ankle fusion. Outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale. A patient satisfaction survey was also distributed.

RESULTS

All ankle fusion conversions between April 2010 and December 2019 were included. Fifty-one patients (30 females) with the mean age of 62.6 (range, 37-83) years were followed. Mean follow-up was 4.2±2.3 (range, 2-11.5) years. Two patients were lost to follow-up (1 is deceased). Pre- and postoperative mean patient-reported outcome scores were all significantly different between groups except VR-12 mental subscale scores. VR-12 physical scores improved from 28.7±8.9 preoperatively to 38.9±9.9 (P < .001) postoperatively; VR-12 mental score was stable. AOS pain and disability subscales similarly improved: 55.9±24.4 to 27.9±25.4 (P < .001) and 61.7±21.1 to 31.1±25.7 (P < .001), respectively. VAS pain improved from a mean of 64.5±27.3 to 29.4±27.7 (P < .001). There was no tibiotalar dorsiflexion or plantarflexion with the ankle fusion. Initial postoperative visit revealed that average dorsiflexion was 10.9±5.93 degrees and average plantarflexion was 14.1±5.22 degrees. At the latest follow-up, dorsiflexion improved significantly to 15.5±6.33 degrees (P < .001), with no significant improvement in plantarflexion (P = .980).

CONCLUSION

In this single-surgeon longitudinal study of 51 patients with a painful, malaligned, or nonhealed ankle fusion treated with an ankle replacement, we found highly satisfactory functional outcomes at an average of 4.2 years. Continued long-term follow-up will reveal whether the longevity of these replacements is comparable to primary replacements.

Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort

ABSTRACT

We present a case series with the objective of identifying risk factors for nonunion after open and arthroscopic primary ankle arthrodesis. Eighty-seven patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis and met inclusion criteria were divided into open (N = 46) and arthroscopic (N = 41) groups. Patient and operative characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as possible risk factors for nonunion within each technique. The nonunion rate was 11% in the open and 12% in the arthroscopic group. Obesity, smoking, and ASA class 3 were highly prevalent in both groups. In the arthroscopic group, a remote history of infection and the use of headed screws had notably higher risk of nonunion, though not statistically significant. In the open group, use of bone graft trended toward lower risk of nonunion, though also not statistically significant. The results of this study demonstrated, nonunion rates are comparable between open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in high-risk patients. For patients with a remote history of infection, open ankle arthrodesis may be preferable, and bone graft importance may vary with open versus arthroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The 15 year ankle arthroplasty experience in a university hospital

INTRODUCTION

The study aim was to review the experience of ankle replacement surgery in a university teaching hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective review of primary ankle replacements performed between 2005 and 2019 was undertaken. Implant survival and reasons for revision surgery were assessed, along with patient reported outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

There were 157 ankle replacements implanted in 140 patients with a mean follow up 7.5 years (range 1.0-14.5). There were 108 Mobility™, 19 Zenith™ and 30 Infinity™ ankle replacements with an overall revision rate of 9.6% at a mean 4.0 years (range 0.1-11.0). Overall survivorship analysis for 5, 10 and 15 years was respectively 92.4%, 89.3% and 86.6%.

DISCUSSION

The revision rate was comparable to international registers and aseptic loosening was the commonest reason for revision. This study, in a teaching university hospital with an average of 10 primary ankle replacements each year, highlighted ankle arthroplasty provides good functional outcomes and medium term implant survivorship. This supports the use of ankle arthroplasty within foot and ankle specialist centres achieving appropriate outcomes.

Converting Ankle Arthrodesis to a Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Several articles in the literature discuss the positive results of converting a painful ankle fusion to an ankle replacement. Our results confirm that in well-selected cases a conversion to a total ankle replacement is not only possible, but also significantly improves quality of life and reduces pain. The outcome of a total ankle replacement after an ankle fusion depends to a degree on the method of fusion. Less destructive fusion that is arthroscopic has better results than conventional transfibular open fusions. Absence of a fibula should be an absolute contraindication for a conversion.

Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Over the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6months and 24months after surgery.

RESULTS

The arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9±1.2, open: 3.8±1.1, p<0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1±0.7 open: 3.5±1.7, p<0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6months (arthroscopic: 58.4±27.1, open: 47.1±24.0, p<0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9±18.9, open: 68.9±24.7, p<0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

PRE-PLANNING ANKLE ARTHRODESIS USING 3D RECONSTRUCTED TOMOGRAPHIES

OBJECTIVE

To implement one analysis method of the ankle bone contour that could make a more precise ankle arthrodesis.

METHODS

Twenty tomographies were submitted to 3D reconstruction. Seven points of anatomic interest for ankle arthrodesis with the three screws technique were marked with a triplannar marker. The median of the position of markers was estimated, and the union of the seven median points allow the construction of one median ankle for that population. Using this median ankle, sizes and angles for the screws position were determined.

RESULTS

Two median ankles were reconstructed, left and right. The position of the screw passage were determined considering the anatomical parameters. In the right ankle the lateral to medial screw should enter 4.56 cm and 0.79 above and posterior to lateral malleolus, with one inclination of 17.34° in relation to tibial longitudinal axis; and 0° in relation to tibial axial plane. The position for the other two screws is also described.

CONCLUSION

Our article is the first to presents one precise guide for ankle arthrodesis based on a populational assessment. Level of evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.