Custom-made 3D-printed cup-cage implants for complex acetabular revisions: evaluation of pre-planned versus achieved positioning and 1-year migration data in 10 patients

A systematic review of custom 3D-printed acetabular components in revision arthroplasty for the management of extensive acetabular defects

Purpose

Multiple papers have been published focusing on the outcomes of custom 3D-printed acetabular components for revision arthroplasty in the management of extensive acetabular defects. However to our knowledge this is the first systematic review on the topic; we have reviewed outcomes and compared to the different methods of acetabular reconstruction. Our primary objective was to ascertain component survivorship and follow-up durations of these components within literature. Secondary objectives were to review their clinical outcomes and the limitations of the published studies.

Methods

5 databases were interrogated for publications from January 1st, 2005 to June 1st, 2022. A search strategy was devised using medical subject headings (MeSH) in line with guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and the review was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO).

Results

The search yielded 183 articles following elimination of duplicates. Then the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria a total of 16 articles were finally included. A total of 283 hips were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65 (range 22-90 in studies that reported age range). The average follow-up was 22.8 months, with mean follow-up ranging from 12 to 65 months. At an average follow-up of 22.8 months the acetabular component survivorship rate was 97.7 %. The mean complication rate was 16.5 %, the re-operation rate was 5.4 %.

Conclusion

Our study presents to our knowledge the first systematic review of custom 3DAC in the setting of extensive acetabular defects. These components appear to offer an efficacious treatment modality in this complex setting, early results suggest both low failure rates and positive clinical outcome data. This reconstructive option allows the surgeon to maximise primary stability whilst minimising further bone loss and attempt to restore hip biomechanics in a patient cohort who often have had multiple previous revisions.

Custom-Made 3D-Printed Augments and Cages: An Effective Solution for Managing Severe Acetabular Bone Loss

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recognized as one of the most effective surgical procedures for the treatment of end-stage hip arthritis. However, the increasing number of primary THA cases has led to a corresponding rise in the frequency of revision surgeries, which are often more complex and challenging due to severe acetabular bone loss. In such cases, managing Paprosky type 3A and 3B defects requires precise implant design and advanced surgical techniques. Standard acetabular augments and anti-protrusio cages are commonly used, but they often fail to provide the necessary stability, leading to re-revision rates as high as 36% within 10 years. This case series explores the efficacy of custom-made 3D-printed acetabular augments and cages in managing severe acetabular bone loss during revision THA.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective case series includes seven patients who underwent revision THA for Paprosky grade 3 acetabular bone loss between January 2023 and April 2024 at two high-volume tertiary care centers. The mean age of the patients was 45 years, with three males and four females included in the study. Pre-operative planning involved advanced imaging techniques, including 3D-computed tomography scans and custom virtual modeling, to design the acetabular components tailored to each patient's specific anatomical requirements.During the surgeries, custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments and cages were used. These implants were fabricated using in-house software, and the turnaround time from the decision to surgery was approximately 10 days. Post-operatively, the planned 3D model was superimposed on post-operative radiographs to assess implant placement accuracy. The Harris hip score at the final follow-up averaged 69.16, with no signs of implant loosening observed.

Conclusion

Custom-made 3D-printed acetabular augments and cages offer a reliable and cost-effective solution for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Despite the small sample size and short follow-up period, the results demonstrate the potential of these custom implants to improve outcomes in complex acetabular reconstructions. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.

Do the porous custom implants have a position consistent with the planning and allow anatomical reconstruction of hip center of rotation in complex acetabular revisions Paprosky III?

INTRODUCTION

In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the advent of porous custom-made triflange acetabular implants with 3D scan planning offers a new perspective to improve implantation accuracy and anatomical restoration of the center of rotation (COR). This issue was investigated using CT-scan as the measurement tool, but in limited series (±10 cases) and without investigating the factors that may influence errors in positioning. Therefore we performed a retrospective study aiming to: (1) assess the placement accuracy of such implants with respect to the preoperative planning, (2) examine whether the volume of bone to be resected in order to apply the implant had an impact on this accuracy, (3) assess if errors in position at surgery had any influence on function, complications and survival.

HYPOTHESIS

Preoperative planning could be accurately reproduced when implanting porous custom-made acetabular implants, and that accuracy would decrease in proportion to the volume of bone to be resected METHOD: Twenty patients undergoing THA revision with porous custom-made acetabular implants were included in this single-center retrospective study. Mean follow-up was 17.9 months ± 9.4 [2-45.1]. Preoperative planning was performed using 3D scanographic modeling. A post-operative CT scan was performed to assess implantation accuracy in terms of orientation and COR restitution. Demographic data, Oxford scores, complications and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean deviation from the preoperative planning in inclination, anteversion and rotation were 4.3 ° ± 2.5, 6.1 ° ± 4.7, and 7 ° ± 4.6, respectively. Restoration of the COR showed a mean deviation of 2.1 ± 1.3 mm anteroposteriorly, 2.5 ± 2 mm mediolaterally and 2.2 ± 1.3 mm proximodistally. In total, 45% (9/20) of implants were positioned with perfect restoration of orientation (±10 °) and COR (±5 mm). The mean planned bone resection was 8.1 ± 4.9 cm3, with placement accuracy and COR restitution decreasing significantly when the volume of bone to be resected exceeded 2.7 cm3. One dislocation was found (5%, 1/20). Survival at last follow-up was 100%, the mean Oxford score at follow-up was 31.7 ± 7.9 [16-52], without being influenced by errors in position or COR restitution.

CONCLUSION

In total 45% of the implants restored an orientation and a COR as planned, particularly when the volume of bone to be resected is less than 2.7 cm3. Although these are complex cases with large amounts of bone loss, 3D manufacturing could give us hope of greater precision. The link between better precision and low bone resection volume could be an area to develop with the manufacturer in order to improve results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; diagnostic using CT in transversal retrospective study.

Bone remodeling after revision total hip arthroplasty for large acetabular defects

Large acetabular bone defects are challenging in hip revision surgery. Clinical assessment is crucial to evaluate modern technologies in surgical reconstruction. We aimed to better understand the bone remodeling that occurs following acetabular reconstruction. Our objectives were: (1) To characterize changes in the shape of the pelvis by studying sequential computed tomography (CT) scans collected immediately and 1-year postoperatively and (2) to identify which part of the pelvis is most susceptible to remodeling. We used the CT scans taken at two timepoints, of 24 patients with acetabular bone defects classified as Paprosky IIIB, treated with three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made acetabular implants. Segmented 3D models of the bony pelvis were co-registered using three different techniques. A global co-registration of the full pelvis was conducted, followed by the co-registration of the innominate bone and then ilium only, on the ipsilateral reconstructed side. The relative movements of the ilium, ischium, and pubis were analyzed from visual inspection and using co-registration metrics (root mean square error and intersection over union). No bone remodeling was found in 14/24 patients (58%). The co-registration of the innominate bone indicated bone remodeling in five cases (21%), while the remaining five cases (21%) presented remodeling in the global co-registration but not the innominate bone co-registration, suggestive of changes occurring at the sacroiliac joint. Changes in the pelvic shape were greatest at the pubis and ischium. Bone remodeling may occur in complex cases of Paprosky type IIIB defects, after acetabular reconstruction (occurrence of 21%, 5/24 cases). Surgeons and engineers should consider this when monitoring implant migration.

Does the interface between individual 3D acetabular implants and host bone influence the functional outcomes in patients with severe bone loss after revision surgery?

INTRODUCTION

There is a wide range of commercially produced revision implants for adequate reconstruction of acetabular large bone defects today, however, it is not always possible to achieve long-term survival of these implants. There is an increasing number of scientific publications concerning the use of custom-designed 3D components, which make it possible not only to achieve stable fixation and connect the pelvic bones but also to restore hip joint biomechanics.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the positioning of 3D acetabular implants after revision hip arthroplasty and its impact on clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

we analyzed results in 48 patients with bone defect types IIIA and IIIB Paprosky types, after revision hip arthroplasty. A prospective study was conducted from 2017 to 2023. Revision arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the components was performed in 30 cases and as a second stage of periprosthetic infection treatment in 18 cases.

RESULTS

We did not achieve a statistically significant difference when using additional flanges and clinical and functional results. In 2 cases we faced aseptic loosening in patients using flanges. In no case were we able to install an implant with 100% adherence to porous structure compared to preoperatively planned adherence. According to the WOMAC and VAS scales, increasing the contact area of the components showed a slight statistical difference in the improvement of clinical and functional results and the reduction of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

When acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by more than 68%, we did not register a single complication in the postoperative period, and acetabular 3D components adhered to the bone by less than 68%, a total of 8 (16.6%) complications were registered.

The role of bone remodeling in measuring migration of custom implants for large acetabular defects

In revision total hip arthroplasty, achieving robust fixation is difficult and implant movement may occur over time. Bone may also rearrange around the implant as a result of mechanical loading, making the measurement of migration challenging. The study aimed to quantify changes in bone shape and implant position 1 year following acetabular reconstruction using custom three-dimensional-printed cups. This observational retrospective cohort study involved 23 patients with Paprosky type IIIB defects. Postop computed tomography scans taken within 1 week of surgery and at 1-year postsurgery were co-registered and analyzed. Three co-registration strategies were implemented including bone-to-bone and implant-to-implant. (1) Co-registration of the ipsilateral innominate bone (diseased anatomy) was used to measure changes in implant position. (2) Co-registration of the implant was carried out to quantify changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape. (3) Co-registration of the contralateral innominate bone (nondiseased anatomy) was performed to measure changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. The median centroid distances (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.3 mm (IQR: 3.7-1.7 mm) for changes in implant position, 2.4 mm (IQR: 3.6-1.6 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape, and 3.7 mm (IQR: 4.6-3.5 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. Following acetabular reconstruction, implant movements and periprosthetic bone remodeling are physiological and of a similar extent. Surgeons and engineers should consider this when performing implant monitoring in these patients.

Assessment Accuracy of 2D vs. 3D Imaging for Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) presents significant challenges, particularly in patients with severe acetabular bone defects. Traditional treatment options often fall short, leading to the emergence of custom-made 3D-printed acetabular implants. Accurate assessment of implant positioning is crucial for ensuring optimal postoperative outcomes and for providing feedback to the surgical team. This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluates the accuracy of standard 2D radiographs versus 3D CT scans in assessing the positioning of these implants, aiming to determine if 2D imaging could serve as a viable alternative for the postoperative evaluation. We analyzed the implant positions of seven rTHA patients with severe acetabular defects (Paprosky ≥ Type IIIA) using an alignment technique that integrates postoperative 2D radiographs with preoperative CT plans. Two independent investigators, one inexperienced and one experienced, measured the positioning accuracy with both imaging modalities. Measurements included translational shifts from the preoperatively templated implant position in the craniocaudal (CC), lateromedial (LM), and ventrodorsal (VD) directions, as well as rotational differences in anteversion (AV) and inclination (INCL). The study demonstrated that 2D radiographs, when aligned with preoperative CT data, could accurately assess implant positions with precision nearly comparable to that of 3D CT scans. Observed deviations were 1.4 mm and 2.7 mm in CC and LM directions, respectively, and 3.6° in AV and 0.7° in INCL using 2D imaging, all within clinically acceptable ranges. For 3D CT assessments, mean interobserver variability was up to 0.9 mm for translational shifts and 1.4° for rotation, while for 2D alignment, observer differences were 1.4 mm and 3.2° for translation and rotation, respectively. Comparative analysis of mean results from both investigators, across all dimensions (CC, LM, AV, and INCL) for 2D and 3D matching, showed no significant differences. In conclusion, conventional anteroposterior 2D radiographs of the pelvis can sufficiently determine the positioning of custom-made acetabular implants in rTHA. This suggests that 2D radiography is a viable alternative to 3D CT scans, potentially enhancing the implementation and quality control of advanced implant technologies.

Is AI 3D-printed PSI an accurate option for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing THA?

BACKGROUND

In traditional surgical procedures, significant discrepancies are often observed between the pre-planned templated implant sizes and the actual sizes used, particularly in patients with congenital hip dysplasia. These discrepancies arise not only in preoperative planning but also in the precision of implant placement, especially concerning the acetabular component. Our study aims to enhance the accuracy of implant placement during Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) by integrating AI-enhanced preoperative planning with Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI). We also seek to assess the accuracy and clinical outcomes of the AI-PSI (AIPSI) group in comparison to a manual control group.

METHODS

This study included 60 patients diagnosed with congenital hip dysplasia, randomly assigned to either the AIPSI or manual group, with 30 patients in each. No significant demographic differences between were noted the two groups. A direct anterior surgical approach was employed. Postoperative assessments included X-rays and CT scans to measure parameters such as the acetabular cup anteversion angle, acetabular cup inclination angle, femoral stem anteversion angle, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy. Functional scores were recorded at 3 days, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22.0, with the significance level was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The AIPSI group demonstrated greater prosthesis placement accuracy. With the aid of PSI, AI-planned THA surgery provides surgeons with enhanced precision in prosthesis positioning. This approach potentially offers greater insights and guidelines for managing more complex anatomical variations or cases.

High accuracy of positioning custom triflange acetabular components in tumour and total hip arthroplasty revision surgery

Aims

Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and pelvic tumour resection procedures. Accurate CTAC positioning is essential to successful surgical outcomes. While prior studies have explored CTAC positioning in rTHA, research focusing on tumour cases and implant flange positioning precision remains limited. Additionally, the impact of intraoperative navigation on positioning accuracy warrants further investigation. This study assesses CTAC positioning accuracy in tumour resection and rTHA cases, focusing on the differences between preoperative planning and postoperative implant positions.

Methods

A multicentre observational cohort study in Australia between February 2017 and March 2021 included consecutive patients undergoing acetabular reconstruction with CTACs in rTHA (Paprosky 3A/3B defects) or tumour resection (including Enneking P2 peri-acetabular area). Of 103 eligible patients (104 hips), 34 patients (35 hips) were analyzed.

Results

CTAC positioning was generally accurate, with minor deviations in cup inclination (mean 2.7°; SD 2.84°), anteversion (mean 3.6°; SD 5.04°), and rotation (mean 2.1°; SD 2.47°). Deviation of the hip centre of rotation (COR) showed a mean vector length of 5.9 mm (SD 7.24). Flange positions showed small deviations, with the ischial flange exhibiting the largest deviation (mean vector length of 7.0 mm; SD 8.65). Overall, 83% of the implants were accurately positioned, with 17% exceeding malpositioning thresholds. CTACs used in tumour resections exhibited higher positioning accuracy than rTHA cases, with significant differences in inclination (1.5° for tumour vs 3.4° for rTHA) and rotation (1.3° for tumour vs 2.4° for rTHA). The use of intraoperative navigation appeared to enhance positioning accuracy, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates favourable CTAC positioning accuracy, with potential for improved accuracy through intraoperative navigation. Further research is needed to understand the implications of positioning accuracy on implant performance and long-term survival.

Intrawound navigation for custom-made acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty: Does it improve implant positioning?

Background

The number of hip revisions makes up over 12 % of all hip arthroplasty cases. For large acetabular defects custom-made acetabular component (CMAC) are required. Rates of malposition of CMACs are highly variable. Our study aims to develop a readily available, reliable and easily reproducible method for positioning of the CMAC. We tried to answer the following questions: 1) how often does the postoperative position of the implant corresponds to the planned one; 2) is the use of intrawound navigation improve the precision of acetabular implant position.

Methods

This was a single-center observational cohort study and included two groups: the experimental group (use of 3D navigation for implant positioning) and the control group (no navigation use). All the patients were scheduled for acetabular revision surgery with custom-made 3D-printed acetabular components. All surgeries took place between 2016 and 2020.

Results

25 % freehand group, 85 % implants in the navigation group matched accuracy positioning criteria. The relative risk of malposition was significantly higher without the intraoperative navigation, with 5 times greater risk of malpositioning in the freehand group versus the navigation group.

Conclusion

Navigation method allows planning of the implant and reamer sizes for optimal bone preparation and preservation. It provides easier implantation of the complex implant with reliable, stable primary fixation in massive bone defects. It reliably decreases malposition rate, allowing for implant placement in a proper position with sufficient bone-implant contact. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between CMAC position accuracy and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Custom-made implants for massive acetabular bone loss: accuracy with CT assessment

BACKGROUND

Custom-made implants are a valid option in revision total hip arthroplasty to address massive acetabular bone loss. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of custom-made acetabular implants between preoperative planning and postoperative positioning using CT scans.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, three patients who underwent an acetabular custom-made prosthesis were identified. The custom-made designs were planned through 3D CT analysis considering surgical points of attention. The accuracy of intended implants positioning was assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative CT analyzing the center of rotation (CoR), anteversion, inclination, screws, and implant surface in contact with the bone.

RESULTS

The three cases presented satisfactory accuracy in positioning. A malpositioning in the third case was observed due to the posterization of the CoR of the implant of more than 10 mm. The other CoR vectors considered in the third patient and all vectors in the other two cases fall within 10 mm. All the cases were positioned with a difference of less than 10° of anteversion and inclination with respect to the planning.

CONCLUSIONS

The current case series revealed promising accuracy in the positioning of custom-made acetabular prosthesis comparing the planned implant in preoperative CT with postoperative CT.

3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects

Background

Currently, metal implants are widely used in orthopedic surgeries, including fracture fixation, spinal fusion, joint replacement, and bone tumor defect repair. However, conventional implants are difficult to be customized according to the recipient's skeletal anatomy and defect characteristics, leading to difficulties in meeting the individual needs of patients. Additive manufacturing (AM) or three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, an advanced digital fabrication technique capable of producing components with complex and precise structures, offers opportunities for personalization.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature on 3D printing orthopedic metal implants over the past 10 years. Relevant animal, cellular, and clinical studies were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. In this paper, we introduce the 3D printing method and the characteristics of biometals and summarize the properties of 3D printing metal implants and their clinical applications in orthopedic surgery. On this basis, we discuss potential possibilities for further generalization and improvement.

Results

3D printing technology has facilitated the use of metal implants in different orthopedic procedures. By combining medical images from techniques such as CT and MRI, 3D printing technology allows the precise fabrication of complex metal implants based on the anatomy of the injured tissue. Such patient-specific implants not only reduce excessive mechanical strength and eliminate stress-shielding effects, but also improve biocompatibility and functionality, increase cell and nutrient permeability, and promote angiogenesis and bone growth. In addition, 3D printing technology has the advantages of low cost, fast manufacturing cycles, and high reproducibility, which can shorten patients' surgery and hospitalization time. Many clinical trials have been conducted using customized implants. However, the use of modeling software, the operation of printing equipment, the high demand for metal implant materials, and the lack of guidance from relevant laws and regulations have limited its further application.

Conclusions

There are advantages of 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic applications such as personalization, promotion of osseointegration, short production cycle, and high material utilization. With the continuous learning of modeling software by surgeons, the improvement of 3D printing technology, the development of metal materials that better meet clinical needs, and the improvement of laws and regulations, 3D printing metal implants can be applied to more orthopedic surgeries.

The translational potential of this paper

Precision, intelligence, and personalization are the future direction of orthopedics. It is reasonable to believe that 3D printing technology will be more deeply integrated with artificial intelligence, 4D printing, and big data to play a greater role in orthopedic metal implants and eventually become an important part of the digital economy. We aim to summarize the latest developments in 3D printing metal implants for engineers and surgeons to design implants that more closely mimic the morphology and function of native bone.

A systematic review of follow-up results of additively manufactured customized implants for the pelvic area

INTRODUCTION

While 3D printing of bone models for preoperative planning or customized surgical templating has been successfully implemented, the use of patient-specific additively manufactured (AM) implants is a newer application not yet well established. To fully evaluate the advantages and shortcomings of such implants, their follow-up results need to be evaluated.

AREA COVERED

This systematic review provides a survey of the reported follow-ups on AM implants used for oncologic reconstruction, total hip arthroplasty both primary and revision, acetabular fracture, and sacrum defects.

EXPERT OPINION

The review shows that Titanium alloy (Ti4AL6V) is the most common type of material system used due to its excellent biomechanical properties. Electron beam melting (EBM) is the predominant AM process for manufacturing implants. In almost all cases, porosity at the contact surface is implemented through the design of lattice or porous structures to enhance osseointegration. The follow-up evaluations show promising results, with only a small number of patients suffering from aseptic loosening, wear, or malalignment. The longest reported follow-up length was 120 months for acetabular cages and 96 months for acetabular cups. The AM implants have proven to serve as an excellent option to restore premorbid skeletal anatomy of the pelvis.

Custom-made acetabular revision arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity: Can we handle the challenge? : a prospective cohort study

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients who were revised using a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC) for component loosening and pelvic discontinuity (PD) after previous total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Data were extracted from a single centre prospective database of patients with PD who were treated with a CTAC. Patients were included if they had a follow-up of two years. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol EuroQoL five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at one- and two-year follow-up. Reasons for revision, and radiological and clinical complications were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance and clinical relevance.

RESULTS

A total of 18 females with 22 CTACs who had a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7) were included. A significant improvement was found in HOOS (p < 0.0001), mOHS (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D-3L utility (p = 0.003), EQ-5D-3L NRS (p = 0.013), VAS pain rest (p = 0.008), and VAS pain activity (p < 0.0001) between baseline and final follow-up. Minimal clinically important improvement in mOHS and the HOOS Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) was observed in 16 patients (73%) and 14 patients (64%), respectively. Definite healing of the PD was observed in 19 hips (86%). Complications included six cases with broken screws (27%), four cases (18%) with bony fractures, and one case (4.5%) with sciatic nerve paresthesia. One patient with concurrent bilateral PD had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage.

CONCLUSION

CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and PD can result in stable constructs and significant improvement in functioning and health-related quality of life at two years' follow-up. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the mid- to long-term outcome.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):53-61.

Reconstruction of Paprosky III defects with custom-made implants: do we get them in the correct position? : short-term radiological results

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the implant accuracy of custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants offer an option to achieve a reconstruction in cases with severe acetabular bone loss. By analyzing implant deviation in CT and radiograph imaging and correlating early clinical complications, we aimed to optimize the usage of custom-made implants.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 45 (2014 to 2019) PPRs for Paprosky III defects at rTHA were analyzed comparing the preoperative planning CT scans used to manufacture the implants with postoperative CT scans and radiographs. The anteversion (AV), inclination (IC), deviation from the preoperatively planned implant position, and deviation of the centre of rotation (COR) were explored. Early postoperative complications were recorded, and factors for malpositioning were sought. The mean follow-up was 30 months (SD 19; 6 to 74), with four patients lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean CT defined discrepancy (Δ) between planned and achieved AV and IC was 4.5° (SD 3°; 0° to 12°) and 4° (SD 3.5°; 1° to 12°), respectively. Malpositioning (Δ > 10°) occurred in five hips (10.6%). Native COR reconstruction was planned in 42 cases (93%), and the mean 3D deviation vector was 15.5 mm (SD 8.5; 4 to 35). There was no significant influence in malpositioning found for femoral stem retention, surgical approach, or fixation method.

CONCLUSION

At short-term follow-up, we found that PPR offers a viable solution for rTHA in cases with massive acetabular bone loss, as highly accurate positioning can be accomplished with meticulous planning, achieving anatomical reconstruction. Accuracy of achieved placement contributed to reduced complications with no injury to vital structures by screw fixation.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1110-1117.

Use of Customized 3D-Printed Titanium Augment With Tantalum Trabecular Cup for Large Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Midterm Follow-Up Study

Aims: In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), large acetabular bone defects pose challenges for surgeons. Recently, wide application of trabecular tantalum, which has outstanding biocompatibility and mechanical properties, and the development of three-dimensional (3D) printing have led to the introduction of new schemes for acetabular reconstruction. However, few studies have focused on the treatment of bone defects with customized 3D-printed titanium augments combined with tantalum trabecular cup. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of this therapy in patients who underwent revision THAs.

Patients and Methods: We included 23 patients with Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects who underwent revision THA between January 2013 and June 2019. The preoperative hip rotation center and functional score were compared with those at 2–7 years (average 4.7 years) postoperatively to evaluate the midterm prognosis of our treatment choice.

Results: Postoperatively, the rotation centres of all hips were comparable with those of the contralateral hips. Hip function improved with average Harris Hip Score improved from 33.5 (22.7–40.2) to 86.1 (73.5–95.6) and average Oxford Hip Score improved from 8.3 (0–14) to 38.8 (35–48) during follow-up. One dislocation, which occurred due to extreme hip flexion within 6 weeks, was treated with closed reduction, and no recurrent dislocation occurred. No nerve injury, infection, aseptic loosening, or osteolysis were observed and no re-revision was performed in any patient.

Conclusion: Satisfactory midterm outcomes were obtained with 3D-printed titanium augment combined with tantalum cup for the treatment of acetabular defects in revision THA. Changes in the Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score suggested a significant improvement in hip function.

Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This study investigates whether three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted revision total hip/knee arthroplasty could improve its clinical and radiological outcomes and assess the depth and breadth of research conducted on 3D printing-assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Only studies that investigated 3D printing-assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty were included. The author, publication year, study design, number of patients, patients' age, the time of follow-up, surgery category, Coleman score, clinical outcomes measured, clinical outcomes conclusion, radiological outcomes measured, and radiological outcomes conclusion were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten articles were included in our review. Three articles investigated the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty, and seven investigated the outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty. Two papers compared a 3D printing group with a control group, and the other eight reported 3D printing treatment outcomes alone. Nine articles investigated the clinical outcomes of total hip/knee arthroplasty, and eight studied the radiological outcomes of total hip/knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

3D printing is being introduced in revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. Current literature suggests satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes could be obtained with the assistance of 3D printing. Further long-term follow-up studies are required, particularly focusing on cost-benefit analysis, resource availability, and, importantly, the durability and biomechanics of customized prostheses using 3D printing compared to traditional techniques.

Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips

Background and purpose - Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) are suggested as good solutions for large acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. However, high complication rates have been reported and most studies are of limited quality. This prospective study evaluates the performance of a CTAC in patients with large acetabular defects including pelvic discontinuity.Patients and methods - Prospectively collected data of 49 consecutive patients (50 hips), who underwent an acetabular revision with a CTAC were analyzed. Follow-up (FU) was 2 years. The median age of the patients was 68 years (41-89) and 41 were women. Primary outcomes were re-revision of the CTAC and differences between the modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS) preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included several patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), radiological results, complications, and a comparison between hips with and without pelvic discontinuity (PD).Results - 1 patient (1 hip) was lost to the 2-year FU. No CTAC needed re-revision. The preoperative and 2-year FU mOHS were available in 40 hips and improved statistically significantly. All of the other secondary outcomes improved over time. 5 hips (of 45 with radiological 2-year FU) had loosening of screws. 8 hips had complications, including 3 persistent wound leakage, 3 pelvic fractures, and 1 dislocation. The mOHS and complication rate were similar in hips with and without PD.Interpretation - Reconstruction of large acetabular defects with and without PD with this CTAC showed good improvement in patient-reported daily functioning, high patient-reported satisfaction, few complications, and no re-revisions at 2-year FU.

Virtual implantation technique to estimate endoprosthetic contact of percutaneous osseointegrated devices in the tibia

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) devices have an endoprosthesis attached to the residual bone of an amputated limb, then pass permanently through the skin to be connected to the distal prosthetic componentry outside of the body. Whether the bone-anchoring region of current OI endoprostheses are cylindrical, and/or conical, they require intimate bone-endoprosthesis contact to promote stabilizing bone attachment. However, removing too much cortical bone to achieve more contact leads to thinner and, subsequently, weaker cortical walls. Endoprostheses need to be designed to balance these factors, namely maximizing the contact, while minimizing the volume of bone removed. In this study, 27 human tibias were used to develop and validate a virtual implantation method. Then, 40 additional tibias were virtually implanted with mock cylindrical and conical bone-anchoring regions at seven residual limb lengths to measure resultant bone-endoprosthesis contact and bone removal. The ratio of bone-endoprosthesis contact to bone volume removed showed the conical geometry had more contact area per volume bone removed for all amputation levels (p ≤ 0.001). In both mock devices, cortical penetration of the endoprosthesis at 20% residual length occurred in 74% of cases evaluated, indicating that alternative endoprosthesis geometries may be needed for clinical success in that region of bone.