Pembrolizumab versus the standard of care for relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma progressing after brentuximab vedotin: an indirect treatment comparison

Safety and efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been used in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R HL) recently. To further understand the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in R/R HL, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Databases and the Clinical Registration Platforms have been systematically searched for related studies by March 2022. For safety analysis, the incidence and exhibition of any grade and grade 3 or higher adverse effects (AEs) were evaluated. Besides, severe AEs (SAEs), treatment-related deaths, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were summarized. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR) were calculated for efficacy analysis. All processes were implemented mainly through the package Meta and MetaSurv of software R 4.1.2.

RESULTS

Overall 20 studies and 1440 patients were enrolled. The pooled incidence of any grade and grade 3 or higher AEs were 92% and 26%, respectively. The pooled ORR, CR rate and PR rate were 79%, 44% and 34%, respectively. The most common AEs were neuropathy (29%), nausea (27%), pyrexia (26%), and leukopenia (25%), and the most common grade 3 or higher AEs included leukopenia (10%), infusion reaction (8%), weight gain (3%), and neutropenia (2.7%). In survival analysis, pembrolizumab monotherapy appeared to perform better compared to nivolumab monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show promising efficacy and tolerable AEs in the treatment of R/R HL.

CD30+ Lymphoproliferative Disorders as Potential Candidates for CD30-Targeted Therapies

CONTEXT.—

In the early 1980s, a monoclonal antibody termed Ki-1 was developed against a cell line derived from a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma. This antibody detected a limited number of benign activated lymphocytes in lymphoid tissue, whereas in Hodgkin lymphoma it appeared to be nearly specific for Reed-Sternberg cells and their mononuclear variants. Subsequent studies showed that Ki-1 expression defined a new type of lymphoma that was later designated anaplastic large cell lymphoma with or without anaplastic large cell kinase expression/translocation. In the past 30 years, numerous new lymphoma entities have been defined, many of which are variably positive for CD30. Many virally transformed lymphoproliferative disorders are also frequently positive for CD30.

OBJECTIVE.—

To illustrate the broad spectrum of CD30+ hematologic malignancies and to provide an update of CD30-targeted therapies.

DATA SOURCES.—

Personal experiences and published works in PubMed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Because of its low expression in normal tissue, CD30 was studied as a therapeutic target for many years. However, the first functional humanized antibody against CD30 was developed only about 10 years ago. Brentuximab vedotin is a humanized anti-CD30 antibody linked to a cytotoxin, and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012 for treating refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Since then, the list of Food and Drug Administration-approved CD30-targeted hematologic malignancies has grown. Recently, the therapies using tumor antigen-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD30 have incited a great deal of enthusiasm and are studied in clinical trials.

Rituximab as adjunctive therapy to BEAM conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma

While high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) leads to improved disease-free survival (DFS) for children and adults with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), relapse remains the most frequent cause of mortality post-transplant. Rituximab has been successfully incorporated into regimens for other B-cell lymphomas, yet there have been limited studies of rituximab in HL patients. We hypothesized that adding rituximab to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning would reduce relapse risk in HL patients post-transplant. Here, we retrospectively review the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory HL who received rituximab in addition to BEAM. The primary outcome was DFS. Our cohort included 96 patients with a median age of 28 years (range, 6-76). Majority of patients (57%) were diagnosed with advanced (Stage III-IV) disease, and 62% were PET negative pre-transplant. DFS was 91.5% at 1 year [95% CI 86-98%], and 78% at 3 years [95% CI 68-88%]. NRM was 0% and 3.5% at 1-year [95% CI 0-3%] and 3-years [95% CI 0-8.5%], respectively. 25% of patients developed delayed neutropenia, with 7% requiring infection-related hospitalizations, and one death. We have demonstrated excellent outcomes for patients receiving rituximab with BEAM conditioning for relapsed/refractory HL. Future comparative studies are needed to better determine whether rituximab augments outcomes post-transplant.

Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in the USA

BACKGROUND

Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease who relapse after or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. Recently, the anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; May 2016 and March 2017, respectively) as treatment options for R/R cHL patients.

OBJECTIVE

In the absence of comparative clinical trials between these agents, this observational study was conducted to evaluate the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of patients with cHL initiated on pembrolizumab compared to nivolumab in the USA.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Healthcare insurance claims from Symphony Health's IDV® (Integrated Dataverse) (July 2014-June 2018) were used in this retrospective study. The study population included adult patients with cHL initiated on pembrolizumab or nivolumab (index date). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between cohorts. All-cause and cHL-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits were measured during the observation (post-index) period and reported per patient-year (PPY). Rates of HRU were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs).

RESULTS

A total of 92 and 218 patients initiated on pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, were included in the study population. After weighting, the mean age was similar at 55 years in both cohorts, while the proportion of females was lower in the pembrolizumab cohort (35.3%) compared to the nivolumab cohort (44.1%). Mean Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was well balanced after weighting in the pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts (4.2 and 4.3, respectively). During the observation period, patients in the pembrolizumab cohort had significantly lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (RR [95% CI] 0.33 [0.09-0.80]) and cHL-related hospitalizations (RR [95% CI] 0.14 [0.02-0.37]) than those in the nivolumab cohort. Rates of all-cause and cHL-related outpatient visits were not statistically different between patients in the pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, adult cHL patients initiated on pembrolizumab had significantly lower rates of all-cause and cHL-related hospitalizations compared to patients initiated on nivolumab.