Skills over pills? A clinical gastroenterologist's primer in cognitive behavioral therapy for irritable bowel syndrome

Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are an emerging medical therapy comprising evidence-based interventions that are regulatory approved for patient use, or are under development, for a variety of medical conditions, including hypertension, cancer, substance use disorders and mental disorders. DTx have significant potential to reduce the overall burden on healthcare systems and offer potential economic benefits. There is currently no specific legal regulation on DTx in the EU. Although European countries have similar approaches to digital health solutions, the adoption of DTx varies across the continent. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the levels of adoption of DTx in Europe, and to explore possible strategies to improve adoption, with the goal of higher rates of adoption, and more consistent use of DTx across the continent. The article discusses the regulatory and reimbursement landscape across Europe; validation requirements for DTx, and the importance of co-design and an ecosystem-centric approach in the development of DTx. Also considered are drivers of adoption and prescription practices for DTx, as well as patient perspectives on these therapeutics. The article explores potential factors that may contribute to low rates of DTx adoption in Europe, including lack of harmonisation in regulatory requirements and reimbursement; sociodemographic factors; health status; ethical concerns; challenges surrounding the use and validation of AI; knowledge and awareness among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients, and data standards and interoperability. Efforts to improve rates of access to DTx and adoption of these therapeutics across Europe are described. Finally, a framework for improved uptake of DTx in Europe is proposed.

Causative Factors, Clinical Manifestations, and Therapeutic Strategies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Abdominal distress and irregular bowel movements are the hallmarks of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a chronic functional gastrointestinal illness (FGID). It is typified by recurring abdominal discomfort brought on by bowel movements or changes in pattern. Mind-body treatments have gained popularity recently as a way to manage IBS because of the role of the brain-gut axis. In addition to offering a helpful guide for identifying alternate diagnoses in patients exhibiting symptoms similar to IBS, this review attempts to offer an evidence-based solution to these perplexing problems. The etiology, diagnostic standards, and treatments for IBS will be summed up in this review, along with a summary of the available data supporting innovative digital medicines for these two illnesses. This brief study will give an overview of the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). In this study, we offer thorough methods for therapeutic therapy and talk about the possible contribution of psychological stress to pathophysiology. Additionally, to help with the introduction and suitability of these patient therapies, we offer a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of exclusion diets (low FODMAP and gluten-free diets, etc.) in IBS.

A Randomized Parallel-group Study of Digital Gut-directed Hypnotherapy vs Muscle Relaxation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH) is effective for treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but access limits its widespread use. We report the first randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a self-administered, digital GDH treatment program with that of digital muscle relaxation (MR) in adults with IBS.

METHODS

After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with digital GDH (Regulora), or digital MR accessed via a mobile app on a smartphone or tablet. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response, defined as ≥30% reduction from baseline in average daily abdominal pain intensity in the 4 weeks following treatment. Key secondary outcomes included mean change from baseline in abdominal pain, stool consistency, and stool frequency.

RESULTS

Of 378 randomized patients, 362 were treated and included in the efficacy analysis. A similar proportion of the GDH (30.4%) and MR (27.1%) groups met the primary endpoint, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .5352). Significantly more patients treated with GDH than MR were abdominal pain responders during the last 4 weeks of treatment (30.9% vs 21.5%; P = .0232) and over the entire treatment period (29.3% vs 18.8%; P = .0254). Improvements in abdominal pain, stool consistency, and stool frequency were consistent across IBS subtypes. No patients experienced serious adverse events or adverse events leading to study discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with a digital GDH program led to an improvement in abdominal pain and stool symptoms in patients with IBS, supporting a role for this intervention as part of integrated care for IBS.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier NCT04133519.

Digital Therapeutics as a New Therapeutic Modality: A Review from the Perspective of Clinical Pharmacology

The promise of transforming digital technologies into treatments is what drives the development of digital therapeutics (DTx), generally known as software applications embedded within accessible technologies-such as smartphones-to treat, manage, or prevent a pathological condition. Whereas DTx solutions that successfully demonstrate effectiveness and safety could drastically improve the life of patients in multiple therapeutic areas, there is a general consensus that generating therapeutic evidence for DTx presents challenges and open questions. We believe there are three main areas where the application of clinical pharmacology principles from the drug development field could benefit DTx development: the characterization of the mechanism of action, the optimization of the intervention, and, finally, its dosing. We reviewed DTx studies to explore how the field is approaching these topics and to better characterize the challenges associated with them. This leads us to emphasize the role that the application of clinical pharmacology principles could play in the development of DTx and to advocate for a development approach that merges such principles from development of traditional therapeutics with important considerations from the highly attractive and fast-paced world of digital solutions.

Causal association between psycho-psychological factors, such as stress, anxiety, depression, and irritable bowel syndrome: Mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND

Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have been reported to be challenging hotspots in clinical practice. Previous observational studies have found that stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental and psychological diseases are closely associated with IBS. This study aimed to further explore the causal relationships of these associations through Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

The data needed for MR were obtained from publicly published genome-wide association databases. We performed a bidirectional, 2-sample MR analysis using instrumental variables (IV) associated with stress, anxiety, and depression, and other mental and psychological factors as exposures and IBS as the outcome. A reverse MR analysis with IBS as exposure and stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental and psychological factors as the outcomes was also performed. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was adopted as the main method of MR, and the causal effect between stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental and psychological factors and IBS was evaluated as the main result of the study. In addition, a series of sensitivity analyses was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the causal relationship between them.

RESULTS

Stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental and psychological factors were the underlying etiologies for IBS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.08), and they were positively correlated. Univariate analysis further supported the above conclusions (Depression, [OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.63, P = .016], Anxiety, [OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.16-2.03, P = .003]). However, in reverse MR analysis, we found that IBS did not affect stress, anxiety, depression, or other mental and psychological factors and that there was no causal relationship between IBS and stress, anxiety, depression, or other mental and psychological factors (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that mental and psychological factors are the underlying etiologies for IBS. These findings may provide important information for physicians regarding the clinical treatment of IBS.

Indian consensus statements on irritable bowel syndrome in adults: A guideline by the Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and jointly supported by the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association (INMA), earlier named the Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association developed this evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 28 statements, which were concerning diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and comorbidities, investigations, lifestyle modifications and treatments. Owing to the Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, lockdowns and mobility restrictions, web-based meetings and electronic voting were the major tools used to develop this consensus. A statement was regarded as accepted when the sum of "completely accepted" and "accepted with minor reservation" voted responses were 80% or higher. Finally, the consensus was achieved on all 28 statements. The consensus team members are of the view that this work may find use in teaching, patient care, and research on IBS in India and other nations.

Belgian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterised by recurrent abdominal pain related to defaecation or associated with altered stool frequency or consistency. Despite its prevalence, major uncertainties in the diagnostic and therapeutic management persist in clinical practice.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of literature review and voting process on 78 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached for 50 statements. The Belgian consensus agreed as to the multifactorial aetiology of IBS. According to the consensus abdominal discomfort also represents a cardinal symptom, while bloating and abdominal distension often coexist. IBS needs subtyping based on stool pattern. The importance of a positive diagnosis, relying on history and clinical examination is underlined, while additional testing should remain limited, except when alarm features are present. Explanation of IBS represents a crucial part of patient management. Lifestyle modification, spasmolytics and water-solube fibres are considered first-line agents. The low FODMAP diet, selected probiotics, cognitive behavioural therapy and specific treatments targeting diarrhoea and constipation are considered appropriate. There is a consensus to restrict faecal microbiota transplantation and gluten-free diet, while other treatments are strongly discouraged.

CONCLUSIONS

A panel of Belgian gastroenterologists summarised the current evidence on the aetiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of IBS with attention for the specificities of the Belgian healthcare system.