Radiation-induced liver disease in the era of SBRT: a review

The Objective Response and Disease Control Rates in Patients with Liver Metastastic Breast Cancer Receiving Transarterial Radioembolization: A Meta-Analysis

AIM

To meta-analyze the utility of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with liver metastatic breast cancer (BC), based on the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

METHODS

A literature search was performed retrieving studies with (1) at least 10 patients with liver metastatic BC treated with TARE and (2) adequate information to derive ORR and DCR. The ORR is the ratio between patients with liver lesions showing complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) over the total number of patients treated with TARE; the DCR is the ratio between patients with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) over the total number of patients treated with TARE.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (650 patients) were eligible; the ORR of TARE resulted 50.71% (95% C.I.: 40.04-61.36) and the DCR resulted 88.37% (95% C.I.: 81.89-93.57). Taking into account resin spheres (395 patients), the ORR was 60.35% (95% C.I.: 46.55-73.36) and the DCR was 92.73% (95% C.I.: 87.17-96.80%). Considering glass spheres (144 patients), the ORR was 32.38% (95% C.I.: 18.43-48.16) and the DCR was 82.69% (95% C.I.: 59.29-97.26).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis favors the use of TARE in patients with liver metastatic BC either with resin or glass spheres.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Liver Metastases

The liver is a common site for metastatic spread for various primary tumor histologies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment technique with broad patient candidacy for the ablation of tumors in the liver and other organs. SBRT involves focused, high-dose radiation therapy delivered in one to several treatments, resulting in high rates of local control. Use of SBRT for ablation of oligometastatic disease has increased in recent years and emerging prospective data have demonstrated improvements in progression free and overall survival in some settings. When delivering SBRT to liver metastases, clinicians must balance the priorities of delivering ablative tumor dosing while respecting dose constraints to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Motion management techniques are crucial for meeting dose constraints, ensuring low rates of toxicity, maintaining quality of life, and can allow for dose escalation. Advanced radiotherapy delivery approaches including proton therapy, robotic radiotherapy, and real-time MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the accuracy of liver SBRT. In this article, we review the rationale for oligometastases ablation, the clinical outcomes with liver SBRT, tumor dose and OAR considerations, and evolving strategies to improve liver SBRT delivery.

ALKBH5-mediated m6 A demethylation of TIRAP mRNA promotes radiation-induced liver fibrosis and decreases radiosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation promotes radiation-induced liver fibrosis (RILF), a complication for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) radiotherapy. The demethylase alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) decreases N6-methyladenylate methylation (m6 A) modification of RNA, while its role in regulating RILF pathogenesis and HCC radiosensitivity remains unknown.

METHODS

Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) were used to screen target genes regulated by ALKBH5. HSC with altered ALKBH5 expression was used to assess irradiation-induced HSC activation and the effect of HSC on recruitment and polarisation of monocytes. Key cytokines in medium from irradiated HSC-educated monocytes were identified by cytokine array detection. The effects of blocking ALKBH5 and key cytokines on RILF and HCC radiosensitivity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Radiation-induced ALKBH5 expression in HSC mediated m6 A demethylation of toll-interleukin 1 receptor domain containing adaptor protein (TIRAP) mRNA and activated its downstream NF-κB and JNK/Smad2 pathways to promote HSC activation. Additionally, ALKBH5 regulated CCL5 secretion by irradiated HSC to promote monocyte recruitment and M2 macrophage polarisation. Notably, polarised monocytes secreted CCL20 to up-regulate ALKBH5 expression in HSC, and reduce HCC radiosensitivity by activating ALKBH5/TIRAP axis in HCC cells. ALKBH5 knockdown-combined CCR6 (CCL20 receptor) inhibitor significantly alleviated RILF and improved HCC radiosensitivity in mice. HCC patients with high ALKBH5 and TIRAP expression were prone to radiation-induced liver injury and poor tumour response to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, irradiation up-regulates ALKBH5 in HSC to mediate monocyte recruitment and M2 polarisation and form positive feedback to promote RILF and reduce HCC radiosensitivity. The dual roles of ALKBH5 as a microenvironmental regulator and radiosensitisation target provide new ideas for RILF prevention and radiosensitisation of HCC.

Selective internal radiation therapy of metastatic breast cancer to the liver: A meta-analysis

Introduction

The aim of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in treating patients with breast cancer with hepatic metastasis.

Method

PubMed and The Cochrane Library were queried from establishment to January 2021. The following keywords were implemented: "breast", "yttrium", and "radioembolization". The following variables and outcomes were collected: publication year, region, sample size, study design, presence of extrahepatic disease, tumor burden, infused radioactivity, breast cancer subtype, previous treatment, median survival time (MST), length of follow-up, adverse events, and radiographical response such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST).

Results

A total of 24 studies from 14 institutions were included in the present meta-analysis. On the basis of the data from 412 patients, post-embolization MST was 9.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.0-11.6] months. Patients with additional extrahepatic metastasis had a poorer survival rate compared with those with localized hepatic metastasis only (MST: 5.3 vs. 15 months, p < 0.0001). Patients with <25% liver tumor burden exhibited more promising survival than those with >25% (MST: 10.5 vs. 6.8 months, p < 0.0139). On the basis of RECIST, mRECIST, and PERCIST criteria, tumor response rate was 36% (95% CI: 26%-47%), 49% (95% CI: 34%-65%), and 47% (95% CI: 17%-78%), respectively, whereas tumor control rate was 85% (95% CI: 76%-93%), 73% (95% CI: 59%-85%), and 97% (95% CI: 91%-100%), respectively.

Conclusion

On the basis of the available published evidence, SIRT is feasible and effective in treating patients with breast cancer with liver metastasis. Patients with lower hepatic tumor burden and without extrahepatic metastasis demonstrated more survival benefit. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Toward Personalized Medicine in Radiotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emerging Radiomic Biomarker Candidates of Response and Toxicity

Radiology and radiotherapy are currently undergoing radical transformation with use of biomarkers and digital technologies such as artificial intelligence. These current and upcoming changes in radiology speak of an overarching new vision for personalized medicine. This is particularly evident in the case of radiotherapy of cancers, and of liver cancer in particular. The development of modern radiotherapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy allows targeted treatments to be delivered to the tumor site, limiting the dose to surrounding healthy organs, thus becoming a new therapeutic alternative for hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver tumors. However, not all patients have the same response to radiotherapy or display the same side-effect profile. Biomarkers of response and toxicity in liver radiotherapy would facilitate the vision and practice of personalized medicine. This expert review examines the available molecular, radiomic, and radiogenomic biomarker candidates for acute liver toxicity with potential use for prediction of radiotherapy-induced liver toxicity. To this end, I highlight for oncologists and life scientists that radiomics allows diagnostic images to be analyzed using computer algorithms to extract information imperceptible to the human eye and of relevance to forecasting clinical outcomes. This article underscores particularly (1) the microRNA-based biomarker candidates as among the most promising predictors of radiation-induced liver toxicity and (2) the texture features in radiomic analyses for response prediction. Radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma is edging toward personalized medicine with emerging radiomic biomarker candidates. Future large-scale biomarker studies are called for to enable personalized medicine in liver cancers.