An essential technique for modern hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: minimally invasive biliary reconstruction

Risk factor analysis of conversion in laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The risk factors of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) requiring conversion to open surgery have not been adequately studied. This study aimed to determine the risk factors and postoperative outcomes of conversion in patients with ICC.

METHODS

From May 2014 to September 2022, Unplanned conversions were compared with successful LLRs.

RESULTS

153 patients with ICC initially underwent LLR, of which 41 (26.8%) required conversion to open surgery. Multivariate analysis for those factors that were statistically significant or confirmed by clinical studies, tumor proximity to the major vessels (OR 6.643, P < 0.001), and previous upper abdominal surgery (OR 3.140, P = 0.040) were independent predictors of unplanned conversions. Compared to successful LLRs, unplanned conversions showed longer operative times (300.0 vs. 225.0 min, P < 0.001), more blood loss (500.0 vs. 200.0 mL, P < 0.001), higher transfusion rates (46.3% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001), longer length of stays (13.0 vs. 8.0 days, P < 0.001), and higher rates of major morbidity (39.0% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day or 90-day mortality between the conversion group and the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Conversion during LLR should be anticipated in ICC patients with prior upper abdominal surgery or tumor proximity to major vessels as features.

Concomitant training in robotic and laparoscopic liver resections of low-to-intermediate difficulty score: a retrospective analysis of the learning curve

In the setting of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), training in robotic liver resections (RLR) usually follows previous experience in laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of RLR in case of concomitant training with LLR. We analyzed consecutive RLRs and LLRs by a surgeon trained simultaneously in both techniques (Surg1); while a second surgeon trained only in LLRs was used as control (Surg2). A regression model was used to adjust for confounders and a Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis was carried out to assess the learning phases according to operative time and difficulty of the procedures (IWATE score). Two-hundred-forty-five procedures were identified (RobSurg1, n = 75, LapSurg1, n = 102, LapSurg2, n = 68). Mean IWATE was 4.0, 4.3 and 5.8 (p < 0.001) in each group. The CUSUM analysis of the adjusted operative times estimated the learning phase in 40 cases (RobSurg1), 40 cases (LapSurg1), 48 cases (LapSurg2); for IWATE score it was 38 cases (RobSurg1), 33 cases (LapSurg1), 38 cases (LapSurg2) respectively. Our preliminary experience showed a similar learning curve of 40 cases for low and intermediate difficulty RLR and LLR. Concomitant training in both techniques was safe and may be a practical option for starting a MILS program.

Robotic-assisted choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is being increasingly used in pediatric choledochal cysts (CCs), but is most commonly performed in older children and adolescents. The outcomes in young infants remain to be explored. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in infants aged ≤ 1 year with an older cohort.

METHODS

From July 2015 to January 2020, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the RAS in patients with CCs at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups (group A ≤ 1 year old and group B > 1 year old). Demographics, intraoperative details, complications, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included in the study (28 patients in group A and 51patients in group B). The median age of patients at the surgery in group A was 4.9 months (IQR: 3.1-9.1), compared with 46.8 months (IQR: 28.5-86.5) in group B. Three patients in group A were neonates. No conversion to open surgery was required. No significant differences were found between the two groups including sex, Todani type, or diameter of the cysts. The diameter of the common hepatic duct was smaller in group A (6.0 ± 1.7 vs. 9.0 ± 3.0 mm; p < 0.001). Group A had the longer hepaticojejunostomy time [51(44-58) vs. 42(38-53) min; p = 0.013], while Group B had the longer cyst excision time [43(41-59) vs. 50(43-60) min; p = 0.005]. However, their total operative time and console time were similar. There were no statistical differences in length of hospital stay and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted cyst resection and hepaticojejunostomy are feasible and safe in infants ≤ 1 year old. Age cannot be considered an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery in patients with CCs.