Can we improve clinical outcomes in patients with pneumonia treated with antibiotics in the intensive care unit?

Profile of Bacteria with ARGs Among Real-World Samples from ICU Admission Patients with Pulmonary Infection Revealed by Metagenomic NGS

Background

Treatment of pulmonary infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) represents a great challenge, especially infections caused by antibiotic resistance pathogens. A thorough and up-to-date knowledge of the local spectrum of antibiotic resistant bacteria can improve the antibiotic treatment efficiency. In this study, we aimed to reveal the profile of bacteria with antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in real-world samples from ICU admission patients with pulmonary infection in Mainland, China, by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS).

Methods

A total of 504 different types of clinical samples from 452 ICU admission patients with pulmonary infection were detected by mNGS analysis.

Results

A total of 485 samples from 434 patients got successful mNGS results. Among 434 patients, one or more bacteria with ARGs were detected in 192 patients (44.24%, 192/434), and ≥2 bacteria with ARGs were detected in 85 (19.59%, 85/434) patients. The predominant detected bacteria were Corynebacterium striatum (C. striatum) (11.76%, 51/434), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (11.52%, 50/434) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) (8.99%, 39/434). ermX conferred resistance to MSL_B and cmx to phenicol were the only two ARGs detected in C. striatum; in A. baumannii, most of ARGs were resistance-nodulation-division (RND)-type efflux pumps genes, which conferred resistance to multi-drug; ermB conferred resistance to MSL_B and efmA to multi-drug were the predominant ARGs in E. faecium. Bacteria with ARGs were detected in 50% (140/280) bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and 50.5% (48/95) sputum samples, which were significantly higher than in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples.

Conclusion

High level of bacteria with ARGs was observed in clinical samples, especially BALF and sputum samples from ICU admission patients with pulmonary infection in Mainland, China. And C. striatum resistant to MSL_B and/or phenicol, multi-drug resistance A. baumannii and E. faecium were the lead bacteria.

Inhaled amikacin adjunctive to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia (INHALE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of ventilated pneumonia is often unsuccessful, even when patients are treated according to established guidelines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combination drug device Amikacin Inhale as an adjunctive therapy to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics for pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

INHALE was a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study comprising two trials (INHALE 1 and INHALE 2) done in 153 hospital intensive-care units in 25 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had pneumonia that had been diagnosed by chest radiography and that was documented as being caused by or showing two risk factors for a Gram-negative, multidrug-resistant pathogen; were intubated and mechanically ventilated; had impaired oxygenation within 48 h before screening; and had a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of at least 6. Patients were stratified by region and disease severity (according to their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score) and randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-recognition system to receive 400 mg amikacin (Amikacin Inhale) or saline placebo, both of which were aerosolised, administered every 12 h for 10 days via the same synchronised inhalation system, and given alongside standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. All patients and all staff involved in administering devices and monitoring outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, survival at days 28-32, was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, were infected with a Gram-negative pathogen, and had an APACHE II score of at least 10 at diagnosis. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01799993 and NCT00805168.

FINDINGS

Between April 13, 2013, and April 7, 2017, 807 patients were assessed for eligibility and 725 were randomly assigned to Amikacin Inhale (362 patients) or aerosolised placebo (363 patients). 712 patients received at least one dose of study drug (354 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 358 in the placebo group), although one patient assigned to Amikacin Inhale received placebo in error and was included in the placebo group for safety analyses. 508 patients (255 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 253 in the placebo group) were assessed for the primary endpoint. We found no between-group difference in survival: 191 (75%) patients in the Amikacin Inhale group versus 196 (77%) patients in the placebo group survived until days 28-32 (odds ratio 0·841, 95% CI 0·554-1·277; p=0·43). Similar proportions of patients in the two treatment groups had a treatment-emergent adverse event (295 [84%] of 353 patients in the Amikacin Inhale group vs 303 [84%] of 359 patients in the placebo group) or a serious treatment-emergent adverse event (101 [29%] patients vs 97 [27%] patients).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings do not support use of inhaled amikacin adjunctive to standard-of-care intravenous therapy in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia.

FUNDING

Bayer AG.

Optimal approaches to preventing severe community-acquired pneumonia

Introduction: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has the highest rate of mortality of all infectious diseases, especially among the elderly. Severe CAP (sCAP) is defined as a CAP in which intensive care management is required and is associated with an unfavorable clinical course. Areas covered: This review aims to identify prevention strategies for reducing the incidence of CAP and optimized management of sCAP. We highlight the main prevention approaches for CAP, focusing on the latest vaccination plans and on the influence of health-risk behaviors. Lastly, we report the latest recommendations about the optimal approach for sCAP when CAP has already been diagnosed, including prompt admission to ICU, early empirical antibiotic therapy, and optimization of antibiotic use. Expert opinion: Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of sCAP, more efforts are needed to combat preventable causes, including the implementation and improvement of vaccine coverage, anti-tobacco campaigns and correct oral hygiene. Moreover, future research should aim to assess the benefits of early antimicrobial therapy in primary care. Pharmacokinetic studies in the target population may help clinicians to adjust dosage regimens in critically ill patients with CAP and thus reduce rates of treatment failure.

Optimizing Antibiotic Administration for Pneumonia

Pneumonia, including community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and ventilator-acquired bacterial pneumonia, carries unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in antimicrobial therapy, emergence of multidrug resistance and high rates of treatment failure have made optimization of antibiotic efficacy a priority. This review focuses on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches to antibacterial optimization within the lung environment and in the setting of critical illness. Strategies for including these approaches in drug development programs as well as clinical practice are described and reviewed.

Aerosol Therapy for Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit

Antibiotic aerosolization in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) allows very high concentrations of antimicrobial agents in the respiratory secretions, far more than those achievable using the intravenous route. However, data in critically ill patients with pneumonia are limited. Administration of aerosolized antibiotics might increase the likelihood of clinical resolution, but no significant improvements in important outcomes have been consistently documented. Thus, aerosolized antibiotics should be restricted to the treatment of extensively resistant gram-negative pneumonia. In these cases, the use of a vibrating-mesh nebulizer seems to be more efficient, but specific settings and conditions are required to improve lung delivery.

The Burden of Viruses in Pneumonia Associated With Acute Respiratory Failure: An Underappreciated Issue

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) results in substantial mortality and represents a leading reason for the use of antibiotics. The role of viruses in this setting is unclear. Identifying a viral cause in such instances could facilitate antibiotic stewardship.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort with pneumonia requiring MV. We included both cases occurring in the community and hospital-onset cases and classified patients according to the cause of the pneumonia. The prevalence of viral pathogens represented the primary end point. We identified variables independently associated with isolation of a viral organism as the sole pathogen.

RESULTS

The cohort included 364 patients, and a virus was the sole pathogen in 79 cases (21.7%). The most common viruses included rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 20), influenza A (n = 12), and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 11). The rate of in-hospital death was high (37.2%) and did not differ from that seen in other patients (36.5%). The duration of MV, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates also did not differ based on the cause of pneumonia. Two variables were independently associated with recovery of a virus: an Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation II score of < 26 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93; P = .027) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) (AOR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.03-9.50; P = .001). A sensitivity analysis excluding patients who underwent SCT did not substantially alter our observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Viruses represent a major cause of pneumonia in critically ill patients requiring MV. Identifying such subjects presents an opportunity for discontinuing antibiotics. Clinicians should consider systematically evaluating patients with pneumonia requiring MV for viral pathogens.

In vitro potency of amikacin and comparators against E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa respiratory and blood isolates

Background

The purpose of this study was to define the potency of amikacin and comparator agents against a collection of blood and respiratory nosocomial isolates implicated in ICU based pulmonary infections gathered from US hospitals.

Methods

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin were tested against 2460 Gram-negative isolates. Amikacin had 96 % susceptibility against the combined E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates and 95 % susceptibility against P. aeruginosa.

Results

Ninety-six percent of all of isolates tested were susceptible (i.e., MICs ≤16 mg/L) to amikacin by current laboratory standards which demonstrates a high level of activity to combat infections caused by these organisms including ESBL, MDR, β-lactam and fluoroquinolone resistant strains. Moreover, 99 % of all organisms had amikacin MICs ≤64 mg/L.

Conclusions

Overall, these data highlight the continued potency of amikacin and suggest that the achievable lung concentrations of approximately 5000 mg/L with the administration of the amikacin by inhalation (Amikacin Inhale, BAY41-6551) will exceed the MICs typically observed for P. aeruginosa, E. coli and K. pneumoniae in the hospital setting.