The use of indwelling pleural catheters for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions

Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Pleural disease (PD), particularly malignant pleural effusion (MPE), is a common cause of hospital admission and its prevalence is rising worldwide. Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options, such as Indwelling Pleural Catheters (IPCs), have simplified PD treatment, allowing an effective outpatients management. Therefore, dedicated pleural services can improve PD care, guaranteeing specialized management and optimizing time and cost. We aimed to provide an overview on MPE management in Italy, mainly focused on distribution and characteristics of pleural services and IPCs use.

METHODS

A nationwide survey, endorsed by the Italian Thoracic Society, was distributed by email to members of selected subgroups in 2021.

RESULTS

Ninety (23%) members replied, most of whom being pulmonologists (91%). MPE resulted the most common cause of pleural effusion and was managed with heterogenous approaches, including talc pleurodesis via slurry (43%), talc poudrage (31%), repeated thoracentesis (22%) and IPCs insertion (2%). The setting of IPC insertion was inpatient care in 48% of cases, with a predominance of draining frequency every other day. IPC management mainly relied on caregivers (42%). The presence of a pleural service was reported by 37% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides an extensive overview of MPE management in Italy, showing a highly heterogeneous approach, a scarce prevalence of out-patient pleural services, and a still limited adoption of IPCs, mainly due to lack of dedicated community care systems. This survey emphasizes the need of promoting a higher spreading of pleural services and an innovative healthcare delivery with more favourable cost-benefit ratio.

A Novel Clinical Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion: Avoiding Chemotherapy in Low-Risk Groups?

Purpose

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a severe complication in patients with advanced cancer that is associated with a poor prognosis. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of MPE after lung cancer. We therefore aim to describe clinical characteristics of the patients with MPE combined with breast cancer and construct a machine learning-based model for predicting the prognosis of such patients.

Methods

This study is a retrospective and observational study. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and univariate Cox regression analyses were applied to identify eight key clinical variables, and a nomogram model was established. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses.

Results

196 patients with both MPE and breast cancer (143 in the training group and 53 in the ex-ternal validation group) were analyzed in this study. The median overall survival in two cohorts was 16.20 months and 11.37 months. Based on the ROC curves for 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival, the areas under the curves were 0.824, 0.824, and 0.818 in the training set and 0.777, 0.790, and 0.715 in the validation set, respectively. In the follow-up analysis, both systemic and intrapleural chemotherapy significantly increased survival in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group.

Conclusion

Collectively, MPE confers a poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. We have developed a first-ever survival prediction model for breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed MPE and validated the model using an independent cohort.

Talc pleurodesis versus indwelling pleural catheter among patients with malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Talc pleurodesis (TP) and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) are used for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Our meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatments among patients with MPE.

METHODS

We acquired pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The endpoints included survival, pleurodesis rates, total drainage, further pleural interventions, hospital days, symptoms, quality of life (QoL), and complications.

RESULTS

We included four high-quality RCTs. Both treatments were effective among patients with MPE and no previous pleurodesis, with comparable survival and equivalent relief of breathlessness. Additionally, the TP group had higher pleurodesis rates, less total drainage, and fewer all-grade complications (including catheter blockage and cellulitis). However, patients in the TP group had more pleural procedures and relatively longer hospital stays. Additionally, no apparent difference was detected in QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

TP has better pleurodesis rates, less total drainage, and fewer all-grade complications. However, TP has more pleural procedures and is not feasible for patients with trapped lungs. IPC has fewer further pleural interventions and shorter hospital stays. However, IPC has the nuisance of long-term in situ draining.