Brief admission (BA) for patients with emotional instability and self-harm: nurses' perspectives - person-centred care in clinical practice

Outpatient Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Suicide Follow-Up Interventions: A Qualitative Interview Study

INTRODUCTION

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Following a suicide attempt, many patients receive suicide follow-up interventions (SFI) from outpatient mental health care services, where outpatient mental health nurses play a crucial role. There is an urgent need to raise awareness of improvements and opportunities for development in this aspect of care to gain insights into potential areas for improvement and opportunities for development.

AIM

To investigate outpatient mental health nurses' experiences of SFI.

METHOD

A qualitative interview study was conducted with 10 outpatient mental health nurses. Conventional content analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Three categories emerged: connecting with and understanding suicidal patients, being dependent on adequate conditions for SFI, and feeling competent but vulnerable in SFI.

DISCUSSION

Providing structured training for nurses to address patients with particularly challenging conditions is vital, as SFI entails complex and challenging situations. Training that incorporates proven methods from other interventions, involving the expertise of those with lived experience, employers, and academics, can offer significant advantages. Promoting increased collaboration can enhance the safety of assessments.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Team-based SFI can enhance suicide follow-up intervention services in psychiatric outpatient care.

What is the purpose of Psychiatric Emergency Care Centres? A qualitative study of health care staff

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric Emergency Care Centres do not have a clear treatment model or evidence base. An understanding of the patient population, clinical practice and approaches is needed to develop an evidence-based framework.

OBJECTIVES

Identify staff perceptions of the purpose of Psychiatric Emergency Care Centres, who should be treated and how.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary sample of clinicians and administrators currently working in, or with administrative oversight of, Psychiatric Emergency Care Centres were interviewed. All New South Wales Psychiatric Emergency Care Centres were approached and staff self-selected. A total of 36 people participated, including nurses, doctors, social workers and managers. A critical realist qualitative thematic analysis approach was used, with an inductive orientation.

RESULTS

Having an achievable admission goal was important. Although 'harm minimization' was often cited as important, this meant conflicting, superimposed notions to different people, including minimizing self-harm, reducing iatrogenic harm from unnecessary or coercive intervention and limiting harm to a resource-constrained system. Participants reported significant clinical practice variation and confidence in their practice.

CONCLUSION

The approach to the primary goal of 'harm minimization' reflects conflicting priorities in a complex system which are often not explicit. However, we identified a clinical practice framework upon which to base care pathways, training, intervention development and outcome assessment.

Issues Related to Patient Participation in Psychiatric Hospital Care-An Integrative Literature Review of Patient Safety Research

AIM

Explore how previous patient safety research has described issues related to patient participation in psychiatric hospital care.

DESIGN

Integrated literature review.

METHODS

The literature review was conducted according to Cooper's framework with the following five-step protocol: problem identification, a literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and the presentation of results.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus databases, years 2005-2023. After quality appraisal, a total of 62 articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Three main categories related to patient participation in psychiatric hospital care were identified: communication (having information, being heard, therapeutic relationships and interaction quality), decision-making (treatment planning, treatment decisions, activities and working on behalf of patients) and restrictive measures (setting limits, exercising power, balancing patient autonomy and safety).

CONCLUSION

Psychiatric hospital care nursing staff continuously balance patients' autonomy, self-determination, and safety, taking into account their well-being and issues of responsibility. Wider use of positive risk-taking is needed to increase patient participation and safety in psychiatric hospital care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Nursing staff should create favourable facilities for patient participation, foster an atmosphere of trust, respect, and encouragement, provide patients individual time to improve patient safety and recognise that they can exert power over patients due to constantly balancing patient autonomy and safety.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

The Perspective of Brief Admission Users on Health-Promoting Behaviors Based on Pender's Model - A Directed Content Analysis

Patient-Initiated Brief Admission (PIBA) is perceived as a constructive intervention. It remains uncertain whether PIBA contributes to healthier behaviors among its users. To comprehend patients' motivation to engage in health-promoting behaviors, it is essential to understand how various nursing interventions influence the behavior-specific thoughts and feelings that lead to healthy behaviors. By integrating the theoretical concepts within the health promotion model, we can gain a better understanding of how PIBA as an intervention impacts health-promoting behaviors. Thus, the aim of this study is to describe PIBA users' perspectives on health-promoting behaviors based on Pender's health promotion model. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 PIBA users, and analyzed through directed content analysis based on Pender's health promotion model. The results illustrate that PIBA users experienced that access to and confidence in PIBA, interpersonal support, and help building self-efficacy promoted health-related behaviors. Deficiencies in PIBA's environmental impact and high internal and external demands were conditions counteracting health-related behaviors. Thus, PIBA has the potential to promote health-related behaviors among its users. However, health professionals need to be mindful of factors that counteract health-related behaviors and should strive to minimize these for PIBA to function fully and guide patients toward healthier behaviors.

Is Brief Admission Effective for Individuals With Lived Experience of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) When Experiencing Crisis? A Mixed Systematic Review

Brief admission has been widely used to support individuals with lived experience of borderline personality disorder (BPD) who are experiencing crisis. This study updates a previous 2014 systematic review of the effectiveness of brief admission for individuals with BPD. Following PRISMA guidelines, four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Cochrane library) were searched from 2011. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts followed by full texts against predefined inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Due to heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis was not conducted. Instead, a convergent segregated mixed method was used for data analysis. A total of 4465 studies were screened. Six studies were included in this review: one randomised controlled trial (RCT), two non-RCT quantitative studies and three qualitative studies. All the studies were conducted in European countries; all were adjunctive to community treatment. All the eligible qualitative and RCT studies met the full MMAT criterion, whereas the eligible non-RCT quantitative studies met four of the five criteria. Objective outcomes in terms of rehospitalisation rates showed conflicting evidence. Data integration indicated that the improvement in symptoms and quality of life can be explained by the qualitative findings of positive self-impact. Brief admission as a crisis management tool is acceptable and can be effective. The quality of inpatient care and preplanning appear important in achieving good outcomes. More rigorous evidence is needed to understand the effect on subsequent admission frequency. The effectiveness of admissions unplanned or unlinked to community treatment remains under-investigated.

Patient Experiences of Patient-Initiated Brief Admission in Psychiatric Care: A Systematic Review

Patient-initiated brief admission (PIBA) is an innovative psychiatric care intervention that gives patients the autonomy to initiate a short admission (approximately 1-3 days) to psychiatric inpatient care. This intervention is structured around a mutual agreement between the patient and their care provider that outlines the specific structure and content of their care. Unlike regular psychiatric admissions, healthcare professionals do not review the patient's decision for admission during PIBA. Similar interventions have been developed globally to reduce the need for long inpatient admissions and compulsory care by enhancing patient autonomy, promoting active participation in care, and empowering patients to recognise early signs of mental health deterioration. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the experiences of PIBA among individuals with mental health disorders. A systematic review was conducted using qualitative articles sourced from the PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. A total of thirteen original articles were included in the review, encompassing 186 patients. Research demonstrates that PIBA significantly impacts patients' care experiences in various ways. Access to PIBA gives patients the opportunity to take a break from daily stressors, which has proven significant in interrupting the cycle of worsening symptoms and negative thoughts. Furthermore, when the care environment is characterised by trust and respect, patients experience an increased sense of freedom, which contributes to a more effective recovery process. PIBA provides patients with a sense of safety and offers the possibility of a more functional daily life. Healthcare professionals'attitude and care provision also significantly influences patients' experiences. Central to a positive patient experience are a warm reception, attentiveness, and active listening. PIBA can not only change patients' perceptions of healthcare but, more importantly, fosters a transformative view of themselves as active participants in their own well-being. Knowledgeable healthcare professionals are crucial for the successful implementation of this intervention. By offering dignity and warmth alongside safety, PIBA addresses a critical gap in patient mental health care.

Brief admission by self-referral for individuals with self-harm and suicidal ideation: a qualitative study based on focus groups exploring relatives' experiences

PURPOSE

Brief Admission by self-referral (BA) is a standardized crisis-management intervention for individuals with self-harm and risk for suicide. This study explored relatives' experiences of BA. Relatives' perspectives may contribute to an increased understanding of the effects of BA given the relatives' role as support and informal caregivers as well as being co-sufferers.

METHODS

Fourteen relatives to adults with access to BA within one Swedish region participated in focus groups analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We generated themes evolving around three meaning-based concepts: access (A low threshold to a safe back-up is crucial and obstacles may easily break faith), independence (Trust in their ability with care and respect), and recovery (The rest and relational recovery we all get are needed and invaluable).

CONCLUSIONS

BA brings considerable value to users and relatives, by supporting them to take care of themselves and each other. Communication and involvement of relatives may enhance users' ability to overcome obstacles to accessing BA. Implementation and adherence may be strengthened by supervision of BA staff and education of emergency care staff. Resources are needed to improve access. Mapping hurdles to BA, support through peers and targeted psychoeducation may improve recovery for BA users and their relatives.

Effects of Patient-Initiated Brief Admissions on Psychiatric Care Consumption in Borderline Personality Disorder: ARegister-Based Study

Previous studies have reported that patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) often have negative experiences in psychiatric inpatient care. To address this issue, a novel intervention known as patient-initiated brief admission (PIBA) has been developed. PIBA offers a constructive approach to crisis management in situations of heightened anxiety, as well as during instances of self-harm and suicidal ideation. The intervention allows patients to directly contact the psychiatric ward to initiate a brief admission lasting 1-3 days. This easily accessible care option during a crisis has the potential to prevent harm to the patient and reduce the need for prolonged hospital stays. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of PIBA on psychiatric care consumption among patients diagnosed with BPD. This retrospective register-based study includes data from both inpatient and outpatient care registries for patients diagnosed with BPD. Data were extracted from the National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden. The study period encompasses 2013-2020, with the PIBA intervention occurring between 2016 and 2019. The sample included 107 patients in the PIBA group and 5659 matched controls. Data were analysed using a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach through ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and ordinal logistic regression. Throughout the 3-year follow-up, both groups exhibited a reduction in the number of days of utilisation of psychiatric inpatient care services. The DiD analysis indicated an additional decrease of 1.5 days at the 6-month mark for the PIBA group (β = -1.436, SE = 1.531), expanding to 3 days fewer at the 12-month follow-up (β = -3.590, SE = 3.546), although not statistically significant. For outpatient care, the PIBA group displayed an increase in the number of visits, averaging to half a visit more every 6 months (β = 0.503, SE = 0.263) compared with the controls. Statistically significant differences were observed for two out of six measurements at the 12-month (β = 0.960, SE = 0.456) and 18-month follow-up period (β = 0.436, SE = 0.219). The PIBA group had a statistically significant lower odds of experiencing extended lengths of inpatient care days after the index date than the controls (OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44-0.72). In conclusion, PIBA was associated with a significant reduction in the length of individual hospital stays, but not in the overall number of inpatient care days. PIBA may be linked to a shift from longer inpatient care utilisation to outpatient care utilisation. These findings suggest that PIBA may reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalisations for patients who have access to the intervention. Future research should explore the impact of PIBA on healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness, both in relation to health care for the individual and cost-effectiveness in relation to recovery and health.

Experiences and attitudes of psychiatric nurses in caring for patients with repeated non-suicidal self-injury in China: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is high and often occurs repeatedly. Psychiatric nurses play a vital role in the care and treatment of NSSI patients, as they have the most frequent contact with patients. The experiences and attitudes of nurses has a direct affect on the quality of care they provide to patients. Negative care experiences and attitudes of patient aversion on behalf of nurses may delay the observation and treatment of changes in the patient's condition, leading to irreversible risks. Although cross-sectional studies have investigated the attitudes of medical staff toward NSSI patients, quantitative research results cannot comprehensively reflect the emotional experiences and complex psychological changes of the study subjects. A few studies have focused on the psychiatric nurses' care experiences and attitudes toward patients with repeated NSSI.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore psychiatric nurses' care experiences and attitudes toward patients during repeated NSSI.

METHODS

A thematic analysis qualitative study was used. Using purposive sampling, 18 psychiatric nurses were recruited from a mental health center in Chengdu, China. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and audio-recorded. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using six-phase thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the analysis: psychiatric nurses' care experiences, perceptions, care attitudes and coping style toward repeated NSSI patients. Psychiatric nurses have experienced negative care experiences and severe career burnout during the patient's repeated NSSI. Nurses' attitudes toward NSSI patients changed during repeated NSSI, from understanding to indifference to anger and resentment. At the same time, it was found that nurses' coping style with NSSI patients could be divided into three stages, namely, active coping, neglect and perfunctory, and criticism and punishment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings have implications for health care systems regarding interventions to improve nurses' care experiences and attitudes toward repeated NSSI patients. These findings suggest that enhancing nurses' understanding of NSSI, establishing standardized emergency response and intervention programs, guiding positive professional values and responsibility, and improving nurses' caring attitudes can promote the early detection and timely intervention of NSSI.

The effectiveness of brief non-pharmacological interventions in emergency departments and psychiatric inpatient units for people in crisis: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVE

Heterogeneous brief non-pharmacological interventions and guidelines exist to treat the burgeoning presentations to both emergency department and inpatient settings, for those in a crisis of mental ill-health. We systematically reviewed the literature to create a taxonomy of these brief non-pharmacological interventions, and review their evaluation methods and effectiveness.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic review across Cochrane, CINAHL, DARE, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO databases. Studies meeting quality criteria, using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, were eligible. Interventions were categorised, and outcomes synthesised.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included: 8 randomised controlled trials, 17 quasi-experimental, 11 qualitative studies, and 3 file audits. Taxonomy produced six coherent intervention types: Skills-focussed, Environment-focussed, Special Observation, Psychoeducation, Multicomponent Group and Multicomponent Individual. Despite this, a broad and inconsistent range of outcome measures reflected different outcome priorities and prevented systematic comparison of different types of intervention or meta-analysis. Few brief non-pharmacological interventions had consistent evidential support: sensory modulation rooms consistently improved distress in inpatient settings. Short admissions may reduce suicide attempts and readmission, if accompanied by psychotherapy. Suicide-specific interventions in emergency departments may improve depressive symptoms, but not suicide attempt rates. There was evidence that brief non-pharmacological interventions did not reduce incidence of self-harm on inpatient wards. We found no evidence for frequently used interventions such as no-suicide contracting, special observation or inpatient self-harm interventions.

CONCLUSION

Categorising brief non-pharmacological interventions is feasible, but an evidence base for many is severely limited if not missing. Even when there is evidence, the inconsistency in outcomes often precludes clinicians from making inferences, although some interventions show promise.

Psychiatry Nurses' Experiences of Patient-Initiated Brief Admission from Inpatient and Outpatient Perspectives: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Patient-initiated brief admission (PIBA) allows patients to decide when admission to psychiatric care is necessary. This may prevent long-term hospitalisation and promote patient participation. Research on psychiatric nurses' experiences with PIBA is lacking, therefore 11 nurses were interviewed and data analysed using content analysis. Prominent categories were: improved personal development for the patient, more equal nurse-patient relationship, rapid access to a safe environment and strengthened professional collaboration. PIBA is a helpful intervention for patients in crisis, giving both patients and nurses a sense of security. Future studies should explore how this impacts nurses' work environment and job satisfaction.

Implementation of Brief Admission by Self-Referral in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Sweden: Insights from Implementers and Staff

Brief admission by self-referral, which allows patients to briefly admit themselves to a psychiatric ward, is a crisis intervention designed to reduce suicide and self-harm. This method was introduced in Sweden for adult patients in 2015, achieving high patient satisfaction and good acceptance among staff. In 2018, the method was adapted and implemented in pediatric psychiatry. The present study comprehensively describes the multifaceted strategies for implementing brief admissions, including planning, education, financing, restructuring, quality management, and policy implementation and reform. It also includes staff's opinions of the practice of brief admissions for young people. Neither of these topics has been addressed in the existing literature. During the study period (April 2018-April 2021), 63 brief admission contracts were established. The number of new contracts increased exponentially (12.7%) per quarter (p < 0.05), and staff satisfaction with both the implementation and its benefits for unstable patients was high. Brief admission by self-referral can be successfully implemented in pediatric psychiatry and appears to be a functional crisis management method for adolescents.

Individualisation, personalisation and person-centredness in mental healthcare: a scoping review of concepts and linguistic network visualisation

BACKGROUND

Targeted mental health interventions are increasingly described as individualised, personalised or person-centred approaches. However, the definitions for these terms vary significantly. Their interchangeable use prevents operationalisations and measures.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review provides a synthesis of key concepts, definitions and the language used in the context of these terms in an effort to delineate their use for future research.

STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our search on PubMed, EBSCO and Cochrane provided 2835 relevant titles. A total of 176 titles were found eligible for extracting data. A thematic analysis was conducted to synthesise the underlying aspects of individualisation, personalisation and person-centredness. Network visualisations of co-occurring words in 2625 abstracts were performed using VOSViewer.

FINDINGS

Overall, 106 out of 176 (60.2%) articles provided concepts for individualisation, personalisation and person-centredness. Studies using person-centredness provided a conceptualisation more often than the others. A thematic analysis revealed medical, psychological, sociocultural, biological, behavioural, economic and environmental dimensions of the concepts. Practical frameworks were mostly found related to person-centredness, while theoretical frameworks emerged in studies on personalisation. Word co-occurrences showed common psychiatric words in all three network visualisations, but differences in further contexts.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The use of individualisation, personalisation and person-centredness in mental healthcare is multifaceted. While individualisation was the most generic term, personalisation was often used in biomedical or technological studies. Person-centredness emerged as the most well-defined concept, with many frameworks often related to dementia care. We recommend that the use of these terms follows a clear definition within the context of their respective disorders, treatments or medical settings.

SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: osf.io/uatsc.

Relatives' experiences of brief admission in borderline personality disorder and self-harming behaviour

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe experiences of brief admission (BA) of people with borderline personality disorder and self-harming behaviour, from the perspective of their relatives.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative design was chosen.

METHODS

Twelve relatives of people with borderline personality disorder and self-harming behaviour who had access to BA were interviewed. Data were analysed with qualitative conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

One overarching category: Hope for the future and three categories occurred: Breathing space, Personal responsibility and Structure. BA created hope for the future and the relatives appreciated that BA is a freer and easily accessible form of care that enables help at an early stage, compared with usual care. When BA functions, the structure and pre-determined days of care give relatives a breathing space, and the uncertainty diminishes for the children, as the parent can still be present during inpatient care. The lack of places was described as a disadvantage of BA.

Structural stigma and its impact on healthcare for borderline personality disorder: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

People with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and their carers/families continue to experience structural stigma when accessing health services. Structural stigma involves societal-level conditions, cultural norms, and organizational policies that inhibit the opportunities, resources, and wellbeing of people living with attributes that are the object of stigma. BPD is a serious mental illness characterized by pervasive psychosocial dysfunction including, problems regulating emotions and suicidality. This scoping review aimed to identify, map, and explore the international literature on structural stigma associated with BPD and its impact on healthcare for consumers with BPD, their carers/families, and health practitioners.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature encompassed MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and JBI Evidence-Based databases (from inception to February 28th 2022). The search strategy also included grey literature searches and handsearching the references of included studies. Eligibility criteria included citations relevant to structural stigma associated with BPD and health and crisis care services. Quality appraisal of included citations were completed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018 version (MMAT v.18), the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses Tool, and the AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care tool. Thematic Analysis was used to inform data extraction, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of the data.

RESULTS

A total of 57 citations were included in the review comprising empirical peer-reviewed articles (n = 55), and reports (n = 2). Studies included quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and systematic review designs. Review findings identified several extant macro- and micro-level structural mechanisms, challenges, and barriers contributing to BPD-related stigma in health systems. These structural factors have a substantial impact on health service access and care for BPD. Key themes that emerged from the data comprised: structural stigma and the BPD diagnosis and BPD-related stigma surrounding health and crisis care services.

CONCLUSION

Narrative synthesis of the findings provide evidence about the impact of structural stigma on healthcare for BPD. It is anticipated that results of this review will inform future research, policy, and practice to address BPD-related stigma in health systems, as well as approaches for improving the delivery of responsive health services and care for consumers with BPD and their carers/families.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/bhpg4 ).

Patient-Initiated Brief Admission for Individuals with Emotional Instability and Self-Harm: An Evaluation of Psychiatric Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life

Patient-initiated brief admission (PIBA) was developed for patients with emotional instability and self-harm, to cope with crises. The hypothesis was that psychiatric symptoms would decrease, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) increase, after 1-3 days at hospital. One hundred and thirteen patients were recruited from a psychiatric clinic in Stockholm during 2016-2020. At admission and discharge, the patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D). The patients also evaluated PIBA as a crisis intervention. A significant decrease in symptoms of anxiety and depression was found. HRQoL increased significantly assessed with EQ-5D and 95.2% of the participants found PIBA to be a constructive intervention.

Brief Admission for Patients with Self-Harm from the Perspective of Outpatient Healthcare Professionals

The aim of the study was to describe the role of brief-admission (BA) in treating high-risk patients with self-harm from the perspective of outpatient healthcare staff in Sweden. Ten outpatient healthcare professionals from three psychiatric clinics were interviewed. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis. The findings of this study help support the role of BA as an acute crisis management intervention, and describe how BA serves as a useful adjunct to outpatient treatment, especially for patients with complementarily psychotherapeutic interventions. The findings also suggest that implementing BA may increase treatment opportunities for outpatient staff and strengthen the concept of person-centered care.

" Being mutually involved in recovery". A hermeneutic exploration of nurses' experiences of patient participation in psychiatric care

PURPOSE

This study aims at exploring how psychiatric nurses' experiences of patient participation could be understood from a caring science perspective.

METHODS

The design was inspired by clinical application research., which is a hermeneutic approach developed within caring science research. . In this study data were co-created during four reflective group dialogues where five participants' experiences of patient participation were reflected on in the light of caring science theory and research. The transcribed dialogues were subjected to a thematic, hermeneutic interpretation.

RESULTS

The interpretation gave rise to three themes; giving room for the patient to find his/her own pathway, strengthening personhood, and being in a balanced communion. From these themes an underlying pattern of the meaning of participation as being mutually involved in the patients' process of recovery arose.

CONCLUSION

From a caring science perspective the meaning of psychiatric nurses experiences of patient participation could be understood as an interpersonal process reflecting the reciprocity in human relationships. This means a shift in understanding of patient participation from procedures related to the planning of nursing care, to understanding participation as a process focusing on the mutual involvement of patients and nurses in the patients' process of recovery.

Experiences of how brief admission influences daily life functioning among individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and self-harming behaviour

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore experiences of how brief admission influences daily life functioning among individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and self-harming behaviour.

BACKGROUND

Brief admission (BA) is a crisis nursing intervention designed to reduce long hospitalisations and the risk of suicide. The intention of the intervention is to develop autonomy and to encourage the patient to take responsibility for and control over their own care and treatment. There are studies in the area that target individuals with psychosis and bipolar disorders, but no previous studies have been found examining how BA impacts upon daily life functioning among people with BPD who self-harm.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative design was chosen.

METHODS

Data were collected using qualitative individual interviews with 16 patients with BPD and self-harming behaviour who had been assigned to BA. The data were analysed using conventional content analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS

The results show that BA was perceived as a functioning nursing intervention that promoted self-determination and self-care. This contributed to increased security in daily life. BA made it possible for individuals to maintain everyday routines, employment and relationships more easily.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that BA was experienced to have a positive impact on daily life functioning.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Brief admission enabled the balance of power to be shifted from the nurse to the patient, and provides conditions for patients to take responsibility for their mental condition and to become aware of early signs of deterioration, in line with the basic ideas of person-centred care.

Easier Said Than Done: Healthcare Professionals' Barriers to the Provision of Patient-Centered Primary Care to Patients with Multimorbidity

Patient-centered care (PCC) has the potential to entail tailored primary care delivery according to the needs of patients with multimorbidity (two or more co-existing chronic conditions). To make primary care for these patients more patient centered, insight on healthcare professionals’ perceived PCC implementation barriers is needed. In this study, healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers to primary PCC delivery to patients with multimorbidity were investigated using a constructivist qualitative design based on semi-structured interviews with nine general and nurse practitioners from seven general practices in the Netherlands. Purposive sampling was used, and the interview content was analyzed to generate themes representing experienced barriers. Barriers were identified in all eight PCC dimensions (patient preferences, information and education, access to care, physical comfort, emotional support, family and friends, continuity and transition, and coordination of care). They include difficulties achieving mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals, professionals’ lack of training and education in new skills, data protection laws that impede adequate documentation and information sharing, time pressure, and conflicting financial incentives. These barriers pose true challenges to effective, sustainable PCC implementation at the patient, organizational, and national levels. Further improvement of primary care delivery to patients with multimorbidity is needed to overcome these barriers.

Self-admission in the treatment of eating disorders: an analysis of healthcare resource reallocation

Background

Self-admission to psychiatric inpatient treatment is an innovative approach to healthcare rationing, based on reallocation of existing resources rather than on increased funding. In self-admission, patients with a history of high healthcare utilization are invited to decide for themselves when brief admission is warranted. Previous findings on patients with severe eating disorders indicate that self-admission reduces participants’ need for inpatient treatment, but that it does not alone lead to symptom remission.

Methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate if, from a service provider perspective, the resource reallocation associated with self-admission is justified. The analysis makes use of data from a cohort study evaluating the one-year outcomes of self-admission at the Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders.

Results

Participants in the program reduced their need for regular specialist inpatient treatment by 67%. Thereby, hospital beds were made available for non-participants due to the removal of a yearly average of 13.2 high-utilizers from the regular waiting list. A sensitivity analysis showed that this “win-win situation” occurred within the entire 95% confidence interval of the inpatient treatment utilization reduction.

Conclusions

For healthcare systems relying on rationing by waiting list, self-admission has the potential to reduce the need for hospitalization for patients with longstanding eating disorders, while also offering benefits in the form of increased available resources for other patients requiring hospitalization.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02937259 (retrospectively registered 10/15/2016).

A Brief Breathing Space: Experiences of Brief Admission by Self-Referral for Self-Harming and Suicidal Individuals with a History of Extensive Psychiatric Inpatient Care

Individuals with severe self-harm and experiences of lengthy psychiatric admissions often have complex mental health conditions and are at risk of suicide. In this qualitative study, self-harming individuals with >180 days of psychiatric admission over 12 months shared their experiences of Brief Admission (BA), a standardized crisis-management intervention encouraging self-admission and autonomy. Phenomenological hermeneutic analysis formulated BA as a worthy respite, replacing an old system of having to prove need 'in blood' or wait and get worse. Successes and struggles in early help-seeking, interpreted in the light of human rights and person-centered care, suggested that individual development of autonomy depended on perceived focus on recovery and compassion. Future research may consider ethical and health-economic aspects of BA in a broader perspective.

Self-admission to inpatient treatment in anorexia nervosa: Impact on healthcare utilization, eating disorder morbidity, and quality of life

OBJECTIVE

Little evidence exists concerning the optimal model of inpatient care for patients with longstanding anorexia nervosa (AN). Self-admission has been developed as a treatment tool whereby patients with a history of high healthcare utilization are invited to decide for themselves when brief admission is warranted. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a self-admission program on healthcare utilization, eating disorder morbidity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and sick leave for patients with AN.

METHOD

In this cohort study, 29 participants with AN in a Swedish self-admission program were compared to 113 patients with longstanding illness but low previous utilization of inpatient treatment, matched based on age, illness duration, and body-mass index (BMI). Data on healthcare utilization, eating disorder morbidity, and sick leave were obtained from national population and eating disorder quality registers.

RESULTS

Participants displayed a >50% reduction in time spent hospitalized at 12-month follow-up, compared to nonsignificant changes in the comparison group. A sensitivity analysis comparing participants to a moderate-utilization comparison subgroup strengthened this observation. In contrast, the approach did not affect participants' BMI or eating disorder morbidity. Regarding HRQoL, mixed results were observed. In terms of sick leave, a beneficial but nonsignificant pattern was seen for participants.

DISCUSSION

These findings indicate that self-admission is a viable and helpful tool within a recovery model framework, even though it does not lead to symptom remission. In its proper context, self-admission could potentially transform healthcare from crisis-driven to pre-emptive, and promote autonomy for severely ill patients.

Brief admission for patients with emotional instability and self-harm: A qualitative analysis of patients' experiences during crisis

Previous studies report that individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder have been met by negative attitudes from healthcare professionals and their care needs have often been neglected during hospitalizations. When symptoms of emotional instability are combined with self-harm, the resulting crisis often becomes difficult to handle for patients and healthcare professionals. To meet their care needs during these crises, an intervention called 'brief admission' (BA) has been developed. The purpose of BA is to provide a timeout, in situations of increased stress and threat, in order to foster self-management in a safe environment. In the present study, we explored the following research questions: What are patients' experiences with BA? What do patients consider to be the key components of BA? What improvements are considered relevant by patients? A qualitative design was employed, and 15 patients (13 females, 2 males; mean age 38.5 ± 12.9, range 20-67 years) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Thematic analyses were performed, which yielded four themes related to the patients' experiences: 'a timeout when life is tough', 'it is comforting to know that help exists', 'encouraged to take personal responsibility', and 'it is helpful to see the problems from a different perspective'. Four themes also described the key components: 'a clear treatment plan', 'a smooth admission procedure', 'a friendly and welcoming approach from the staff', and 'daily conversations'. Lastly, three themes described areas for improvements: 'feeling guilty about seeking BA', 'room occupancy issues', and 'differences in staff's competence'. Collectively, the findings indicate that BA constructively supports patients with emotional instability and self-harm during a period of crisis.

Mental health nurses' experiences of implementing a model to facilitate self-empowerment in women living with borderline personality disorder in South Africa

In South Africa, various treatment models from abroad have been implemented for patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. This report is based on a South African model that has been developed, implemented, and evaluated for mental health nurses to use in facilitating the self-empowerment of women living with borderline personality disorder. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of a model to facilitate self-empowerment in women living with borderline personality disorder and to describe mental health nurses' experiences of implementing this model. A qualitative, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual research design was used for the study. Participants were mental health nurses working in an inpatient psychotherapy unit in a mental health hospital. Findings revealed that mental health nurses experienced the model as a secure framework to assist women living with borderline personality disorder in making a shift to being self-empowered. The mental health nurses found that they had to adapt the model's timeframe to the women's own pace. Through use of the model, the mental health nurses also gained self-leadership. This report provides evidence from mental health nurses that the model was practical and helpful in working with women living with borderline personality disorder. The mental health nurses saw signs of self-empowerment in women living with borderline personality disorder.